Showing posts with label Wright. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wright. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2009

Tarpley: "Obama is a world tragedy in the making"

April 5, 2009

Interview with Webster Tarpley, who is a historian and author. He’s written about the world economic crisis, terrorism, 911, George Bush 1, essays on history. Wrote two books about barry: Obama, The Postmodern Coup, The Making of a Manchurian Candidate. Second book: Unauthorized Biography of Obama.

DISCLAIMER: I have no personal knowledge of who he is or what he does or anything else. I am not promoting anything he says - I found it interesting and am providing it as information only.

There’s the videos and then a written interview below it.

“The Men Behind Obama”

Interview by DeepJournal in MAY 2008

Part 1

200nmo

Some of his words - He think Brzezinski is the main player in everything. And it doesn’t sound like it is a personal vendetta - bu I don’t know who he is.

barry is a servant of finance capital and can deliver Europe as a pawn as puppets as expendable assets.

Wars on a greater scale - Zbigniew Brzezinski says center of power in the world is in Moscow and Beijing and he’s determined to smash Russia and China in order to let the US/UK world domination for the UK/USA next 100 years. He wants to use Iran against Russia. Make a deal with Syria against Russia.

People in Europe had better wake up because that silly romantic illusion they have about Obama is going to be suicidal for them if they don’t understand this.

Puppet of finance capitol of the David Rockfeller and George Soros impoverishment of the US. [two of barry's staunch supporters]

Theirs is extreme austerity.

Plan to have a global showdown with Russia and China so they need left cover.

Puppet of the worst circles of imperialism.

Left wing demagogue who promises hope and change

This is what he wants to know: [they are not my thoughts]

Did he sign up for the Selective Service? [possible forgery]
Is he HIV positive? [He and Michelle had their blood drawn in Africa - but as far as I know the results were not made known if it was even tested. He has refused to release his medical records.]
Bisexual?
Does he have a criminal record?
Does he smoke crack cocaine?

He says nothing about the birth certificate issue, which is very interesting as he questions so many other things.

PART 2

Goal to destroy Pakistan. Iraq cut up into 3 parts. Pakistan cut up into 4-5 parts. Because it is a potential ally to China. Iran is a candidate to be played against China. [Darfur has 7% oil supply to China] Obama doesn’t even know where Pakistan is.

Last summer a conference in Chicago - barry said he wants to have unilateral bombing of NW Pakistan. US is bombing there.

Would Japan be a staging area for China - no. Tawain no.

[Interestingly - as born out in their behavior] Tarpley says that Bush and Chaney are not even lame ducks. They’re there for show.

Power passed to the principles committee Rice, Gates, Paulson, Admiral Mullen. Policies are from Brzezinski - no attack on Iran. Make a deal with North Korea. Chaney was horrified that was done by Rice. Attack Pakistan, Darfur, Zimbabwe, Burma - under humanitarian considerations.

Interview with Daan de Wit of DeepJournal May 16, 2008.

There are alot of typos and European spelling of words that I did not correct.

Discussing the Kentucky and West Virgina Primaries.

TARPLEY: The US Intelligence Community penetrates the news organisations like mad and most of these organisations are now owned by the same bankers who want to put Obama in a kind of dictator.

Q: I have always wondered, where do these candidates for presidents come from? Is there a grooming process? You actually say Obama has been recruted by Zbigniew Brzezinski as a student on Columbia University?

TARPLEY: Yes. This is the interesting about Obama’s biography, that he has these lost years and the lost years where nobody knows anything about what he was doing, we’re not even sure where he was. 1981, 1982, 1983 his last two years in college. He was a Junior and a Senior at Columbia University, actually Columbia College at Columbia University in uptown Manhattan, Morningside Heights. He had started his career at Occidental College near Los Angeles after going to a very expensive private school in Hawaii, the Punahou School. If you go back to 1981, 1982 - you can do this with the help of Samuel Huntington’s Book on American politics, which I quote in my own book, which is called Obama, The Postmodern Coup, the Making of a Manchurian Candidate. If you look in here you will see that they were already sort of summing up their experiences under Carter and they were looking ahead. Huntington is explicitly looking ahead to 2010 and 2030, in other words he believes that there’s gonna be a crisis of ungovernability, what he called the ‘creedal passion period’. Political upsurge and economic breakdown perhaps. All of this starting around 2010, which is now where we are, we have reached that point.

[Also note that Bill Ayers lived within a mile of Columbia when barry was there.]

TARPLEY: My guess is that Obama was recruted by Brzezinski at Columbia 1981, 1982, 1983. You cannot notice this positively, because Obama in his memoires, he has got this thing called Dreams from my Father, he tells you everything about himself, he tells you about marihuana, cocaine, almost heroine, but not quite, tells you all this stuff, but when it comes to Columbia University he tells you nothing. It’s exactly puzzling, because why would he tell you about marihuana and cocaine, which are bad and than not tell you about his career, with this wonderful Ivy League prestigious elite Columbia University, he doesn’t say anything about it.

The same thing is what The New York Times found. The New York Times, trying to do the life of Obama, they focused on his years in New York City, because they’re from New York and they couldn’t find anything. They couldn’t find out what courses he took, who his friends were, anything that he did, he doesn’t seem to be in the yearbook, it’s all very strange. Chicago Tribune which is very, very favourable to Obama did the same thing, could not find anything about those years at Columbia.

Now they’re two possibilities. One is that he’s hiding homosexual activity. Obama, I think, is pretty well established to be a bi-sexual, he’s accused by Larry Sinclair of homosexual encounters with crack-cocaine. We can talk about that in a minute. But I think the deeper level is what he’s covering up in terms of his contacts with Brzezinski.

Obama was a politic’s major with his speciality in international relations and a thesis topic that was Soviet nuclear disarmament. Now that has Brzezinski written all over it. In those years Brzezinski was on the campus at Columbia, he was the head of the Institute of Communist Affairs, an anti Soviet thinktank. It seems to me extremely likely that he was recruted by Brzezinski at that point. Meaning that he has been indoctrinated for 25 years.

If this is not true, I would invite Obama to tell us the full story of his years at Columbia and he has said zero. No friends, no professors, no transcript, no nothing. It is the biggest obsessive secrecy that we’ve seen. It’s comparible to, you know Bush has tried to hide his drunk driving record. In this case Obama won’t let you know what he did at Columbia. He should be saying, ‘Oh I’m proud, I was an A-student, I wrote this wonderful thing’, the highlight of his early career was to go to Columbia. So, he doesn’t do that. What this means then is: 25 years of indoctrination and grooming. With Carter they only had 5 or 6 years at most. They’re from 1970, 1971, 1972 until 1976 when he won the presidency. In the case of Obama I think you’re looking at a 25 year process where they were guiding his career.

He didn’t graduate with honors from Columbia and he took several years off before he got into Harvard - so how did he get in? Was it just the little boxes or was there a word put in?

He talks about Austin Gooslbee barry’s NAFTA economist who told Canada not to worry. Then about how the Intelligence community is barry’s best buddies. Would explain why no one cares about the birth certificate issue. The entire US Intelligence knows exactly where barry was born, where he has visited and what citizenship he has - they have his passport and school and medical records and they know if he was in the church when that racist anti-American was spewing evil and they have not said anything.

TARPLEY: I don’t have a crystal ball, but it is very interesting that all these left liberals, basically all the names you have mentioned, are the left wing of the U.S. intelligence community, or at least some of them. Hersh certainly is, some of them represent a kind of right wing of the U.S. intelligence community. But Obama is the candidate of the U.S. intelligence community in toto. If you don’t believe that, just turn on an American television station and you will see what is going on. So, I would believe that the scenario has fundamentally changed and that people are having a very hard time grasping this. We have got to radically shift our field. What you have seen going on now for the past 18 months to two years is that the field has been shifting. Tony Blair is gone; most of the top neocons have now left the government. They are trying to cash in in the private sector. And you know, you have a whole new crew coming in which are these Brzezinsky types. The Samantha Power-Brzezinsky types, the Soros people, the color revolutions crew, the people power coup crew, and they are on their way in. And that means that the face of U.S. imperialism is indeed getting a facelift.

His thoughts on Brzezinski. I have no idea who Tarpley is - I’ve just read and listened to this and neither endorse nor defend his words - this is just information. But I will say in all the times I have watched Brzezinski on Morning Joe, I have wondered what side he is on. I don’t know his personal history in Poland or what the Russians might have done to his family but he sure hates Russia and is sympathetic of sorts to Syria, Iran.,and Iraq - the Arab world in general. Just observations with absolutely nothing to back them up. He just comes off as very skin-crawly is the best I can say. And frighteningly menacing. I’ve written about it before. Tarpley puts Brzezinski as the head mover in all this, which is hard to imagine, but then again all of this is - except for the fact that barry is hiding a great deal and the Intelligence community doesn’t care to share it with The American People.

In fact, I wish I had not run into this - but since this website is set up to question the proobama media bias this certainly qualifies. Wonder what government agencies it will bring to our doorstep. They already know all about me because Marine One has flown directly over my house (two different times) on the way to O’hare with Bush inside. I happened to be in the yard and I have to say it was totally surreal to see that helicopter in person - it’s more brown than green - flanked by weaponized helicopters. They were not flying very high and were a lot quieter than I would have thought. barry goes south, so there’s no chance of seeing him unless he goes somewhere north.

Anyway. This is just information - with no underlying agenda or endorsement. In the back of my mind, I can still hear President Clinton saying with an interesting face that after the Inauguration he was going to sit down and reveal what is really going on. And then his wife was appointed Secretary of State, leaving him essentially muted for the sake of her job.

TARPLEY: Brzezinsky’s hatred of Russia is now this: Brzezinsky looks at the neocons and he says to the neocons: ‘You bunglers’. Brzezinsky and Samuel Huntington, his right hand man, says: ‘We gave you the clash of civilizations as an idea’ and he says: ‘What you should have done is to play these different countries one against the other. The essence of imperialism is you don’t attack Iraq, you play Iran against Iraq. You don’t attack Venezuela, you play Colombia against Venezuela. You don’t attack Somalia, you play Ethiopia against Somalia’. ‘And ultimately you don’t attack Russia ‘ he says, ‘You play China against Russia, or some variation of that’. So the strategy that Brzezinsky has is to say first of all: ‘There should be no attack on Iran. There should rather be an effort to turn Iran against the Russians’. And this is realistic, based on the fact that there is a large degree of anti-Russian resentment in the Iranian population. He would also say: ‘You can probably turn Syria against Russia at the same time’.

Brzezinski did visit Syria and is sympathetic to them. Nancy Pelosi went as well and barry’s best bud - who tried to recruit him right out of Harvard - Tony Rezko - is from Syria. Not buying into conspiracy - merely facts.

TARPLEY: But now the heart of Brzezinsky strategy is this. Brzezinsky looks at China. And he says: ‘China can be manipulated through their raw material and oil dependency on Africa, and in particular Sudan. We know that now Sudan is supplying 7, 8% maybe of China ’s oil needs, petroleum, in general. Brzezinsky would say: ‘What you have to do first of all is kick the Chinese out of Africa. That is why Bush went to Africa, that is why the U.S, is creating a new Africom, U.S. African command, probably in Ethiopia. That is why you have Al Qaeda in Algeria, Tunesia and Morocco to help this destabilization. You’ve got the campaign against Mugabe. You got a quasi civil war in Kenya , you’ve got destabilization in Chad, and most of all you’ve got this attempted coup now. In the last couple of days there was an attempted bloody coup in Khartoum, Sudan undoubtedly piloted by these Brzezinsky forces.

So the first step of this is to use Obama as the facelift of U.S. imperialism; a new face for U.S. imperialism in Africa specifically, to kick out the Chinese. At the same time you’ve got a campaign to destroy Pakistan as a state, as a nation. And that is being done through bombing now, demanded by Obama, and now going on; a bombing of so-called Al Qaeda bases in northern Pakistan. It is a very interesting story.

Q: You call Obama a Manchurian candidate, a sort of mind controlled man. Why do you do that?

TARPLEY: First of all Obama is the most synthetic. He is the most prepared, indoctrinated, and I would indeed say brainwashed candidate that we’ve had. Obama himself is nothing. He has no legislative record, he has no accomplishments, no commitment, no loyalties. He is essentially an empty slate on which people are invited to project what they think.

His pedigree is first of all the Ford Foundation. The Ford Foundation is of course the institution which more than any other, tries to maintain the existing social order in the United States , which is to say: The dominance over this society by Wall Street, by financier oligarchs and the super rich. So his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham - he had a mother named Stanley which is interesting in itself – his mother was a pro-communist who worked for the Ford Foundation. She was part of the gender equality program of the Ford Foundation. She also worked then for the Word Bank and the US Agency for International Development.

Obama himself has worked for the Gamaliel Foundation. This is a counter insurgency operation. It is the Saul Alinsky community organizing foundation of Chicago and the Gamaliel Foundation is a satellite of the Ford Foundation. And the idea with them is organizing community control projects, autogestion, local control on a very very local basis , always with the idea of pitting white against black, against Hispanic, against Asian, against Korean or Chinese or whatever it is, always keeping the population fragmented. On the lowest possible level, very parochial, very local and not allowing therefore a challenge to Wall Street to emerge.

He is also associated, this Obama, with the Woods Fund. And here he sat next to Bill Ayres, the Weatherman terrorist bomber, a professed an unrepented terrorist, an odious personality who I had a chance to observe in the late 1960s inside Students for a Democratic Society. Ayres is somebody who has also promoted Obama’s carrier. Ayres hired Obama to become president of the board of the Edinburg [ANNENBERG] – Chicago Challenge, which is yet another foundation funded effort at social engineering and racial conflict inside the Chicago school system. So we’ve also got the fact that Obama attends a church the pastor of which is now a Ford Foundation scholar, a guy who got his college education thanks to the Ford Foundation, and that is the Trinity United Church of Christ. You must have seen things about this.

Q: But is it fair to go that far to portray a man? \

TARPLEY: You have to because you’re dealing with somebody… This is a man who wants to get his hands on the thermo-nuclear button. How in God’s name can you allow access to the thermo-nuclear button by someone of whom you know basically absolutely nothing? Someone who consorts with terrorists, who consorts with gangsters like the Mafioso Rezko, and his backer Auchi, when reaching now into the Iraq world of organized crime, the Iraq - Syria mafia with this character Auchi. The only way to know anything about Obama is to look at his advisors and to look at these people around him. And the overwhelming thing you see around him is what I would call ‘left CIA’. And let me just try to explain this.

[...]

TARPLEY: Now, the obvious courses are first of all, a global warming tax, a carbon tax, that will further cut into the standard of living, then probably a Third World solidarity tax. So with Obama they are going to say: “We’re gonna teach you now into savage austerity, killer austerity, in the name of the polar bears, the ice cap and the Third World.” Now the trick of course is that none of this money will go for the polar bears, the ice cap and the Third World. It will go into the pockets of David Rockefeller, George Soros and other Wall Street thugs, who are running Obama.

Because that is what Obama is today, you can look at the cast of characters. It’s pretty much the same as Carter: He’s got Zbigniew Brzezinski and Mark Brzezinski, that is to say Zbigniew’s son who now is on the scene. Zbigniew Brzezinski is the guru of the entire campaign, although efforts are being made to conceal this fact. Brzezinski has put forward the entire profile, the austerity, the globalization and this question of the final showdown with Moscow.

About rev Wright:

TARPLEY: I just want to add in terms of that church: This Jeremiah Wright is of course a racist provocateur, working in the framework of something called ‘Black Liberation Theology’. It’s a synthetic religion created by the Union Theologian Seminary in New York and then spread with the help of the Ford Foundation, in order to do what? In order to perpetuate racial conflict. The model of the Ford Foundation is divide and conquer. Play white against black in every conceivable way to prevent the emergence of a class based challenge to Wall Street. And what they’ve done is take this into the realm of theology and church affairs, knowing the importance of churches in the black community and in the United States.

Where has he been hiding? And after all his years of spouting he ended up selling out anyway.

Again this post in no way endorses any comments made by Webster Tarpley. This is provided as information only.

Friday, January 9, 2009

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Interview with new barry replacement appointee, Roland Burris

December 30, 2008

NBC 5 News Chicago = Roland Burris interview with Alex Perez.

PEREZ: Do you understand the controversy behind your appointment?

BURRIS: I separate it. The governor has his problem. I understand it. Perhaps he has some serious problems. That has nothing to do with Roland Burris. I have no problem with going to US Senate and doing a job for the people - not only of Illinois - right now the nations needs someone with Roland Burris' talent and skills.

PEREZ: Sen Dick Durbin already said that all 50 senators have said that they would not seat the appointment made by Governor Blagojevich. When you hear that...what do you say?

BURRIS: I will say to them - and I think they better check the law -that what the governor has done is constitutional [smile]and legal. I respect the president [elect] but he does not have the authority.[smile]

PEREZ: What about the allegations against Blagojevich? You can't ignore them.

BURRIS: I can ignore them. Why not? They don't impact me. He has to get whatever is coming to him from the court of law and not from...public opinion.

PEREZ: So how hard is it going to make your job if walking into it says we don't want you Mr Burris?

BURRIS: That's their problem. [Smiling] That's not my problem.

Haha. Why not? He's gets a lot of publicity and has nothing to lose. I wonder what he thinks about barry and the fact that barry never paid his dues while taking credit for legislation he did not work for - Ricky Hendon's videotaped interrogation law comes to mind. And I wonder how Burris felt about barry throwing Revs Wright and Jackson under the bus. And Bobby Rush has never exactly been a fan of barry's.

Burris is a veteran politician who knows how to play the angles and still look like sweet grandpops. Not so for Emil Jones, who was still in hot rod's corner last week. I wonder if he still is behind him now that Burris got the appointment...

Monday, December 29, 2008

That was not the Rod Blagojevich I knew...

"This is not the Blago I knew" claims  poker-faced Obama

Courtesy of obamawtf

That is not the Blagojevich I knew.

That was not the Jeremiah Wright I knew...

That was not the Bill Ayers I knew...

That was not the Father Pfleger I knew...

That was not the Tony Rezko I knew...

He's known Wright, Rezko and Pfleger for over 20 years.

He has known Bill Ayers for at least ten years.

He worked with Gov Blagojevich in a professional manner ans Rezko served as primary fundraiser to both.

So where is this superior judgment? One little politically expedient speech in 2002 outweighs the lack of judgment in his decades-long personal and professional acquaintances?

What is it going to take?

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Dear Pro-Obama Media Members:

Where are your interviews with barry's close friends from school? From childhood? From before Chicago?

Who are the people barry has known the longest in his life?

Rev Wright, Father Pfleger and Tony Rezko.

And why is it you think they are not relevant?

Friday, November 21, 2008

barry love al qaeda style

November 21, 2008

Smurf ayman al-zahari goes after barry. How dense are these people? They could have at least waited till barry actually DID something…though they may have to wait a very long time for that. He’s in seclusion while the market drops 400 points, the auto industry is uncertain and his minions are chirping like hungry angry birdbots about Senator Clinton. This man is weaker than I thought. So weak his own people are leaking to make him DO something.

Highlights of al-zahari's message:
Be aware that the dogs of Afghanistan have found the flesh of your soldiers to be delicious, so send thousands after thousands to them.
That's pure savagery. They've not gotten out of the stone age.
...And in you and in Colin Powell, Rice and your likes, the words of Malcolm X concerning “House Negroes” are confirmed. [translation: house slaves]
Why was he talking about Malcolm X – the originator of the “chickens coming home to roost”? Shout out to Farrakhan? Has farrakhan ever come out against al Qaeda? Malik Shabazz who used to work for Farrakhan is the head of the New Black Panther Party - whose endorsement was on barry's official website. They were wright's bodyguards at the Press Club. Shabazz went off on barry on FOX radio right after barry trashed wright. And on live TV he called Michell Malkin a whore. Upstanding man.
My final message it is to the American people. I tell it: you incurred defeat and losses by the foolish actions of Bush and his gang, and at the same time, bin Laden sent you a message to withdraw from the lands of the Muslim and refrain from stealing their treasures and interfering with their affairs. So choose for yourselves whatever you like, and bear the consequences of your choice, and as you judge, you will be judged.
This says to me that bin laden is dead. He said bid laden SENT past tense a message -- not bin laden IS watching or WILL BE sending more messages. He’s gotta be dead. Praise Allah.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Who is the real barack obama?


Can you see why he was pist Governor Palin came on the scene? Newsweek sunk to an even lower low (which I didn't think possible after jonjon's DISABLED INFANT comment) with Governor Palin's cover. Why didn't they just use a magic marker and make a devil tail and scrawl on her locker that she's dumb hillbilly and to get lost.

Note that Wright's church magazine, "Trumpet" has a willing posed shot of barry. How do you believe that story...still? How did you fall for WHITE AMERICA not understanding black churches as an explanation for that hate-spewing man?

[Thanks to whomever put the covers together. I lost your link. Sorry.]

Japan's view of the impending presidency

November 16, 2008

I found AYAKO DOI's Washington Post article, "In Japan, the Picture Isn't Quite So Bright", interesting for the simple fact that a country exists that doesn't believe obama is the messiah. Refreshing. Ms Doi lays out the reasons why Japan is not particularly happy with barry: his associations (such as Wright, Ayers, Alisnsky, Marshall); the belief that Japan will be overlooked in favor of other countries (in particular, China); the impact on Japanese automakers should there be a bail out to save the auto industry; involvement in Afghanistan; barry's lack of knowledge concerning Japan; a change in trade policies; difficulty with unions in US based Japanese manufacturers; regular old anti-Americanism (What would Japan's economy be like without the US buying their products?); negotiations with North Korea (they are holding kidnapped Japanese citizens) and general questioning of why they have to "coddle up to Washington".
The image “http://www.pbs.org/newshour/images/asia/july-dec96/japan5.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
Ayako Doi
pix courtesy of PBS
Selected quotes from Ms Doi's article:
"The most astounding article appeared in Sentaku, a monthly magazine with a reputation for objectivity and solid analysis. "the most dubious character in history to occupy the White House." Criticizing Obama's foreign policy statements as "abstract" and "strings of empty words such as 'consultation' and 'cooperation,' " the article concluded that under Obama, the United States would lose its position of global leadership and drag the world into "enormous chaos."
I have to agree. barry is an unknown quantity. He had to learn about the issues - national and international - during the primaries and general election. He was running on the rhetoric of Change! - which worked - but it has left The American People expecting and wanting great things from him that he cannot accomplish in four years...if at all. His job is to stop the bleeding. Hence the need for a stellar cabinet. He is also going to have to act. How and to what is still the mystery.
"The first public opinion poll, released last week by the left-leaning Asahi Shimbun newspaper, showed that 79 percent of Japanese had favorable feelings about Obama himself. But even so, only 41 percent thought that his election would lead to an improvement in U.S.-Japanese relations."

"...Two days before the U.S. elections, Japan's public television network, NHK, aired a documentary on Japanese diplomats in Washington. It showed them cultivating connections with Asia policy advisers to the Obama and McCain campaigns, trying to find out what the next U.S. president would expect from Japan and to preempt anticipated demands for fresh military and financial contributions from Tokyo. It showed them suggesting what Japan could offer instead as an essential partner in global affairs, such as economic assistance in reducing poverty and help in cutting greenhouse gas emissions. Only by making these efforts, the diplomats believed, could Japan avoid becoming irrelevant to U.S. foreign policy in an Asia increasingly dominated by China."
And a fitting end:
"But [Japanese leaders will] be facing an increasingly introverted public at home, whose opinions of America are about as high as George W. Bush's approval ratings."

Old home week: Wright

Barry's old uncle, who sometimes says things he doesn't agree with. Things barry admitted he knew about. Things that weren't foul enough to cut that old uncle loose from his official campaign position for three more months. Things that were written off as out-of-context sound bites until he made one long clearly in context sound bite that even the pro-obama media couldn't spin. barry got pist because Wright ranted the truth. (Have to admit the Grambling bit was hysterical.) That barry gave the speech because it was politically expedient. I guess wright remembered the Iraq Fairy Tale speech. The reporters didn't. Not a word about it in the paper the next day. And have you ever heard him say that the rally was Rev Jesse's show?

I wonder what wright thought about being compared to a typical white person? Enjoy!

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Dear Pro-Obama media members:

Did you ever ask the Secret Service whether barry was really in the pew?

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Hillary Clinton 2008 Woman of the Year

November 11, 2008
2008 Glamour Women of the Year Awards

Hillary Clinton: "I'm very grateful to Glamour because they liked my pantsuits....I thank Glamour for trying to help us recognize the many ways that women - young women in particular - are changing their lives, their families, their communities and hopefully the world."

She truly believes this and she says it at every turn. Forget barry or mrs barry. Never gonna happen and adding Patty Solis Doyle is just one more stab. How successful was she at controlling her boss Joe gaffing Biden? The young people, however, are thoroughly clueless of what went on in their grandmother's lives when they were referred to as Mrs husband's first and last name...Mrs Bill Clinton.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Ayers' campaign oppression revealed

November 10, 2008

They celebrated in their own way...with Obama first and then by and for themselves.
11-7 Ayers
11-7 Wright
11-9 Pfleger
11-9 Farrakhan

Ayers tries to romanticize with false outrage - his tone an attempt at a conspiratory whisper. Self indulgent. Can't feel aggrieved and unrepentant at the same time. The first sentence tells you wear it's going. "Whew"?? He sounds like he gets winded going up stairs.
Ayers blog: On the campaign trail, McCain immediately got on message. I became a prop, a cartoon character created to be pummeled.

....And every day, I participate in the never-ending effort to build a powerful and irresistible movement for peace and social justice.
As a well-paid, Starbucks-drinking, vanilla ex-hippy professor. It's not what he did - it's the fact that barry felt it necessary to lie. Somebody should barry off that his body language gives him away. Blinking and looking down (lying), scratching his cheek (arrogant anger - McCain roasting him and post ABC debate dissing Sen Clinton). His word usage and speech pattern, predictable. And, as with the flagpin, his patriotism, all matters Rezko, Wright and lipstick - he kept at it. He couldn't let it go. That is a monstrous ego. Ayers is sellout periphery. His own (lack of) integrity revealed in that he waited till the election to come forward.

How better to whine and stretch out those 15 seconds?

He ignorantly repeats the: "Kill him!" allegation in a pathetic attempt to inflate his self-importance. The Secret Service tape said "THAT'S him" and DAVID SINGLETON's claim completely unsubstantiated. And yet Barry himself used it during the final debate without once retracting it. Man above the Fray? Grand Uniter? Much the same as not publicly denouncing Rep Lewis' comments. Equating Senator John McCain to George Wallace is heinous. (As was equating his typical white person grandmother with the hate-spewing Wright.) Rep Lewis has every right and authority to speak, of which I can never know. But to a POW, who weeks earlier referred to him as one of the three most men he respected in America? Heinous. As is the fact that every single one of Barry's opponents left the race as racists, when none of them entered so. Including one who had worked with him as a freshman senator - one who had the backing of much of the black community before more misinformation was passed along.

The vanquished can lose only as gracefully as the winner triumphs.

Ayers admits only to the Woods Foundation to hint at his connection to Rezko and Allison Davis. He then has to indict Senator Clinton, Governor Palin and Senator McCain. The fact that this piece of filth wrote about Senator McCain in any fashion is disgusting. The coward from a privileged background tried to bring some righteous change to America man while the true American hero, a man who stands--not hides--behind his words was being tortured to protect it.

Unconscionable.

I'm done with this. If interested go there. You're not missing anything.

John Murtaugh, a victim of their firebombing. Their alleged grand plans - video (2:20). Their cowardly acts. 11-14-08 ABC interview

Rev Wright finally speaks at Northwestern

November 7, 2008

Once the coast was clear and barry became the president-elect, Rev Wright headlined Northwestern's first "State of the Black Union Address" after an invitation by 'For Members Only', NU's black student alliance in part to make up for the retraction of Wright's honorary degree. Ironic who delivered it and who didn't. I wonder who was capturing live video for barry and what he and Wright said to each other when they met up this week. Would've loved to hear that. Ayers also made an appearance. Father Pfleger was most certainly there somewhere.

It was closed to the media but was reported on by the Daily Northwestern's NATHALIE TADENA (with Christina Chaey). Approximately 900 people attended, some from Wright's church who waited to fill the empty seats. Wright gave a 90 minute long speech: "Redeeming and Reclaiming our Community" including a Q & A. It was set up by Zachary Parker, Coordinator of Form Members Only, who reportedly developed a relationship with Wright after Wright was denied an honorary Doctorate of Sacred Theology in June because it would provide a distraction to commencement ceremonies. Parker's comments preceded Wright's.

Per TADENA:
Although the discussion focused on issues still present in the black community, the event was "an educational experience for the entire university," Parker said.

"From black to white to everyone in between, it was very important for these topics to be presented in an uplifting way," he said.
A little insight gained from the September 30th announcement (NorthbyNorthwestern's ALEX CAMPBELL & CHELSEA FINGER) of Wright's upcoming speech in the comment section. Not everyone was welcome. (emphasis added)
Parker: "This will be a GREAT event. All are welcome and everyone is encouraged to attend having an open mind....This will go down in history."
More from TADENA:
[Wright encouraged students to] "pursue a global perspective and acknowledge their culture in Northwestern's first State of the Black Union address Friday night."

"Please don't worry - I am not going to preach tonight," Wright said early in the For Members Only "State of the Black Union" keynote address, adding that he could differentiate between a sermon and an academic speech. "You can all exhale."

[He spoke about] the black liberation movement of the 1960s and historically black colleges and universities as part of his theme, "Redeeming and Reclaiming Our Community."

"There's a rupture in generational consciousness and generational understanding," Wright said. "We need to first teach our students, our children to teach their own stories and stop depending on others to tell their own stories."

His speech...drew laughter from a diverse audience in Cahn when Wright compared styles of worship from black and white churches and said that he had to pass examinations on classic literature "from Beowulf to Virginia Woolf" before he could study the black oral tradition.

"Take everything you learn in here back home to those who gave you birth," Wright said.

The retired Trinity United Church of Christ pastor spoke only briefly about the most famous former member of his congregation, President-elect Barack Obama, calling Obama's election "awesomely inspiring and history-making" and saying that he had supported Obama throughout the campaign, although the Illinois senator severed ties with Wright before the election.

"My family's getting lynched in the process," Wright said. "Never in the history of this country has there been a demonization of a person like I've been demonized."
Non-accidental choice of words. Never in the history of this country? An ego as large as barry's. It was his own words right out of his own raging mouth. Seems he reprised his Press Club presentation - Beowulf instead of Beethoven. Why must he ridicule white America to get his message across? Why not focus on the good in the black community? Why always the need to stress the division? How are non-blacks to bridge the divide when the black community chooses to keep the division alive? If the FMO really and truly wanted to get their message across, how better to do that than let members of the press in? Doesn't begin to pass the sniff test. Will videos and text be available, including the Q & A? If not, the message is clear.

Comments: Daily Northwestern's editorial, Ayers', event sponsor, For Members Only's, Zachary Parker and President, College Republicans, James D'Angelou. Background here, here, and here.

Ayers and Wright both spoke at Northwestern

November 10, 2008

I find it impossible to believe that Ayers met Wright for the first time on Nov 7th. They have the same ideas and they both know Father Pfleger, as well as Barry. Ayers was invited to speak for obvious reasons. Recall Parker's comment: "This will go down in history." For what? From the Daily Northwestern's NATHALIE TADENA. Not sure where we would have gotten any info if not for her. Bernadine Dohrn, Ayers' wife, is a professor at Northwestern Law School.
TADENA: Ayers, who now teaches at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said he met Wright for the first time Friday. "He has fought his whole life for justice, and I've just admired him," Ayers said.

In inviting Wright to speak on campus, FMO coordinator Zachary Parker said he hoped to "de-mystify stereotypes" surrounding Wright and his controversial remarks. He said inviting Ayers was "only fitting" because the media treated the two figures similarly.

After Friday night's event, Ayers had harsh words for the administration. He said Bienen made a "critical, critical decision" in uninviting Wright from commencement.

"What possible reason could they have except pressure by alumni, pressure by others?" Ayers said. "It's freedom of speech, freedom of thought. Without that, academics is dead."

He said he felt a "huge connection" to Wright.

"Both Rev. Wright and I were brought up as cartoon characters in this campaign because of disinformation and dishonest news," Ayers said. "I did not suffer as much as he did, but we both got out of it with a certain amount of dignity."
And Obama made it out with the presidency by distancing himself from them. How much did Barry respect freedom of speech of his compatriots? How can a man who is unrepentant about being a domestic terrorist use the word "dignity"?

When are people going to get past the issue of race as concerns Wright's statements? Yes, he raged at "White America" and at Obama's opponent who "ain't never been called a nigger" and he ridiculed Obama endorser "Colon Powell" and friend of one of the murdered girls in the Birmingham bombing "Con-damnesia Rice". But he preaches Black Liberation Theology from a black Nationalist Afro-centric church that rejects the United States flag for the Pan-African flag. What else would he be promoting at his "Unashamedly Black" Church? Imagine Senator McCain belonging to an "Unashamedly White" church for twenty years.

The Double Standard.

It was Wright's raging against the government, who created HIV/AIDS as a means of black genocide. (HIV/AIDS originated in Africa from eating/touching infected chimpanzees.) And his unbelievably disgusting comments on the Sunday after 9/11 that the government was responsible for the murder of 2973 innocent American citizens and foreign nationals that is the true evil in his rage. What he chooses to believe about Europeans and Africans is up to him. What a former marine says about his country is another matter, as is his connection to president-elect Obama. And the fact that people still believe Obama had no knowledge of Wright's beliefs never read his book: "Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream", which was based on Wright's speech about "white man's greed".

Wright's speech
was "Redeeming and Reclaiming our Community"

Zachary Parker: Wright's speech a "huge success"

November 10, 2008

Comments by For Members Only's, Zachary Parker about Rev Wright's speech.
"State of the Black Union" was a huge success. Our goals were to provide the NU community with an educational event, providing key perspectives of the black community here at Northwestern.

...FMO stands in solidarity with Rev. Wright because of what he has meant and done for our community....the message that we were attempting to send by our invitation was simply that we as a community support Rev. Wright as a pillar and hero in our community.

Some have to get away from the idea that difference infers deficiency or that one's perspective on life, existence and reality represents that of everyone."
"Some"?

A different view of Wright's speech

November 10, 2008
Editorial in the Daily Northwestern re: Wright's speech
Presented with an opportunity to promote discussions of race, For Members Only's "State of the Black Union" on Friday failed to capitalize on it.

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, chosen as the keynote speaker, provided the star factor to attract attention to issues of race and diversity on campus. Wright delivered an insightful and often humorous speech Friday night in front of Cahn Auditorium.

The two student leaders who preceded him, however, chose to repeat divisive and tired attacks. Both Mark Crain and Zachary Parker, the past and present coordinators of FMO, ripped the university for only enrolling 81 black students in this year's freshman class.

"Let me not exaggerate and make this seem like a crisis for the university, because frankly it's only a crisis if you care," Crain said. He didn't mention repeated public statements by University President Henry Bienen and other administrators calling the low black enrollment a serious problem.

Parker talked about "racially insensitive financial aid packages that are awarded to students of color." He offered no specifics, neglecting to mention programs like QuestBridge and NU Ambassadors that target minority students.

We have previously called the university's low black student enrollment a disappointment. It is a complex issue that requires serious thought and cooperation between students and administrators.

Parker later said, "Now, I introduce to you all a new vibrant, politically conscious FMO that will no longer stand alone while our community disintegrates around us."

As NU's black student alliance, FMO should do just that. We hope it will work with other student groups to bring racial issues to the forefront in an open dialogue.
It would be nice to read/view the speech. I keep going back to Parker's comments: "This will go down in history."

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Father Pfleger on Barry's win

November 9, 2008

Father Pfleger is in fine form. Can't help himself. He wasn't supposed to talk about politics from the pulpit but what is Cardinal George going to do? The parish loves him, there are a lot of good things happening there and there isn't an excess of priests. So he waits till after the election and hops right in. The dialect is insane. I wonder if Wright put him up to it? Maybe barry wouldn't have an audience with him. Wright and Pfleger didn't wast any time getting in on the action. Pfleger today Wright and Ayers Friday. Wonder when they met with barry to pray over and rejoice in his victory?

St Sabina's Church in Chicago. Father Pfleger preaches - take particular note of how he plays to the camera so FOX can get his good side. "Tuesday, hope was given a new breath. Promise was given new legs."

Here's the link to St Sabina's website. I can't get the video file of his homily to open. I wonder if barry was there and whether Pfleger said a blessing for his grandmother.

Sen Clinton advisor Ann Lewis vs Mike Allen from Politico

A blast from the past
March 23, 2008
ABC 7 Capital Sunday's segment "Turn the Tables"
(I'm not familiar with the show. I wonder if they kept the segment after this.)

Mike Allen from Politico is politely confronted about pro-obama media bias by Senior Clinton Advisor, Ann Lewis. Listen to the question. Watch how Allen can't even look Ms Lewis in the eye as he waffles. And then he complains about a follow-up question. This was at the point when Sen Clinton released her White House papers and the first thing the pro-obama media did was report that "She was in the White House THAT day!" Allen says obama scrutiny will increase. Did it? Read his articles and you have the answer. It's not worth pointing out again. Just watch him. That's all one needs to know who he is. Same as watching Jonathan Martin, who is quite the odd odd duck.

Video courtesy of thedscir
Here's Allen's (I hate to even promote his corrupted words) article (4/8) concentrating on Sen Clinton's falsehoods but no investigation, as promised, into Barry's own - concerning his taxes, his health, Rezko and Wright. And then on 4/13, Allen goes into barry's bitter comments with nary a sentence on Barry's own tendency to lie, lie, lie. Please note that barry's comments took place on 4/6. You Tube and archives - how better to demonstrate how little integrity the pro-obama media has...as if proof is any longer needed.

Friday, November 7, 2008

View of Wright's upcoming visit to Northwestern

November 7, 2008

A view of Wright's visit by the President, College Republicans, JAMES D'ANGELO:
I believe there could be many additional lectures that the vast majority of NU students would learn something from. Here are the first five that come to mind:

1) The Causes of 9/11: "America's chickens are coming home to roost" -Jeremiah Wright, 9/16/2001

2) AIDS in America: "The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color" -Jeremiah Wright, 9/16/2001

3) America and Israel: "We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians" -Jeremiah Wright, 1/15/2006

4) America's Exceptionalism: "Not God Bless America, God Damn America." -Jeremiah Wright, 4/13/03

5) Race Relations in America: "'U.S. of KKK-Azzzzz' -Jeremiah Wright, 9/16/2001
He's proven to FMO he can 'Redeem and Reclaim our Community' with these unifying and inspiring quotations.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Tough questions for the president-elect

November 6, 2008
From the "World News" section of the Sunday Express "The World's Greatest Newspaper"
This is what the media is covering. They don't ask the questions about his grandmother or his aunt. But we know all about the first pet situation, what he's wearing, and where he's going. Is he going to meet his "secret man"? How about that one time he "went to the gym" three times? And could that visit have anything to do with Wright's speech at Northwestern? So they could make a deal that Wright doesn't go off the deep end until after his inauguration. Maybe Wright prayed for the repose of barry's grandmother's soul.
Later he left the house alone, clad in sports clothes, a cap and sunglasses, and spent an hour at a friend's apartment building where he uses the gym.

By the time he left, a small crowd of well-wishers had gathered outside, cheering as his car drove off.

Then it was back home to shower before heading in to the office in a downtown building, where he held a conference call to thank campaign staff around the country.

The President-elect wore a suit but no tie, and carried a black satchel. Asked how much sleep he had managed to get, he said: "Not as much as I'd like."
That's the only question they had to ask the new president-elect? How long before the pro-obama media climbs out of their cocoon?