barry obamates on Tim Geithner the tax cheat

January 14, 2009

It's not a barry Rezko "boneheaded mistake" this time it's an "innocent mistake". This is absolutely insane. The man who is going to be head of the Treasury, which also means head of the IRS has been audited by them and still didn't come clean until after he was nominated. I can see the first time but after the audit? Yes. These are tough times. But if a guy can't pay his own taxes - or ok made a honest mistake over the last decade and didn't realize it - how is he going to head up the IRS? He didn't know he had to pay taxes? What in the hell type of financial wizard is he?

And what kind of innocent mistake was the lapsed legal immigration status of his housekeeper?

What good was barry's whatever page questionnaire?

What is it going to take folks?

vandura1500

REPORTER: Are you considered that Timothy Geithner's taxes mishap will affect his chance of confirmation?

BARRY: No, Tim Geithner, when I nominated him, was rightly lauded by people from both sides of the aisle, from the market, from labor, as somebody who is uniquely qualified to deal with - as what Lindsay described properly as - the biggest crisis that we've had since the Depression. Ya know, look, is this an embarrassment uh-uh for him - yes. He said so himself. But it was an innocent mistake. It is a mistake that is commonly made for people who are working internationally or for international institutions. It has been corrected. He paid the penalties. And, as I've said before, if my criteria whether it was for cabinet secretary, or vice presidents, or presidents, or reporters was that if you've never made a mistake in your life - none of us would be employed. So, my eh-eh-eh expectation is that he will be confirmed. And my expectation is that he is going to do an outstanding job on part-on part - on behalf of the American people.

barry: US does not torture

January 9, 2009

barry answers a question about national security, torture and Iran.

VoiceofAmericans2008

BARRY: I was clear throughout this campaign and through this transition that under my administration the United States does not torture. We will abide by the Geneva Conventions. That we will uphold our highest values and ideals. And that is a clear charge that I've given to Admiral Blair and to Leon Panetta. And, I think it is important for us to do that, not only because that's who we are, but also will ultimately make us safer. And will help in changing hearts and minds in our struggle against extremists.

With respect to Iran. I will have more to say about Iran after January 20. I have said in the past, during the course of the campaign, that Iran is a genuine threat to US National Security. But I've also said that we should be willing to initiate diplomacy as a mechanism to achieve our national security goals.

And my national security team is reflective of that practical, pragmatic approach to foreign policy. And when we have a policy towards Iran that has been shaped by my national security team - we will release it.

He's already trying to pawn it off on his team even though he says the change will come from him. And note his use of "does not" not WILL NOT. He knows exactly what he is saying and is still trying to obamanate 11 days before he becomes president. It is going to be a very rude awakening...for him, The American People and the world.

Watch his previous stumps on Iran. One day it's a tiny country that doesn't pose a serious threat and the next day it's a grave threat. What do you think he'll settle on come Jan 21st? Here's a few more of his favorite poll-directed, politically expedient stances.

mkhammer

May 18, 2008: Iran, Cuba and Venezuela- these countries are tiny compared to the Soviet Union. They don't pose a serious threat to us.
May 19, 2008: Let me be absolutely clear: Iran is a grave threat.
May 20, 2008: This obsession with Ahmadinejad is an example of us losing track of what's important.

FBI agent: Background checks are not routinely performed

January 10, 2009

I was out looking for info on Gov Richardson's inability to get FBI clearance for his confirmation hearing and I ran across this interesting post from Citizen Wells. It's dated 9-30-08 and is a radio interview of an FBI agent about background checks on politicians. It was "written by Phil's Assistant". I'm presuming it was a Philip Berg assistant. [emphasis added]

ASSISTANT: We have received a lot of question asking: 'How did Obama get this far, he must have had background checks as he is a U.S. Senator.'

ASSISTANT: However, this is inaccurate according to Special Agent-in-Charge: C. Frank Figliuzzi of the Cleveland FBI.

FIGIULIZZI: Background checks are not performed on those elected, once elected they work for Congress and are handed a secret clearance.

Audio transcription of Special Agent-in-Charge: C. Frank Figliuzzi, Cleveland FBI & Mike Trivisonno on the Mike Trivisonno Show, WTAM 1100, 7/02/08, Hr. 2.

CALLER - Do they perform background checks on candidates and fellows who are in Congress and the Senate and perhaps potential presidential candidates?.

FBI - The short answer is no. No we don't, but they're given top secret clearances because they're members of Congress, or Senators, or even higher ranking officials.

HOST - Time out. There are no background checks from the FBI on the people that lead the country, the United States of America?

FBI - Let me emphasize, elected officials. This is a democracy, the people have elected an official to represent them in Washington, and we do not routinely run background checks on those people.

HOST - Even people running for president of the United States of America?

FBI - That's correct.

HOST - That's a little weird.

FBI - Well, its part of democracy, its part of what the American people want, they want to be able to vote for somebody to represent them in Washington and they don't want us to get in the way of that and we have no predilection to get in the way of that.

HOST - Yeah, but what if they're voting for a bad person and they don't know that person is bad, do you follow me?. I'm saying, if the guy's got a background and maybe he's involved with some people that he shouldn't be involved with, shouldn't we know that as voters?.

FBI - Well, I think you'd agree that the American political process is about as rigorous as you'll ever see and if there's dirt back there, probably the opponent is gonna get it out probably before anyone else will.

HOST - Now I know why you're the head of the FBI, they're good, aren't they?.

It's hard to fathom. because of barry's admitted past history of drug abuse - he cannot be a DEA, FBI or Secret Service agent anfd yet he will be in charge of them. What is not know about Sen Clinton vs barry? he claims transparency but he refuses to release his birth certificate, his full medical and full school records.

A look at his passport history. If he held and Indonesian passport one end of story. Immediately eliminates one avenue of inquiry. And why didn't the Secret Service tell us if he was in the pew?

barry's passport could clear up one avenue of inquiry. If he held and Indonesian one - end of story. At least six people know the answer to that: an Intelligence superior, one high clearance computer person, one lower level discoverer, some type of police officer, a lawyer of some sort as well as the President. Why aren't we allowed to know that information? Maybe SCOTUS is able to subpoena them.

And China breached the system. What info do they have on barry?

No. I am not a (tinfoil-wearing) paranoid conspiracist racist who wants to destroy barry because my candidate lost. I had no candidate and did not vote. And who in their right mind would want him to fail? I'm just carrying it to extreme to point out what little access to information we have from the Man of Transparency.

And who has the ethical journalistic duty to demand the answers?

It used to be called the press. Now it's called the proobamedia.

No decision on Berg v Obama (1-9-09)

January 9, 2009

I have heard nothing and can find no evidence of any ruling by SCOTUS on the Berg case. Nothing updated on the docket ot the order so it’s Monday. Same thing they did with Donofrio and the refusal was out first thing Monday. Anyone have info please share.

I’m still working on the summary on the Lightfoot case from California that was distributed on 1-7-09 and is scheduled for conference on 1-23-09. Won’t finish until later - maybe early tomorrow.

Update: Why can't they leave Gov Palin's family alone?

January 6, 2009

Countdown

herr olbermann is so hate-filled he would be perfect on al Jazeera. His anger must stem from not being able to see his parts in over a decade. He still is going after Senator Palin (how he refers to her). He made sure to report on Bristol Palin's future mother-in-law's drug related arrest. Now he's after her fiance, Levi Johnston. He just started an electrician's apprenticeship, which evidently requires a high school education. Now, because of the media attention and suggestion that the Gov or First Dude Palin used their influence, he has had to quit the job.

What parent has helped get their kid a job? Levi's dad works on the site which is a normal way of getting your kid a job. I didn't realize Gov Palin had such supreme control of the universe.

Where is that breaking the law or even newsworthy?

Original op-ed was by Dan Fagan some loser radio host. Here's a little insight by one of his fans named Jack:

At first I just called you a FAT BASTARD now I have to ad COMUNIST FAT BASTARD, How did you get your job, on your knees or bent over a desk. Give the Palins a break, Levi is only trying to man up and be a man, take some of his actions and use them for yourself, maybe you could get laid and knock up one of your hookers or boyfriends.

Maybe he's the Anchorage version of herr olbermann.

Anchorage Daily News' WESLEY LOY:

Levi's dad, KEITH JOHNSTON on his son quitting: He felt it was the best thing to do to kind of calm the waters, so to speak.

On no GED: It's just something that slipped through the cracks." He said the lack of a diploma wasn't something that managers at ASRC caught and neither he nor Levi gave it much thought.

You guys are watching him so tightly. He's being treated different than an average 18-year-old kid. He has to do everything by the book now.

Sarah had nothing to do with him getting hired on the Slope. If there was any help getting him on up there, it was because of my associations and no one else's.

This isn't funny anymore - not that it ever was. He has a child to support and media pressure just forced him to quit what would have been excellent lifelong security. Leave them alone to get on with their lives. I really cannot get past the sexism and absolute misogyny. What would happen if she didn't live outside the United States?

OLBERMANN: She is a bottomless pit of political standards. I'd be lost without her.

Says a lot doesn't it?

How often has olbermann reported on the arson of a former vice presidential candidate's church (Wasilla Bible Church) while women and children were clearly inside it when the fire was set?

Worst Person in the World?

And then his I don't even know how to characterize her Margaret Carlson goes on about Blair House. Get over it. They aren't living there. Move on to something important. She says John Howard, Former Primer Minister of Australia is staying there just as some plausible reason.

Why doesn't anyone ask why the Obama's deserve it when they haven't been inaugurated? Why should the whole world be at their feet? It took the Germans and Bush to say no.

What is going to happen to the proobamedia when their eyes are opened once and for all?

obama v obama divorce record

January 5, 2009

Philip Berg has obtained barry's parent's divorce record.

Stanley Ann D. Obama vs. Barack H. Obama which was filed in the First District Court of Hawaii on January 20, 1964. The Obama divorce was finalized on March 5, 1964.

The Obama divorce records state there was one child born to the parties on August 4, 1961, a son, by the name of Barack Hussein Obama, II. There is absolutely no mention of where the child was born.

That would have been too easy. I remember reading in barry's book that he was afraid to look up his parent's marriage records. He didn't say why but it's not hard to conjecture. He did however say that he had his original birth certificate - so why the hiding?

Background and relevant documents re: barry's eligibility to be POTUS.

Ret Adm Dennis Blair to Head NIA

Retired Admiral, Dennis Blair to Head the National Intelligence Agency

Don't know anything about him.

Leon Panetta to Head CIA

Leon Panetta to Head CIA

Clintonite with experience - President Clinton Chief of Staff. Right age group to shove under the bus.

Where's the missus?

January 4, 2009

Where has the First Lady elect been hiding and why?

Dear proobamedia members:

January 2, 2009

Why are you letting barry get away with no comment on Hamas-Israel? He had no problem making an immediate statement on Mumbai. But he hasn't made a single comment other than there's only one president like he has on everything else. The timing of the bombing is not at all coincidental - just like Putin's attack on Georgia.

When are you going to do your job?

Roland "Trailblazer" Burris' final resting place

January 3, 2009

Blagojevich appointee Roland "Trailblazer" Burris has a granite mausoleum already in place that lists his many accomplishments, including the distinction of being the first black statewide office holder in Illinois. He is not a man lacking in self-confidence, as he showed in his (12-30-08) interview with NBC 5's Alex Perez:

BURRIS: I have no problem with going to US Senate and doing a job for the people - not only of Illinois - right now the nation needs someone with Roland Burris' talent and skills.

Talking in the third person says a great deal as does the naming of his children: daughter Rolanda, son Roland W Burris II and grandson, Roland T. Burris.

Call his mausoleum strange narcissistic or whatever. But a walk through the Oak Woods cemetery provides more info about Burris than the proobamedia has provided The American People about barry.

As one of The People of Illinois, I would be pleased to see Burris take over barry's seat. (It should be Tammy Duckworth.) Burris has a history of making independent decisions, standing by them and being accountable for the consequences.

Something barry will do for the first time on January 21st 00:01.

barry's Certification of Live Birth

January 3, 2009

You asked for a copy. I couldn't find the old post so here. Go to Dr "Ron Polarik's" website for the technical breakdown of the alleged forgery. Note: it takes a while to load because of the enlarged photo evidence.

barry's Certification of Live Birth posted on KOS shows an obvious difference in security borders.

Election Year in Review: barry voters

January 3, 2009

Here's an eye-opening video of how little barry voters knew and strangely how much they knew of his opponents. This would have been a much better video if it was done during the primaries. Folks would come out of the yes-we-can rallies eyes all a'glaze and not be able to recite anything barry said or state his position on anything other than "he voted against the war". Which of course is a fairy tale that will go down as the most blatant fraud perpetrated on The American People (o-baaa-ma sheeples) in presidential election history. The ones who could answer most often said return of the middle class or universal healthcare, which were Sen Clinton's stands. Anyway take the ten minutes to watch. See if you find it funny as in Leno's Jaywalking. Then take it a step further and realize that folks like these spent the last two years making personal attacks on barry's opponents - including the tried and true cries of racism - instead of learning something about barry.

courtesy of talktozig

Name one accomplishment: Dukakais

Name one accomplishment: Kirk Watson

Name on accomplishment: Harlem voters

Name one accomplishment: Super Tuesday voters

Name one accomplishment: New Yorkers

Name one accomplishment: Democratic voters

Proobamedia books: Chuckie T's

January 2, 2008

Now the proobamedia books are coming out. Chuckie Todd's book which I hate to name is: "How Obama won". He's co-wrote it with Sheldon Cowiser (polling expert). They said it would have been written even if barry lost "but the data's the data".

The proobama media bias is all the data one needs.

Check out a chuckie's fan club. "An online salute to the smartest guy on TV how makes sense of the senseless"? Has to be some type of a joke.

The New York Observer's LEON NEYFAKH:

According to editor Errol McDonald, who approached Mr. Todd with the idea about a month before the election, the book will be divided into four sections: Battleground states, emerging battleground states, receding battleground states, and all the rest. Mr. McDonald said the book will come with an introduction by Mr. Todd and Mr. Gawiser (who is NBC's Elections Director) and an appendix that will "give very surprising facts based on the data."

Very surprising facts? Will they finally reveal the proobama media bias? Haha. And interesting folks involved. Now you can see why NBC/MSNBC were the #1 proobamedia outlet followed closely by NEWSWEEK and the Washington Post. I hope I live long enough for them to be called out on their obvious bias. Bias that 74.7% of Americans believe directly affected the outcome of the presidential election. And 93% thought barry received more coverage. Now just imagine if Sen Clinton and Sen McCain were black. What type of outrage would there be?

The Double Standard.

One step closer to a More Perfect Union?

barry on blago's pick of burris

barry on blago's pick of burris

Quote of the day: "I'm on the wrong planet"

Quote of the day: "I'm on the wrong planet"

exactly who and what was Biden referring to?

Exactly who and what was Biden referring to?

Quote of the day: "He's either a corrupt madman or a psychopathic genius"

Quote of the day: "He's either a corrupt madman or a psychopathic genius"

2008 Word of the Year: Proobamedia

2008 Word of the Year: Proobamedia

POLL: IFC/ZOGBY overwhelming media bias

December 29, 2008

Independent Film Channel/Zogby poll shows overwhelmingly that Americans believe the news is biased and that the biased coverage influenced the outcome of the presidential election. Surprise.

They polled 3,472 adults nationwide on November 5 and 6, 2008 with a very good split of sampling. Of those surveyed: Dems 38%, Rep 31% and Independents 28%. East (22%), South (26%), Center/Great Lakes (30%) and west (22%). Nearly all (99.6%) were registered to vote,99.7% voted. 53% voted for barry 46% McCain. MOE +/- 1.7%.

RESULTS:
93.1% barry received more coverage
4.1% thought McCain received more

74.7% thought media coverage of the presidential election influenced the outcome
94.2% Rep
55.6% Dem
79.3% Men
70.2% Women

Overall unreliable
80% TV
84% Radio

72.6% believe the news they read/see is biased.
88.7% Rep
57.5% Dem
77% males
67% females
73.3% White
76.7% Hispanic
62.2% Black
70.6% Asian
83.5% Other

Most reliable source of news
37.6% Internet
20.3% National TV News
16% Radio
11.3% Valid newspapers
4% Local TV News

Most trusted Newspaper
20.1% don't read newspapers
19.6 NY Times
19.2% Local
17.4% WSJ

Most trusted source:
39.3% FOX
16% CNN
15% MSNBC
10.1% PBS
6% NBC

Least trusted:
0.6% CNBC
1.5% CBS
3.3% ABC

81% Rep trust FOX
30.3% Dems trust MSNBC
26.2% Dems trust CNN

Most trusted news personality:
12.5% Rush Limbaugh
10.1% Bill O'Reilly
10.3% None listed
8.5% Brokaw
8% Hannity
6.9% Olbermann
6.6% Williams
6.3% Maddow

Least trusted:
0.6% Elisabeth Hasselbeck (How is she considered a news source?)
1.6% Colbert
1.9% Matthews
2.1% Stephanopoulos

Most trusted news personality:
­14.2% Dem Keith Olbermann
29.2% Rep Rush Limbaugh

Don't think media giving a true representation of Iraq
73% overall
90% Rep
55.6% Dem

So 73% believe there is media bias in general, 75% thought media bias influenced the outcome of the presidential election and 93% thought barry got more coverage.

Sure doesn't get a lot clearer than that or folks who need stats to point out the obvious.