Showing posts with label Ageism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ageism. Show all posts

Monday, December 22, 2008

What entails a hate crime?

December 22, 2008

Morning Joe

They're discussing barry's pick of Rick Warren and the LGBT outrage.

JOE: When you call people who don't agree with you're a bigot--

MIKA: You're cutting off the conversation.

JOE: If, I disagree with somebody on same sex marriage, then I'm immediately called a bigot. The conversation ends right there.

Do they even listen to themselves? What did we hear from them during the election season? People not voting for barry were bigots. They couldn't get their heads around a black man being president. They weren't voting for another candidate they were automatically voting against barry and therefore bigots.

This exhausts me.

The Double Standard and hierarchy of -isms is alive and well. Racism has it's own rules and wins out over any other type of prejudice. What is "white racism"? Or "reverse racism"? When did racism become color-coded? Sexism, ageism and prejudice against homosexuals are ok in various forms. Women are whiny man-hating, sweatshirt and Birkenstock-wearing feminazis. Ageism is a punchline. And gays are being unreasonable because it's a moral not civil issue.

Human rights are human rights.

And barry can do no wrong. He's bringing people together...he's uniting America...he's the greatest president-elect who hides behind a federal prosecutor when they did nothing wrong.

So why the silence?

It's just another politically expedient decision. What else would it be? barry is most certainly not going to lose the LGBT vote and is pandering to the right. Didn't he used to be the most liberal senator when it suited his needs? Voting 97% time with his party with no dissenting votes of consequence? He is trying to ensure his place in history without having done anything but nominate people and the proobamedia is coronating him as the second coming of Lincoln, FDR, Kennedy and Reagan.

Name one great senator he resembles - a job he has actually had.

Anyone?

Sexual "orientation" is not universally covered as a hate crime whereas race is. Matthew Shepard was savagely murdered 10 years ago and there is still no all-inclusive bill. Since then only 8 states have added sexual orientation. The Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007 passed in the Senate 60-39 on September 27, 2007. All Dems yea - plus Coleman, Collins, Gregg, Lugar, Sanders, Smith, Specter, Snowe, Voinivich, Warner. McCain not present. It was eventually dropped mainly because Bush vowed to veto it. barry says it's going to be a priority.

We'll see, won't we?

2006 DOJ Hate crime statistics

12,620 law enforcement agencies participated in the UCR Program's hate crime data collection. Agencies provided 1 to 12 months of data about bias-motivated crime, and of those agencies, 2,105 (16.7%) reported 7,722 incidents. 83.3% of the 12,620 participating agencies reported that no hate crimes occurred in their jurisdictions.

Alabama and Mississippi reported ZERO cases. That's an absolute impossibility.

51.8% racially motivated -- 64.4% anti-black

15.5% sexual orientation -- 98% anti-homosexuals (transsexuals not categorized)

Now consider that only 3% of the population identify themselves as homosexuals. So, from this data, hate crimes against homosexuals are disproportionately high and hate crimes in general are markedly under reported.

And 45 states (+ DC) have statutes covering race, religion, and ethnicity but only 31 of them cover sexual orientation.

The stats speak for themselves and the LGBT community should be allowed to speak. And to be heard. And not referred to as "fascists" like scarborough just did.

==============

You may know about the gruesome torture and murder of Matthew Shepard.

Now consider the case of the white female nurse's aide who hit a homeless black man with her car and then went home and had sex with her boyfriend while the homeless black man bled to death in her garage.

The force of impact impaled him in the windshield - forcing his head and torso inside her vehicle. His right leg was fractured in two places and his left nearly amputated.

It is unclear if she stopped and tried to extricate him. She would have had to pull on his legs.

She drove several miles home, his face inches from hers as she apologized for hitting him and he moaned in pain and pleaded for help. She ignored him. She then pulled into her garage, shut the door and left him there to bleed to death. She didn't know how long it took him to die because she eventually stopped checking on him.

He did not suffer a head injury or any type of internal injuries. He would not have died from his leg injuries. He knew what happened to him and was in severe pain. He begged her for help. She promised she would get him some. She never did - even though she continued to check on him. She did not give him the water he asked for. She did not render any type of first aid even though she was a nurse's aide and knew how to do so. She did nothing to cover him - his pants and underwear were hanging off his leg.

She let him bleed to death, naked from the waist down, impaled in the windshield of her vehicle, with his mangled legs splayed on the hood of her car.

Eventually he knew he was going to die. Alone. He knew help would never come. He knew the people he could hear inside the house weren't going to help him. He knew she had lied to his face each time she came out to see if he was dead yet. He knew he was going to die impaled in the windshield. He knew that his naked body would then have to be disposed of. He knew there was a chance his family would never know how or where he died. He knew he would never again see his son or attend his marriage. He knew he would never see his grandchildren or say goodbye to his family. He knew there was a chance his body would never be found and thus not receive a proper burial. He knew that the women who hit him and allowed him to bleed to death like an animal might never be found. And he knew that she might never be punished for killing him while withholding medical assistance and torturing him with assurances that help was coming.

I don't know how someone can be so evil. What possesses someone to do this to another human being? How could she continue to go out and listen to him beg? How could she walk away? A nurse's aide? Pure evil.

The case was broken after the nurse's aide giggled to her friend: "I hit this black man." And then she went on to say she had sex with her boyfriend while the naked homeless man moaned in agony. She later denied saying it. She said she was afraid to call for help because she was high on alcohol, marijuana and ecstasy.

The woman's attorney, MIKE HEISKILL:

[His client] not the animal or monster the police are portraying her to be. [She is] not this cold inhumane person that we've heard about. I think this is overreaching on the part of the prosecution and the police and, in the end, I believe the law will shake out that this was simply a case of failure to stop and render aid.

Read that again.

Her two male friends - both white - eventually yanked the dead homeless man's body out of the windshield - leaving behind his tissue and hair and a big pool of blood - took him to a local park and dumped him like garbage - still naked.

The coroner said he could have been rescued even after he was inside her garage. He had no other life-threatening injuries. There were no head injuries that would have rendered him unconscious. It took approximately two hours to for him to bleed to death.

Did you hear about this case?

Did you hear Revs Sharpton and Jackson or Johnny Cochran in the news raging about the reckless disregard for human life? That a white woman allowed a black man to die in her garage impaled in her windshield and then threw him away like trash?

No. You didn't. For a very good reason. Change the races on all the players. The woman was black and the man was white. It was not prosecuted as a hate crime. And if the races were reversed it most assuredly would have been.

How can a crime be more heinous? How is what she did not extreme indifference for a human life? Why should there be a difference relative to their skin color?

Her statement to the son of the man she lied to and allowed to die:

MALLARD: I am so sorry, Brandon. I am so sorry for what I have caused your family. And I'm sorry for the pain that I have put my family through.

The victim's son Brandon went on Larry King after the verdict and had this to say:

BIGGS: Well, I believe there is something good in every situation. Positively, it's making me a stronger person. It's going to make me able to speak with other people who are going through a tragedy like this and not just with sympathy but with empathy. But negatively, there are probably too many to even list. He will not be around for the rest of my life and that's -- that's a very sad thing.

CALLER: Brandon, I would like to know how in the world could your family sit back and let your father be homeless?

Sick and heartless. Brandon was 18 at the time and his father had been homeless for approximately 2 1/2 years. His father struggled with bipolar disorder but Brandon had a relationship with him - seeing him at the shelter where he lived.

KING: And what was it like for you and him?

BIGGS: Well, it was great. We did a lot of fun things together. We went shopping. We went fishing. Just had a good time with each other....He would stay in a shelter on Lancaster Avenue in Ft. Worth and he would actually pay rent there. It was kind of a place for people who were down to get back up on their feet. And so, when he told me that he was living there, I would go visit him as much as I could and we would still go do the things that we had always done.

KING: Did he -- was he able to look for work? Was he trying to get his life straightened out?

BIGGS: Yes, he was, Larry.

KING: So, you can say the two of you were very close?

BIGGS: That's right.

Brandon wants to be a pastor. He forgave the woman who allowed his father to suffer and die and be thrown away like garbage. He went to court everyday. He heard the testimony and saw the gruesome pictures. He heard how her accomplices "got rid of the dude". And he forgave her. He was 20 y/o at the time (2003).

BIGGS: The forgiveness, well, it comes because I've been forgiven of so much. And I just -- I can't not forgive other people, no matter how grievous -- no matter how grievous. Life is too short to live with all the anger and the bitterness. It's just too short for that.

She was found guilty and sentenced to 50 years. What would they have done to her in Iran?

Gregory Biggs (37) and convicted murderer, Chante Mallard (27)

Friday, November 28, 2008

Curiosity: "Silver Alerts"

November 28, 2008

Now they have Silver Alerts for cognitively impaired seniors like with Alzheimers. It piggybacks the same notification system as Amber Alerts. It's a great idea. And Project Lifesaver has been using wrist bracelets to track wandering or at risk seniors since 1999. They should be required at nursing homes in ambulatory patients with Alzheimers. And why don't they use something similar for newborns? The hospital alarms and safeguards have been beaten.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

barry's campaign strategy

November 19, 2008

I came across an article by BUD WHITE: "Misogyny was the central narrative of the Obama campaign". And that it was. But barry had a boost - he's biracial raised by a white family after his dad abandoned him. No that won't work - he's black and doesn't look like the dollar bills. A classic battle: Man vs woman. Inexperience vs experience. Yes, we can - I hope vs yes, we will - I've done it. A media darling vs THAT woman. But what it came down to was racism vs sexism and in the end racism vs ageism.

barry used sexism as his offense and racism as his defense. Perfectly clear to those not mired in Hillary hate and free of obamerism. He needed to race bait because he needed the black vote -- the sexism came naturally. Here is barry playing the aggrieved black man when he grew up in the most diverse state in the union where interracial marriage was legal. He lives a privileged life - yes - and gets and Ivy League education and lives in a 1.65 million dollar house. He runs for president and suddenly he is speaking for the Oppressed Southern Negro when he had never been in the south, never lived under segregation and is not descended from slavery -- his family held slaves.

This election proved racism trumps everything. Proved the existence of The Double Standard. All three of the self-proclaimed Transcender of Race's opponents (and Mr Bill) left the race racists when none of them entered that way. And the Grand Uniter and Agent of Change! has done nothing to disabuse that notion.

Congratulations, Mr 44th president, on your honorable public life. I look forward to more because that CHANGE! you speak fraudulently of needs to start with you.

Follow the link - it's worth the read.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Despicable botwork: Jill Greenberg

[Thought this needed a little re-visiting to show what barry has never stood up to or denounced. He still hasn't denounced Rep Lewis' stunning remarks. He has every right to say what he likes because he lived it but that was completely uncalled for and shows - once again - that race gets a free pass while it is used to explain why a black man can never be president. How in the hell do people justify to themselves in privates moments that barry is not anything he says or appears to be? Definition of obamerism. Many are just ignorant of the facts. Those so blinded with hate for barry's opponents - especially Senator Clinton - that they refuse to see who he is....a fraud promising false hope.]

Liberal Artwork by bot JILL GREENBERG

Atlantic Monthly's unused cover photos by Jill Greenberg. This is one (more) disturbed Obama fan. Quoted in Photo District News Pulse, Greenberg said: "Good. I want to stir stuff up, but not to the point where I get audited if he becomes president.”

jmccaincntgreenberg.jpgjillgreenberg3.jpgjillgreenbeerg1.jpg2854584120_bfcd9ce06c_o.jpg
Captions: "I called my wife a cunt."
"I am a blood thirsty warmonger."
"It was fun cheating on my car-injury-disabled first wife."
No caption needed.

This is depravity of the finest. These are the stalwart supporters of barry fans. The man above the fray = joke.

Another on her website: "I'll have my girl kill Roe v Wade".

Watch Atlantic Monthly's Editor, James Bennett's explanation.

Read this article at American Digest website, which goes into detail and contains this interesting tidbit:
"As far as it goes it is workmanlike enough and presents McCain, unlike the Obama covers we are used to seeing, without the halo. Given the level to which the owner and the staff of the Atlantic are in the tank for Obama -- the owner's wife, Katherine Brittain Bradley, is on record in one instance for $28,500.00 to committees supporting Barack Obama-- even the cover-lines are not half-bad if a bit half-hearted."
Who needs lobbyists and PACs when the MSM is your best propaganda outlet and shamelessly contributes to your campaign? Who's going to investigate?

Read this interview at PopPhoto where Greenberg remarked on her "crying babies photos". "Maybe getting kids to cry isn't the nicest thing to do, but I'm not causing anyone permanent psychological damage."

Disturbing Photos and story at GuardianUK of Greenberg's photo exhibit "End Times" where the Greenberg-intentionally-induced-crying kids captions include: Shock, Torture, Four More Years, Left Behind, The Rapture Index. Greenberg said: "her concern was to depict what she says reminded her of the 'helplessness and anger I feel about our current political and social situation'."

It's clear who has permanent psychological damage. And what of the parents who allowed their child to be used for such revolting political purposes? Who allows their child to be captioned "Shock" or "Torture"?

Why didn't Atlantic Monthly know this? Bennett says he doesn't screen his photographers as to their "political views". Anyone buying this? Especially when the owner's wife contributed $28,500 to Obama? And as if they would hire a Republican to take McCain's picture. The non-mesmerized masses see through the messiah and the MSM's mancrush. It's just as disturbing as her photos.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Age and gender mattered more than race in this election

November 5, 2008

Exit polls: age was a factor over race by 2:1
Exit polls during the primaries: gender was more of a factor than race.

Sexism and ageism were more of a detriment than race in this election cycle. Yet all we heard about was racism and all three opponents ended up racists. It's what happens when you go up against a post-racial candidate. Sexism - whining. Ageism - laughed at.

White vote
1976 Jimmy Carter 47%
1996 Bill Clinton 43%
2008 Barack Obama 43%

Blacks 96%
Hispanic 67%
Asian 61%

Race a factor: obama 53-45
Race not a factor : obama 51-47

Whites (17%) race a factor: McCain 61-37.
Whites race not a factor: McCain 54-44
Blacks (32%) race a factor Obama 95
Hispanics (22%) race a factor: Obama by 67-33

Age a factor (39%) Obama 66-33

2008 Blacks 13%
2004 Blacks 11%
2000 Blacks 10%

So much for historic turnout. And had he lost by a small margin?

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS BRADLEY EFFECT

November 4, 2008

The fact that people - pundits, surrogates, former politicians - keep mentioning it shows how non-informed the media actually is and how much they want to use race to drive the election. Blackness as a hindrance, blackness as a strategy overlooked and blackness as a triumph of America. Joe actually said that if barry wins America is not a racist nation. That is about as idiotic as it gets. And barry's impact on American political campaigns will be massively overexaggerated - as it already is. Things came into play in this election that never were represented before. Things that would have caused a record turnout, which was already in evidence turning the primaries.

HILLARY CLINTON GOT THE SAME AMOUNT OF VOTES AS BARRY.

He was not the sole reason for anything in the primaries and in the general democrats had only one choice. Turnout I argue would have been massive - the black vote in question - which will decide this election. 95% of the black vote against a white woman is not considered racist and yet white blue collar worker is. A joke. An embarrassing joke that people wither don't care about or don't realize. It doesn't matter

1 - president with the lowest approval rating ever
2 - change no matter what
2 - two wars neither of which is popular
3 - the economy is in the worst shape since the depression
4 - America's standing in the world is in the tank
5 - no jobs, no homes, no healthcare, no gas money
6 - Anger at Republicans and general pessimism
7 - 72 y/o Republican nominee
8 - 44 y/o VP nominee who let's face it is not fit for the job
9 - barry never vetted - opponents vetted to death and falsehoods aired with no retractions.
11 - barry's myth on Iraq - it's what got him out of Iowa and held him until the economy became number one. By then the lie had him in the position of inevitability.
12 - DNC behind him and against Clintons.
13 - Illegitimate dealings about Michigan delegates. Imagine this happening to barry leading to Clinton's nomination. There'd be a very different atmosphere and a different nature of "historic".
11 - Female candidate
12 - black candidate
13- Sexism and ageism laughed at and racism used as primary barry strategy and found in any and all possible comments and actions.
12 - barry lied about public finance allowing him to destroy McCain in ads and ground game. This is what won the general election. It is the biggest lie that barry has gotten away with.
13 - PROOBAMA MEDIA BIAS

I say this last (which means the major impact) because they worked to destroy Sen (and Pres) Clinton and kept the racist myth alive, which worked to get out the black vote, without which barry would not have gotten the nomination. This is undeniable and irrefutable, whether you choose to believe it or not. The irony in all this racist WHITE AMERICA is that barry's win hinges on the nonwhite turnout.

Any yet - it will be barry - alone - that gets credit for the turnout and win. It is more wrong than the racial bias the media has shown TOWARDS AS IN IN FAVOR OF barry. Hillary's people trashed - Hillary's people on the ground in places like Ohio and Pennsylvania will not get the credit they deserve.

Colorblindness? Race as a hindrance? Sexism is a myth. Ageism is a joke. Barry will have won this because of his race - the half that he claims. And fatherless children in the black community? What does his success say to them - directly?

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Ageism code words: "He's a grumpy old man in his slippers and bathrobe"

October 15, 2008
Countdown
Olbermann talking with Senator-in-waiting and debate negotiator, Rahm Emanuel.

RAHM EMANUEL: He's come across as the grumpy old man in his slippers and his bathrobe, picking up the newspaper, yelling at the kids in the neighborhood to get off the yard. That's not what the American people want. He is grumpy. He is not focused on the issues. He's barking at people all the time. He doesn't have the right demeanor, style or the substance. If he changed that, he'd be relevant to the American people. Right now, his campaign is not relevant, and it's off tune from where the American people are.

OLBERMANN: I mentioned at the start here that you were the rules negotiator for these debates. There is some thought that, as we look over your right shoulder, that you pulled one over on the McCain campaign tonight. The way they will be seated will not be, from the theatrical point of view, showing John McCain's good side. Would you care to comment on that theory?

EMANUEL: No. Let me say this. All this, you know, podium sitting, all that is important. The most important is what the, you know-the candidates have to say and how they say it. I'm not-you know, I spent a lot of time negotiating through the minute segments, the topics. We did all that as a team. I think it counts for something. But that won't make up for either a strong debate performance or a weak debate performance. That's what's going to come. I think people are over obsessing about that camera angle stuff.

Nothing happens "accidentally" in the obama camp, which will be prove to be the most vicious group ever assembled. This can only be revealed after barry becomes president - for obvious reasons. Rahm Emmanuel is a combination of Matthews, Olbermann and Mayor Daley. He is salivating for Obama's senate seat. jonjon alter over at the proObama newsletter tried to campaign for him. I'd give you the link but then Newsweek and alter would get a hit.

For a breakdown of debate negotiations per Patrick Healey/Jeff Zeleny see here. An interesting quote: "Mr. Obama's advisers have been studying in particular Mr. McCain's temperament and mood and looking for potential flash points of anger."

Ageist code words: grumpy, barking, demeanor, not focused, not relevant, off tune, flash points, anger. (For more see: here, here, here, here)

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Quote of the day: "I know you are a supporter of Sen Obama"

September 16, 2008
Morning Joe

McCain zings Mika for favoring barry. Mika pretends she isn't and mentions her brother working with McCain another works for barry. And then of course, there's her dad who loves barry. She also mentioned she had family supporting Sen Clinton. What does it matter? She's the one loving up obamessiah.


Courtesy of MSNBC

MCCAIN: I'll leave that for the American people to decide. I still say to you, and I know you are a supporter of Senator Obama, if you would urge him to come and do town all meetings with me as I have asked him to do time after time the whole tenor of the campaign would change.

MIKA: Senator, as a characterized Barack Obama supporter, I take objection. I'Il just say, take care of my brother working at the campaign.

MCCAIN: Thanks -that was a cheap shot.

And off he went, but MIKA couldn't let it go. She never can when someone calls her out on something.

MCCAIN: In light of the John McCain interview, I feel I need to say not only does my brother work for the McCain campaign, but he worked for George Bush for six years. I'm proud of him.

Well-paid Republican MIKE MURPHY: I don't think he meant it as an attack. There's definitely become a mentality inside the McCain campaign which is very hostile for anybody in the media they think is at all favorable to the other side. I think that's mistake. I think they overreact. I think doesn't do McCain well to have that mentality in the campaign. I don't really understand it because it's not his natural way.

But he made sure to use one of the McCain code words: *hostile*