Thursday, April 30, 2009

Joe Bidengaffer: “I wouldn’t go anywhere in confined places now”

April 30, 2009

VP Joe Biden is back and it’s for the same thing as always: his mouth. On the Today Show, Matt Lauer asked whether he would advise his own family against flying to Mexico and Biden answered as expected:

matrixxx123456789

BIDEN: I would tell members of my family — and I have —I wouldn’t go anywhere in confined places now. It’s not just going into Mexico. If you’re any place in a confined aircraft, and one person sneezes, it goes all the way through the aircraft. That’s me. I would not be at this point - if they had another way of transportation - suggesting they ride the subway.

109 cases 11 states. More states reported. Patient Zero found in Mexico - 5 y/o boy alive and well.

Here are the responses to Biden’s statements.

Within 2 hours they had a statement out from the VP’s office about Biden’s comment. Compare that to the 6 hours for Gibbs to say he knew nothing about the dive bombing of NYC by Air Force One. 7 hours for Louis Caldera to release an apology and over 24 hours for barry to say 24 words with not a word addressed to the traumatized New Yorkers/Jerseyans.

This is conclusive proof they knew exactly what was going on with the “mission” and stalled for as long as they could to gauge the fallout. They were saved by Arlen Specter and the H1N1 flu.

BIDEN SPOKESWOMAN:

On the Today Show this morning, the Vice President was asked what he would tell a family member. That advice he’s giving family members is the same advice the administration is giving to all Americans.

They should avoid all unnecessary air travel to and from Mexico. If they are sick they should avoid airplanes and other confined spaces.

Acting head of the CDC, DR RICHARD BESSER:

There’s no one action that’s going to stop this, there’s no silver bullet.

CDC’s DR ANNE SHUCHAT:

This is a time when we don’t want the worried well flooding the emergency rooms. At no time in our nation’s history have we been more prepared to face this kind of challenge.

If you’re ill, you shouldn’t get on an airplane or any public transport to travel. If you’re sick, stay home. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve said that this week.

Homeland Security Director: JANET NAPOLITANO:

If they’re feeling sick they should stay off public transit or confined spaces because that indeed is the advice we have been given.

JAMES MAY, president of the Air Transport Association, which represents airlines, sent Biden a letter expressing “extreme disappointment at your suggestion that people should avoid air travel.”

American Airlines spokesman TIM SMITH:

To suggest that people not fly at this stage of things is a broad brush stroke bordering on fearmongering.

Source: MSNBC

barry staffer contracted “flu virus” on trip to Mexico

April 30, 2009

barry exposed to swine flu/Felipe Solis Olguin dies

The trip that Gibbs said on (4-27) “no warning or caution given” & “president’s health was never in danger“ & that “nobody traveling with him had shown any symptoms” resulted in a “flu-like illness” in Dept of Energy staffer that tested “probable” for swine flu. His family also contracted the same flu and all have since recovered. In fact he is back at work.

By the way, technically it is not the Swine flu at all. It is a genetic variant to Influenza A categorized as H1N1 virus. And it has nothing to do with eating pork. The poor pig farmers are getting devastated like the tomato growers.

Anyway. How dumb are we? A man goes into a whorehouse where the occupants have been exposed and some treated for gonorrhea and a day later develops pus in the offending area - he’s going to test “probable” for the same strain of gonorrhea.

So in light of this development - Gibbs gave the timeline just now - they probably knew about it on Monday. Here’s the rest of just the relevant quotes from Monday’s press briefing. See if you can count the “I don’t knows” and “I’ll check” and sarcastic whines.

=================

Q Following up from yesterday’s briefing here, sort of what did you know and when did you know it — the first case in Mexico was apparently either reported, or the first death was — I’m not sure — April 12th. The President was there about five days later. Did our team learn of this during the advance or in the course of the visit?

MR. GIBBS: I’m not aware that we learned until I think earlier last week. That’s what I — that’s what I’ve been told and I will double-check on that.

Q So there was no warning or caution given

MR. GIBBS: Not prior to the trip, no.

Hear that? ‘Not prior’ to leaves open ’subsequent to’ - he knew.

—————–

Q A quick follow to what Bill asked about Mexico. The fact that the administration was not told about what had been going on in Mexico when you got there, is there any concern the Mexican government was not truthful? Or is it that it hadn’t been — the whole thing had not been formulated yet, so maybe they didn’t have all the information?

MR. GIBBS: Without speculating on what the situation might have been, it’s hard for me to guess. I said this yesterday, and there’s certainly been no change in that — that the President’s health was never in any danger.

—————–

Then comes the sarcasm. And of course it has been hampered. Sebelius hadn’t even started a game and she’s called in in the bottom of the 9th nobody out.

Q Robert, two questions — a quick follow on Jake’s question. So your response hasn’t been hampered at all by not having an HHS Secretary, by having an acting HHS –

MR. GIBBS: I mean, I’m happy to respond to something that you think might have hampered that response.

How about spending precious time trying to confirm a tax cheat, which resulted in the delay of the confirmation of the replacement tax cheat?

—————–

Q It doesn’t — it’s not a concern at all to the administration that you don’t have your person there and then they don’t have their people there? Not at all?

Whoever asked this question asked a second about Air Force One and Gibbs didn’t bother answering the first about HHS.

Does the press ever read these things to see how few questions get answered. And how often does he actually get back to them? Is it a way to stay off official record. I don’t think I’ve read or watched more than ten of these and each time he says “I don’t know” as a means of not answering. Does the press care how ridiculous they look? He’s done this in every briefing I’ve watched or read.

——

Then there’s policy questions about public health crises. More evasion.

Q What — just to go back to the questions — the earlier questions about the economic effect, you said there were discussions here. At what level –

MR. GIBBS: Well, it was simply raised in one of the meetings — I forget which one I was in -- that simply a discussion that it was something that should be noted. That’s why, again, there’s — we’ll ask Treasury for more on their group, but just that the NEC and the CEA are monitoring.

Q Was it one of the meetings where the President was present?

MR. GIBBS: I don’t believe it was, but I can go back and check my notes.

Why isn’t he ever prepared? And where does he keep these notes? Why doesn’t he carry them with him?

==============

Here he directly denies any government staffer showing any symptoms, which we now know is not true. The out? The unknown flu staffer traveled back commercial and didn’t fly Air Force One on the way there.

Q Robert, a follow-up on that. What was – can you clear up what the President’s contact was with Felipe Solis, the gentleman who died the day after? And we’re hearing that he could have –

MR. GIBBS: Let me balance the — let me balance exactly what Peter said. I’ve got no information on that. Again, I’m going to repeat what I’ve now said any number of times: Having talked to the doctors directly about this, the President’s health was never in danger. The President, nor anybody that I know of traveling with him in either a governmental or press capacity has shown any symptoms that would denote cause for any concern.

—————–

Q Understanding that, what was his contact, though, with Felipe Solis? Can you clear that up?

MR. GIBBS: I have not talked to anybody about that.

Q Did this man actually escort the President in Mexico City? No, seriously, it is a –

It’s been 11 days and he doesn’t know?

Here comes the sarcasm. He’s like a 6th grader who knows nothing and his fellow students don’t care and the teacher is more than happy for him to entertain them so they can’t learn anything either. And, yes, his sarcasm is more wicked to the women. Listen to how he uses her name to put her in her spot. Part of that Southern Charm to go along with the bright pink sweaty forehead when he lies.

MR. GIBBS: No, I am serious, but, April, if I didn’t know the answer to the previous question, extrapolating on the follow-up is going to be hard for me to provide information, based on the fact that the basis of the previous question I didn’t have any information to answer it.

And whose fault is that? Not April’s.

—————-

Q Was the President in the room with this gentleman?

Q I can ask you one –

MR. GIBBS: Okay, and I will check on it. Again, it’s hard for me to go three levels down when — sorry.

———————

Now whoever Major is he knows Gibbs’ game but he still lets him off. He asks a question where there is video proof of barry and Solis in proximity. It was the 16th and the day of this press briefing is the 27th. It’s been 11 days. Solis died on the 23th [They're saying he died the next day but the artdaily.org said the 23rd] so 4 days since he died - a man with proximity to barry - a man who supposedly gave barry a tour of his museum - a man both sides had to have known would shake hands with each other - and Gibbs doesn’t know how close the man was to barry? Why does he have a job if he is that - to put it bluntly - stupid and/or lazy? What does he do that he has to check on all this? barry’s somewhat of a friend - where’s his natural concern and curiosity for barry and by extension himself and his family since he’s so close to barry? Sorry folks. Doesn’t wash.

MAJOR: I understand this is a fluid situation, Robert. You may not have the answers right now, but if you could take these questions if you don’t and get back, I’d appreciate it.

MR. GIBBS: Sure.

Q Is the White House actively curious about Mr. Solis and the cause of his death? He did — he wasn’t — he was next to the President. He was there. There is video of him on the 16th.

MR. GIBBS: Let me – let me check. Let me check.

Q Can you really come back to us? I mean, it’s a serious question.

MR. GIBBS: I will check.

Q This man possibly died from swine flu.

Q Well, we don’t know yet.

Q We don’t know, but we’ve been hearing the reports constantly, and he possibly had contact with the President the day before — that’s a real question.

Is April a Yankee? More sarcasm. Again her name while he scolds someone who asked a question he should 100% know the answer to and is lyiing about not knowing it. Finally found transparency in the WH - he’s a transparent liar.

MR. GIBBS: A real question that I said five minutes ago that I would try to find out, April. I haven’t forgotten.

Q — curious if it’s pursuing to try to find out some more information about the situation.

You go girl. Now remember he knows the staffer has “flu-like symptoms” and that Solis had “flu-like symptoms” but he needs to still check. And more nastiness. Why is he so defensive folks? You don’t even need to see his face to tell he’s lying. If he didn’t know or it was unreasonable for him to know then he would just say no. Instead there is an emotional reaction = lie. T

MR. GIBBS: I will certainly check. Again, but let me — hold on, but let me — I said this the other day, I’m going to try not to take it personally that giving an answer on the seventh time has yet to break through. So let me try an eighth. I specifically asked somebody on my staff to speak directly with the doctors of the President of the United States of America, ask them if they were at all concerned. They said, no. The President, as I mentioned yesterday and on many other previous occasions, has not exhibited any symptoms that would require that to be of concern.

So while I will check individually on your question, I think it’s important to understand, for the eighth time, that there’s no medical concern for the President.

Testy = discomfort = lie?

———————

Q In previous administrations, and I assume in this one, advance trips for the President — wherever the President is going to go, medical teams go out with specific medical questions: the personnel who are going to be on-site with the President is going to be, and the larger medical — or air quality, or any type of medical concerns where the President is going to be.

Were these teams dispatched to Mexico? Were questions asked about swine flu, do you know? And did you get any response from the Mexican officials either about what the President was likely to encounter, or possibly would encounter?

MR. GIBBS: I will ask. Without — and maybe I shouldn’t do this. Im not entirely sure that somebody would have asked about that given the timing. But let me –

Q The President arrived on the 16th, and as Bill reported, the first case was documented on April 12th. So it’s possible that within that environment –

MR. GIBBS: Let me find that out. But again –

Q But again, it could have been asked.

11 days later and he doesn’t know these things? Sarcasm alert. Listen for the same qualifier as before.

MR. GIBBS: I’m going to go for number nine.

MR. GIBBS: I understand. I understand. But let’s — for purposes of the previous question, I just, again — boy, I’m glad I’m not a public health spokesman. Let me just this one more time. The doctors have informed me, based on my personal curiosity, knowing of yours, that the President’s health was never in any danger; that he has not exhibited any symptoms; neither has anybody traveling with him; neither has any of the press that traveled with him that I’m aware of exhibited any symptoms that would cause some reason for concern.

No concern now if the man is back to work and his family is fine. And see how his answer has evolved? He didn’t know, he would check, he personally sent someone to ask and now he himself asked because of personal curiosity. Now we’re getting somewhere. He has kids you’d bet he’d personally ask. That’s as close to the truth as you’re gonna get, Unless he spills the beans they aren’t getting anything else.

Q Major’s question is not getting at that. There’s a lot of speculation –

MR. GIBBS: No, no, no, no, no, no –

Ding! Ding! Ding!

Q — that the Mexican government was withholding information from the United States.

MR. GIBBS: I’m not — Chuck, hold on, let me –

Q I’m asking a question –

MR. GIBBS: No, no, no — no, no, no — and I’m –

Q His health is not what we’re asking about.

More sarcasm. More I don’t know I’ll check.

MR. GIBBS: No, no, I’m trying to balance what somebody previously asked about concern and panic, okay — so I’m reiterating that answer as a larger global answer while I check on the other questions. Guys, I — my ears work fine. I will check on the questions, all right.

Don’t tell me, let me guess — go ahead.

Q I am not going to ask about the President’s health….

And they didn’t. Doesn’t the press corps have any shame? To be treated like irritating little children by a man who doesn’t know anything but will “check”? What is his job description? Seriously.

Bottom line. He was lying - a frequent habit. Exhibit A - the bow to the beast where there was clear photographic evidence. He lied and then he got testy and sarcastic. I’d love to ask him a few questions. It’d be a regular riot, Alice.

His personal defense is sarcasm - hopefully prompting a distracting laugh and hey we’re all together in this harkening to the campaign trail where it worked marvelously. His work defense is: I don’t know, I’ll check, I’m not sure, I’ll get back to you - which then allows him to be angry when people keep asking him.

What he forgets and what the press corps seems to overlook - even after 100 days - is that he should already know these things. It’s his job to know those things as much as it is the press’ responsibility to ask and make him answer those things.

Neither are doing their job and it seems neither cares.

11 days after barry is in the same room - and I would bet shook the hand - of a man who got sick and then died in the epicenter of the pandemic, the WH Press Secretary doesn’t know where the dead man was standing in reference to his boss, the POTUS?

If that is true he needs to be fired.

No warning of swine flu before trip to Mexico

April 30, 2009

Since the archaeologist Felipe Solis Olguin, director of the National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City - the epicenter of the pandemic - died, questions were raised that were quickly downplayed. Was barry exposed, did he get sick, was the WH forewarned, did the Secret Service do their job, was it intended to make sick the president? Thing is by the time the man died it was well past the 3-day incubation stage.

Here's Gibbs on Monday (4-27)

Q Following up from yesterday's briefing here, sort of what did you know and when did you know it -- the first case in Mexico was apparently either reported, or the first death was -- I'm not sure -- April 12th. The President was there about five days later. Did our team learn of this during the advance or in the course of the visit?

MR. GIBBS: I'm not aware that we learned until I think earlier last week. That's what I -- that's what I've been told and I will double-check on that.

Q So there was no warning or caution given --

MR. GIBBS: Not prior to the trip, no.

For a WH press Secretary he sure doesn't know a whole lot. I'm not aware, I don't know, let me check on that, I'll get back to you. Like master like minion.

POTUS exposed to swine flu? (Felipe Solis story links)
GIBBS (4-27): No warning before Mexico trip
Energy security detail contracted flu in Mexico
White House (4-27) Mexican Embassy spokesman Ricardo Alday re: Felipe Solis


Axelrod: Madame Secretary is doing "Great!"

April 29, 2009

Now ghoulish David Axelrod is singing the praises of Madame Secretary Clinton. Just listen to his words. Clinton- notice the tense - HAD A GREAT KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD. Yes she did. Even when she was lazily sipping tea with the ambassadors.

Maybe he thinks she acquired it while she was out stumping for barry before he was nominated while he took a vacation and hid out in Hawaii. Or maybe he thinks she acquired it between the Convention and Election day while she worked selflessly to recruit her voters while being trashed in the media for having ulterior motives. Without her voters barry would not have won. Period. Peraps he thinks she acquired her great knowledge under bary's tutelage during the transition phase.

Truth is she had it all along and only now when it's politically expedient, when she's helping barry and when he can no longer deny it does Axelrod admit to it. Says alot, doesn't it?

Barama Matthews is talking with Axelrod. Interesting first question. He's not so sure barry can handle the economy...why he just gave him an A minus.

MATTHEWS:

Is there a sense that she could be helpful to this and on the economic front politically at home. If it is rough going - that she could bring the Clinton coalition to bear on behalf of the president?

DAVID AXELROD:

I don't know. She's got her hands full. We've got a lot of challenges in the world and she's working tirelessly at them. So were not thinking about ancillary uses of the secretary of state. When you think about Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Middleast her dance card is pretty full.

MATTHEWS: How's she doing?

No hesitation.

AXELROD: GREAT!

I think it's been a wonderful partnership. The president chose her because he knew her as a rival and a colleague as someone who is smart, tenacious, well-prepared, HAD A GREAT KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD and all of that is coming into play.

And she's been a great, a great leading light in this administration.

Leading light. Not subservient light or rogue light or out for herself will only sabotage barry light. She actually cares about The American People and that is clearly evident in the way she conducts herself.

barama asks him about a scene from West Wing about Jimmy Smits picking Alan Alda and something about being inspired by it.

AXELROD:

You know that one of his favorite books is Team of Rivals. And I think he was inspired by that--mostly he was inspired to make that appointment by his knowledge and his sense of then Senator Clinton. And I think his instincts have been proven right.

barry and his instincts had nothing to do with anything. Madame Secretary is no different than she was in the July 2007 debate when all she knew was sipping tea with the ambassadors. and barry understood African villages because his father's mother lives there. And people bought it because of his "superior judgment".

And what did he do? Couldn't even conduct himself on the world stage. He said he would sit down with Chavez. Clinton said absolutely not - it'll be used propaganda. barry backed off during the campaign and first chance he gets he bows to the beast and shakes hands and yuks it up with the dictator, who called barry's predecessor the devil. Couldn't have asked for better propaganda footage - including their little not so private, not so genial chat.

I sure hope someone out there has the time and wherewithal to put together video sound bites of what barry and his camp -- that includes the media -- said then and what they're saying now. That's all that would be needed to prove their castration anxiety and gyne envy.

They want something - she does it.

She does it - they want more.

But before she started doing the very job she is doing for them - she wasn't capable of doing it.

The difference?

She was fighting for the same job.

Says all you need to know about barry and the rest of them.

Getty Images

Of the People, for the People...Madame Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

barry whines about the teabaggers

April 29, 2009

Yes another swing state townhall - why didn't he have these when he was a candidate? Well he's still acting like a candidate. Why didn't he have the courage to debate in a townhall setting with then Sen Clinton and/or Sen McCain?

He goes to these places to get his fix of adoration and to complain about his naysayers. It's the one and only thing he is transparent about. When he went to Indiana he whined about Rush Limabugh and Sean Hannity. They must have calmed down because this time it was the teabaggers he went after to get his dig in and laugh from the crowd.

And the familiar barry whine: it's not my fault - it wasn't me - it was here when I moved in - it's Bush's fault.

Arnold Missouri - see CNN video - here's the CNN relevant transcript courtesy of Martina Stewart.

BARRY: I know you've been hearing all these arguments about, oh, 'Obama is just spending crazy.' Well, let me make a point. Number one, we inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit — that wasn't from my — that wasn't me.

...Then he tells them why he's still campaigning - he wants to get his health package through to add to the monstrous debt that was there. What's the next president going to inherit? Morning Joe said that barry's debt is going to be more than all the presidents combined. That's sobering. And yes a great deal of it is going to be his fault - not Bush's.

BARRY: That's why I've said we've got to have health reform this year — to drive down costs and make health care affordable for American families, businesses and for our government.

He doesn't mention FOX as per usual because it was Rick Santelli on CNBC that set off the Teabaggers. The media scoffed at them and here barry is still whining. Gibbs went after Santelli as well. If you can, watch the video to see him dismissively waving his hand when he mentions the teabags. He doesn't get the crowd roar he was expecting. There's nothing funny about trillions of dollars of debt. Who can even conceptualize it?

So, you know, when you see — those of you who are watching certain news channels on which I'm not very popular and you see folks waving tea bags around, let me just remind them that I am happy to have a serious conversation about how we are going to cut our health care costs down over the long term, how we're going to stabilize Social Security.

But let's not play games and pretend that the reason is because of the [$787 billion stimulus bill], because that's just a fraction of the overall problem that we've got.

Susan Boyle: BBC video interview

Another post that disappeared. Sixth one of the day.

Ruling: Kathleen Savio estate

April 30, 2009

Hey Marcie T.

Hope you figured out the last post. Kathleen Savio was initially thought to have died without a will. Then in walks Peterson’s uncle with a handwritten one saying Kathleen didn’t want her family near her estate. She had been murdered just short of dividing the marital assets. Long story short - Peterson got the whole estate. Savio family — Savio’s father, Henry Savio, and sister, Anna Doman– appealed and won. Melissa Doman is Kathleen Savio’s niece.

This is the Feb 4th ruling to Peterson’s appeal. He lost - the Savio family remained in control of the estate.

March 11th: Peterson filed an appeal with the Illinois Supreme Court challenging this lower court ruling.

April 21 Savio’s father and sister file a wrongful death lawsuit against Peterson.

Special Grand Jury investigating Kathleen Savio’s murder and Stacy Peterson’s disappearance are still convening.

Peterson has not been charged with any crime.

Click top right to get full screen.
==========================

Filed February 4, 2009 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2009 In re ESTATE OF KATHLEEN SAVIO, Deceased. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the 12th Judicial Circuit.

=================================

Drew Peterson’s “fiance” moved out…again

Drew Peterson hit with wrongful death lawsuit
Drew Peterson’s response to wrongful death lawsuit
Drew Peterson’s official statement on Savio wrongful death lawsuit
Kathleen Savio’s niece comments on lawsuit

Drew Peterson: “[Stacy's] on vacation and she’s not coming back”
Drew Peterson reaches all-time low
Police searching for Stacy Peterson again

Drew & his lawyer talking about case on WGN (video doesn’t embed)

Press release Savio death ruled a homicide
Ruling Kathleen Savio estate

Savio v Peterson wrongful death lawsuit

Story today in Sun Times about Peterson uncle who was the initial executor

Press release: Savio’s death ruled homicide

April 29, 2009

Hey Marcie T.

Here’s the States Atty Press Release: Drew Peterson’s third wife, Kathleen Savio’s Death Ruled Homicide based on pathologist reports.

March 1, 2004 Kathleen Savio was found dead in her circular dry bathtub with a 1″ gash on the back of her head.

March 2, 2004 - first autopsy - cause of Death: Drowning.

Six-person coroner’s jury ruled her death an accidental drowning. Will County coroner, Patrick O’Neil.

October 28, 2007 Stacy Peterson, Drew Peterson’s 4th wife, “disappears”

November 13, 2007 - Body exhumed and autopsy performed by Dr Larry W. Blum, forensic pathologist:

Cause of death: drowning, Manner of death: Homicide.

November 16, 2007 — Dr Michael Baden performs the third autopsy per request of the Savio family.

Will County Special Grand jury still convening re: Stacy Peterson’s disappearance and Kathleen Savio’s murder.

February 4, 2009 Peterson lost his appeal and the Savio family remain in control of Kathleen Savio’s estate.

March 11, 2009 Peterson file an appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court challenging the February lower court ruling.

April 21, 2009 Savio family filed a wrongful death lawsuit.

Today the State Police were out searching in relation to Stacy’s case.

His alleged fiance moved out weeks ago — hopefully for good.

Links below the press release. Click top right for full screen. Hope that helps. Check the Drew Peterson archive if this doesn’t cover it what you need.

==================

==================

Drew Peterson’s “fiance” moved out…again

Drew Peterson hit with wrongful death lawsuit
Drew Peterson’s response to wrongful death lawsuit
Drew Peterson’s official statement on Savio wrongful death lawsuit
Kathleen Savio’s niece comments on lawsuit

Drew Peterson: “[Stacy's] on vacation and she’s not coming back”
Drew Peterson reaches all-time low
Police searching for Stacy Peterson again

Drew & his lawyer talking about case on WGN (video doesn’t embed)

Press release Savio death ruled a homicide
Ruling Kathleen Savio estate

Savio v Peterson wrongful death lawsuit

Story today in Sun Times about Peterson uncle who was the initial executor

Savio v Peterson wrongful death lawsuit

April 30, 2009

Ok Marcie T. that should do it.

No, I don’t know when the last sighting of the alleged fiance-fiance-ex-fiance was or even if she was crazy enough to return. She moved out on the 4th I believe and Peterson said she was still moved out as of last Friday. We have hers, her father’s and Thomas Morphey’s interviews in the drafts somewhere that I can maybe dig out if you need them too.

Have you tried websites devoted to Peterson? I’m fairly certain there are ones whose sole purpose is following his madness. We’re in Chicago, which is why we’ve followed it.

Here’s one about Stacy and other missing women run by Delilah: Peace4 the missing. She was putting together a cookbook in Stacy’s honor to benefit domestic violence.

Good luck with everything. As I said - there are a lot more posts in the archives.

Click top right for full screen.

Savio v Peterson

===============

================

Drew Peterson’s “fiance” moved out…again
Drew Peterson hit with wrongful death lawsuit
Drew Peterson’s response to wrongful death lawsuit
Drew Peterson’s official statement on Savio wrongful death lawsuit
Kathleen Savio’s niece comments on lawsuit
Drew Peterson: “[Stacy's] on vacation and she’s not coming back”
Drew Peterson reaches all-time low
Police searching for Stacy Peterson again

Press release Savio death ruled a homicide
Ruling Kathleen Savio estate

Story today in Sun Times about Peterson uncle who was the initial executor

Comments from Mayor Bloomberg, NYPD, FAA, Pentagon re: Air Force 1 flyover

April 28, 2009

Source: NY Times City Room A. G. Sulzberger & Matthew L. Wald

MAYOR BLOOMBERG:

[The e-mail notification] did have the normal language of saying this is sensitive information, should be distributed on a need-to-know basis, that they did not plan to have any publicity about it, which I think is ridiculous and just poor judgment.

Why the Defense Department wanted to do a photo-op right around the site of the World Trade Center catastrophe defies imagination. Poor judgment would be a nice ways to phrase it, but they did. I also think that once they had told us, we should have done a better job. Had I known about it, I would have called them right away and asked them not to. It is the federal government and they can do in the end what they please, but I would have tried to stop it. I don’t know there’s a lot else to say other than they shouldn’t have done it.

NYPD:

The flight of a VC-25 aircraft and F-16 fighters this morning was authorized by the F.A.A. for the vicinity of the Statue of Liberty with directives to local authorities not to disclose information about it but to direct any inquiries to the F.A.A. Air Traffic Security Coordinator.

FAA spokesman JIM PETERS:

the photo op was approved and coordinated with everyone.

Pentagon press secretary GEOFF MORRELL

It was such an obvious mistake that I think it is virtually impossible that it will happen again. Everybody in the wake of this now realizes how insensitive it was and what a mistake it was not to inform the American people, the residents of New York, particularly lower Manhattan, in advance.

=====================

Here’s a few more comments. Source: CNN [emphasis added]

Bush former Homeland Security adviser FRAN TOWNSEND:

I’d call this felony stupidity. This is probably not the right job for Mr. Caldera to be in if he didn’t understand the likely reaction of New Yorkers, of the mayor.

SEN JOHN MCCAIN letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates saying he was “profoundly disturbed” by the flyover “against the backdrop of September 11.” And that:

“The supposed mission represents a fundamentally unsound exercise in military judgment and may have constituted an inappropriate use of Department of Defense resources”.

CAPT ANNA CARPENTER, Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland said local law enforcement agencies and the FAA had been given notice of the “mission” aka barry photo shoot.

FAA said it was taking part in a classified, government-sanctioned photo shoot.

Deputy Commissioner PAUL J BROWNE said the NYPD had been alerted about the flight “with directives to local authorities not to disclose information about it.”

LINDA GARCIA-ROSE is a therapist who counsels PTSD patients said she was inundated with calls from them. She is considering filing a class action suit on behalf of her patients, calling the flight an “absolute travesty.” I’m sure there are many more. At the very least they could use a direct apology from barry.

GARCIA-ROSE: There was no warning. It looked like the plane was about to come into us. I’m a therapist, and I actually had a panic attack. [Her patients] traumatized. They’re asking ‘How could this happen?’ They’re nervous. Their anxiety levels are high. I believe the government has done something really wrong.

I second it. And I sure wish someone would ask why barry wouldnt know about a) low-flying planes in NYC and b) a “classified mission”. Who has the authority to run classified mission without the POTUS’ ok

===================================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??

White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Mayor Bloomberg, NYPD, FAA, Pentagon re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)
barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover

Videos: Air Force 1 footage + fleeing observers

(4-27) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-28) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-29) Rudy Guiliani re: Air Force 1 flyover

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Susan Boyle: video interview: UK Telegraph

April 28, 2009

Susan Boyle: Daily Record interview

April 17, 2009

Just noticed this disappeared when I was checking links. Don’t know what happened.

Britain’s Got Talent sensation’s interview with The Daily Record’s LAURA COVENTRY:

Susan has lived alone with her cat Pebbles since her mum Bridget died two years ago at the age of 91.

She has admitted that she has never been on a date or even been kissed but she was too shy to discuss her spinster lifestyle on CBS.

Aaah, no comment. I don’t want to talk about that.

Sawyer asked Susan what she would do with the prize money if she won, but she replied:

Well, it’s just baby steps at the moment, we shall see how things progress.

Susan wouldn’t rule out having a makeover as part of Britain’s Got Talent, telling Sawyer:

You’ll have to watch the programme and find out.

But she did admit there would be no repeat of the dance steps she showed off on Saturday.

That’s it. Let’s try and keep it ladylike.

Susan suffered a mild form of brain damage at birth and she admitted to Sawyer that she was bullied when she was younger.

They did a bit, but they always do that with someone who is quiet and I tended to be quiet at school. Well, they have turned around. They are nice to me now, so we will move on from there.

Susan said her friends and family were “gobsmacked” by her success. And when Sawyer asked what she would say to her late parents if she could, she replied:

I would like to say thank you for supporting me over the years, thank you for looking after me and I hope I can make you proud.

She added:

I went on the audition to see how far I could get but the standard is very high. You need a lot of hard work and perseverance to make it.

I think there is room for improvement though.

====================
Susan Boyle got a brand new do
Susan Boyle: 12 y/o competitor Shaheen Jafargholi

Susan Boyle: UK Times interview (4-19)
Susan Boyle: “I Dreamed a Dream“ (Les Miserables)
Judges (not Simon) apologize to Ms Boyle on The Early Show
Susan Boyle: Daily Record interview
Susan Boyle: “Cry Me a River” (First recording - charity CD)
Susan Boyle: “I Don’t Know How To Love Him” (Jesus Christ Superstar -1986)
Susan Boyle quitting Britain’s Got Talent?
Susan Boyle: video interview: UK Telegraph
Susan Boyle: Simon Cowell weighs in

Videos: Air Force 1 footage + fleeing observers

April 28, 2009

Here are a couple of videos documenting the flyover.

Air Force 1 with F-16 fighter jet companion

ErlangerTruth

Brian Williams news report with Mike Taibbi, Robert Gibbs, Mayor Bloomberg, Sen Schumer

kiuhy7

Gibbs laughs, puts his hands up and lies:

I don’t know.

If the White House aka barry didn’t know they would have put out an immediate statement or Gibbs would have at least been prepared.

Mayor Bloomberg, who found out about it on his Blackberry - just like thousands of other New Yorkers.

I’m annoyed — furious is a better word — that I wasn’t told.

Sen Schumer:

It really borders on being cruel or very, very stupid.

If full video press conference link below.

Cellphone video of New Yorkers fleeing. Listen to the panic in their voices and realize all barry had to say was 24 words. And not a single one of them was to these folks and the others who were terrorized because barry needed a photo op.

Jersey City, NJ
faavradmin
====================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??
White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)
barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover
Videos: Air Force 1 footage + fleeing observers

(4-27) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-28) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-29) Rudy Guiliani re: Air Force 1 flyover

4-27 Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover

April 28, 2009

The flyovers took place between 10-10:30 EST.
WH Press briefing took place at 14:23 EST.
Louis Caldera statement 16:39 EST.

Why did Robert Gibbs not know anything 6 hours later?

Why did it take Caldera 8 hours to make a statement?

How much time does it take to come up with a lie and a scapegoat?

And then barry says nothing until the next afternoon and only in response to reporter’s question. He still has not personally apologized to the folks on New York or New Jersey. Did he personally apologize to his buddy, Mayor Bloomberg?

This is what Robert Gibbs had to say-not say. Listen to how flip he is - he laughs like it’s funny he knows nothing and the press corps goes merrily along.

PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS
Monday April 27th

Q Second question, do you guys feel you owe folks in New York City this morning an apology for this incident having to do with the airplane that looks like Air Force One with two fighter jets? There seemed to be a lot of panic –

MR. GIBBS: I would point you to the FAA or Air Force.

Q Everybody’s pointing us to the White House Military Office, so that’s why –

MR. GIBBS: Well, then I would contact the White House –

First off - no apology has been made by barry himself. Second, isn’t Gibbs the spokesman for the White House as in White House Press Secretary? And why is it funny? Watch the video below of NJ folks running - thinking there was an attack and listen to the panic in their voices. And the WH thinks it’s funny. Next Gibbs admits to seeing news reports but he’s going to have to go discuss things. What was he doing for 6 hours?

Q Well, the White House Military Office won’t tell us anything — they’ll refer us to you. (Laughter.)

MR. GIBBS: Well, then let me go discuss with the White House Military — I don’t – I have seen some news reports but --

Q What was the photo op for?

MR. GIBBS: I don’t know. That’s — I have no information on this other than what I saw

So he saw it. He saw it and didn’t investigate it. And then he wants us to believe he didn’t anticipate the press would ask questions. If so, he is completely ignorant.

[...]

Q I mean, I understand the way this works. I’m just saying, appearance-wise, it’s odd that you guys don’t have a response. I mean, this is the President’s aircraft or what looks like –

MR. GIBBS: I understand. I was working on other things. You might be surprised to know I don’t know of every movement of Air Force One or what happens to it. But I will certainly talk to the Military Office.

Q — very edgy about it.

Q A follow-up?

MR. GIBBS: What’s that? No, let’s go to — yes.

Q As long as you’re taking questions that you’re going to get back to us on, on the flight of Air Force One, the aircraft this morning down along Lower Manhattan at a very, very low level, Mayor Bloomberg says he is furious, it was insensitive, poor judgment, and he would go all the way to the White House to stop it if he knew it was going to happen. Do you think it’s insensitive to have a big aircraft fly low over an area that — when it’s clearly such a trigger for them?

MR. GIBBS: Well, I’m going to find out this information based on Chuck’s question and we’ll try to get back to you with whatever details we can.

Did he get back to them? Yesterday’s press conference wasn’t any more enlightening.

====================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??
White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)
barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover
Videos: Air Force 1 footage + fleeing observers

(4-27) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-28) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-29) Rudy Guiliani re: Air Force 1 flyover

Rudy Guiliani re: Air Force 1 flyover

April 29, 2009

Rudy Guiliani was on Fox & Friends just now giving his take. He was pretty mild. They didn’t ask him if he thought there was any way barry didn’t know about it.

He was asked how he would have reacted if he was still mayor:

I imagine very much like a Mike did. Mike was very angry about it - except my language might not have as…genteel. He talks a little different than I do sometimes. But I would have had exactly the same reaction that he had. I’d have been outraged and very, very upset that they did it, on a number of different levels, not the least of which is not informing us - not informing the people - clearly some of whom were panicked by it.

And you know I hate to make too much of — because they did apologize for it - but doesn’t it show a complete lack of understanding of September 11, once again? We’ve redefined it so much we can’t use the word terrorism. We can’t use the word Islamic terrorism. We can use the word terrorism about returning veterans.

There’s a big gap here and this White House. Look at it from another point of view - suppose it were a private jet and from some big American company - GE, GM whatever. The CEO would now be in very deep trouble for having used the plane to take a couple of background shots of something they have probably millions of shots. After all the different explanations trying to hide what this is about. What this is about was taking pictures.

The White House said it was a training mission. It cost an estimated $328, 835.

Anytime you put Air Force One up in the air it’s a training mission by definition. You’re probably trying to keep up the hours, keep up the training for the pilots. That’s why these planes are so darn expensive. Remember that when they go after everybody on private planes. How often the president uses it. How often he uses it for discretionary purposes. Go to San Diego to have a press conference instead of having it in Washington.

I don’t begrudge him that - nor do I think he should undo it. But I do think - boy, if it was a Republican, the hypocrisy would be right out front. He’s saying corporate executives shouldn’t use airplanes. And then he’s using this airplane you can say may be half the time for discretionary reasons when he could save money.

You know there are some reporters here in New York want to see the flight manifest want to see who was on board.

I once used a helicopter to take photographs from. I would do it when I actually had to be on the helicopter anyway. For a photographic exhibit for charity - for the Children’s Foundation. I took 25 photographs of New York and about a third of them from the helicopter. But I remember once going to a fire - I used to keep with me, and I would shoot. You get great shots from places like that.

But the reality, is they gotta clear this. If you going to do this mission, you gotta clear it.

I think the mayor will be very angry that people actually withheld this information from him and he couldn’t warn the people on the ground.

======================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??
White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)
barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover
Videos: Air Force 1 footage + fleeing observers

(4-27) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-28) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-29) Rudy Guiliani re: Air Force 1 flyover

Simon Cowell re: Susan Boyle

April 28, 2008

Simon Cowell weighs in on Susan Boyle in the UK’s Telegraph.

SIMON COWELL quotes from IAN JOHNSTON’s article. Cowell wouldn’t say if he was signing her and wasn’t sure Ms Boyle would be able to cope with all the attention - hence his advice.

I’m tired of hearing about the way she looks or the kissing, or this or that. Susan mustn’t become a gimmick.

The problem is with all the sub-stories about the cat and how she looks.

It could all go horribly wrong now because there are so many other distractions.

Addressing her directly, Cowell told her to

get yourself together, sweetheart, for the big one – which is the semi-finals”

Choose the right song, focus yourself, shut your front door, maybe take a holiday and come back to the person you want to be and not as the person you think you should be.

==================
Susan Boyle got a brand new do
Susan Boyle: 12 y/o competitor Shaheen Jafargholi

Susan Boyle: UK Times interview (4-19)
Susan Boyle: “I Dreamed a Dream“ (Les Miserables)
Judges (not Simon) apologize to Ms Boyle on The Early Show
Susan Boyle: Daily Record interview
Susan Boyle: “Cry Me a River” (First recording - charity CD)
Susan Boyle: “I Don’t Know How To Love Him” (Jesus Christ Superstar -1986)
Susan Boyle quitting Britain’s Got Talent?
Susan Boyle: video interview: UK Telegraph

4-28 Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover

4-28 Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover

April 29, 2009

ROBERT GIBBS PRESS BRIEFING
April 28th

Transcript from the WH website. Just the relevant questions included. He doesn’t know anything, barry was furious, it’s Caldera’s fault, going to conduct a review while they watch the fall out. The press let him off easy. Surprise. He says every briefing he doesn’t know and that he will get back to them - does he?

Q Thank you. Two unrelated things. On the plane flyover yesterday, does the President think that it’s an appropriate use of government funds –

MR. GIBBS: No.

Q — at this sort of belt-tightening times to update those promotional photos?

MR. GIBBS: No.

Q Do you know how much was spent on that?

MR. GIBBS: I don’t have an exact amount. Obviously I think there have been — Congress has looked into the cost of operating Air Force One, and GAO reports that I would point you to.

The President has directed Jim Messina, the Deputy Chief of Staff here, to conduct a review as to how the decision was made to conduct the flight, to understand — to understand, as I said, why that decision was made, and to ensure that it never happens again. And the President will look at that review and take any appropriate steps after that.

Read: barry’s gonna wait to see what the press does and the public outcry before he decides to let Caldera “resign”.

Q I want to follow up on two of Jennifer’s questions. One, when it comes to the Director of the White House Military Office, Mr. Caldera, does the President have any concerns that this decision he made, that he took responsibility for, indicates a lack of judgment that might make him improper to keep holding that post?

MR. GIBBS: Well, as you mentioned, Mr. Caldera took responsibility for this. I think it’s been characterized that the President was furious upon learning of this decision. And that’s why he’s asked the Deputy Chief of Staff to undertake a review in order to understand how the decision was made and to ensure that it doesn’t happen again, and based on that, will take steps from there.

I think…it has been characterized…doesn’t he talk directly to barry? Wouldn’t he know exactly how he felt about?

Q And in terms of the cost of the plane incident yesterday, can you — actually, you pointed to the GAO reports, but can the White House provide, you know, A, how much it did cost, since the President has been making government spending such an important priority; and secondly, a manifest of who else was on that plane? Were there any non-military people on the plane?

MR. GIBBS: I’m told that — keep in mind this was a — this was two training missions that, in the end, became a picture mission, which the President having quite clearly called today a mistake and one that he will ensure doesn’t happen again. Because this was a training mission, the only people on that plane were Air Force personnel.

So he knows enough to know who was on the plane but nothing else. And here comes typical Gibbs sarcasm when he gets pressed on something he doesn’t want to answer. He’s like a 6th grader.

Q So in terms of the cost, will you provide what the cost was?

MR. GIBBS: I would point to your reports — I haven’t been in a cabin — there’s not like a taxi meter, so I don’t know how much –

Q You can presumably figure out how much gasoline is used and –

MR. GIBBS: I would point you to those reports to give you a sense of how much the plane — how much people have said it costs an hour to operate.

Yes, sir.

MR. GIBBS: Can you get the crossword puzzle now?

Q Back to the Air Force One flyover. Mr. Caldera said he takes full responsibility, and I just wonder what that means as a practical matter. The President has said, we hear, that he was furious. Apparently this guy was chewed out by the Chief of Staff. But what does it mean as a -

MR. GIBBS: I have firsthand knowledge that the President was furious.

Q Okay, fair enough. So he’s furious, this was a mistake –

MR. GIBBS: I wasn’t at the meeting, but I think we can all rest assured that we weren’t at that meeting with the Chief of Staff.

Q Right. So in any event, what’s the practical result of his taking responsibility? Some have suggested he should lose his job.

MR. GIBBS: Well, I think that’s why — I think the President has rightly asked that a review of the situation and the decision-making be undertaken so that we can have a better understanding of why that decision might have been made.

Q Is firing a potential outcome of that review?

MR. GIBBS: Well, I don’t — I think our course would be to conduct the review before something like that is determined.

Q Yes, back to the flyover. What was the — who made the –

MR. GIBBS: I’m going down to a B-plus, just FYI.

Go ahead.

Q Who made the decision, and what was the rationale for not informing the public?

MR. GIBBS: Well, I think the statement that was put out yesterday denotes that Mr. Caldera made the decision.

Q Including not informing the public?

MR. GIBBS: I will — I honestly don’t know the answer to that. I can look into it. I know some, as I think some of the stories mention, there were people in the area that were notified of the existence of the flight.

He knows barry was furious and he knows who was on the plane but he doesn’t know anything else. Why was barry furious?

Q But those are the authorities, not the general public.

MR. GIBBS: Some of them — right, right. No, I understand, I understand.

Q Did it come out of the White House budget then, if Caldera made the decision?

MR. GIBBS: I think — I don’t know where the operating budget for Air Force One is. I presume it’s out of the Air Force.

[...]

MR. GIBBS: Well, look, I think — not surprisingly, I doubt I’m going to enumerate them. But I think anybody is hard-pressed to look back over a significant period of time like 99 or a hundred days and think you wouldn’t have done some things differently. I’ve mentioned a decision today that the President would have made quite differently than was made in this White House. I think it is safe to say that the President spends some time each day reflecting on what’s been done here in the course of any given day, and has asked us and asks himself to figure out how he can do what he does better.

Why does barry think he is separate from the White House? And why is the press letting him get away with it? What are the chances it will be brought up tonite?

======================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??
White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)
barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover
Videos: Air Force 1 footage + fleeing observers

(4-27) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-28) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-29) Rudy Guiliani re: Air Force 1 flyover