"Politically neutral"

January 25, 2009

cindyinatl:

Thank you for your thoughts. You have a very good point that people have been asking, so I am answering out here. Our blog is based on documenting the lack of vetting of barry by the media and the direct effect it had on the primaries and general election. That's how it started. Now since it seems it's just me and the bias has been proven many times over - I tend to write more opinion than strictly facts. Lately I've been doing whatever.

We began by compiling evidence of the actual events and ways the press was not vetting barry. The most obvious, indisputable, irrefutable proof of media corruption was the March 3, 2008 press conference, where they let barry walk away - c'mon guys, I already answered like eight questions. It was the night before he could have clinched the Democratic nomination and they did not ask him about NAFTA, Rezko whose trial began that day and whose indictment barry was named in, Dorothy Tillman's arrest and other matters. They let him walk away. They got him lying on camera about NAFTA and they did nothing

There is no way they would have let Sen Clinton walk away.

Pro-Obama media bias loud and clear.

Some of my fellow citizens stopped that day as it was proven outright. Some hung in and continued to document it in their posts. Some quit after the primary. Some still post partial drafts or links to examples but there's no way I can keep up by myself. There are 2186 drafts - some relating back to barry's Chicago days. Now they've all stopped, it seems, because the pro-obama media bias has been proven statistically and the media themselves has admitted to it.

There does not need to be any studies. Evidence abounds in just their daily interactions. One example: during the heat of the Wright controversy, Sen Clinton got more bad press than barry - documented by an impartial group. It's in here somewhere or maybe on the other site. The proobamedia deemed him Teflon.

Most of us aren't political in nature. I had never watched or been involved in politics until Jan last year. Many of us live in Chicago and have known of barry since he started in just a general sense. The first time I saw him I thought there's someone I might actually vote for. None of us voted for any of the candidates. I have never voted. Thus, we are politically neutral as in we came in with no bias toward anyone. We had no axe to grind and no need to denigrate barry to promote our candidate.

I think what you are getting at is an overall politically neutral site, as in we discuss the aspects of politics in general and give both sides of the issues? Besides not being the purpose of this blog, most of us - me most assuredly - have such a limited knowledge of politics we could never begin to accomplish that. I'm still learning about the Constitution. And I had no idea the primary voting process was so fundamentally flawed and crazy.

Thus, what Bush has done, what Keating 5 entailed, and whatever else has no specific relevance to the pro-Obama media bias. The press has already admitted they were partially to blame for Iraq because they did not ask tougher questions. And what will they say about their coverage and non-questioning of barry? And what will bring about that questioning?

barry reached the highest office in the land - the world - having never had to make a stand on anything. He had never once made a stand where his vote was the deciding one or made a decision where the consequences rested solely on him. Not once. And now he holds the whole world in his hands.

How many serious issues has he changed his mind on to suit the political winds?

For example, barry likes to speak of the evils of lobbyists, right?

His own chief advisor David Axelrod is a lobbyist. The technicality of Illinois laws is what keeps him from being named "lobbyist". His lobbying office is the same one he worked out of for barry. He handled a case for Commonwealth Edison (Ayers father was the longtime Chairman and CEO) while he was on the campaign trail for barry as barry stood there and spoke about how lobbyists will never work for him. And even if he were to admit to being a lobbyist - he's not a "Washington lobbyist". Problem is - his clients are.

Right to your face he said and is still saying these things.

We follow and document the birth certificate/constitutional eligibility to be POTUS not because we want barry deposed so our candidate can win or become president - we have none - but because it is clear straightforward evidence of the pro-obama media bias.

Is there a single political candidate in this country - besides barry - who could have become president without showing their original long form birth certificate? Clinton, McCain, Bush or Palin?

Not a chance.

That is the crux. Why hasn't the media forced him to? Even now? Why has there been a media blackout? Have you even heard of the cases before the Supreme Court? It wasn't just one or two "wild conspiracy theories". The crazy things that have hung up the process of getting them heard? Filing clerks intentionally misfiling the paper work to miss the deadline or mess up the appeal? Paper work filed by the same lawyer the week before sent for Anthrax quarantine? The guy responsible for Anthrax had already killed himself and quarantine does not take 10 days but the deadline would pass. Papers signed for by the Chief Justice's clerk getting "lost" for weeks?

And that's just what we're familiar with. Most folks haven't heard anything about it just like they didn't hear about Rezko or Blagojevich, who we had been mentioning since the beginning. Now who doesn't know who blagojevich is and what he's about?

These are real issues - not some crazy wingnuts or tinfoil heat wearers or Neo-cons crazies or the old tired refrain of racists. I don't even know what a "neocon" is. But I know what media bias, embargoing, propaganda and censorship is because it is still happening and that is wrong and unconstitutional.

No matter your candidate that should worry you especially after their terrible job on Iraq. Where would we have been if they had done their job?

And what would have happened if the press had favored Gore and Kerry like they have barry?

This world would have been a very different place.

The smoothest transition ever!!!

January 19, 2009

Everything barry does is the best ever! He is getting rave reviews for the smoothest transition in history:

Despite his two top aides Valerie Jarrett (talked with SEIU) and Rahm Emanuel (talked with blago multiple times) and barry himself having to be interviewed by the Feds because of their involvement with Blagojevich.

Despite his pick to head the National Economic Council, Larry Summers, who thinks women's minds are innately defective and not geared to mathematics and the sciences and that it's ok for pollution to be exported to undeveloped countries because it's cheaper to treat their potential health hazards.

Despite his pick for Commerce Secretary, Bill Richardson being involved in a federal investigation with more proof at present than blago's own alleged pay-to-play scheme.

Despite his appointee for National Intelligence Admiral Blair's questionable involvement in Indonesia.

Despite his Treasury Secretary (who will head the IRS) Tim Geitner - not paying his taxes ("an innocent mistake") even after he was audited and oh by the way didn't know that his housekeeper was an illegal alien.

Despite his pick for Attorney General, Eric Holder "forgot" to mention his involvement with blagojevich.

Despite his pick to head the CIA Leon Panetta has no intelligence experience .

Despite his first choice for CIA John Brennan had to bow out because of his - however nebulous - involvement with Bush's policy on harsh interrogation.

I'm sure there are more. And then there are the lobbyists barry was going to root out! How blind are folks? And barry's famed reaching across the aisle that he has no personal history of doing? He's laying the load on Sen McCain should something fall through and of course he needs McCain in the Senate, since McCain has a proven track record of acting and making a deciding vote.

Everything barry does is politically expedient. The only way the proobamedia is going to see that is when he actually has to act. So far he has been consistently "redefining" his view on almost everything. Does anyone know his views on illegal immigration? What's his latest on Iraq? Taxes? Guantanamo Bay? And many many more.

Yes, he has sought McCain's counsel - but has he publicly apologized for his comment in the debate--the last thing the electorate heard--that McCain's supporters were yelling "kill him"? It was a complete falsehood. But how are people to know that when the MSM is ignorant of the facts - still. And did barry ever make a stand on Rep Lewis' comments comparing McCain to George Wallace? No.

Uniter?

Transcender of Race?

Mr Transparency?

Right. Who still is buying that? And the release of his birth certificate? A list of his donors? His school and medical records?

How is that anything but a typical barry obamanation?

What is it going to take folks?

Barry's first unilateral decision with consequences will be as Commander in Chief and may very well be at 3am on 1/21.

You ok with that?

Voting procedures need to be revamped

January 8, 2009

The Senate made the final official electoral count - as expected 365-173. Dick Cheney read as his last VP duty:

Pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the United States, the Senate and House of Representatives are meeting in joint session to verify the certificates and count the votes of the electors of the several states.

barry and biden can now be officially inaugurated on 1-20-09.

I wouldn't count on SCOTUS to do anything to change that - no matter how inclined and no matter the evidence. At this point it is too late - which was the point in the delaying.

From a non-political person, who has never voted and had not been involved in politics of any sort until Jan 08 - the voting process needs to be changed. Each person's vote is not counted the same. The superdelegates decided this election after the DNC Rules Committee decided to hijack the votes in Michigan and give delegates to barry whose name was not on the ballot and therefore not one vote could have been proved to have been cast for him.

Are any Michiganders suing? If so, what would be their recourse?

It was an illegal primary. A vital and (deciding as far as popular vote) deliberation went on behind closed doors. Absolute corruption. You cannot have a process be clean if one element of it is dirty. The primary results will forever be illegal.

Imagine the outrage if Sen Clinton and barry's positions would have been reversed. It would never happen. No way. Period. That alone reflects its illegality and inherent bias. The Double Standard.

Then there are all the other irregularities with ACORN, bused in voters and the choosing of South Carlina and Nevada as the two primaries moved up. And had they been Michigan and New York? It was an intentional intervention that directly affected the outcome. As was the proven to exist proobama media bias.

Should be:

1 - No caucuses. Completely undemocratic and are subject to coercion and intimidation. They are inherently biased toward some demographics - in this case, Sen Clinton's: seniors, shift workers and single moms, which most definitely the outcome as she won only 1/14. And the one she won - Nevada - had many complaints of barry voter intimidation and is presently being litigated. Again - what is the recourse? So what's stopping someone from doing it as long as nothing happens before the general election?

2 - Every state should have a vote in the primaries. The primary vote is more important and the individual's vote means more because they can vote for whomever they want - not just the final choice. Primaries should take place over the period of two weeks or so - no longer.

3 - Superdelegates should be completely abolished. They decided this election. Period. They could have voted for Sen Clinton just as easily as they both got the same amount of votes - actually more people actually pulled the lever for Sen Clinton - that should not be forgotten much the same that Al Gore's vote count. barry won by virtue of caucus states (13/14) only 4 of which were blue. That is not the will of the democrats. A caucus in Idaho should not count the same as a 100K lead in votes in a blue state like Ohio or Pennsylvania. barry did not get the required number of delegates to win. Period.

4 - ID standards should be the same in every state as should the voting machines and procedures.

5 - Both parties should abide by the exact same procedures and rules for nomination.

5 - Independents should be allowed for whomever they want in every state.

6 - Absolute cap on campaign finances. barry broke his promise and was not held accountable. Say what you want - barry bought the election. He outspent McCain massively at the end and McCain could not fight back. (Neither could Sen Clinton.)

Well, that's my two cents.

Election Year in Review: barry voters

January 3, 2009

Here's an eye-opening video of how little barry voters knew and strangely how much they knew of his opponents. This would have been a much better video if it was done during the primaries. Folks would come out of the yes-we-can rallies eyes all a'glaze and not be able to recite anything barry said or state his position on anything other than "he voted against the war". Which of course is a fairy tale that will go down as the most blatant fraud perpetrated on The American People (o-baaa-ma sheeples) in presidential election history. The ones who could answer most often said return of the middle class or universal healthcare, which were Sen Clinton's stands. Anyway take the ten minutes to watch. See if you find it funny as in Leno's Jaywalking. Then take it a step further and realize that folks like these spent the last two years making personal attacks on barry's opponents - including the tried and true cries of racism - instead of learning something about barry.

courtesy of talktozig

Name one accomplishment: Dukakais

Name one accomplishment: Kirk Watson

Name on accomplishment: Harlem voters

Name one accomplishment: Super Tuesday voters

Name one accomplishment: New Yorkers

Name one accomplishment: Democratic voters

#9 Most Ignorant Proobamedia comment: Roland Martin

#9 Most Ignorant Proobamedia comment: Roland Martin

POLL: IFC/ZOGBY overwhelming media bias

December 29, 2008

Independent Film Channel/Zogby poll shows overwhelmingly that Americans believe the news is biased and that the biased coverage influenced the outcome of the presidential election. Surprise.

They polled 3,472 adults nationwide on November 5 and 6, 2008 with a very good split of sampling. Of those surveyed: Dems 38%, Rep 31% and Independents 28%. East (22%), South (26%), Center/Great Lakes (30%) and west (22%). Nearly all (99.6%) were registered to vote,99.7% voted. 53% voted for barry 46% McCain. MOE +/- 1.7%.

RESULTS:
93.1% barry received more coverage
4.1% thought McCain received more

74.7% thought media coverage of the presidential election influenced the outcome
94.2% Rep
55.6% Dem
79.3% Men
70.2% Women

Overall unreliable
80% TV
84% Radio

72.6% believe the news they read/see is biased.
88.7% Rep
57.5% Dem
77% males
67% females
73.3% White
76.7% Hispanic
62.2% Black
70.6% Asian
83.5% Other

Most reliable source of news
37.6% Internet
20.3% National TV News
16% Radio
11.3% Valid newspapers
4% Local TV News

Most trusted Newspaper
20.1% don't read newspapers
19.6 NY Times
19.2% Local
17.4% WSJ

Most trusted source:
39.3% FOX
16% CNN
15% MSNBC
10.1% PBS
6% NBC

Least trusted:
0.6% CNBC
1.5% CBS
3.3% ABC

81% Rep trust FOX
30.3% Dems trust MSNBC
26.2% Dems trust CNN

Most trusted news personality:
12.5% Rush Limbaugh
10.1% Bill O'Reilly
10.3% None listed
8.5% Brokaw
8% Hannity
6.9% Olbermann
6.6% Williams
6.3% Maddow

Least trusted:
0.6% Elisabeth Hasselbeck (How is she considered a news source?)
1.6% Colbert
1.9% Matthews
2.1% Stephanopoulos

Most trusted news personality:
­14.2% Dem Keith Olbermann
29.2% Rep Rush Limbaugh

Don't think media giving a true representation of Iraq
73% overall
90% Rep
55.6% Dem

So 73% believe there is media bias in general, 75% thought media bias influenced the outcome of the presidential election and 93% thought barry got more coverage.

Sure doesn't get a lot clearer than that or folks who need stats to point out the obvious.

Quote of the day: "Are you black enough to be part of all this?"

December 26, 2008

Morning Joe

Mika is introducing folks and Joe cut in and said John Ridley is here.

JOE: Sometimes he's got a beard - sometimes he doesn't have a beard.

MIKA: He always looks good, Joe.

Ridley smiling.

MIKA: He's always dressed nicely. And he's groomed. You outta take a lesson from him.

JOE: Why don't you just call him articulate. We're going into a territory, John Ridley, that we don't want to go...Mrs Biden.

RIDLEY: Storybook, man. We're looking back on the year - it's ok to bring that back up again.

Mika was referring to Joe's scruffiness and lack of grooming and manners and Joe morphed it into the Biden comments on Obama being clean and bright and articulate.

RIDLEY: Starting in 2009 that might be the question everyone asks: Are you black enough to be part of all this?

Note that Ridley was not a barry fan at the beginning.

[...]

JOE: What do you think we'll be talking about this time next year?

RIDLEY: What a fantastic job Barack Obama has done.

RIDLEY: You have Geraldine Ferraro saying he's just a lucky black man.

JOE: Can you admit one thing? Because Geraldine Ferraro was compared to David Duke for saying that in some ways his race helped him. A lot of people think race helped him...

RIDLEY: But you can also--you look at all the people who were at these rallies saying 'Kill Him'. I mean people yelling 'Kill him, he's a terrorist'.

JOE: Aw, c'mon, John

RIDLEY: Joe, what a second. Did that not happen, Joseph Scarborough?

JOE: Kill him?

RIDLEY: Joe, it happened.

No it absolutely did not.

And how did anything those folks might have said mattered? They were never going to vote for barry.

JOE: I guarantee you Barack Obama had no more people yelling kill him at a rally as I do every time I walk through a democratic rally. Shouting at me. Come on. That's such a cop out.

RIDLEY: Joe, it happened. Joseph.

No it absolutely did not.

Back and forth.

RIDLEY: Listen, just because George Bush got a shoe thrown at him at the end of the year - that means nothing, Joe Scarborough. For many of us race did not take a vacation turning this.

He's comparing an assault on the POTUS by an Arab in Iraq with comments that never happened. How would he feel if it was barry having shoes thrown at him? Would it mean absolutely nothing?

And what are the chances barry would have stayed hidden behind the podium? The Secret Service would have hauled him away...willingly.

HEILEMAN: There was no question it was a plus in driving African American turnout. That was a big deal in a number of states that Obama won that he would never have won without that happening. Places like North Carolina.

Black enough to be part of it?

Black voter turnout increased 2%. That is all. 2% and it went up 1% from 2000-2004. Eight million eligible black voters did not bother to register to vote for the first black POTUS. The black vote did not win barry the presidency. Helped in the primary with the race-baiting but that's it.

RIDLEY: I think Barack Obama will be the most American president we have ever had. From Hawaii, biracial, made himself in Chicago. Went back and became a community organizer and really ran for the people. He's the most American president.

Do they even hear themselves?

Parts of the US are not more patriotic than others?

Really ran for the people?

The most American president we have had is the most ridiculously arrogant comment of this election season...next to the black enough to be part of this.

What has he actually DONE? Absolutely nothing. And why are people expecting this will all of a sudden change?

When is he going to figure out that no one "makes" themselves in Chicago - they pay to get where they are and so did barry. It will eventually come out when Rezko starts talking and connects the dots between blago and barry because they're there.

And Ridley still thinks the "kill him" actually happened. It didn't. It was disproven by the Secret Service as "that's him" and the case in Pennsylvania was made up by the reporter. The Secret Service and other law enforcement had a large presence because of the previous comment and they were surprised to read about it in the paper the next day. And what happened to the reporter? His editor stood behind him. The paper endorsed barry.

It is absolutely reprehensible that barry has not yet set The American People correct. His false hearsay comments were made in the last debate. The last words from both candidates and barry accuses McCain/Palin of inciting crowds to yell death threats.

OBAMA: In which all the public reports indicated were shouting when my name came up things like: 'terrorist' and 'kill him'. and that your running mate didn't mention, didn't stop, didn't say 'Hold on a second, that's kind of out of line'.

"In which all the public reports" is irresponsible and as a lawyer he knows all about hearsay. It is very hard to yell hold on a second to something that was never heard because it was never said. The terrorist comments were directed at Ayers. And how many votes did that win barry?

You want the measure of the Man of Integrity and Transcender of Race and the Great Uniter?

Each of his opponents (plus Mr Bill) left the race racists when none of them started that way. He never spoke out against Rep Lewis' horrifying statements about Sen McCain. And he never apologized to Sen McCain or Gov Palin for lying on national TV to pander for votes.

I have a draft put together somewhere with all the evil things said about Senator Clinton during the campaign that barry never once stood up and objected to. I'll have to post it. Here's something Micheal Graham said about Sen Clinton in 2003:

Anyone listening to Hillary Rodham in her speech last week about patriotism, that screaming, screeching fingernail, I wanted to bludgeon her with a tire iron.

And the outrage?

It's called The Double Standard.

That is the race issue that is still not being discussed and I don't see barry giving a politically speech about it.

Senate Resolution: McCain "natural born" citizen

12-14-08

Senate Resolution: McCain "natural born" citizen

http://citizensagainstproobamamediabias.wordpress.com/

Truth. At last.

December 13, 2008

Chicago Tribune reporter, JOHN KASS:

He is merely a Chicago politician caught on tape.

Absolutely true. And that would be the tack of the story if barry wasn't involved.

Instead Blagojevich is crazy, bonkers, insane, delusional, a whack job...as a setup to rebut any comments made by him about barry. jonjon alter made sure to get it out there right away. The proobamedia like the good little obamerized cultists they are sheepled right along. Presently on the CNN feed there is one story and it's about Jesse Jackson, Jr.

If there were any lingering doubts as to whether pro-Obama media bias exists - they are proving it is alive and well. barry's daily pageantry filled say nothing and then answer pre-scripted softball questions press conferences took up the bulk of MSM coverage until Blagojevich. How many questions was barry asked? Four. Three on Blagojevich. Now Bush and the economy and the Detroit bailout has become an urgent topic dominating the news cycle.

Who are they kidding? Who needs a media study to be done to prove how little coverage it is getting - especially on NBC/MSNBC. What did Dateline do a bit on last night? Caylee Anthony.

And if it were Senator Clinton, John McCain or Gov Palin or anyone other than barry?

Comic relief from John McCain on Letterman

December 11, 2008

David Letterman Show

Sen McCain is back to his old self now that he doesn't have the RNC beating down on him. He talked about his campaign, Blagojevich, barry's Cabinet, Hillary Clinton and Caroline Kennedy.

courtesy of swordfishh22

LETTERMAN (1:55): Do you know this guy - the governor from Illinois?

MCCAIN on BLAGOJEVICH: He came to my office after he was elected governor and told me he was going to be a great reformer. I'm not making it up. he wanted to do how I had done in the senate with all the reforms. I really must have impressed the guy.

LETTERMAN: They say he's either stupid or nuts.

MCCAIN: Or a rare combination of both.

LETTERMAN on IL Senate seat (5:20): It goes to the highest bidder.

MCCAIN: It's not free but it's reasonable.

Joe the Sellout

December 10, 2008

Turns out he's just like any other person seeking their 15 seconds of shame. Joe the Plumber thinks it's ok to come out and trash Sen John McCain. This makes me very angry. Besides the fact that Sen McCain is a war hero - which no one can even begin to understand unless they were held captive and beaten and made a selfless choice to remain with his fellow Americans - and without Sen McCain he would not be criticizing him and making money off him. How much in taxes will he pay on his get rich scheme? He's just trying to make people buy his book. And he's trying to set himself up with Palin's wing of the Party.

He's supposedly pissed about Sen McCain's reasoning for the bailout. As if Sen McCain had much of a choice in that situation. He was chatting up misogynist Glenn Beck, who received not a single sanction for his cowardly comments about Sen Clinton: Does she shave? "It" cried. Seems Joe the Sellout is in good company.

JOHN SEWER, AP

Joe: I was angry. In fact, I wanted to get off the bus after I talked to him.

Then why in the hell didn't he? FAME and MONEY. He sold his soul - his words are meaningless. Here's the truth:

...he didn't say exactly what set him off, hinting that would be in his book that is due out this month. He said the only reason he didn't get off the McCain bandwagon was "because the thought of Barack Obama becoming president scares me even more."

And here's his motivation. Another cliche: infatuation.

He had only praise for her, calling Palin the real deal. "It disgusts me on how often they try to bash her just for her sincerity. She really wants to work for America.

And he's feeling the fading glow of the spotlight and wants more.

Didn't his music deal go through?

And if barry were to be proven ineligible?

December 5, 2008

For those wondering why barry wouldn't be considered a US citizen even if his mother had given birth to him in Kenya, Canada or anywhere else - as I understand it - the law in 1961 said that a child born to an American outside the US could be considered a US citizen as long as the parent resided in the US for five years after their 14th birthday. Barry's mother was 18 at the time of his birth and her age has never been contested.

I had no idea of all these laws and I'm not sure I have a full grasp of any of it. I thought a child born to an American citizen in any foreign country was an American citizen as long as one parent was a full legal US citizen. But a US citizen is not the same as native born (barry) or natural born. I personally doubt the Kenyan (or anywhere else) birth simply from a logistical and financial standpoint. Besides the fact Sr abandoned his pregnant tribal wife and their young child for a white woman from America...and then another.

And then there are his grandparents. I can't imagine a mother of an only child and a father who fought to defend his country's liberty would allow their grandchild to be born on foreign soil in the homeland of a man they had known for less than a year on a continent they had never visited. Especially if they were the typical white person racists barry has politically expediently made them out to be.

And as far as McCain, he was born to two American citizens on an American military base. Even though he was not physically born on US soil there is no doubt to his citizenship. It's the "natural born" citizen part.

Who is so blind they don't see all this? The angry bots mindlessly screaming it's a right wing conspiracy (even though McCain was part of Donofrio's suit) and it's those frigid Hillary feminazis and well you know everybody's a racist too.

How can so many Americans be so ignorant? Or at the very least uncurious? I get the German people now and the true power of propaganda.

Ask yourself - even if you believe it to be a massive racially-motivated conspiracy brought on bitter Hillaryites, the KKK, disgruntled Republicans and/or Independents or by "people who don't know what to do with their time" -- why hasn't barry just cleared Berg's lawsuit up by simply producing the vault copy?

behavior any other way. Because if he had produced it, and it was legal, there would never have been a Berg/Martin (et al) lawsuit and the DNC wouldn't still be spending money defending him. barry can't do anything about his British subjectness or his time in Indonesia when he may have surrendered his US citizenship. That's what I would pursue - it would explain barry's obvious hatred of his mother (and her race).

And take it a step further. If barry is not a natural born citizen and therefore ineligible to become president then he knew all along her was ineligible. He's a constitutional lawyer. He knew, his lawyer wife knew, his campaign knew, the DNC knew and at least one person in the MSM knew and not one of them did anything to stop the election.

If it were to be true, each one was complicit in the systematic trashing of barry's opponents. Unlawfully stealing the nomination from Sen Clinton (as well as the other democratic candidates), looking the other way when Chelsea Clinton was questioned about that woman, destroying the reputation of Gov Palin and exposing her teenage daughter to unbelievably cruel words and her husband to accusations of incest, dishonoring Sen McCain, who has served this nation for over 50 years - five of them being tortured in a POW camp - and allowing the former two-term democratic president - the last one to bring prosperity to the nation - to be called an array of things including crazy.

Pause and ponder what was done to Gov Palin's teenage daughter. Think of what she has had to go through, is still going through and will always be scarred by. Her entire life out there in cyberspace for her child to one day read. To read about how barrybots called his/her grandmother a hypocritical liar and a Caribou Barbie, who should have just aborted the DISABLED INFANT retard because it was a sign from God of her wicked ignorance. How they called his/her mother a whore and other things not worth repeating. How his/her was a product of incest. Al Franken should rot in hell.

And Trig himself?

Imagine if barry knew he was ineligible to be president and allowed it to continue. It's despicable in its own right - whether he is eligible or not - but his allowing it (Had barry said stop - it would have stopped.) to continue, knowing full well he was not qualified for the job, is a very special type of evil.

And what are Malia and Sasha going to feel when they read what their father allowed to be said about his opponent's children? Imagine if one of them were to become pregnant? How would barry want them treated? Mrs barry?

All three of barry's opponents were labeled racists and Senator McCain was compared to George Wallace, linking him to the evil bombing of a church and murder of four innocent girls. Something barry has never apologized for. Nor has he dispelled the ludicrous notion that Senator and President Clinton suddenly became racists after 30 years of public service and civil rights activism.

Any wonder why the non-obamerized are angry? Or why Senator Clinton - besides being her nature - fought to the end of the primaries?

Would this have been allowed to go uncovered and unresolved if it were about barry's opponents? Would there have been even a whiff of convention capitulation? Daily demands to get out? A behind closed doors out of the way of cameras Michigan delegate hijack? Are any Michiganders suing for voter theft?

Think of the national outrage if the obamahoax were to be true. Well-educated, well-informed folks who deal with politics everyday haven't heard of it and think it's a joke and a "silly waste of someone's time". How are regular citizens going to see it as anything other than a conspiracy to prevent a black man from being president? And every step of the way barry knew he could count on this, as did the DNC.

barry would be the only one to unequivocally admit that what he did was illegal and he did it forethought and malice and that is as likely as him ascending to heaven.

And the global ramifications? Do you want to live in that world? It is the main reason it will never be successfully challenged. At this point, it is a true national and international security issue. Something else barry counted on. His true genius as a politically expedient politician is being ignored, while he is compared to great presidents, having done absolutely nothing but raise a lot of cash, lie and allow his opponents to be thoroughly destroyed. Forget great president - he is not in any way a man of principle.

There was never a chance he wouldn't get the nomination and there is absolutely no chance that after 64 million voters voted for him he won't become president.

End of story.

Dear Pro-Obama Media Members:

Why is it you keep bringing up the potential unconstitutionality of Sen Clinton’s nomination as Secretary of State, while ignoring the controversy that is barry’s birth certificate and his eligibility to become president? The issue of Senator Clinton’s appointment has been circumvented several times. That is precedence = no problem unless, of course, you’re Senator Clinton.

You’re going to have to run her over to stop her and none of you venture far from your camouflage of cameras and computers.

And it’s not like you don’t know what’s going on MSNBC because NBC5 Chicago did a bit last night on the 10 o’clock news with Robert Schultz, founder of We the People Foundation. They had no choice because of WTP’s open letter to barry in the Dec 1st & 3rd editions of the Chicago Trib. Not to mention the upcoming conferencing by the Supreme Court on the 5th and the scheduled WTP press conference on the 8th.

Hello. The blogosphere exists in reality. In the real reality of the cosmos – not your preferred state of obamerism. None of us are going away – not even the “weird little sites” Blankley referred to. And barry's googleman can't mess up Donofrio's site anymore.

Senator Clinton hasn’t even reached the confirmation hearings. And don’t you know the minute you start going after Sen Clinton on something – turning it back on barry reveals the real problem. You’re obamerism has overtaken whatever sanity and/or ethics you once might have possessed.

As a (natural born) American citizen, I am outraged that propaganda like this is so widespread – but I am even more embarrassed at your adolescent behavior. An 8 y/o knows how to get something past their mother better than you do with The American People barry always talks about but never to.

CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin compared the issue of Sen Clinton with Sen McCain eligibility to be president--a moot point. What was really on his mind was the upcoming SCOTUS decision about barry's.

Do you realize the fact that you refuse to cover it just gives it more credence? Why hasn’t barry released his birth certificate to just get it over with? Not a single non-guilty person would persist and spend a half million dollars to block something that could have been debunked by $12. His being a British subject he can do nothing about.

Maybe on Monday you'll have a little something to say after WTP's press conference.

"Natural born citizen" defined

December 1, 2008

NATURAL BORN CITIZEN

Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution contains the clause:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Additionally, the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that:

[N]o person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." The grandfather provision of the Natural Born Citizen Clause thus covered the first several presidents and vice-presidents, who were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, but had been born as British citizens before the American Revolution.

The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides an additional source of constitutional doctrine stating that birth "in the United States" and subjection to U.S. jurisdiction at the time of birth, entitles one to citizenship:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States are subject to the Jurisdiction thereof, are Citizens of the United States and of the State in which they reside...

Section 8 of Article One of the United States Constitution confers on Congress the power "to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization..." This power has been construed to include defining the characteristics of a "natural born citizen", as well as the conditions of "naturalization". But, according to the U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual, "the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes. (The presidency)

Senators McCaskill and Leahey (and Obama) tried this through the 4-30-08 resolution:

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a "natural born Citizen" under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

Cox News Service EUNICE MOSCOSO

WHO IS A NATURAL BORN AMERICAN?

The Founding Fathers never defined what it means to be a natural-born American citizen. Federal law defines several instances in which a person qualifies. They include:

— Anyone born inside the United States.

— Any Indian, Eskimo Aleutian, or member of another aboriginal tribe born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the United States does not impair the person's right to tribal or other property.

— Anyone born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year.

— Anyone born outside the United States, as long as one parent is a U.S. citizen of the United States who lived in the United States for at least five years, with military or diplomatic service included in that time.

— Anyone found in the United States, under the age of 5, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21.

barry's admits on his website that he is a NATIVE born citizen:

The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.

Change! "redefined"

December 1, 2008

I don't know who still believes (or why anyone ever did) this Change! chant. He didn't lay it out until the Convention speech. The pick of Joe Biden should have given it away. He used it as a campaign slogan because what else had he? It took him a while but he finally has an answer to his recycling of Clinton people. He says the Change! will be coming from him. We know. It's all we've seen except it's called a "refining of position".

barry bragging about not being able to be held accountable for Iraq or Iran.

Dear Pro-Obama media members:

November 29, 2008

When are you going to stop trying to make everything barry does the -est ever? Yes. He raised the most amount of money ever but he did so because he lied about taking public finance. Though it's just a matter of time before all of his illegal foreign donations are exposed. And with all that money he got the same amount of votes as Sen Clinton - one can extrapolate what would have happened had they been on an equal financial footing. As it was, he outspent Sen Clinton by as much as 5-1 and per vote barry outspent McCain by $4.

Yes. His popular vote margin of victory was the largest for a non-incumbent presidential candidate but not the largest ever. Nor was his popular vote percentage. There wasn't the massive turnout you predicted. People were not voting in "record numbers". Record amount of blacks did not show up to vote. Only 2% more came out to vote for the first black president ever and the media has not done a story on what that says about Black America.

Yes. He used the internet in a novel way compared to the last election for a simple reason: Youtube and Facebook hadn't been invented yet. And Google is based in Chicago, which made it easy for Googleman to get involved.

Yes. He is picking his Cabinet quicker than anyone. It's because no president has ever had such problems facing him. In particular, the economy that can't wait another two months and now with India neither can national security and foreign diplomacy.

And yes. He has had the largest media assist in campaign history. That no longer has to be proven - by us or anyone else. But the constant comparison to previous presidents absolutely has to stop. barry has done absolutely nothing except name part of his Cabinet that cannot even make an impact until after he is inaugurated. So can you please please please stop the lovefest? Or at least wait until he's done something to deserve it?

barry's campaign strategy

November 19, 2008

I came across an article by BUD WHITE: "Misogyny was the central narrative of the Obama campaign". And that it was. But barry had a boost - he's biracial raised by a white family after his dad abandoned him. No that won't work - he's black and doesn't look like the dollar bills. A classic battle: Man vs woman. Inexperience vs experience. Yes, we can - I hope vs yes, we will - I've done it. A media darling vs THAT woman. But what it came down to was racism vs sexism and in the end racism vs ageism.

barry used sexism as his offense and racism as his defense. Perfectly clear to those not mired in Hillary hate and free of obamerism. He needed to race bait because he needed the black vote -- the sexism came naturally. Here is barry playing the aggrieved black man when he grew up in the most diverse state in the union where interracial marriage was legal. He lives a privileged life - yes - and gets and Ivy League education and lives in a 1.65 million dollar house. He runs for president and suddenly he is speaking for the Oppressed Southern Negro when he had never been in the south, never lived under segregation and is not descended from slavery -- his family held slaves.

This election proved racism trumps everything. Proved the existence of The Double Standard. All three of the self-proclaimed Transcender of Race's opponents (and Mr Bill) left the race racists when none of them entered that way. And the Grand Uniter and Agent of Change! has done nothing to disabuse that notion.

Congratulations, Mr 44th president, on your honorable public life. I look forward to more because that CHANGE! you speak fraudulently of needs to start with you.

Follow the link - it's worth the read.

Old home week: Father Pfleger

Father Pfleger in Wright and barry's church a month after wright's rant exhorting the congregants to support barry. The primaries were basically over. Nothing he said mattered - not that it would ever have. Remember that barry has known Pfleger longer than wright. Imagine if this were "Hillary's" pastor mocking barack? Sen McCain's pastor trashing on Mrs barry? Not happening. The Double Standard. How is this a More Perfect Union? Fellow Americas are being treated differently because of the color of their skin but it's ok because it's white skin.

Folks, do you not see this or don't you care?

Video courtesy of cancelledbysbc

Evan Thomas on the barry he still doesn't know (but can write about with authority)

November 15, 2008 (long post)

Here's Evan Thomas saying that he didn't feel the neediness of Obama on the campaign trail. Does it get any more unenlightened? Obamerism at it's most well-conditioned.

THOMAS: Obama is extraordinarily contained. Most candidates you can feel their neediness -- give me the love, give me the love." (Hands drawing to self. Me. Me. Me.)

barry already had it because you were providing it. What kind of journalistic skills does this man have? He clearly doesn't have any people or body language skills. I used to wonder about folks who get drawn into Nigerian internet and pyramid schemes and cults. Not any longer.

THOMAS: Not with Obama. (He puts his hands over his chest in a pulling in protective fashion. You're not worthy of me.) There was much more self-contained. That he's controlled. It's kind of manipulative and a little cold in a way. It was hard to penetrate his tremendous self-possession. (= EGO = Messiah Complex)

DARIN BRISCOE: ...There's a lot that remains mysterious about him to me. He's a very difficult person to know well....He had to learn, sorta on the fly, that any misstatement he makes anything that he says that could be misconstrued in a negative way was likely to be construed that way by someone.

Where? In their notebooks? And after almost two years spent with this man--every day--a lot is still mysterious to him? And yet those bitter bowling alley babes were to trust barry because they heard him saying nothing at a rally? None of the pro-obama media have a clue who barry is because they've crafted his persona for him. And they don't have a clue what he's gonna do because he's done nothing but string them along and they followed happily like little sheep.

THOMAS: He didn't give us a whole lot to work with ("more" hand motion) in a way, generalistically. Uhh, (head down, smacks lips = doubt), you know, what's that going to be like when he's president? Well...he'll stay cool...I think...(Doubtful face). Which is an admirable and necessary quality in presidents (Voice changes - trying to justify.) Presumably, his White House will be less chaotic than Bill Clinton's was. (Eyebrows up = facial shrug = Not sure and hoping he's right.)

He is still saying I think..presumably...after they have been following him and writing about him in glowing knowledgeable terms since the beginning. Who believes these people? He's starting to doubt himself. But it's too late. The damage has been done and they are going to be held accountable for what happens...more likely what doesn't happen.

THOMAS: The American People are gonna also want to see a human side to him. And they are willing to cut him a lot of slack in the election 'cuz he had this message of hope and because McCain wasn't so great and they wanted change.

Said dismissively - like I fell for it too. I think he has finally realized how he was played. Curious how he phrased that. McCain wasn't so good and so they voted for barry and are willing to give him a break because what other option have they?

THOMAS: But, uh, they're also gonna want to see a real human being inside of obama and he's gonna have to find ways to show that...I think. (Puts head down. Guilty he hasn't seen it.) Uh, and in somebody who's that self contained (shaking his head = he was fooled) it's really hard to know what they are thinking (still shaking) and where they're really going. And (deep frowning = personal worry) I think there's still some question about that. (Nods = certain ending)

Now he has questions and doubt? Will he ever feel remorse of guilt in his complicity in promoting pro-obama propaganda? He got barry the win and now he has to cover himself as a citizen and editor for what he doesn't know about barry. It's good to connect the face with the words. His face gives him away...as do howie's and jonjon's and barry's. barry's convinced that his obamerized masses will follow him no matter what he says and they have...still are. Those of us rational beings see right through his empty words and we are still waiting for you to see the light instead of a halo.

Igor the Ironworker vs Joe the Plumber

pix courtesy of firebox/pravda/lenin & voices.washingtonpost.com