POTUS Thanksgiving message (text)

November 26, 2009

Pardons “Courage” (video)

POTUS Thanksgiving message and weekly address all in one.

WASHINGTON – In the midst of these challenging times for our nation, President Barack Obama used his weekly address to express gratitude to America’s military men and women and their families, and give thanks for our nation’s many blessings. He also discussed the steps his administration is taking to repair the damaged economy, so that next Thanksgiving, Americans across the country can give thanks for a brighter and stronger economy.

The audio and video will be available at 6:00am Thursday, November 26, 2009 at www.whitehouse.gov.

Prepared Remarks of President Barack Obama
Weekly Address
Thursday, November 26, 2009

For centuries, in peace and in war, in prosperity and in adversity, Americans have paused at this time of year to gather with loved ones and give thanks for life’s blessings. This week, we carry on this distinctly American tradition. All across our country, folks are coming together to spend time with family, to catch up with old friends, to cook and enjoy a big dinner – and maybe to watch a little football in between.

As always, we give thanks for the kindness of loved ones, for the joys of the previous year, and for the pride we feel in our communities and country. We keep in our thoughts and prayers the many families marking this Thanksgiving with an empty seat – saved for a son or daughter, or husband or wife, stationed in harm’s way. And we say a special thanks for the sacrifices those men and women in uniform are making for our safety and freedom, and for all those Americans who enrich the lives of our communities through acts of kindness, generosity and service.

But as much as we all have to be thankful for, we also know that this year millions of Americans are facing very difficult economic times. Many have lost jobs in this recession – the worst in generations. Many more are struggling to afford health care premiums and house payments, let alone to save for an education or retirement. Too many are wondering if the dream of a middle class life – that American Dream – is slipping away. It’s the worry I hear from folks across the country; good, hard-working people doing the best they can for their families – but fearing that their best just isn’t good enough. These are not strangers. They are our family, our friends, and our neighbors. Their struggles must be our concern.

That’s why we passed the Recovery Act that cut taxes for 95 percent of working people and for small businesses – and that extended unemployment benefits and health coverage for millions of Americans who lost their jobs in this turmoil. That’s why we are reforming the health care system so that middle-class families have affordable insurance that cannot be denied because of a pre-existing condition or taken away because you happen to get sick. We’ve worked to stem the tide of foreclosures and to stop the decline in home values. We’re making it easier to save for retirement and more affordable to send a son or daughter to college.

The investments we have made and tough steps we have taken have helped break the back of the recession, and now our economy is finally growing again. But as I said when I took office, job recovery from this crisis would not come easily or quickly. Though the job losses we were experiencing earlier this year have slowed dramatically, we’re still not creating enough new jobs each month to make up for the ones we’re losing. And no matter what the economists say, for families and communities across the country, this recession will not end until we completely turn that tide.

So we’ve made progress. But we cannot rest – and my administration will not rest – until we have revived this economy and rebuilt it stronger than before; until we are creating jobs and opportunities for middle class families; until we have moved beyond the cycles of boom and bust – of reckless risk and speculation – that led us to so much crisis and pain these past few years.

Next week, I’ll be meeting with owners of large and small businesses, labor leaders, and non-for-profits from across the country, to talk about the additional steps we can take to help spur job creation. I will work with the Congress to enact them quickly. And it is my fervent hope – and my heartfelt expectation – that next Thanksgiving we will be able to celebrate the fact that many of those who have lost their jobs are back at work, and that as a nation we will have come through these difficult storms stronger and wiser and grateful to have reached a brighter day.

Thank you, God bless you, and from my family to yours, Happy Thanksgiving.

Tags: barry soetoro, citizens against proobama media bias, obamahoax, president obama, President Obama Thanksgiving address, President obama weekly address, proobamedia, thanksgiving

POTUS Thanksgiving message (text)

November 26, 2009

Pardons “Courage” (video)

POTUS Thanksgiving message and weekly address all in one.

WASHINGTON – In the midst of these challenging times for our nation, President Barack Obama used his weekly address to express gratitude to America’s military men and women and their families, and give thanks for our nation’s many blessings. He also discussed the steps his administration is taking to repair the damaged economy, so that next Thanksgiving, Americans across the country can give thanks for a brighter and stronger economy.

The audio and video will be available at 6:00am Thursday, November 26, 2009 at www.whitehouse.gov.

Prepared Remarks of President Barack Obama
Weekly Address
Thursday, November 26, 2009

For centuries, in peace and in war, in prosperity and in adversity, Americans have paused at this time of year to gather with loved ones and give thanks for life’s blessings. This week, we carry on this distinctly American tradition. All across our country, folks are coming together to spend time with family, to catch up with old friends, to cook and enjoy a big dinner – and maybe to watch a little football in between.

As always, we give thanks for the kindness of loved ones, for the joys of the previous year, and for the pride we feel in our communities and country. We keep in our thoughts and prayers the many families marking this Thanksgiving with an empty seat – saved for a son or daughter, or husband or wife, stationed in harm’s way. And we say a special thanks for the sacrifices those men and women in uniform are making for our safety and freedom, and for all those Americans who enrich the lives of our communities through acts of kindness, generosity and service.

But as much as we all have to be thankful for, we also know that this year millions of Americans are facing very difficult economic times. Many have lost jobs in this recession – the worst in generations. Many more are struggling to afford health care premiums and house payments, let alone to save for an education or retirement. Too many are wondering if the dream of a middle class life – that American Dream – is slipping away. It’s the worry I hear from folks across the country; good, hard-working people doing the best they can for their families – but fearing that their best just isn’t good enough. These are not strangers. They are our family, our friends, and our neighbors. Their struggles must be our concern.

That’s why we passed the Recovery Act that cut taxes for 95 percent of working people and for small businesses – and that extended unemployment benefits and health coverage for millions of Americans who lost their jobs in this turmoil. That’s why we are reforming the health care system so that middle-class families have affordable insurance that cannot be denied because of a pre-existing condition or taken away because you happen to get sick. We’ve worked to stem the tide of foreclosures and to stop the decline in home values. We’re making it easier to save for retirement and more affordable to send a son or daughter to college.

The investments we have made and tough steps we have taken have helped break the back of the recession, and now our economy is finally growing again. But as I said when I took office, job recovery from this crisis would not come easily or quickly. Though the job losses we were experiencing earlier this year have slowed dramatically, we’re still not creating enough new jobs each month to make up for the ones we’re losing. And no matter what the economists say, for families and communities across the country, this recession will not end until we completely turn that tide.

So we’ve made progress. But we cannot rest – and my administration will not rest – until we have revived this economy and rebuilt it stronger than before; until we are creating jobs and opportunities for middle class families; until we have moved beyond the cycles of boom and bust – of reckless risk and speculation – that led us to so much crisis and pain these past few years.

Next week, I’ll be meeting with owners of large and small businesses, labor leaders, and non-for-profits from across the country, to talk about the additional steps we can take to help spur job creation. I will work with the Congress to enact them quickly. And it is my fervent hope – and my heartfelt expectation – that next Thanksgiving we will be able to celebrate the fact that many of those who have lost their jobs are back at work, and that as a nation we will have come through these difficult storms stronger and wiser and grateful to have reached a brighter day.

Thank you, God bless you, and from my family to yours, Happy Thanksgiving.

Tags: barry soetoro, citizens against proobama media bias, obamahoax, president obama, President Obama Thanksgiving address, President obama weekly address, proobamedia, thanksgiving

Rep Scott Garrett confronted re: barry’s birth certificate (video)

November 23, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Unknown NJ lawyer questions Rep Scott Garrett (R-NJ) about the birth certificate issue. The lawyer took up so much time asking the question he let Garrett off the hook. A woman off camera says it’s time to move on to healthcare. Garrett said the courts were deciding the matter and when pushed he said:

There is no political solution to it even if the entire Republican Party was to–

And then he got cut off. He doesn’t seem to realize all it takes is one.

lonhosford

The video was produced by njcommonsense (tea party). On the site there’s a post by LON HOSFORD with this odd paragraph:

Does Obama Birth Documentation Measure Up?

There is Obama birth documentation indicating he was born in more than one place. This is not unexpected today due to the lack of confidence US citizenship proof in general. We come to accept that a person could have inconclusive or contradictory proof and get away with it. The birth certificate documentation you do see on the Internet will never measure up to what millions of Americans say they need for proof. This is a key item that helps make this issue persist. Americans detest unequal treatment. The intensity varies depending on what we see as unequal. It is strongest when it is about something integral to being an American such as citizenship.

Tags: barack obama birth certificate, barry soetoro,Congressman Scott Garrett, president obama,

Did barry admit he has no documentation to prove who his father was?

November 18, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

I ran across a few interesting lines in barry’s book “Dreams” when I was looking for his account of meeting his half-brother Mark, who he met up with in Beijing.

barry admits to going home to Hawaii the summer before he left for good, he mentions having a passport and of course his birth certificate and his reluctance to discover the particulars of his parent’s marriage.

He also talks about the Old Man’s (barry sr’s) inheritance and quotes his half-sister Auma saying: “ So of all the Old Man’s kids, Mark’s claim is the only one that’s uncontested” because his mother, Ruth “has all the necessary documents to prove who his father was“.

barry was eligible for the Old Man’s inheritance. So according to this, his mother did not have the necessary documents to prove barry sr was barry’s father.

So what name is on barry’s “vital records”?

barry sr wives:
1-Kezia – Auma
2-Ann – barry
3-Ruth – Mark

Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance
© Barack Obama 1995, 2004
Crown Publishing (Random House)

Excerpts from Google books.

barry’s fear of finding out the particulars of his parent’s marriage – along with the mention of his typical white person grandfather’s racism. barry has all these thoughts and yet he never once asks what they are truly thinking. Why? Because he would find that their true thoughts didn’t match his racial angst?

In fact how the marriage occurred remains a bit murky, a bill of particulars that I’ve never quite had the courage to explore.

Courage = truth.

His admission that he had a copy of his birth certificate.

(page 41)

Curious isn’t it? His father’s imperious manner and the editor may have been the reason why barry sr neglected to mention he had a wife and child in Hawaii. He also neglected to inquire about barry jr when Neil Abercrombie met up with sr in Africa: “To Abercrombie’s surprise, Obama never asked about his ex-wife or his son.”

So was he really barry’s father?

Funny how barry never mentioned barry sr’s [byline: Barak H. Obama] 8 page essay on Problems Facing Our Socialism.

And here, on return from Indonesia, barry says he’s an American and had a passport. He also writes that he returned from Indonesia the summer before he returned for good. Two more trips stamped on a passport somewhere.

And a curious remark by barry’s mother at his wedding that leaves one wondering what the other half was.

(page 440)

Upon meeting Ruth in Kenya, barry was asked about his last name:

Why didn’t he answer the question?

And what would he have answered?

This next excerpt is about the inheritance. It follows barry’s meeting with his half-brother Mark in Kenya. He was speaking with Auma and the quote is hers.

(page 345)

So of all the Old Man’s kids, Mark’s claim is the only one that’s uncontested.

Wouldn’t barry be one of those children who had a possible claim?

The answer is yes.

The one with everything?

Lawyers in Kenya know who barry sr’s children are…is barry one of them in the eyes of Kenyan law? Was he a Kenyan citizen at that time?

And what does Mark know about barry’s parentage?

He has already written his autobiography and reportedly shopping it around for a publisher. One wonders if he had to amend a few things about barry.

Tags: barack obama birth certificate, BARACK OBAMA SR, barry soetoro, Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance, Mark Okoth Obama Ndesandjo, obama relatives, president obama, Ruth Nidesand,

New style birth certificate billboard

November 20, 2009

Updated

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits
barry, refried beans and Sotomayor billboard

There’s a new billboard that has a little more info than WND’s “WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?”

This one features a grinning cartoon likeness of barry in a turban with “PRESIDENT or JIHAD?” written above it, a yellow box with red letters “BIRTH CERTIFICATE, PROVE IT!” and below that: “WAKE UP AMERICA! REMEMBER FT HOOD”.

MSNBC

It was commissioned by Phil Wolf, owner of Wolf Interstate Leasing and Sales, approximately 7 miles outside Denver. It was put together by artist David Lee, who said he heard plenty of honks while he was putting it up – it’s positioned so that it is visible Interstate 70, including Mr Wolf’s name and phone number.

The turban, of course, makes it racist, MoveOn is calling for a boycott of the dealership and by Monday Mr Wolf will have been arrested for refusing to remove it or villified by the barrymedia or attacked by the community or fined or whatever.

Unless barry gets a rebound in the polls because of it. Then they’ll keep it up. Olbermann started in last night, lumping Glenn Beck in with the birthers, when Beck came out a long time ago and said barry released his BIRTH CERTIFICATE and birthers are crazy and it would destroy the country if it were true.

According to AP/MSNBC, birthers are fringers, who claim barry was not in born the US and think the “BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a fake“.

What barry is pawning off as a “birth certificate” is a digital image that has been altered at least three times. And no high-tech forensic investigation is needed to prove it.

The key to barry is what’s not there…what’s not said…what’s missing.

In this case, there is no uninterrupted image of the back side of the CERTIFICATION of Live Birth. The seal (which also not pictured in its entirety) and the registrar’s signature have to seen in situ to confirm it is a certified copy. Until then, it is not an official anything and is a forgery until proven otherwise.

One could argue that it’s reasonable for him to refuse to release his original vital records – but it is not at all reasonable for him to refuse to provide images of that COLB from every possible angle and hard copies of it to any and all media outlets.

And if was derived from an official Hawaii certified copy of CERTIFICATION of Live Birth, there would never have been any lawsuits or birthers. Birthers exist because of barry. He can make them go away. Instead he’s paying his personal lawyer over $1.5 M to defend him in court 10 months after his botched oath.

June 2008, barry posted that digital image and people — who routinely ridicule and attack the “birther movement” – still have no idea what they’re talking about.

At this point, one wonders if they’re lazy, brainwashed or afraid of losing their job.

And this is what enrages birthers:

Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate along with birth notices from the two Honolulu newspapers were brought forward even before he took office. State officials in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that Obama was born in Honolulu.

1-No BIRTH CERTIFICATE has ever been produced.

2-The digital image on his website has not been connected in any way to what Dr Fukino saw.

3-Dr Fukino said only once – in her second statement – that barry was born in Hawaii. And then she promptly proved herself unreliable when she deemed him a natural born citizen.

Tags: "Where's the birth certificate?", barack obama birth certificate, barry soetoro, birth certificate billboard, phil wolf, president obama, , Wolf Interstate Leasing and Sales

Arianna Huffington: “Jon Klein fired Lou Dobbs from CNN”

November 21, 2009

Updated

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Who knows the truth.

I watched Lou Dobbs on Bill O’Reilly and there was no inkling he was fired. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t. But it seems a tad odd that a man who was fired walked away with a reported $8M. More curious is who provided the cash.

According to the NY Post, Dobbs left because of the birth certificate issue. Dobbs said the only thing that changed was the president.

Next on their list: Glenn Beck.

Arianna Huffington fearmongers with Olbermann about “fearmonger-in-chief” Glenn Beck. The whole conversation was rehearsed propaganda to get barry’s poll numbers back up and distract folks away from the healthcare bill. It’s getting so old. Especially the racism.

EIGHT MILLION eligible black voters didn’t even register to vote.

Are they racists?

Ms Huffington uses a decided them vs us “we” as if she has a team behind her. I guess that would be the Huffington Post. Wonder how Axelrod’s son is doing out in Colorado. No practical experience experience and he was “hired” as editor right out of college.

The full transcript is in the next post along with the video. Wanted to put this quote in a separate post.

Olbermann wonders if Beck would just disappear.

ARIANNA HUFFINGTON (4:40)

Well, I hope it‘s going to happen,

but it’s not going to happen without people pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

I mean, we saw how it worked with Lou Dobbs and John Klein.

You know, John Klein in the end fired Lou Dobbs from CNN.

Pressure makes a difference.

So, we all have a part to play here in pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

Yes comrade.

The way she spoke so matter-of-factly I’m starting to believe they think they are going to get away with everything.

Tags: arianna huffington, barrymedia, censorship, COUNTDOWN, fear-mongering, Glenn Beck fearmonger-in-chief,

Olbermann/Huffington: Glenn Beck, “fearmonger-in-chief”

November 20, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Herr Olbermann is a plain nasty human who spouts lies that no one calls him on. He’s after the birthers again with the same old tired racism. What does he know about racism and/or the birthers? He still thinks barry’s birth certificate was what was posted on barry’s website.

Arianna Huffington is the guest and the two of them talk about Beck’s fear-mongering by fear-mongering themselves. They both say “it’s frightening”. Remember how that was the campaign whine when his numbers dropped? First Secy Clinton and then Palin. It’s getting old.

Then they talk about how “various establishments” are going to have to stop Beck and stop Sen Grassley from giving out Beck’s book. And that if violence erupts – Beck, Ailes and Murdock will be morally liable.

When did she become God?

And why isn’t she saying that about the muslim murderer?

TRANSCRIPT

HERR OLBERMANN:

The ugly environment was not fostered overnight, but town hall opposition to health care reform and all those tea bagger rallies gave comfort to racism and even intonations of violence. The Birther movement was nothing more than extreme and desperate attempt to delegitimize a new president. And Congressman Joe Wilson‘s “you lie,” though a first should not have been a surprise.

Our third story on COUNTDOWN, a sweeping new report on anti-government rage in America not only connects the dots it refuses to let off the hook the most irresponsible voice in the mainstream media, the man it describes as the fearmonger-in-chief, Glenn Beck. Simply stated Beck creates an intersection between the mainstream and the extreme, according to the report by the Anti-Defamation League. It calls Beck, “The most important mainstream media figure who has repeatedly helped to stoke fires of anti-government anger…”

Beck has compared Obama to Adolf Hitler.

[Why is it he forgets how Pres Bush was portrayed as AH by his fellow liberals? And DL Hughley said the Rep Convention looked like Nazi Germany.]

One of Beck‘s guests claimed that Obama was trying to create a civilian national security force.

[barry said it himself in a stump. Watch for yourself.

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.

OLBERMANN: Beck once promoted the conspiracy that theory FEMA was building concentration camps to house dissidents, but he eventually backed away from it. But Beck has consistently posed Obama is “dangerous to America.” The United States, Beck say, “Is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism beyond your wildest imagination.”

Beck‘s obsession with so-called czars is one example, decrying a term proudly launched by the Republicans under Nixon and Reagan and not actually used by the current administration.

[What? barry's called them czars.]

OLBERMANN: Beck is just part of the ADL report which takes stock of the ugliest aspect of those town hall meetings and the tea bagger rallies, the birther movement and Joe Wilson‘s “you lie.” But the September 12^th rally in Washington, the report notes, featured the worst in racist, violent imagery since Obama was elected. That event, heavily promoted, of course, by Beck, a man who projects his own hate onto others.

[That's the pot calling the kettle black.]

OLBERMANN: It would be nice to think of Glenn Beck just as a joke, as fodder for this show and the “Daily Show” and others that point out how stupid some of this stuff is. But this report, you know, suggests something else, this is—fearmonger-in-chief term is frightening.

HUFFINGTON: It is frightening.

[Talk about fear-mongering.]

HUFFINGTON Well, I would say the fearmonger-in-chief title should still be reserved for Dick Cheney, even in retirement. But barring that, there is something that we need to really pay attention to with Glenn Beck. We cannot just dismiss him. Because the truth of the matter is that there is a good reason why we have an exemption to the free speech protection by the first amendment when we say you cannot shout fire in a crowded theater.

And he‘s doing that every night. He‘s basically using images of violence to bring together with all that he‘s accusing the Obama administration of, which varies from racism to communism, Nazism and everything else in between. So, all that has definitely an impact. I believe words matter, language matters and he‘s using it in incredibly irresponsible ways night after night.

OLBERMANN: What do you say to the argument that this country has always self corrected, that whether Father Coughlin on the radio in the ‘30s or Bo Carter (ph) who was a newscaster who presented literally stuff that was made up on the hour in CBS News in the ‘30s or the columnist Westbook Pegler or Senator Joe McCarthy? All these people a finale in which they exited the stage and suddenly. What is to say that that‘s not going to happen here?

[The internet and talk radio.]

HUFFINGTON: Well, I hope it‘s going to happen, but it‘s not going to happen without people pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing. I mean, we saw how it worked with Lou Dobbs and John Klein. You know, John Klein in the end, fired Lou Dobbs from CNN. Pressure makes a difference.

So, we all have a part to play here in pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

And even though he may not be legally liable if violence ensues from what he does, he‘s morally liable and so is Fox and Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes for keeping him on the air.

[And her and olbermann? They've been lying and riling people up since barry was campaigning. And they're talking about fearmongering even as they do it.]

OLBERMANN: Some of Beck‘s claims, according to the report from the ADL, let me quote it again, “play an important role in drawing people further out of the mainstream making them more receptive to extreme notions and conspiracy theories.” And without going into Sociology 101, isn‘t the point here that people like Beck enable some of the wildest, most paranoid notions about what the U.S. government is doing and instead of people thinking, as they think these things, for whatever they think them, no, that‘s crazy, he says, no you‘re not crazy, come with me down this path?

[A moment of truth. Of course, she makes no connection to the fact they're legitimately angry because of barry. That would be sacrilegious.]

HUFFINGTON: Yes. But, on top of it, Keith, what makes it possible for Glenn Beck to enable and even take advantage of what‘s happening is the fact that there‘s a lot of misery out there, there‘s a lot of legitimate anger. People are losing their jobs. They‘re losing their homes. Or they‘re afraid of losing their jobs or losing their homes, so it‘s in this climate of often legitimate rage that Glenn Beck comes in and provides scapegoats.

I mean, traditionally throughout history, these are the dangerous times. And that‘s why various establishments also need to become much more sensitive to what is happening out there and not leave it up to the Glenn Becks of the world to take advantage of what‘s happening.

[VARIOUS ESTABLISHMENTS?? Take advantage of what? barry's ineffectuality? And what is happening?

Of course, here's the old standby of race-baiting. Every single person who did not vote for barry is a racist. It's getting awfully tired - especially coming from old white men's mouth.]

OLBERMANN: Obviously, the new component to this is the race of the president. And a lot of this rage that we‘re discussing here is rooted in racism, something we certainly knew before the ad put out its analysis. But Beck tried unsuccessfully to turn that one in the other direction, claiming that Mr. Obama is the racist. Is that the twist by which he and the other actual racists are rationalizing their own prejudice simply project it on to the other people?

[He's projecting it onto every person who doesn't agree with barry. Everyone is a racist to him. And Huffington has become Mrs Freud.]

HUFFINGTON: It is a classic case of projection. But, even worse than Glenn Beck saying that is the fact that Rupert Murdoch endorsed it, all though then he took it away. Or to have people like Senator Chuck Grassley giving away books of Glenn Beck.

[Can't give away books? Do they even hear themselves? What's more frightening - state run media or freedom of speech? Even a convicted muslim murderer got access to barry's books.]

HUFFINGTON So, this is really what the ADL report is talking about, this sort of intersection between the mainstream and the extreme. There are always extremes. There are always paranoids who sound like Russell Crowe in “A Beautiful Mind,” you know, connecting everything and scaring everyone. But, it‘s when that becomes part of the mainstream that it becomes dangerous.

—–

Precisely what this rehearsed chat is doing. The entire conversation was fear-mongering to the leftists. One by one they’re trying to pick off non barryfans.

The question is who gave them their marching orders?

Tags: arianna huffington, barrymedia, Glenn Beck fearmonger-in-chief, CIVILIAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCE

Barnett/Keyes: Taitz’s Velamoor declaration

November 18, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

This is Taitz’s most recent declaration concerning her motion for reconsideration. In it she outlines the connection between barry, eligibility lawsuits, Robert Bauer, Perkins Coie, Siddarth Velamoor and Judge Carter.

Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration

Thanks to Jack Ryan.

View this document on Scribd

————

Tags: barnett v obama, barry soetoro, JUDGE DAVID O CARTER, perkins coie, president obama,

Barnett/Keyes: Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration

November 18, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

barry’s defense lists the rules for reconsideration and then declares:

Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration completely violates, procedurally and substantively, the above quoted Local Rule, and, accordingly, should be summarily denied.

Also: No conference of counsel or Notice of Motion to be filed.

Motion for reconsideration
Taitz’s Velamoor declaration

Thanks to Jack Ryan

View this document on Scribd

Tags: president obama, barry soetoro, JUDGE DAVID O CARTER, barnett v obama, roger west, Siddharth Velamoor, david DEJUTE

Axelrod re: Afghanistan & terrorists being tried in NYC

November 16, 2009

Are you aware that David Axelrod sits in the discussions about Afghanistan?

David Axelrod the WH’s resident lobbyist discussed Gitmo closure, Afghanistan decison and KSM being tried in NYC on State of the Union with John King (Lou Dobbs new replacement). Axelrod sets up Holder as the one responsible – barry was informed of the decision and the reasoning behind it. Axelrod admitted Gitmo won’t be closed completely, but wouldn’t give a deadline. He said they are going to “substantially meet the deadline”. barry said it would be closed. He ran on that and people voted for him because of it. Once the deadline passes – barry’s lies will be 100% complete and he will have been proven to be a complete fraud.

TRANSCRIPT

KING: Let’s begin with the controversial decision to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four other 9/11 alleged conspirators in the federal courts in New York City, just a short walk from the site of the twin towers collapsing….This is Jim Webb, Democratic senator from Virginia who says, “they do not belong in our country, they do not belong in our courts, and they do not belong in our prisons.”

Why, David Axelrod, did the administration decide to take this step?

AXELROD:

Well, I think for the same reason that Mayor Bloomberg and others felt strongly that we should. We believe that these folks should be tried in New York City, as you say, near where their heinous acts were conducted, in full view in our court system, which we believe in.

Translation: barry wants to make an impression on the world – 9-11 family members be damned. Just like 9-11 anniversary – neither POTUS or FLOTUS went to NYC and they named Sept 11 day of service – like it needed naming. No reason why Michelle couldn’t have been there. And who are the “others”? And the heinous acts were an act of terrorism that resulted in the deaths of 2974 innocent people.

AXELROD: We’ve had, you know, since 2001, have had 195 terrorism cases in the courts, and we’ve been successful 91 percent of the time. We’re very confident about these cases, and we believe this is the appropriate thing to do.

And what if this trial ends in that 9%?

They’re relying on the jury to convict and totally ignoring the judge and whether the confession will be allowed. In civil court, torture obtained confessions are inadmissible. Period. It will come down to whether a terrorist, who has no rights under the Geneva Convention, and who carried out an unprovoked on American soil was read his rights.

AXELROD: This is a judgment the attorney general made in concert with the secretary of defense. As you know, there were five other cases that were sent to military commissions, but we feel strongly that justice will be done here.

And frankly it’s been a long time in coming. A lot of these cases have been delayed for many, many years. And now, the people who suffered so much in that attack will get the justice they deserve.

Did he ask them what they wanted?

A daily reminder? Having to look at the murderers face in the papers and in TV and all over the internet?

KING: We will have later in the program the former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who of course was the mayor when the horrible tragedy of 9/11 took place. And he is among those who say, to him, this reflects returning to a pre-9/11 mentality of treating terrorism as a crime, not an act of war. How would you answer that?

AXELROD: You know, it is odd, because when the 20th 9/11 bomber was tried in Virginia, in a civilian court, and convicted, Mayor Giuliani testified in that case and he heralded the outcome. So he may have changed his view, but we haven’t changed ours.

It may have had something to do with the muslim murderer in Texas.

KING: You mentioned this was the attorney general’s decision. How involved was the president of the United States?

AXELROD: Well, the president was informed of the attorney general’s decision and his reasoning for the decision. This was a decision for the attorney general to make, in concert with the secretary of defense.

Translation: Doesn’t go well, it’s Holder’s head.

KING: It is a reminder bringing these terrorists to New York City for trial, alleged terrorists, a reminder of the controversy about Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. We are just now two months and one week away from this promise from the president of the United States.

KING: If you talk, David Axelrod, to top officials at the Pentagon, top officials at the building you work at, in the White House, they say now it is a near impossibility that that deadline will be kept. When will Gitmo be closed?

AXELROD: We believe we are going to substantially meet the deadline. We may not hit it on the date, but we will close Guantanamo. And we are making good progress toward doing that.

“Substantially”?

Open – close are absolutes and barry said one year.

KING: Any idea? Two months, four months, six months more?

AXELROD: I‘m not going to put a deadline on it, John. But we are going to get it done. We are moving toward getting it done in all the different dimensions that are necessary to get it done. The president believes it is important to get it done and to end this chapter in our history. And we are going to get it done.

Too late you already have a deadline. And again, barry’s words mean nothing.

KING: Part of this chapter in our history is the 9/11 attacks, which, of course, were hatched in Afghanistan. And the president is closer to making this big decision he has to make about how many troops. When he makes that decision, will he lay out for the American people not only the rationale for the decision he has made, but an exit strategy for Afghanistan? If you travel the country as I do all the time, people keep saying, eight years later, how long is it going to take? How much is it going to cost? How many lives will be lost? Will the president give us an exit strategy?

AXELROD: Well, I think that is a concern. And it is obviously one of the factors the president is thinking through. We have been there for eight years; it is a long, long time. And we have to keep focused on what our purpose was in the first place. Our purpose was to disrupt and dismantle and destroy Al Qaeda. That remains our purpose.

But obviously we can not make an open-ended commitment. And we want to do this in a way that maximizes our efforts against Al Qaeda, but within the framework of bringing out troops home at some point. And the president has made that clear in all these discussions. There has to be a framework to this decision.

But we are getting close. It has been a good process.

And how many Americans have been killed? How many undeployed soldiers killed themselves so they wouldn’t have to go? He’s not going to make his decision until after the new year.

KING: As you know, conservatives have been critical of the president’s policy review, saying, why is it taking so long? The former Massachusetts governor and Republican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney gave a speech this weekend in which he said, not only why is it taking so long for the president to decide, but he also said, why is David Axelrod, his top political adviser, involved in these deliberations? Let’s listen.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MIT ROMNEY, (R-MA,) FMR. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I find it incomprehensible and inexcusable that this president invites David Axelrod into national security meetings. Polls and politics have no place at that table. He is the commander in chief. What has he been doing? Do you realize he carried out more than 30 campaign visits in this last season, for various Democrats? While he can’t make up his mind on Afghanistan, or have enough time to meet with generals, he is out there campaigning.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: Let’s take them in order. Why does David Axelrod deserve a seat at that table? And why is it taking so long?

AXELROD: Well, first of all, let’s be clear. David Axelrod does not have a seat at that table. I have observed these discussions because, as I am today, I have to help communicate the message of the administration. And so it is helpful for me to hear. I have not said a word in any of those meetings.

Now let’s take the second part. Governor Romney has to choose one argument or another. Either he has to say he is not paying attention or he has to say he is taking too long because he has been involved in a rigorous review.

The president has had hours and hours and hours of meetings with his military commanders, with his national security team, to run through every aspect of this, in order to get it right. And we’ve seen in the past what happens when we don’t do that; when we don’t do the necessary preparations. And he is determined to get Afghanistan right. It is something that Secretary Gates supports. It is something that the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff supports. General McChrystal has been supportive of this process.

And, you know, I know that Governor Romney has never had responsibility for any decision akin to this, and so he just may not be familiar with all that it entails. But I think the American people are being well served by a process that is assiduous and in which every aspect of this is considered. Because, after all, lives of American servicemen are involved here. An enormous investment on the part of the American people. We ought to get it right.

He’s Philosopher in Chief not Commander in Chief. Gen McCrystal had to force barry’s hand. It’s clear what he wants.

And why is Axelrod cleared to “observe”?

Who else is in there?

Tags: 9-11 murderers, 9-11 terror attacks, barry soetoro, GUANTANAMO BAY CLOSURE, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, , president obama, september 11 attacks, state of the union,

Whoopi wrong again: barry’s bow

November 20, 2009

Whoopi Goldberg should study up on what she decides to yap about – especially when it comes to barry. Or rape. She thinks it’s “protocol” for the president of the United States to bow to 90 degrees and greet the emperor with the top of his head and at the same time treat the press corps to a view of his buttocks. Again. It’s a replay of King Saudi — although barry actually genuflected that time (video). And in the interim barry has refused to learn proper protocol. He prefers to show the world how clueless he is of international protocol, while Secy Clinton travels and conducts herself like a head of state.

Ms Goldberg: the emperor doesn’t bow to anyone.

Greeting Emperor, servant barry at your service.

Unfortunately this is the only video I could find. I would have like to hear the whole conversation and whether Ms Walters chimed in about what’s proper or just defended barry like she did with the Saudi bow.

WHOOPI: Dick! It’s called protocol. What’s wrong with you?

(Photo: ABC)

Tags: barry soetoro, Emperor Akihito, foreign relations, international relations, obeisance, president obama, state department protocol, subserviance,

Video of the day: Power of Iconography (barry logo)

November 19, 2009

Bill Whittle talking about the power of iconography. It is really worth your time to watch. Especially if you’re wondering why his cultists are so obamerized.

Whittle breaks down barry’s “packaging” and discusses the barrylogo and how it is gradually replacing the Presidential Seal and DNC logo. Probably because the barry presidential seal didn’t go over well.

PIX

WHITTLE:

The DNC is branding an ideology centered around the Cult of Personality.

What’s a Cult of Personality?

A cult of personality arises when a country’s leader uses mass media to create an idealized and heroic public image, often through unquestioning flattery and praise.

Sound familiar?

Simply put: cult followers are attracted to the packaging – not the content. Aka barry.

Whittle’s example: A thick grill-marked steak and baked potato on a plate vs pureed in a blender. Same ingredients.

The minions who called the NY Times to demand they change their depiction of barry’s pre-dawn mission (Dover) will find his example racist – just like everything else.

Wiki — Stalin is “often credited with possessing the most extensive personality cult of all time”.

There was no reference to barry in the article but it’s clear he has already outdone Stalin and the media has outdone both Pravda and Goebbels.

Daniel44125

I never knew what barry’s logo was supposed to “mean”. The NY Times did a Q & A with the designers of the logo (Nov 2008). Late 2006, Axelrod contacted Mode, a motion design studio in Chicago, who then approached graphic designer Sol Sender. Allegedly barry had nothing to do with it.

SOL SENDER:

We saw (and visualized as part of the creative process) buttons, billboards, ads, Web banners, T-shirts and hats. We did not foresee the scope of the variations and the personal “ownership” that emerged, though.

We handed the logo and design assets off to the campaign in the summer of 2007. From that point on, everything that you’ve seen was done by the campaign, including the “demographic” variations of the logo.

STEVEN HELLER: I have to ask, since many agencies that do political campaigns are simply “doing a job,” did you have strong feelings one way or the other for the Obama candidacy?

A: We were excited to work on the logo and energized by the prospect of Mr. Obama’s campaign. However, we didn’t pursue or develop the work because we were motivated exclusively by ideology.

And yet:

A: The design development was singularly inspired by the candidate’s message.

Q: What were you thinking when you conceived this idea?

A: When we received the assignment, we immediately read both of Senator Obama’s books. We were struck by the ideas of hope, change and a new perspective on red and blue (not red and blue states, but one country. [Should have been purple then.] There was also a strong sense, from the start, that his campaign represented something entirely new in American politics — “a new day,” so to speak.

Q: Did you have any qualms about this symbol? Did you ever think it was too “branded” and “slick”?

A: We didn’t, though there were certainly instances where we sensed a need to be careful about its application. We never saw the candidate as being “branded,” in the sense of having an identity superficially imposed on the campaign. The identity was for the campaign, not just for the candidate. And to the degree that the campaign spoke to millions of people, it may have become a symbol for something broader — some have termed it a movement, a symbol of hope.

Wonder what he thinks now and what he thought of nonbarry fans’ alterations.

Tags: egomaniac, president obama, barry soetoro, messianic complex, barry's presidential seal, mind control, iconography, cult of personallity, obama logo, bill whittle, sol sender, barrylogo

Barnett/Keyes v Obama: Motion for Reconsideration

November 10, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Hey Jacqi -

I added the Scribd copy of Taitz’s Declaration to the original post. Here’s the Motion to Reconsider that goes along with it. I haven’t finished reading it so I can’t comment.

Thanks to Jack Ryan

View this document on Scribd

Anita Dunn is done

November 10, 2009

Anita MTS Dunn is the latest to catch the bus out of town…from underneath it.

She is “stepping down” from her ‘interim” position and her deputy, Dan Pfeiffer will take over. She will return to Squier Knapp Dunn, the consulting firm where she is a partner and still carry on as “consultant to the White House on the communications and strategic matters”.

The spin is she went out and trashed FOX because she was just going to be interim communications director anyway.

Why do they even bother?

Bottom line: Dunn’s the first senior advisor to go and it sounds like Rahm Emanuel might be next.

Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s chief of staff and former Illinois Congressman, has made clear he would like to return to elected office at some point in the not-too-distant future and, if past presidencies are any guide there will be some further turnover in the senior staff over the next year or so.

Valerie Jarrett has gone back into hiding after the Olympic failure and David Axelrod has brought his lobbying firm to Washington.

Here’s a curious part about Dunn that I was not aware of.

Dunn worked for Blair Hull on his 2004 US Senate bid. She advised him not to mention anything about his 1998 contentious divorce from his wife, which included verbal and physical abuse. Three weeks before the March Primary, Hull’s divorce records were unsealed and there went Hull’s chances. Up until that time he was ahead in the polls.

And who did it open the door for?

Yep. barry.

So exactly who was the little commie lover it was just irony really working for?

And then in the general election, barry’s people got Republican opponent Jack Ryan’s divorce papers unsealed and again barry won by default.

The only fair election barry went into he got crushed 60-30 by Rep Bobby Rush.

Dr Fukino statements 1 & 2 (pdf copies)

July 29, 2009

Gloria4430

Here are the original pdfs of both Dr Fukino’s statements.

The rest of the documents you were interested in can be found by following the link above,

Statement 1

October 31, 2008

Statement 2

July 27, 2009

MSM’s outrage = birther recruitment

July 22, 2009

It’s so predictable it’s funny.

It’s so predictable they can’t possibly be aware they are doing it.

It’s so predictable the Independents the folks who voted barry in are starting to get the picture.

And who is causing the drop in barry’s numbers?

His own MSM minions.

They are still so obamerized they can’t see folks have had enough of barry himself appearing on TV. Why is it that even though nobody’s watching summer TV, the networks weren’t exactly jumping on covering THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES? Like FOX did not last time.

Why did the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES have to barter two days before his faux “press conference” aka staged questions for an earlier time to at least get CBS to agree to cover him?

Susan Boyle.

And for sure folks have had more, more, more than enough of the talking heads who say barry is God and actually bow to him.

How long is it going to take for them to get this?

There is a certain poetic justice to it, though. They propagandized and embargoed so that folks voted for him and now their propaganda and manic nastiness is turning them off.

Word to MSM: Folks are getting the fact that the COLB barry posted is not the real birth certificate. They are getting the fact that you lied to them and are continuing to do so. They are getting the fact that the “factcheckers” are sympathetic to the cause. They are getting that the factcheckers are changing their “facts”. They are getting that the lawsuits that have been brought were not dismissed because his birth certificate was deemed legal. And most importantly, they are getting that the lawsuits would have gone/would go away if barry produced/produces his birth certificate.

And that is what is drawing them in. Simple logic. Why doesn’t he just produce it? And they are beginning to wonder why the media is attacking instead of asking that simple question themselves.

This isn’t the same birther craziness. More and more folks are looking into it. Folks are reading old posts all the way back to before the election with Donofrio and Wrotnowski. Even the usual anti-birther bots aren’t out refuting every post.

Why?

Read the message boards.

See how many more posts like this are popping up: I voted for him…I think he is a citizen…I think those birthers are deranged…but I’m beginning to wonder why he hasn’t just released it. He needs to just release it and be done with it.

And the ones to worry about are the ones: I voted for him…I think he is a citizen…I think those birthers are deranged…but Obama has lied about a lot of things. Why did he lie that it was a birth certificate when it wasn’t? Why is he still lying about it? Why isn’t he releasing it so at least the military doesn’t have to worrry about it. He needs to just release it and be done with it.