Showing posts with label harry smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label harry smith. Show all posts

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Harry Smith: POTUS on Iran (6-19)

June 20, 2009

Harry Smith interviewed barry at the White House yesterday. Harry sure has one hot voice. It makes barry’s sound like a native Chicagoan’s. I wonder how hard he works to keep it that way. Like does it change when he’s watching sports or get’s angry and whether it sounds the same in the dark or comes off as creepy? One more mystery that will never be solved. barry’s answers, however, are not a mystery.

Here’s the CBS released video/transcript re: pertinent comments on Iran. The other parts of the interview: North Korea, economy, Dick Cheney will be aired next week on the The Early Show. Anyone know why he keeps giving Cheney air time? It just gives him and his argument legitimacy. Worse – it underscores barry’s insecurities as Commander-in-Chief and undermines the myth that he is Mr Kool inside.

HARRY SMITH: Let’s move on to news of the day. The Ayatollah Khamenei gave his – speech today and gave his sermon. He said that the election in Iran was, in fact, legitimate. He said, quote/unquote, “the street – street demonstrations are unacceptable.” Do you have a message for those people in the street?

BARRY: I absolutely do. Well, first of all, let’s understand that this notion that somehow these hundreds of thousands of people who are pouring into the streets in Iran are somehow responding to the West or the United States. that’s an old distraction that I think has been trotted out periodically. And that’s just not gonna fly.

What you’re seeing in Iran are hundreds of thousands of people who believe their voices were not heard and who are peacefully protesting and – and seeking justice. And the world is watching. And we stand behind those who are seeking justice in a peaceful way. And, you know, already we’ve seen violence out there. I think I’ve said this throughout the week. I want to repeat it that we stand with those whoA would look to peaceful resolution of conflict, and we believe that the voices of people have to be heard, that that’s a universal value that the American people stand for and this administration stands for.

And I’m very concerned based on some of the tenor and tone of the statements that have been made that the government of Iran recognize that the world is watching. And how they approach and deal with people who are, through peaceful means, trying to be heard will, I think, send a pretty clear signal to the international community about what Iran is – and is not.

But the last point I want to make on this – this is not an issue of the United States or the West versus Iran. This is an issue of the Iranian people. The fact that they are on the streets under pretty severe duress, at great risk to themselves, is a sign that there’s something in that society that wants to open up.

And, you know, we respect Iran’s sovereignty. And we respect the fact that ultimately the Iranian people have to make these decisions. But I hope that the world understands that this is not something that has to do with the outside world. This has to do with what’s happening in Iran. And, I think ultimately the Iranian people, will obtain justice.

Q: People in this country say you haven’t said enough, that you haven’t been forceful enough in your support for those people in the street, and which you say?

A: To which I say the last thing that I want to do is to have the United States be a foil for those forces inside Iran who would love nothing better than to make this an argument about the United States. That’s what they do. That’s what we’ve already seen. We shouldn’t be playing into that. There should be no distractions from the fact that the Iranian people are seeking to let their voices be heard.

Now, what we can do is bear witness and say to the world that the, you know, incredible demonstrations that we’ve seen is a testimony to, I think what Dr. King called the the arc of the moral universe. It’s long but it bends towards justice.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Octuplets: The Early Show" Allred vs Jeff Czech (video)

March 25, 2009

Updated list of octuplet posts (3-24)

Jeff Czech, Nadya's lawyer/spokesman looks like he is hungover. Gloria Allred is screaming. Harry Smith doesn't have a clue. This little charade helped no one. Czech wanted AIW to sign a disclosure form to prevent them from talking about anything that went on in the home. That is illegal, as well as a violation of the #1 rule of AIW/Allred/Dr Phil agreement.

.


Transcription not complete.

HARRY SMITH: Jeff, what is your clients primary complaint about these care givers?

JEFF CZECH: Nadya has nannies helping her out. She does not needs the nurses. Her primary concern with AIW was that, basically, AIW was this Trojan rocking horse, that was sent into her house, and out popped these nurses. They were never really on her side.

Lie. The nurses were the deal. It was precisely what Nadya agreed to.

SMITH: So you really think they are setting her up?

CZECH: Well they're not on her side. And the whole thing started with the complaint to Child Protective Services, and I don't think it got any better.

She signed an agreement [see link above] after she initially refused AIW. She knew about the report from the start. It was made by Allred before she even signed on with AIW. When the hospital was threatening not to release any of the preemies because of the unsanitary and unsafe consditions in her house, suddenly got a whole lot better. Don't have the octuplets at home - can't sell their photos.

Dr Phil got AIW, Allred and Nadya together and hammered out a deal and a consent that Nadya signed.[see link above]

AIW got things going with the help of Dr Phil - she then got her free stuff -- no one had offered her anything because of her disgusting selfishness -- the kids came home -- she needs money- - AIW wouldn't let her film a reality show (which is coming) - she didn't like having professionals watching her - AIW was forced to make three reports - not good for nadya - if they take those babies away her meal ticket is gone - she hired non-English speaking nannies (are they in this country legally?) who know nothing about reports - three of them had a positive skin TB test - which Kaiser knew - while they were actively caring for the preemies - and good bye AIW.

This is the judgment of a woman responsible for 14 innocent souls.

We are supposed to believe that a woman, who has just proven she is unable to communicate, for the sake of her octuplets, with adult medical professionals, is capable of communicating with 14 children? 8 preemies and 6 children under 8 - three of whom have neurological dysfunction, including ADHA and autism as well as three generically neglected children?

And then there's the non-English speaking nannies, radaronline, doctors, social workers and paparazzi?

She can't solve a communication problem with an adult - she certainly can't do it with children.

What more is it going to take folks?

And don't minimize Kaiser's self interest. Each day her infants stay in the hospital is a day they're not getting paid by Nadya.

SMITH: Were these nurses sent in there to keep an eye on her so that you can have information so you could wrest control of these children away from this woman?

Unbelievable question. What are they going to do with them? And no one is going to have wrest control of her children away from her - their not in her control.

Allred stated that Nadya only cares for the children when the cameras are rolling. AIW alleges [Dr Phil] that nadya fed the babies only 8 times in 5 day and that 12 hours would pass wthout Nadya checking on the babies.

CZECH: And since the nurses are, there Nadya was able to have some free time. That's why the nurses are there.

10 children and she has free time. Who is watching the older children?

SMITH: Are these kids going to be ok?

ALLRED: Well, we were concerned about endangerment. Apparently, Nadya does not understand that a nurse is a legally mandated reporter. That is, a nurse is required by law to report to o authorities - Child Protective Services - if they believe a baby or a child in their care is in danger, at risk, at harm, or neglected. They have to report that.

I don't know why Nadya wants to cover this or doesn't want them to speak publicly about what has happened or to the authorities. This is what they are required to do. They are the voice, the ears of these babies. And they need to be able to protect them.

HARRY SMITH: This is a very sad story.

It's not a story, Harry, or even a surprise -- it's 14 innocent lives that she alone is responsible for.