Showing posts with label PTSD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PTSD. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Videos: Air Force 1 footage + fleeing observers

April 28, 2009

Here are a couple of videos documenting the flyover.

Air Force 1 with F-16 fighter jet companion

ErlangerTruth

Brian Williams news report with Mike Taibbi, Robert Gibbs, Mayor Bloomberg, Sen Schumer

kiuhy7

Gibbs laughs, puts his hands up and lies:

I don’t know.

If the White House aka barry didn’t know they would have put out an immediate statement or Gibbs would have at least been prepared.

Mayor Bloomberg, who found out about it on his Blackberry - just like thousands of other New Yorkers.

I’m annoyed — furious is a better word — that I wasn’t told.

Sen Schumer:

It really borders on being cruel or very, very stupid.

If full video press conference link below.

Cellphone video of New Yorkers fleeing. Listen to the panic in their voices and realize all barry had to say was 24 words. And not a single one of them was to these folks and the others who were terrorized because barry needed a photo op.

Jersey City, NJ
faavradmin
====================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??
White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)
barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover
Videos: Air Force 1 footage + fleeing observers

(4-27) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-28) Robert Gibbs re: Air Force 1 flyover
(4-29) Rudy Guiliani re: Air Force 1 flyover

barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover

April 29, 2009

Finally found barry’s comments on Air Force 1 flyover…all 24 words.

AP

BARRY: It was a mistake, as was stated.

In this week’s under the busser, Louis Caldera’s statement. [link below] barry qualifies it. He is not sorry. Where was his apology to New Yorkers? Him. The President. Who is responsible for Caldera?

It was something we found out about along with all of you.

BLINK BLINK BLINK = Lie

Looks forward to the camera after the lie.

It will not BLINK happen again.

Of course not - he got his photos.

POTUS wants us to believe he knew nothing about where Air Force 1 was. And he wants us to believe he knew nothing about a “classified mission’.

What does he know?

And why does the press not care that he (allegedly) did not know?

=================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??
White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)

WH: Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 over NYC

April 28, 2009

As of 2200, this is the only White House comment I can find on that outrageously cruel stunt yesterday. If it was a photo op - barry knew about it. If it was Air Force 1 - barry knew about it. If it was a “classifed mission” - he sure the hell had better of known about it.

White House website

Louis Caldera, Director White House Military Office, on Air Force One flight over New York

Last week, I approved a mission over New York. I take responsibility for that decision. While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it’s clear that the mission created confusion and disruption. I apologize and take responsibility for any distress that flight caused.

That’s it folks.

NYC residents: I’m sorry. It was wrong. Stand up and say so. Demand an answer directly from barry and don’t stop till you get it. You deserve to know why from the man responsible.

=============================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??
White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)
barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??

April 28, 2009

Then we’ve got a lot more problems than the economy and swine flu.

For the President of the United States, barry sure doesn’t know what’s happening. Now he wants us to believe he knew nothing about the flyovers in New York because it was a “classified mission”?

A classified mission and he knew nothing about it?

If that is true, it’s more frightening than him knowing and lying about it.

What other “classified missions” are taking place without his knowledge?

It’s one thing with the AIG budgets that were a done deal - but a plane flying that low and unexpectedly in New York City? He knew nothing?

Then how come no word came to him - no alert about what was happening?

If he knew nothing about it, he would have made an immediate statement. As is, he waited, like usual, to assess the fall out and then pretend he knew nothing.

Folks, this man is the President and you don’t mind that he says he doesn’t know about any of these things? That he doesn’t know about “classified missions”?

Do you really feel comfortable knowing that American airplanes - no matter Air Force One or otherwise - can fly over New York without the president’s ok?

What is the biggest fear of the citizens of New York?

What is the most traumatic scene - video, photo - for them?

What do many of them still see in their heads?

An airplane low in the skies heading at them.

And that’s what they saw yesterday, which I am sure for some - maybe even more than some - brought back those horrible day/nightmares. Something some - maybe more than some - had thought they had gotten past.

What if someone had panicked and jumped out the window?

What is the widowed spouse of a man murdered on 9-11 telling a their 8 y/o about mom’s reaction yesterday?

How many New Yorkers were unable to sleep last night? Unable to get out of bed this morning?

How many started drinking or using drugs again after that sight?

Overly dramatic statements, you say?

Just one New Yorker is too many and in absolute surety there is at least one.

And it happened on barry’s watch.

And he says he knew nothing about an alleged “classified mission”.

And people are giving hims a pass.

Again.

This is not ok folks. Most especially if he did not know about it - which I 100% doubt. But since he is saying that - he’s “furious” - he needs to be scrutinized. The issue has to be raised as to why he, the President, is not aware of what is happening below him. Why he doesn’t know low-flying planes are circling New York City.

The press love affair has got to stop. He needs to finally get that the buck stops with him and they need to be the ones to make sure of it. He needs to be held accountable.

What he allowed to happen yesterday was beyond ignorant - it was cruel and inhuman.

Would that have ever happened - classified or not - if Hillary Clinton were president?

Absolutely never.

Just go back over the things barry has done in the last three weeks and ask yourself if any single one of them would have happened with Hillary Clinton as president.

If I was a New Yorker, not only would I be pist, I would be frightened about the president’s underling’s ignorance and lack of awareness. And I would be frightened of the president’s “judgment” in either hiring them or okaying (yes he did) their actions.

And the folks in the New York area who approved it?

Does it seem reasonable to you that having lived through 9-11 and the aftermath firsthand - maybe even saw those planes fly live into the towers and witnessed the bodies flying 100 stories to the ground - that they would allow the planes to fly that low for anyone other than the president? Or at least without the 100% assurance that the order was approved by the president?

Absolutely not on this planet.

Can you tell if this is a photo from 9-11 or yesterday?

Witnesses reported seeing a plane circle over the Upper New York Bay near the Statue of Liberty.

And if you were standing on the ground looking up?

And if you were standing on the ground looking up, having stood in the same spot on 9-11?

(PIX)

========================

POTUS doesn’t know about low-flying planes in NYC??
White House Dir Military Office, Louis Caldera re: Air Force 1 flyover
Sen Schumer re: Air Force 1 flyover (video)
barry’s 24 words re: Air Force 1 flyover

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Quote to the day: "I think he's sexually attracted to me!"

October 26, 2008
Joy Behar was on Larry King discussing the election. She sure has made had a lot of press lately. Larry played a videotape from The View.

BEHAR: When he comes on the show, when he is backstage with us, he's a lot of fun. The John McCain that I'm seeing now is not the same guy that I see backstage. He's not!

HASSELBECK: He's a dignified figure in the Senate! Barack Obama is so far left.

BARBARA WALTERS: Elisabeth, do you ever, ever doubt anything about the Republicans? Do you ever doubt what you're saying -- what?

HASSELBECK: Sure. I've sat here and talked about Rush Limbaugh. I actually -- when Barack Obama gave his speech, and I've said this...

BEHAR: He's not a Republican.

BEHAR: He's a terrorist. Rush Limbaugh is a terrorist! You heard it here, ladies and gentlemen!

HASSELBECK: Barack Obama actually potentially could have had my vote after his speech at the DNC...

BEHAR: Oh, come on.
HASSELBECK: You don't believe me?
BEHAR: No, I don't.
HASSELBECK: Call me a liar then, Joy.
BEHAR: I don't think you're lying, I think you're delusional...
HASSELBECK: ... the first person to say -- I was not delusional!

Interesting. I wonder if Walters has ever doubted what barry's says. I bet she hasn't even looked at him with her once sharp professional journalist's eye. Now she's just in love. I remember her kissing the Dalai Lama not too long ago. He was amused. I wonder what goes on inside his mind. He has a permanent smile like devious child. Anyway Behar goes on about Palin, O'Reilly, McCain and PTSD.
BEHAR: Oh yes. I'd like to thank Sarah Palin for helping my career. And I'd like to thank Elisabeth Hasselbeck and all the Republicans that I can rub up against, you know. It helps a lot to have all of that fun and friction.

[Palin] has become a joke. let's tell the truth here, Larry. The woman is a joke. Look at Tina - you can see how hilarious she is. And all you have to do is quote the woman and reproduce what she says, and you've got a comedy bit.

So if they start to spotlight you and make fun of you, the comedians, that means that your campaign is a joke. That's why they can't do it to Obama so easily, because he's really not that funny. He's not a joke. There is nothing to make fun of with the guy. It's very hard.
This is called obamerism. The joke? All the obamerized masses, of which she is one, believe his every word. I find it very sad. Imagine what he will do to all the people who have put their hope in him? The world? And he ends up exposed a fraud? What are they going to do when the MSM can't hold back the truth anymore? Brian Williams and Tom Brokaw are a shame to the profession. They are as impartial as Behar and Walters except they are suposed to be real journalists...impartial and conveyers of the whole truth. They can't even begin to know who barry - nor do they care. Now she moves on to O'Reilly. See here for his appearance on The View.
BEHAR: I think O'Reilly is -- you know what, Larry? I think he's sexually attracted to me. That's all I have to say.
You know, I have to say something about this, seriously. Now I liked McCain. I always liked him. But before he was in the position of running, before he became the desperado that he is, he was a much more amiable guy. And you've got a glimpse of it on those Alfred Smith -- that Alfred Smith night. I thought he was very amiable that night and not so wacky, as he has been acting lately.

But has anybody asked -- now I'm a big girl -- a big therapy freak, OK? I believe in psychotherapy, the talking cure. This guy was in a -- in the Hanoi Hilton for five years. They broke his arms. They burnt him. They hurt him. Then he was in four or five plane crashes, I heard, too, right? Am I right about that?

KING: I think so, yes.

BEHAR: OK. He is -- he could be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, that he is now...
KING: All this time later?

BEHAR: What? Yes. Because it could be triggered. If it hasn't been treated in the initial incident, it could be triggered. And the election is making it -- I think it's triggering it off, especially when you're so behind in the polls.

The guy is getting upset. He keeps saying the same things, "my friends," "my friends," "my friends," "my friends." What is wrong with him? Why does he keep saying that? And who are these friends anyway?
[What about Ladies and Gentleman? or barry's The American People?]
BEHAR: "Joe the Plumber," "my friends," "I'm a maverick," I mean, all of these like buzzwords. He just keeps, you know, saying the same thing over and over again. That could be PTSD.

KING: Who is going to win the election, Dr. Behar?
(LAUGHTER) BEHAR: Well, I think that Obama will win. I'm hoping that he will win. I think that we need it very much. And I will do what I can to help him, as you may have noticed.

I don't usually do this. I don't usually come out strongly for a candidate. But this time I just feel strongly about it. I was strong about Hillary, too. But then when she didn't make it, then I threw my weight behind him. And I think it would be great for the country.
I don't recall her vocality for Senator Clinton, do you? She certainly has had no problem ridiculing her to help barry. And most definitely has been all over Mr Bill for not supporting obama when obama never bothered to call him. "He was busy."

Monday, January 14, 2008

Women in the military more likely to be raped than killed

January 14, 2009

While Kurdish women in Iraq are being held down and having their genitals mutilated without anesthesia, while young girls are being disfigured with acid for daring to go to school and while child marriages are sanctioned in Yemen, Saudi Arabia and throughout the Arab world, American woman continue to be killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But not all of them die.

Some come home broken, having had their bodies forcibly invaded and souls murdered. By rape. By their fellow countrymen.

Raped while they are defending our freedom.

Raped by their fellow soldiers, while others look the other way.

Raped by their superiors, who are supposed to protect them from harm.

Why the focus on "Don't ask, don't tell" and not on the epidemic of rape?

Rape cannot be blamed on war or explained away by conditions on the battlefield.

It's a heinous crime that has no cure or retribution. What gets stolen can never be given back or replaced. A hole remains that can never be healed.

Rape murders a woman's soul just as surely as a bullet.

Imagine you are a woman covering your buddy's back during the day only to be raped by him at night. Where could you go to seek help? Safety? Sanctuary?

Would you have the courage to speak up in a place where all you have are your fellow soldiers - many of whom know what is happening but do nothing to stop it?

Who could you tell? Would you think anyone would listen - let alone believe you?

And even if someone did - how would you get away from the immediate environment? From the rapist? From the shame?

I read this article, "Alarming Sex Assault Rate Found Among Vets" by CBS News national security correspondent DAVID MARTIN. It's more horrific than I imagined. But how can a man report on the full impact of rape in ways other than statistics?

He can't.

How many female soldiers feel safe enough to speak up (even after they've left the military)? And if they do, who treats them? A man?

MARTIN (highlight added):

Tuesday, researchers reported that an alarming number of female soldiers have sought treatment for sexual assault committed by fellow soldiers. A Veterans Administration study found that one in seven female veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan seeking medical care from the VA suffered sexual trauma - everything from harassment to rape.

Medical records of 125,000 war veterans, both men and women, showed 15 percent reported sexual trauma. That works out to nearly 2,600 veterans, almost all women. And that's just the tip of the iceberg, since the study covered only a fraction of the 870,000 veterans who have fought - and none still on active duty.

"I do feel that it is much higher than that, and if they could get the records of all the women that have returned that had been sexually assaulted, those afraid to come in, they would find that it's a lot higher," said Wanda Story.

Story, who was raped twice during her military service 20 years ago, now heads the United Female Veterans of America. She says the military has done a lot to improve the climate for women, but war makes it worse.

"They're out there, they're away from their families, they're away from their girlfriends, you know, their wives," she said. "They see an opportunity."

A recent survey by the Government Accountability Office of just 13 military bases found that 103 service members who say they've been sexually assaulted in the previous 12 months.Numbers like that produced this jaw-dropping statement by Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.:

"Women serving in the military today are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than to be killed by enemy fire in Iraq."

And women who suffer sexual trauma are more likely to develop medical and mental problems.

Studies show it ranks high - or higher - than combat as a cause of post-traumatic stress disorder.

And what is being done about it? What does she come home to? What does she say to her husband ? Her family? Her children? Her community?

Why should a woman, who volunteered to defend our freedom, come home with such shame when she did nothing but serve her country honorably?

Why should a man, who dishonored the Military Code of Ethics and broke the law while killing their fellow soldier's soul, come home to silence and face no punishment?

How many of you are right now thinking: It's their own fault...women shouldn't be allowed in the military...they're just faking it to get a free pass home...c'mon what do you expect guys to do?

Look inward and answer to your own conscience. Remember that rape is under reported in the regular population and much more so in the military. If moved, do something. Show some support in whatever way you can - if only being kind to the women you know.

Go to the United Female Veterans of America website. "Holding Aloft the Torch of Patriotism." They are a non-profit veterans organization founded in May 2006 "out of a necessity to bring women veterans together in a unified organization." Their dream?

That no veteran ever spends another day without a friend, a home, a family, a meal, a job, a healthy mind and body and a heartfelt thanks for their sacrifices for our country.

Is that too much to ask?

And why should they need to?