Thursday, October 30, 2008

Dear pro-obama media members:

Can you please tell me why Gov Palin mentioning Bill Ayers is racist?

A man barry willingly lied about and tried to minimize his relationship with? Might you just look at the one "attacked" vs the attacking racists (aka all barry naysayers)? Barry says he's just a guy in the neighborhood which was a blatant lie and what have you done since then? Lied and spun for him. Do you know how utterly pathetic that is...even for you?

Here's a few of the hall of famers.

Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks: "He's 'not one of us'? That's racial. That's fear. They know they can't win on the issues, so the last resort they have is race and fear. They are trying to throw out these codes."

To Republicans - Barry is "not one of us" simply because he is a democrat. The same argument would be playing if it were Sen Clinton who palled (palling was the wrong tense - there was the problem...but of course that would have never happened because she has been vetted as completely as any human being on this planet.

"Codes." I know all about these codes. We've documented them: racist (anything), sexist (quit whining, back in the kitchen and iron my shirt) and ageist (you gotta be kidding me he's an erratic old man who needs Depends). This election will be looked back on as historic and the degree to which racism was brought in not only to defend barry on any and all avenues of attack but also to attack any and all of his opponents. I find it disgusting beyond words.

I watced Hardball and some democratic "strategist" who the hell are these people and why don; they have a real job? And if they can be paid to sit and destroy barry's opponents why aren;t they out stumping? Why do they choose instead to continue t tear down the Clintons while they've been out stumping? It's sad really.

Anyway. Ron Chrisite was on yesterday and was being savaged as usual. The poor man doesn't get to complete three sentences. Here is a black man being attacked by two white folks while they complain about white folks attacking barry because he's black.

Here is the madness of the pro-obama media bias: they will attack any person of any race, who isn't a barry supporter, for being a racist. And as anyone can observes the MSM on TV is predominantly white and predominantly male.

Ron hrisie was tryong to say how upset he was as a black man that barry has intrduced race at aevery turn in the election. He was trying to conveny his disgust and emabrasssment over it and was attacked for tryong to say it. Christie said Rev Wright is a racist and the white dude made a face like yeah ruight. Maybe he's been in a lot of "black churches" - my guess is that Christie might have the edge on that

Why must people keep being reminded? To continue using the race card that worked so well for barry in the election. He has to keep his black voters behind him so there is no complacency and he has to keep hitting hard on white guilt. What is the point? Who keeps bringing up this perceived discrimination? And by doing so, who is undermining his legitimacy as a presidential candidate who happens to be biracial? They do it to hide the fact that there are other reasons people are uncomfortable with him like: he has DONE nothing and continues to lie about his background and meager accomplishments. Oh well, it's not worth a rant. It's sad that that is still their go-to argument.

Newsflash:

BARRY DOES NOT "DESERVE" A SINGLE VOTE.

BARRY IS NOT "OWED" A SINGLE VOTE.

NOT EVERY VOTE FOR BARRY'S OPPONENT IS AN ACTIVE VOTE AGAINST BARRY.

SOME VOTES FOR BARRY WILL BE BECAUSE HE IS BLACK.

PEOPLE HAVE A MYRIAD REASONS NOT TO VOTE FOR BARRY BUT IT WILL ALL BE REDUCED TO RACE if hE LOSES

And how will that reflect on the black community itself?

Who is bringing in race as an issue on a daily basis? BARRY. And the funniest part when Sen Clinton brought up the issue of media bias and sexist treatment she was bashed for complaining that someone voted against her for being a woman. Anyone see the hypocrisy? People weren't voting against Clinton they were ALL voting FOR barry. And ALL the people voting FOR Clinton were voting AGAINST barry.

Sad.

Anyone heard a word of dissent from barry the "post-racial" candidate? The one who pontificated about race in his speech but has not done anything about it in action. He has continued to let race drive the election - start to finish - and the pro-obama media playing happily along. He himself addressed it (as in words followed by no action) only as a matter of political expediency, which is why he was so pissed with wright for saying it. Holds a lot more weight coming from his spiritual mentor of 20 year

Can't claim prejudice on one hand and dismiss it out of hand on the other. Race has consistently been an issue in this election because barry and his camp (MSM/DNC) continue to introduce it.

How far have we come when the first measure of dissent against barry is adjudged to be because of race?

Tolerance? Open mindedness?

No comments: