Official Dem Party blogger alters Trig Palin’s face as “joke”

June 25, 2009

There really is no end to the classlessness bots are capable of. Since they can’t go after Secretary Clinton because she’s doing a job barry couldn’t even begin to attempt – a job they ridiculed her qualifications for – it’s Gov Palin and her family. From slutty crack ho mom to incesting dad to teenage daughter whores to the most innocent of souls – Trig. Thinking it’s a “joke” to make fun of an infant with Down Syndrome by changing his face.

What kind of person – a woman no less – even thinks of something like that? And how lacking in morals does one have to be to be so proud of ones depraved thoughts that they share it with the entire planet? And these people are inspired by barry. A link to her site is posted on the official Alaska Democratic Party website. So if she isn’t being paid directly by the Democratic Party – she is at the very least officially endorsed by them. Hence the request for barry to get his party in line.

CELTIC DIVA’S BLUE OASIS

Folks need to see what they are capable of and explaining it is not the same as seeing it but it will not stay here for long. The original photo was shot by Reuters. I hope they go after her somehow. It’s the only way they will be stopped.

Proud artwork courtesy liberal Alaskan Blogger LINDA KELLEN BIEGEL, who is so proud of her work she removed it. Note that she was using the pix as a way to raise money.

(REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton)

Caption: Republican vice presidential candidate Alaska Governor Sarah Palin hugs her son Trig onstage after her address to the 2008 Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota September 3, 2008.

Palin spokeswoman MEGHAN STAPLETON:

Recently we learned of a malicious desecration of a photo of the Governor and baby Trig that has become an iconic representation of a mother’s love for a special needs child. The mere idea of someone doctoring the photo of a special needs baby is appalling.

Babies and children are off limits. It is past time to restore decency in politics and real tolerance for all Americans. The Obama Administration sets the moral compass for its party. We ask that special needs children be loved, respected and accepted and that this type of degeneracy be condemned.

Were barry’s children used in any fashion by anyone other than their parents? And if this a picture of Malia with Chris Matthews face what would these folks be screaming? Here’s an example of the comments at CNN, confirming the character of obamafans – one going so far as to actually write “special needs card”.

that is one of the funniest pictures ever….keep at her!

With all due respect to Mrs. Palin and anyone offended by this pic. GET OVER IT ALREADY!

(Iowa liberal) Sarah, quit trotting out the “special needs” card.

his picture is not offensive.

(Kimberley in CA) Of course. It’s been a week now, time to get her name back in the news.

(Independent voter) no, what’s appalling is palin’s constant whinning and complaining over trivial stuff!

I don’t see a special needs child in the picture, she’s tossing that out there for spin.

(Harvey for Obama) One word Palin, lighten up.

(Robert Austin, Texas) I think it has become apparent that Palin has become a “special needs” adult.

It’s about time for the Wasilla Imbecilla to stop playing the victim.

That baby has special needs, alright. He needs a new mother.

The photo is funny and the point is well taken.

M. Bellew-Smith So, he’s special needs. You had him. Keep him home and stop inflicting him on us and us on him.

Orly Taitz's site cyberattacked...again

April 11, 2009

It’s gone. I tried to access it and I get redirected. Don’t bother because who knows what they are doing once you end up on that site. I went to her old site and there is no referral there. I know she had a mirror site but I don’t know what it is. This is why she wanted folks to copy as many posts as possible and post them everywhere. The problem being you post too many they’re just as likely to come after you. The *Orly Taitz* posts here got deleted on March 22nd and I had to recover them from the cache and the other site.

Was it because of the update on the Quo Warranto paperwork that has been processed and confirmed as being retrieved by the Department of Justice? I find it disturbing and I am increasingly more concerned about violence - as should the government.

Once was too many - twice no way. Hacking into her PayPal account was serious criminal behavior. And impersonating a soldier in the way that girl allegedly did is beyond disgusting.

And here’s the expected but eerie thing. I can’t find any chatter of it on google and went to some sites who would know and nothing.

This is wrong.

***

(4-9) Update on quo Warranto
(3-13) Orly Taitz delivers documents to Chief Justice Roberts
(3-25) Orly Taitz: Documents present and accounted for at DOJ & SCOTUS
(3-25) Quo Warranto and Application for Emergency Stay re-filed in person

========================

(4-15) Updated list of birth certificate posts
(4-11) Orly Taitz cyberattacked…again?
(4-11) Site abruptly shut down because of PayPal investigation?
(4-11) Taitz Dossier #5 re: PayPal account
(4-12) Taitz site taken down because of fraudulent claims?
(4-12) Taitz letter to SCOTUS - alleged reason for the site shutdown?
(4-12) Orly Taitz’s interim blog
(4-13) Explanation re: Orly Taitz site change from her interim blog
(4-13) Orly Taitz: PayPal, FBI, Lisa
(4-15) Orly Taitz interim blog = http://repubx.com/
(4-17) Update on Orly Taitz’s blog situation
(4-18) Orly Taitz new blog = www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
(4-20) Do not send Orly Taitz donations through PayPal

barry & rahmbo’s “civilian national military force”

April 5, 2009

barry and right hand man’s idea of a civilian national military force. Thing is one is already amassing and it is interested in making barry prove he is not a usurper. both barry and Rahm want Americans to serve their country - watch how Rahmbo skirts the issue of whether it would actually be a “draft” since it would be mandatory - and yet neither of them have done so.

DontBeObamaZombies

I wonder what those 13 milion barry zombies who registered their email and/or phones numbers are thinking now. The government has all their information and they gave it willingly.

Rep Posey being bot attacked for introducing barry soetoro birth certificate bill

March 24, 2009

(3-22) Rep Posey’s Birth Certificate Bill to stop future barrys
(3-22) Rep Posey’s barry soetoro birth certificate bill (text)
(3-24) Rep Posey being bot attacked for introducing barry soetoro birth certificate bill

Here is an interesting blog entry by Rep Bill Posey (R-FL) , who sponsored a bill to require presidential candidates to provide proof of their eligibility for president - at the very least a long form birth certificate. It will be called the barry soetoro (his presumed legal name at this point) birth certificate bill. Rep Posey is, of course, being ridiculed and bot attacked. Proposing this bill is rather courageous considering he was just elected. Emphasis added.

U.S. Rep. Bill Posey blog
By Bill Posey
Legislative Update

Posted March 20, 2009

I want to take a moment to recap on my legislative efforts so far… I have been here a little over 2 months and I have 3 bills introduced with more on the way real soon….

He discusses his first two bills.

Now for my third bill…

… Last Friday I introduced a bill that requires all future presidential candidates to file a copy of their birth certificate, along with all the other necessary documentation, to show that a candidate meets the qualifications for president under the Constitution.

What does the U.S. Constitution say about this – Article II says there are three qualifications for president:
1. Must be a natural born citizen
2. Must be at least 35 years old
3. Must have been a resident of the U.S. for at least 14 years.

Why’d I do this? Well, for a number of reasons and the more and more I get called names by leftwing activists, partisan hacks and political operatives for doing it, the more and more I think I did the right thing. First, it’s easy to call people names. This week, I’ve been called some pretty nasty things. That’s fine. But none of these tolerant people actually want to discuss the issue at hand… whether or not a presidential candidate should have to file these documents with the government.

I could easily fill up a page listing all the activities an American needs to show their ID for … everything from playing youth soccer to getting a drivers license, buying cigarettes and alcohol, to opening bank accounts and even playing little league. So I was pretty surprised to find out that to run for president, despite the constitutional requirement and the media scrubbing that goes on, it’s not required for a candidate to file these documents when they submit their statement of candidacy with the FEC.

But having been charged with reforming the elections in the State of Florida after the 2000 recounts and lawsuits, I thought I could offer a solution to this question on eligibility. There’s nothing anyone can do about changing past elections… the President won. All the lawsuits in the world are not going to change that. But if what some folks are worried about – that presidential candidates don’t have to submit to the same documentation that average folks have to submit to – well, then we can change that for the next election.

A recent AOL poll found showed that 75% of the people participating agreed with me. And many have expressed surprise it is not already a requirement.

I’m willing to discuss this issue with anyone who wants to talk in a rational manner, but I WILL NOT engage in name calling, smear campaigns, or any other venomous activity. I will not. Why? Well for one thing, it’s childish. But on another level, we’re supposed to be able to have a civil debate on the issues in this country.

Anyway, I feel I need to be open with folks on this.

As always, if you’re having a problem with a government agency and need help, my staff and I are ready to assist. Please feel free to contact my local office at (772) 778-3534.

Also, please feel free to visit my website, sign up for my e-mail newsletter and take my constituent survey.

Hope all is well – Bill

Despicable botwork: Jill Greenberg

[Thought this needed a little re-visiting to show what barry has never stood up to or denounced. He still hasn't denounced Rep Lewis' stunning remarks. He has every right to say what he likes because he lived it but that was completely uncalled for and shows - once again - that race gets a free pass while it is used to explain why a black man can never be president. How in the hell do people justify to themselves in privates moments that barry is not anything he says or appears to be? Definition of obamerism. Many are just ignorant of the facts. Those so blinded with hate for barry's opponents - especially Senator Clinton - that they refuse to see who he is....a fraud promising false hope.]

Liberal Artwork by bot JILL GREENBERG

Atlantic Monthly's unused cover photos by Jill Greenberg. This is one (more) disturbed Obama fan. Quoted in Photo District News Pulse, Greenberg said: "Good. I want to stir stuff up, but not to the point where I get audited if he becomes president.”


Captions: "I called my wife a cunt."
"I am a blood thirsty warmonger."
"It was fun cheating on my car-injury-disabled first wife."
No caption needed.

This is depravity of the finest. These are the stalwart supporters of barry fans. The man above the fray = joke.

Another on her website: "I'll have my girl kill Roe v Wade".

Watch Atlantic Monthly's Editor, James Bennett's explanation.

Read this article at American Digest website, which goes into detail and contains this interesting tidbit:

"As far as it goes it is workmanlike enough and presents McCain, unlike the Obama covers we are used to seeing, without the halo. Given the level to which the owner and the staff of the Atlantic are in the tank for Obama -- the owner's wife, Katherine Brittain Bradley, is on record in one instance for $28,500.00 to committees supporting Barack Obama-- even the cover-lines are not half-bad if a bit half-hearted."

Who needs lobbyists and PACs when the MSM is your best propaganda outlet and shamelessly contributes to your campaign? Who's going to investigate?

Read this interview at PopPhoto where Greenberg remarked on her "crying babies photos". "Maybe getting kids to cry isn't the nicest thing to do, but I'm not causing anyone permanent psychological damage."

Disturbing Photos and story at GuardianUK of Greenberg's photo exhibit "End Times" where the Greenberg-intentionally-induced-crying kids captions include: Shock, Torture, Four More Years, Left Behind, The Rapture Index. Greenberg said: "her concern was to depict what she says reminded her of the 'helplessness and anger I feel about our current political and social situation'."

It's clear who has permanent psychological damage. And what of the parents who allowed their child to be used for such revolting political purposes? Who allows their child to be captioned "Shock" or "Torture"?

Why didn't Atlantic Monthly know this? Bennett says he doesn't screen his photographers as to their "political views". Anyone buying this? Especially when the owner's wife contributed $28,500 to Obama? And as if they would hire a Republican to take McCain's picture. The non-mesmerized masses see through the messiah and the MSM's mancrush. It's just as disturbing as her photos.

Joke of the day: "NY Times endorses Obama"

October 24, 2008
NY Times officially endorses Obama. They're like the supredelegates trying to make their endorsements the most dramatic. As usual the endorsement includes the expected trashing of Sen McCain. Can't ever be strictly for Obama - they have to tear down his opponent and their supporters to make him look better, because, really, what has he actually done? Anyway, NY Times:

Mr. Obama has met challenge after challenge, growing as a leader and putting real flesh on his early promises of hope and change. He has shown a cool head and sound judgment. We believe he has the will and the ability to forge the broad political consensus that is essential to finding solutions to this nation's problems.

In the same time, Senator John McCain of Arizona has retreated farther and farther to the fringe of American politics, running a campaign on partisan division, class warfare and even hints of racism. His policies and worldview are mired in the past. His choice of a running mate so evidently unfit for the office was a final act of opportunism and bad judgment that eclipsed the accomplishments of 26 years in Congress.

Wouldn't be an Obama endorsement without the racism charge. Notice that each and every one Obama's opponents are racists? Where is this race speech maker who preaches unity but does nothing? Do you see the persistent theme? Lofty talk not followed by action. I'm sure it would be the same if he ran against a black opponent because Obama needed to prove he was "black enough" before the back community got behind him. They were initially voting against (no one is ever voting FOR his opponent - they are all voting AGAINST him.) because they didn't think he would win. And the 8 million black votes who couldn't be bothered to even register? Madness. Joe laughed out loud at the racism charge. And there's the elitism charge brought on by Obama himself. And the compulsory - he ran a vicious campaign. Do they really believe this or is it the standard party line? Annie, I've just about had enough too. Then there's the running mate is unfit so he's a doddering old fool. If it was worth the effort I'd compare this endorsement with the primaries.

Given the particularly ugly nature of Mr. McCain's campaign, the urge to choose on the basis of raw emotion is strong. But there is a greater value in looking closely at the facts of life in America today and at the prescriptions the candidates offer. The differences are profound.

Raw emotion? It's comedy hour. That's what Obama's campaign is based on. Look at the articles. It's been a consistent and persistent Obama lovefest, Hillary trashing and McCain destroying campaign. I wonder how much responsibility they will own up to when the voter registration/voter fraud comes to light? There's more but why bother. It's like the "statements" - they're all written from templates by the Obama campaign.

bots attack "Joe the Plumber"

October 16, 2008
The last debate is over, barry's up in the polls and writing about McCain's facial expressions, anger, fidgetyness, agitation, irritation etc is getting tired so what do the bots do? They investigate poor "Joe the Plumber". Imagine if a black man was referred to as Joe the Plumber? Donna Brazile prefers Joe and Jane Sixpack but Senator Clinton referring to an actual demographic was clear evidence of racism. This poor man asks barry how he was going to help him and barry couldn't answer. Today they're all over him with camera crews outside his house. How more vicious can the attacks get? The obama camp is going after a man who had the misfortune to ask barry what he was actually going to do. And what do they do to this hardworking dad? They reveal that he has a lien because he owes something in back taxes and are questioning whether he's licensed to be a plumber. They're maggots.

It does not get more despicable than that. Going after an "angry old man" wasn't enough, so they discredit any and everyone who dares speak about the messiah in less than haloific terms. How many of these immoral bots bothered to look into Ayers, Wright, Rezko, Alinsky, ACORN and all the other connections barry has? The pro-obama media has completely and utterly proven their lack of "journalistic integrity" - if it had ever applied to them. I don't know because I never followed politics until February. Every single dem strategist (who are these people and why don't they have a real job?) has said the same thing. He's angry, he looks unpresidential and barry was calm and composed. The manlove is back to overflowing and the rage against barry's opponent as virulent as ever. Whoever that facial expression expert was - he didn't see very much. When McCain brought up barry's abortion vote, barry clenched his jaw, swallowed hard and took a sip of water. All clear signs of discomfort and deceit. I no longer wonder how Hitler controlled the media.

UPDATE

bots heckling at McCain march

September 21, 2008 Liberal Outrage: A Pro-McCain March in Manhattan
Courtesy of RedSquareEye from ThePeoplesCube.com Listen the bots comments. Especially about Nazi Germany. And while you're at it count the fingers given.

Ignorant MSM of the day: "guy he met 10-20 years ago"

October 7, 2008
Hardball about Townhall debate tonite
Matthews the obamerized misogynist just asked a McCain person to pledge not to mention or make personal attacks about a guy (ayers) barry "met 10-20 years ago". He rants and rages at guests for picking on barry the weakling but doesn't have a clue what bo is all about. Don't they have any idea how this discredits barry? How it shows what a wimp he is? How he can't fight his own battles? Why doesn't barry call McCain or call him out in the MSM and say no more? He can't because of his ego but also because it's true.

Remember how matthews went after Sen Kirk Watson for not knowing anything about barry? matthews doesn't either. Pro-Obama MSM bias exists - this is one more clear evidence of it.

bot work : Spraypainting GOP building

September 30, 2008
New Smyrna, Beach
GOP building defaced by Obama's face.

Obama's face sprayed painted on window, sign and telephone booth, 50 stolen signs including 4' x 8' billboard. That is not just a bunch of kids...well maybe well paid kids. That half billion has to go somewhere...

See Mark I. Johnson, Daytona Beach News-Journal

bot: "Did you call your wife a cunt?"

April 30, 2008
Des Moines, Iowa
Polk County Convention Center - McCain healthcare forum

The man who asked such a vile question is Marty Parrish - a business owner and Baptist minister who has a master's in political science, has worked on Capital Hill and moved to IA from AR to work for Biden campaign. He said he was concerned about McCain's temperament. Fair assessment. So why not ask that straight out? But the question, the leaflet, the preamble and the excuse don't match up - as well as the fact that he signed in as a HuffPo reporter, was taking pictures and knows his way around Capitol Hill. In truth, he had read an article in the HuffPo that mentioned McCain's alleged statement about his wife and got pissed that McCain got away with that but Barry was getting hammered about Wright and those racist bitterites.

See story from OffTheBus, Keith Dinsmore.

PARRISH: "A guy who would call his wife a trollop and a cunt just because she had ruffled his hair in front of five guys is not only a jerk, but a dangerous hothead if he ever gets his finger on the button. And since the mainstream media has decided to give McCain a free pass, I decided to stand up and, if they gave me an open mike, ask the question that the press refuses to touched. Our country is in a serious crisis after nearly eight years of Bush, and America appears to be oblivious to the danger this guy (McCain) poses to our country."

PARRISH: "We have a man whose temper can get the best of him. What I am worried about is his temper. Our country is in a serious crisis. This election is the most significant one since 1860. It appears America is asleep -- so I stood up and asked the question."

PARRISH: "I wanted them to know that I was acting out of a genuine concern for my country and my belief that a man whose temper often gets the best of him should be disqualified for the presidency."

Most significant election since 1860? Then why the subterfuge? Why not ask that point directly? He made up a flier and then got 500 copies made and moveon.org staff helped pass them out.
According to Chris Dorsey at Iowa Politics.com

He handed out a leaflet prior to the event alleging McCain called his wife the name in 1992 while on the campaign trail running for re-election in the Senate. The leaflet asked members of media why they were focusing on the controversial statements made in the past by Democratic candidate Sen. Barack Obama's pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright and ignoring the alleged comment McCain made to his wife.

"Barack Obama spent three weeks defending that," Parrish said afterwards.

"Why does the news media continue to ignore this outrageous statement by John McCain, but fixates on Barack Obama's truthful observation that some people are bitter?" the leaflet reads.

I can't seem to find the leaflet anywhere. Basically a bot was pissed that barry was getting hammered about his bitter statement and rev wright and saw an opening and pounced. Nothing new. Definition of an obamabot.

PARRISH: "This question goes to mental health and mental health care. Previously, I've been married to a woman that was verbally abusive to me. Is it true that you called your wife a cunt?

MCCAIN: Now, now. You don't want to... Um, you know that's the great thing about town hall meetings, sir, but we really don't, there's people here who don't respect that kind of language. So I'll move on to the next questioner in the back.