Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts

Saturday, May 23, 2009

President of Notre Dame, Fr Jenkins: Commencement remarks

Updated list of Fr Weslin/Fr Jenkins/Notre Dame posts

May 22, 2009

Once I saw Fr Jenkins' face, it was clear why he invited barry - he has the same glazed-eyed look as the manlove media members. Priest, laymen, women, children, fellow politicians, the press - it doesn't matter. It's the same look: obamessiah mesmerism. I didn't think it could get any more disturbing. At times, his eyes were aglow and cheeks flushed with an abnormal...stimulation is the best world I can come up with. It literally made my skin crawl. A priest should not have that look unless they are looking at Jesus on the Cross. His voice choked up, his mouth parched and he began blinking when he began to speak of barry, with the great awe that the president accepted the invite - his invite. Listen to him - it had nothing to do with barry facing the controversy, which he was trying to imply. It had to do with Fr Jenkins' personal wish, desire if you will, coming to fruition.

Nothing at all wrong with it except for the confusion of Catholics everywhere, the students who could not in good conscience go to their own graduation, the brutal treatment of Fr Weslin, the sexist treatment of Professor Glendon and the breaking of a 120-year old tradition of awarding the highest honor an American Catholic can receive. Something former Ambassador to the Pope, Professor Glendon would have received had barry just declined the honorary deree. He could have still spoken and been adored. And she received and accepted her invitation 4 months before barry was ever offered one hers. Imagine if that were the ther way around. Would it have been allowed? Double Standard.

Obama_at_Notre_Dame2.JPG

Fr John Jenkins relishing the moment, flushed cheeks and all

Fr Jenkins is a natural speaker in the crisp rhetorical tradition of the Jesuits and most likely a scholastic genius, especially the Classics, but his physical voice and intonation are grating and jarring - so the speech is better read than heard. At least to my ear. He also appears in vigorous health - my guess, a runner, who has a precise schedule. Wonder what he is trying to keep at bay. Just curiosities based on observation. If he didn't anger me so for what he allowed to happen to Fr Weslin, I would want to know more about him.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, May 17, 2009
President of Notre Dame, Father John I. Jenkins Commencement Remarks (Text) (Video)
Remarks and Introduction, As Prepared [emphasis added]

President Obama, Fr. Hesburgh, Judge Noonan, Members of the Board of Trustees, Members of the faculty, staff, alumni, friends, parents, and most of all – the Notre Dame Class of 2009:

Several autumns ago, you came to Notre Dame from home….now Notre Dame has become home. And it always will be. For home is not where you live. Home is where you belong. You will always belong – and I pray you will always feel you belong – here at Notre Dame.

You are … ND.

In my four years as President of your University – I have found that even among those who did not go to Notre Dame, even among those who do not share the Catholic faith, there is a special expectation, a special hope, for what Notre Dame can accomplish in the world. They hope that Notre Dame will be one of the great universities in the nation, but they also hope that it will send forth graduates who—grounded in deep moral values—can help solve the world's toughest problems.

Their hope is in you, the graduates of 2009.

That is a good place for hope to be. I have great confidence in what your talent and energy can accomplish in the world. But I have a special optimism for what you can do inspired by faith.

It is your faith that will focus your talents and help you build the world you long to live in and leave to your children.

The world you enter today is torn by division – and is fixed on its differences.

Differences must be acknowledged, and in some cases cherished. But too often differences lead to pride in self and contempt for others, until two sides – taking opposing views of the same difference—demonize each other. Whether the difference is political, religious, racial, or national—trust falls, anger rises, and cooperation ends … even for the sake of causes all sides care about.

More than any problem in the arts or sciences – engineering or medicine – easing the hateful divisions between human beings is the supreme challenge of this age. If we can solve this problem, we have a chance to come together and solve all the others.

A Catholic university – and its graduates – are specially called, and I believe specially equipped, to help meet this challenge.

As a Catholic university, we are part of the Church – members of the "mystical body of Christ" animated by our faith in the Gospel. Yet we are also – most of us – citizens of the United States – this extraordinary evolving expression of human freedom. We are called to serve each community of which we're a part, and this call is captured in the motto over the door of the east nave of the Basilica: "God, Country, Notre Dame."

As we serve the Church, we can persuade believers by appeals to both faith and reason. As we serve our country, we will be motivated by faith, but we cannot appeal only to faith. We must also engage in a dialogue that appeals to reason that all can accept.

When we face differences with fellow citizens, we will be tested: do we keep trying, with love and a generous spirit, to appeal to ethical principles that might be persuasive to others – or do we condemn those who differ with us for not seeing the truth that we see?

The first approach can lead to healing, the second to hostility. We know which approach we are called to as disciples of Christ.

Pope Benedict said last year from the South Lawn of the White House: "I am confident that the American people will find in their religious beliefs a precious source of insight and an inspiration to pursue reasoned, responsible and respectful dialogue in the effort to build a more humane and free society."

Genuine faith does not inhibit the use of reason; it purifies it of pride and distorting self-interest. As it does so, Pope Benedict has said, "human reason is emboldened to pursue its noble purpose of serving mankind, giving expression to our deepest common aspirations and extending … public debate."

Tapping the full potential of human reason to seek God and serve humanity is a central mission of the Catholic Church. The natural place for the Church to pursue this mission is at a Catholic university. The University of Notre Dame belongs to an academic tradition of nearly a thousand years – born of the Church's teaching that human reason, tempered by faith, is a gift of God, a path to religious truth, and a means for seeking the common good in secular life.

It is out of this duty to serve the common good that we seek to foster dialogue with all people of good will, regardless of faith, background or perspective. We will listen to all views, and always bear witness for what we believe. [Like Fr Weslin did, which resulted in manhandling, handcuffing, humiliation, arrest and jail.]

Insofar as we play this role, we can be what Pope John Paul II said a Catholic university is meant to be – "a primary and privileged place for a fruitful dialogue between the Gospel and culture" [Ex corde ecclesiae, 3.34].

Of course, dialogue is never instantaneous; it doesn't begin and end in an afternoon. It is an ongoing process made possible by many acts of courtesy and gestures of respect, by listening carefully and speaking honestly. [Fr Weslin spoke honestly, but recieved none of the other in return.]

Paradoxically, support for these actions often falls as the need for them rises – so they are most controversial precisely when they can be most helpful. [His words speak for Fr Weslin and he doesn't seem to realize it.]

As we all know, a great deal of attention has surrounded President Obama's visit to Notre Dame. We honor all people of good will who have come to this discussion respectfully and out of deeply held conviction.

Most of the debate has centered on Notre Dame's decision to invite and honor the President. [Here's where he begins to gets emotional.] Less attention has been focused on the President's decision to accept. [Surveys the crowd, smile of personal accomplishment.]

President Obama has come to Notre Dame, though he knows well that we are fully supportive of Church teaching on the sanctity of human life, and we oppose his policies on abortion and embryonic stem cell research.

Others might have avoided this venue for that reason. [Sounds like he is going to cry.] But President [voice cracks] Obama is not someone who stops talking to those [voice cracks] who differ with him. [barry responds by scratching his cheek]

Mr. President: [looks to barry] This is a principle we share.

As the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council wrote in their pastoral constitution Gaudium et Spes: "Respect and love ought to be extended also to those who think or act differently than we do in social, political and even religious matters. In fact, the more deeply we come to understand their ways of thinking through such courtesy and love, the more easily will we be able to enter into dialogue with them."

If we want to extend courtesy, respect and love – and enter into dialogue – then surely we can start by acknowledging what is honorable in others.

We welcome President Obama to Notre Dame, and we honor him for the qualities and accomplishments the American people admired in him when they elected him. [a most revealing smile best seen on video]

fr jenkins smile

He is a man who grew up without a father, whose family was fed for a time with the help of food stamps—yet who mastered the most rigorous academic challenges, who turned his back on wealth to serve the poor, who sought the Presidency at a young age against long odds, and who – on the threshold of his goal—left the campaign to go to the bedside of his dying grandmother who helped raise him.

[Here I must interject facts, Padre. barry spent only 22 hours there, did not stay with her, and refused to stay for her last birthday (a few hours after he left) knowing it would be her last. His choice - but your statement is disingenuous. He said to Harry Smith before he left for Hawaii that he didn't want to make the mistake like he did with his mother. BARRY: Most people understand that if you are not caring for your family, then you are probably not the kind of person who is going to be caring for other people.” He then left his sister alone in Hawaii to grieve and take care of all of the arrangements. Did his actions match his words? Who was there to hold her hands and recall fond memories of a woman who worked so he could be be where he is now? A woman who did not raise her, but a woman she had taken full responsibility, by necessity, to care for. He never even thanked her by name in his speeches. Only one direct relative - only one sister to acknowledge and nothing. He also was not at his mother's side when she died not unpredicatably from cancer, again leaving his sister alone. Yes. Don't judge, lest ye be judged. But that is cold. My opinion.]

He is a leader who has great respect for the role of faith and religious institutions in public life. [How? In actions, not just words?] He has said: "Secularists are wrong when they ask believers to leave their religion at the door before entering into the public square."

He is the first African American to be elected President, yet his appeal powerfully transcends race. [Another telling smile - like a proud papa. It's clear why he wanted him there for the anniversary of Brown vs Board of Education]

fr jenkins "barry appeal"

In a country that has been deeply wounded by racial hatred – he has been a healer. [??]

He has set ambitious goals across a sweeping agenda—extending health care coverage to millions who don't have it, improving education especially for those who most need it, promoting renewable energy for the sake of our economy, our security, and our climate.

He has declared the goal of a world without nuclear weapons and has begun arms reduction talks with the Russians.

He has pledged to accelerate America's fight against poverty, to reform immigration to make it more humane, and to advance America's merciful work in fighting disease in the poorest places on earth.

[He's talked about a lot of things and they don't quite come through as he spoke of them. Iraq, military commissions, torture photos, Gitmo, Fisa.... Why those folks voted for him, who aren't feeling healed by yet another example of his words not in the same reality as actions.]

As commander-in-chief and as chief executive, he embraces with confidence both the burdens of leadership and the hopes of his country.

Ladies and Gentlemen: The President of the United States.

----------------------------

Unfortunately, his last smile and the subsequent greeting is not on the video. Something that would have been most enlightening as to the actual physical contact involved. The looks said plenty.

Notre Dame Students Stand for Life Video

May 21, 2009

The students who ultimately had no say in the matter.

jimblazsik.com

Fr Weslin arrest/Notre Dame Commencement posts

Fr Weslin arrest/Fr Jenkins/Notre Dame

May 21, 2009

Fr Weslin’s earthly reward for defending sacred vows

May 20, 2009

(5-15) Arrest #1 Fr Weslin (Video)
(5-16) Arrest #2 Fr Weslin (Video)
Updated list of Fr Weslin/Fr Jenkins/Notre Dame Commencement posts

A Catholic priest, Father Norman Weslin goes about defending the Church’s Teachings on the sanctity of human life in his protest against abortion. He attempts to protest on the campus of a Catholic University, Notre Dame, where he should be welcome as a Catholic priest.

Father Norman Weslin carries a cross as he leads an anti-abortion protest towards the Notre Dame campus Friday, May 15, 2009 in South Bend, Indiana. The protestors object to the selection of President Barack Obama as the Notre Dame commencement speaker. (AP Photo/Joe Raymond)

(AP Photo/JOE RAYMOND)

He wasn’t welcomed. He was arrested for trespassing, for putting one foot on to Notre Dame property. And then spent the next 4 minutes being brutally manhandled and handcuffed just for taking that step. Manhandled while he sang to Our Lady aka “Notre Dame”.

fr Weslin arrest

Why was a 78 y/o Man of God manhandled like this? Look the pain on Fr Weslin’s face – for what? For being a Catholic Priest, for following his vows, for trying to save the lives of unborn children, for protesting that a Catholic University wuld reward a man with an honorary degree who is as far away from the Church’s Teaching on abortion that it can get.

Fr Weslin was not treated with the respect a Catholic priest should have been given – trespassing or not. He was doing his job just as the policemen were doing theirs. Who treated the other as thy would like to have been treated? Who never fought or complained or waivered despite the obvious pain and humiliation?

Fr Weslin bowed

Fr Weslin to policemen:

We’re Catholic priests. Why are you arresting a Catholic priest for trying to stop the killing of a baby? Use your mind. What are you doing that for? Why are you arresting a priest for trying to stop the killing of a baby? You’ve got it all backwards.

This was the policemen’s answer.

Father Norman Weslin arrested

AP

Note how Fr Weslin’s hands are bound tightly behind him and the pressure of the handhold of the blue blanket is directly on them – jostling up and down on his hands, wrists, elbows and shoulders as they haul him away. Just try it. Get in that position yourself. Have someone used a soft sock to bind your wrists and see how uncomfortable it is. Then imagine you have the joints of a 78 y/o man. And then imagine that your arms have been broken before. And then realize that the officer who handcuffed him knew about Fr Weslin’s injuries and did it anyway as Father “resisted” by singing.

86881849SO020_OBAMA_MAKES_C

May 17, 2009 (SCOTT OLSEN/Getty Images)

While Fr Weslin was still jailed following his second arrest, others carried on the protest. Even as barry accepted an award ASU said he was not qualified to receive. One that should never have been awarded to a man who thinks abortion, something the Church classifies as murder. Here a unidentified nun is acting out her faith. Look at the pain on her face and look at the deference she was given.

Why the difference?

And indoors the alleged Catholic priest, who allowed his fellow priest to be manhandled, shakes hands with a man who vows never to outlaw the murder of the most innocent of soul even as he admits determining whether life begins at conception is above his pay grade.

POL/

(JEFF HAYNES/Getty Images)

Matthew 7:15

Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but within are ravening wolves.

Obama

(AP/GERALD HERBERT)

Thursday, May 21, 2009

The hood of honor vs the humiliation of handcuffs

May 21, 2009 by mattie14

May 21, 2009

I can’t get past this.

fr Weslin arrest

Fr Weslin Arrest #1: Four minutes of pain and humiliation while he sings

And is has nothing to do with my personal views on abortion or stem cell research or Notre Dame or Catholicism or Father Weslin’s foundation or even barry. I’m not debating the issue of abortion – the morality or ethics – or my personal thoughts. I am looking it from the Catholic viewpoint.

I can’t get past the vision of a 78 y/o Catholic priest–who was doing what the Lord asked of him and what he vowed to the Lord he would do–getting manhandled, disrespected and humiliated in front of the world, on the grounds of Catholic University because the president of the alleged Catholic University, an alleged Catholic priest, chose to award a man who thinks it’s okay not only to kill fetuses, but to withhold from them medical care should they survive the attempt on their life.

Father Weslin, hands bound behind his back, propped up by policeman asks:

We’re Catholic priests. Why are you arresting a Catholic priest for trying to stop the killing of a baby? Use your mind. What are you doing that for? Why are you arresting a priest for trying to stop the killing of a baby? You’ve got it all backwards.

In what world, let alone Catholic institution, is this even remotely okay?

And how is it a Catholic University when it allows a devout Man of God to be manhandled, bound and humiliated for the sake of a man who disregards the most sacred tenet of the Church? A man who believes killing a fetus is not murder. A man who voted to withhold treatment from a human life that by any definition was alive, despite the attempt to murder it.

As of Friday, Notre Dame ceased being a Catholic University. By censoring a priest, who was defending the Church, they unequivocally sanctioned abortion and did so for a man in favor of withholding medical care from fetuses who survive abortion.

Over what?

An ego-feeding honorary degree that means absolutely nothing because he has done absolutely nothing.

These honorary degrees are apparently pretty hard to come by

POL/

(JEFF HAYNES/Getty)

This smiling man, who made Father’s arrest necessary, could have gotten his fix of adoration, given his teleprompter reading and been feted like a king even without accepting the honorary degree. And his greedy egomania prevented an accomplished Harvard Law Professor and former Ambassador to the Holy See, Professor Mary Ann Glendon, a woman who was actually deserving of the highest honor bestowed by the University to not be awarded hers. A 120 year tradition broken for a man who is not even Catholic and who is diametrically opposed to the most sacred teaching of the Church.

But his ego wouldn’t budge. His needs were more important than the Catholic electorate and ND graduates opposed to his presence. ASU wouldn’t give him anything but naming rights to an already established scholarship and he was not about to go 2-0. He even admitted so in his Commencement Address. So he chose to accept an honorary degree that was based on nothing and had no inherent meaning other than a token given out to dignitaries during commencements.

But that meaningless token now has meaning. It will forever be linked to the image of Father Weslin, helpless on the ground, alone, hands bound behind his back and his torso held in place, not by human hands, but by a booted leg and anonymous material. Instead of some trivial degree given away to a man who speaks but does not act – it will represent the actions of a man who stood behind his words, willing to suffer the consequences.

The hood of honor vs the humiliation of handcuffs

Obama Delivers Notre Dame Commencement Address in South Bend, Indiana

(UPI Photo/Brian Kersey)

Fr Weslin handcuffed

Arrest #2
Side by side video of barry’s and Weslin’s respective welcomings

Quinnipiac poll re: Notre Dame Commencement

May 20, 2009

Quinnipiac University poll
April 21-27
2041 voters
MOE +/- 2.2%

Should Notre Dame rescind invite to POTUS?
Yes 31%
No 56%

Catholics
Yes 34%
No 60%

Catholics attend service weekly
Yes 43%
No 49%

Less observant Catholics
Yes 26%
No 70%

Protestants
Yes 33%
No 51%

Evangelicals
Yes 42%
No 44%

Given four choices on abortion:

  • 15% of all voters, including 13% of Catholics and 10% of observant Catholics, say abortion should be legal in all cases;
  • 37% of all voters, including 37% of Catholics and 19% of observant Catholics, say abortion should be legal in most cases;
  • 27% of all voters, including 28% of Catholics and 40% of observant Catholics, say abortion should be illegal in most cases;
  • 14% of all voters, including 16% of Catholics and 26% of observant Catholics, say abortion should be illegal in all cases.

Pres Notre Dame Fr Jenkins’ letter to 2009 Graduates

May 20, 2009

President of Notre Dame (and priest who allowed Fr Weslin to be manhandled, disrespected and humiliated) FATHER JENKINS’ letter to the 2009 graduating class of Notre Dame. Found at rpinet. In closing he says “there is much to admire and celebrate in the life and work” of barry and that he is a “remarkable figure in American history”.

What? And for what?

How many graduates – because of their Catholic consciences – could not attend their own graduations?

What special type of letter did they get?

A refund?

—————–

May 11, 2009

Dear Members of the Notre Dame Graduating Class of 2009:

This Sunday, as you receive your degrees at Commencement, your joy – and that of your families – will be shared by the faculty, staff, and administration of the University. We have had the privilege of laboring with each of you to inquire and discover, to teach and to learn, and we will send you off with affectionate and fond hopes for the future.

For those of you who are undergraduates, I feel a special kinship. You arrived in your dorm rooms as I arrived in the President’s Office. You have learned much; I may have learned more. I am grateful for the opportunity I had to learn with you, come to know you, and to serve you during our time together at Notre Dame.

During your years here we have endeavored to train you in the various disciplines and urged you to ask the larger questions – discussing not only the technical and practical but also the ethical and spiritual dimensions of pressing issues. I have been proud of you as you’ve grappled with intellectual, political, and spiritual questions. But I have never been more proud than I have been watching the way you’ve conducted yourselves over the past several weeks.

The decision to invite President Obama to Notre Dame to receive an honorary degree and deliver the Commencement address has triggered debate. In many cases, the debate has grown heated, even between people who agree completely on Church teaching regarding the sanctity of human life, who agree completely that we should work for change – and differ only on how we should work for change.

Yet, there has been an extra dimension to your debate. You have discussed this issue with each other while being observed, interviewed, and evaluated by people who are interested in this story. You engaged each other with passion, intelligence and respect. And I saw no sign that your differences led to division. You inspire me. We need the wider society to be more like you; it is good that we are sending you into that world on Sunday.

I am saddened that many friends of Notre Dame have suggested that our invitation to President Obama indicates ambiguity in our position on matters of Catholic teaching. The University and I are unequivocally committed to the sanctity of human life and to its protection from conception to natural death.

Notre Dame has a long custom of conferring honorary degrees on the President of the United States. It has never been a political statement or an endorsement of policy. It is the University’s expression of respect for the leader of the nation and the Office of the President. In the Catholic tradition, our first allegiance is to God in Christ, yet we are called to respect, participate in, and contribute to the wider society. As St. Peter wrote (I Pt. 2:17), we should honor the leader who upholds the secular order.

At the same time, and born of the same duty, a Catholic university has a special obligation not just to honor the leader but to engage the culture. Carrying out this role of the Catholic university has never been easy or without controversy. When I was an undergraduate at Notre Dame, Fr. Hesburgh spoke of the Catholic university as being both a lighthouse and a crossroads. As a lighthouse, we strive to stand apart and be different, illuminating issues with the moral and spiritual wisdom of the Catholic tradition. Yet, we must also be a crossroads through which pass people of many different perspectives, backgrounds, faiths, and cultures. At this crossroads, we must be a place where people of good will are received with charity, are able to speak, be heard, and engage in responsible and reasoned dialogue.

The President’s visit to Notre Dame can help lead to broader engagement on issues of importance to the country and of deep significance to Catholics. Ultimately, I hope that the conversations and the good will that come from this day will contribute to closer relations between Catholics and public officials who make decisions on matters of human life and human dignity.

There is much to admire and celebrate in the life and work of President Obama
. His views and policies on immigration, expanding health care, alleviating poverty, and building peace through diplomacy have a deep resonance with Catholic social teaching. As the first African-American holder of this office, he has accelerated our country’s progress in overcoming the painful legacy of slavery and segregation. He is a remarkable figure in American history, and I look forward to welcoming him to Notre Dame.

As President Obama is our principal speaker, there will no doubt be much attention on your Commencement. Remember, though, that this day is your day. My fervent prayer is that May 17 will be a joyous day for you and your family. You are the ones we celebrate and applaud. Congratulations, and may God bless you.

In Notre Dame,

Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C.

President

barry’s Notre Dame Commencement Address (video)

May 20, 2009

TEXT

Video of barry’s commencement speech at Nortre Dame

Courtesy of joegerarden http://townhall.com/blog/

PART 1

PART 2

PART 3

Match not made in heaven: Francis Cardinal George & barry

May 20, 2009

Francis Caedinal George is not a fan of barry’s politics. barry of course doesn’t like that – he takes it as a personal attack. And it came to play at Notre Dame. Why did barry speak of Cardinal Bernadin and not Cardinal George, who is alive and the current president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops? Because George spoke out against Notre Dame and barry – early and loudly and before that because of his stance on abortion.

(4-30) CARDINAL GEORGE: Whatever else is clear, it’s clear Notre Dame didn’t understand what it means to be Catholic when they issued this invitation and didn’t anticipate the kind of uproar that would be consequent to the decision, at least not to the extent that it has happened.

There are only two things one needs to know about who barry:

1) He works solely out of political expedience.
2) He cannot and will not stand for anyone to saying anything less than glowing about him.

He seeks not just to win but to destroy his opponent as well. Born out in his political career if one has the honesty to look. If you haven’t seen it or are still denying it – stay tuned.

Other video comments by Cardinal George re: Notre Dame, barry’s intent to reverse the healthworker “conscience clause” and that voting for barry was a “Hobson’s Choice” for Catholics.

April 3, 2009

Addresses his previous comments re: Notre Dame’s decision to invite barry in which he told Catholics “to call, to e-mail, to write letters” about the “extreme embarrassment” the University of Notre Dame has caused and that “Notre Dame doesn’t know what it means to be Catholic”

CatholicChicago

March 16, 2009

Francis Cardinal George in response to barry’s announcement on Feb 27th to remove the conscience clause for health care workers.

USCC

barry’s Notre Dame Commencement speech:

Let’s honor the conscience of those who disagree with abortion, and draft a sensible conscience clause, and make sure that all of our health care policies are grounded not only in sound science, but also in clear ethics, as well as respect for the equality of women.

————

March 2, 2009

Parish Leadership Day 2009 at Maria High School. Cardinal Francis George is talking about who voted for barry and abortion.

CatholicChicago

You have to have a very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, good reason to vote or somebody who is pro-abortion, as is the president.

Abortion is fundamental to the common good of the country. It does away with a human right, namely the right to life, which is fundamental to every other right. If you’re dead you have no other rights.

But it was a Hobson’s choice.

Hobson’s choice as in something’s better than nothing – not exactly praise. Then he goes on to quote barry saying at the National Prayer breakfast that God never permits the killing of an innocent person. Which clearly doesn’t square with abortion unless the fetus in not a person and/or is not innocent.

barry can’t stand for awyone to criticize him and takes it as a personal affront rather than an idealogical one where we “can agree to disagree”. He is very good at saying lofty things about what others should do that never seems to apply to him. At this stage folks still believe his words – hear only his words. They have refused to look at his actions, which have no relevance to those lofty words. Once they do (he’s counting on it never happening) there are going to be some really angry people. His recent reversals on the photos and tribunals have woken some folks up. Be prepared for some more stumping to keep the folks mesmerized…

“Emergency ruling” was not directed at Notre Dame protesters

May 18, 2009

It seems Notre Dame was getting ready for a police state just like Denver. God forbid freedom of speech and religion and the right to assembly interrupt barry’s adoration. A 78 y/o Catholic priest, who was doing nothing more than peacefully protesting and singing to the Virgin Mary, was manhandled like he was a meth head threatening to assassinate someone.

Four policemen layed hands on him, forcibly restrained him, roughly bound his arms behind his back, shoved him down, pinned him there with a booted leg and let him lay humiliated on the ground – surrounded by gawkers and media who captured the humiliation on cellphones and video and camera but did absolutely nothing – before they hauled him off to jail. Four minutes of violence perpetrated ON him and he was arrested for trespass and resisting arrest.

I sure hope Father Weslin fights his arrest in court – as humiliating and demeaning as that video is – so that the media will be forced to show what they have censored and Fr Jenkins will have to be forced to explain why he didn’t simply have a wheelchair waiting to take Fr Weslin away. If there was anyone who was absolutely certain Fr Weslin was coming it was Fr Jenkins and he allowed his fellow priest — who was actually following his vows — to be dehumanized and humiliated.

And also so all of those mindless folks who chanted Change! and Yes, we can! can see what exactly Change! means and that Yes, they did! assault a priest in the name of barry’s ego.

Why doesn’t the absolute media corruption not concern folks?

Here’s what St. Joseph Superior Court judges got together and decided. Guess they figured the sight of a Catholic priest getting assaulted day after day might just have to be picked up on the media somewhere so they made themselves a little ruling under the darkness of night and cover of media embargo that on the second arrest on a misdemeanor charge [for instance, trespassing at Notre Dame], the arrestee would not be able to bond out until a hearing before a judge, at which time the judge would have the discretion to set a new (higher) bond.

Yep. A second misdemeanor arrest would warrant a special hearing before a judge on a weekend before the violent misdemeanor offender could safely be released back into society on Monday with the commencement long over. But Judge Jerome Frese made an appearance on Saturday and they were allowed to bond out. Why?

(5-17) WSBT.com SUE LOWE:

….However, the St. Joseph County prosecutor’s office and St. Joseph Superior Court Judge Jerome Frese reviewed the cases Saturday and Frese set the bonds, allowing the six to be released, St. Joseph County Police Sgt. Bill Redman said.

The only person arrested for a second time Saturday was the Rev. Norman Weslin, 78, of Council Bluff, Iowa.

Redman did not know if Weslin’s case will be reviewed today or if the priest will have to stay in jail until Monday.

Weslin was one of four people arrested Saturday on charges of trespassing and resisting arrest. Another 15 were arrested only on trespassing charges.

Please watch the videos of Fr Weslin’s arrest and decide for yourself whether he resisted arrest or whether he was a victim of excessive police force.

(5-15) Arrest #1 Trespass (Four minutes of excessive force while Fr Weslin sings)
(5-16) Arrest #2 Trespass/Resisting arrest (Takes less than a minute, no handcuffs, no manhandling)

Then decide how much the video of Father’s first arrest played into his additional charge and the sudden reversal of the judge’s ruling allowing the violent misdemeanor offenders posing a threat to society at large to bond out after all.

And the best part?

The police, the St Joseph Superior Court, the DA and evidently the media in and around South Bend must think the entire country either loves barry or just too damb dumb to reason because they expect the world to believe the “emergency ruling” did not come about because of protests at Notre Dame and that it was just a coincidence that it didn’t come to light until after the first set of arrests were made on Friday.

How many turnip trucks are there driving around South Bend?

South Bend Tribune, PABLO ROS (5-16):

Reported that the ruling was signed on Thursday, went into effect Thursday, but wasn’t announced until after the policed captured their first wave of Notre Dame insurgents, and that it will expire on Dec 31st if not adopted. He interviewed Judge Scopelitis who would have folks believe that it was something brewing and that Notre Dame had nothing to do with and that the timing was, you know, strictly coincidental and that it’s meant really for drunks and not to keep 78 y/o (real) Catholic priests and barry naysayers from taking the spotlight away from obamessiah and making ND look bad.

Too late for that.

ROS: The new rule is something “we, or at least I, have been thinking about for quite some time,” Chief Judge Michael P. Scopelitis said Friday. The arrests of protesters at Notre Dame brought the need for such a rule into focus, but the need existed also in other cases, he said.

A classic example, Scopelitis said, is of an individual arrested for driving while intoxicated, posting bond, then being arrested a second time for driving while intoxicated and posting the presumptive bond yet again.

How often does/has that happen in that jurisdiction? Is it a common problem? Has it been talked about by prosecutors? MADD? Is $1K bond the norm for a simple trespass charge? It would have been nice to know that the reporter at least looked into something. What else would the Judge say?

ROS: Notre Dame officials did not ask the judges to implement such a rule at this time, Scopelitis said.

This local rule is not for Notre Dame’s benefit,” he said. “It was not created to benefit Notre Dame in some way.”

Why the need to say it? What are the chances any reporter will actually become a reporter and investigate this further for the non-South Bendians?

Are there any reporters not corrupted by barry? Any with even a microgram of curiosity? An outraged law student?

Forget the national press corps. Their corruption is complete. They are now the National Press Corps.

There has to be someone locally who saw that video of Fr Weslin being “arrested” – the word punishment and scapegoat come to mind – with the wherewithal to investigate and continue documenting this insanity.

A real old fashioned American who could tell folks the connection of the St Joseph Superior Court Judges personally and professional to Notre Dame University, Father Jenkins and barry; whether they’re alumni, board members, contributors, have family members involved in the Commencement or barry’s campaign; whether they’re Catholics; appointed (most likely), elected, running for re-election; the precedence for the ruling, whether it had been brought up before, how often these emergency rulings are made; explain why St. Joseph Superior Court Judge Jerome Frese did what he did; and then document the quid pro quo resulting from the ruling – especially from the White House.

Remember those days?

barry’s idea of Change! is becoming clearer and clearer, isn’t it, Comrade?

Alan Keyes message from jail

(5-15) Catholic priest, Fr Weslin, arrested at Catholic Univ for protesting abortion

(5-16) Arrest #2 (respectful, takes less than a minute, no handcuffs, no manhandling, no humiliation)
(5-17) POTUS anti-Catholic stance awarded – Catholic priest, Fr Weslin, arrested and jailed (side by side video of POTUS & Fr Weslin)

May 18, 2009

A view from Notre Dame from Alan Keyes.

DISCALIMER: Provided for informational purposes only. This website neither espouses or denounces Alan Keyes’ message.

Speaking only for myself – I find what was done to Fr Weslin nothing short of police brutality/excessive police force and think it should be prosecuted as such. Change his race and/or his religion and it would have been plastered all over the media. As is, it recevied very little media attention. Why? Because of how it would reflect on barry. Media corruption persists.

===========================

Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 12:08 PM
Subject: FROM: Alan Keyes at Notre Dame

Last Friday, and again this week, I and others profoundly concerned with the University of Notre Dame’s scandalous invitation and extension of an honorary degree to Barack Obama were engaged in peaceful, prayerful witness to truth on the Notre Dame campus…

then it happened…

We walked onto the campus praying the rosary and bearing witness to the Church’s teaching against the objective evil of abortion. At the behest of Father John Jenkins, the President of the University, we were detained by the UND police and turned over to the civil authorities!

So I went twice to jail, along with two Catholic priests and other brothers and sisters in Christ. I am told that on Thursday unpublicized action was taken by a local Superior Court judge to enforce new, harsher procedures for posting bond in cases such as ours, so that those of us persistent in our witness could be unjustly incarcerated without relief or any opportunity to post bail for days. This judge cooperated with the “powers and principalities” who disgrace Notre Dame with the Obama “honors,” and now violate our constitutional and canonical legal rights to our witness for life. During our arrests we were not defying civil law, but merely obeying the laws of God and the directives of the Church and its leadership!

We sought to counteract the scandalous impression given by University authorities that it is compatible with Christian faith and Catholic teaching to honor and hold up as an example of good conduct someone who has made himself the focus of abortion evil in the world today.

Unlike Father Jenkins, we are acting with respect for Christ’s instruction that people of faith should work out their differences within the communion of the faithful before calling upon civil authorities, who may not act with respect for the laws of God and the teachings of the Church.

This is why I sought to meet with Father Jenkins before I joined in the spiritual rescue efforts occasioned by the University’s scandalous behavior. He refused to respond to my request!!!

In this, Father Jenkins displayed the same obdurate indifference to spiritual considerations that has exemplified his conduct throughout this scandalous affair. He has encouraged a bunker mentality within the University of Notre Dame community, by treating other members of the Body of Christ, even those in communion with the Holy See, as if we are “outsiders.”

This mentality contradicts the “emphasis on Community in Catholicism” cited in the University’s mission statement but utterly ignored by Father Jenkins and his colleagues.

Archbishop Burke of the Vatican and the some 70 American bishops who have demanded that the invitation and honorary degree be withdrawn; the hundreds of thousands who have signed the petition with the same plea; the millions of Catholics and prolife Christians they represent — although part of the Church communion, the body of Christ, and a community of the faithful, all are apparently to be treated as criminals if they dare to set foot on the Notre Dame campus to protect life and protest the University administration’s scandalous judgment!!

Where is the humility that should characterize Christian leadership?

Where is the love toward other believers that should give glory to God?

And where is the respect and the will to stand up and protect innocent, vulnerable life?

Instead of ordering arrests and persecution of those – including PRIESTS – bearing true witness, a faithful Catholic and Christian heart should seek to converse in order to instruct or to learn!

Instead, Father Jenkins has reacted with a harshness that bespeaks fearful guilt, using force to dispose of opposition. If, despite the opinion of the Vatican, the bishops and so many of the clergy, religious and the laity, Father Jenkins and his colleagues are right to honor evil, why are they afraid to deal openly and respectfully with both the Church authorities and fellow believers who disagree?

They react with forceful abuses of their authority because they cannot properly defend their actions in terms of the laws of God and the teachings of the Catholic Church.

They therefore substitute force for persuasion. In this too they honor evil, by imitating its methods.

Please help us expose this grave injustice, as this shocking scandal unfolds!

My Utmost for His Highest Honor,

Alan Keyes

P.S. Father Jenkins continues to arrogantly ignore national and international pleas to hear the concerns from Christians about the injustice of honoring Barack Obama with a podium and degree from Notre Dame, in direct contradiction to the directives of the American Bishops, and in disrepute of the purpose, principles and mission of such a prestigious institution of faith. He has faithful Catholic priests and laity unjustly arrested and jailed for days to silence their witness for innocent life. Father Jenkins and the police powers collude in abuse of the faithful to curry favor with Barack Obama, who is eager for the political credential that “honors” from the University of Our Lady will bring him, to aid in duping a prolife America about his radical anti-life policies. Help us bring public pressure on Jenkins and Obama to force acknowledgement that their abuses of faith and trust diminish Notre Dame’s integrity in on-going scandal, controversy and dishonor throughout the Christian and Catholic community, and bring disillusionment to voters of conscience.

P.P.S. If you are able to help us financially in the battle, our needs are rising! We have dozens of people in jail, including Father Weslin and others with families facing a likely few hundreds of dollars each in court costs and fines, never mind the high $1,000 bail that has been set for each of us. With your faxes of protest, you will help us free our brothers and sisters still in jail, INCLUDING 78-YEAR OLD FATHER WESLIN, of the Lambs of Christ!

POTUS anti-Catholic stance awarded – Catholic priest arrested & jailed

(5-15) Catholic priest arrested at Catholic Univ for protesting abortion

(5-16) Fr Weslin arrested (again) at Notre Dame

May 18, 2009

A non-Catholic lay man, who believes abortion is legal and vows to made sure it never becomes illegal and who voted to withhold medical care from fetuses who happened to survive the attempt on their lives, is given a Prodigal Son welcome and honored with an award by the President of a prestigious Catholic University, who claims to be a Catholic priest–meaning he took the same vows as the Pope–while another man, a 78 y/o devout Catholic priest, who also took the same vows and because he was defending them in action on the campus of the very same Catholic University, was, with the tacit approval of the very same Catholic priest President, allowed to be disrespected, manhandled and humiliated in front of the entire world by being laid on the ground with his hands bound tightly behind his back and his torso pinned in place by a booted leg, and then hauled off, arrested and jailed.

How is any of this even remotely Catholic?

You decide.

Watch them side by side as graciously provided by max1media


———

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Catholic Priest, Fr Weslin, arrested at Catholic Univ for protesting abortion

may 15, 2009

Arrest #2 (5-16)

In Denver, for the Democratic Convention, they had a warehouse full of cages ready. Actual cages meant for Americans who dare protest against barry were lined up one after the another with razor wire on top (indoor) and warnings that Tasers would be used.

I have to wonder if they have something like that set up in South Bend and if Father Weslin ended up in it.

On Friday (15th), 19 people were arrested, including Father Norman Weslin, founder of The Lambs of Christ, a non-violent Catholic pro-life organization. They protest by praying outside abortion facilities. They don’t throw bloody entrails at scared teenagers or plot abortion clinic bombings or attempt to mastermind the assassination of abortion doctors and nurses. They believe in the sacred Teachings of the Church, the sanctity of life being the most precious.

Fr Weslin took a sacred vow to defend those teachings and that’s what he and his “lambs” were doing. Praying the Rosary and singing in protest of a Catholic University’s awarding an honor to a man who not only believes abortion is legal – but he voted against providing medical treatment for a fetus that somehow managed to survive the attempt on its life.

What kind of priest would he be if he didn’t protest?

A Notre Dame faculty member, perhaps?

Also present was ALAN KEYES who was the first protester arrested. Video.

I call on all Christian people to bear witness this betrayal of our faith.

Alan Keyes, former Republican presidential candidate, was among those arrested Friday.

Then came something I hope I never see again as long as I live. A nonviolent Catholic priest, on the grounds of a Catholic University, protesting the most sacred tenet of the Catholic Church, dressed in full habit, was taken to the ground, had his hands forcibly handcuffed behind his back and then was humiliatingly laid out on a cloth “stretcher” and hauled away like a piece of meat.

It was the most shocking thing I have seen yet related to barry.

Watch the video yourself. No matter your views on abortion, embryonic stem cells, religion, politics or barry himself, ask yourself, honestly, if this makes you proud of your president and whether it makes you proud as an American. And then ask yourself if any award is worth what was done to this priest. His dignity stripped as he was taken to the ground with no regard for his habit, his hands pulled behind his back and then carried off like a lamb to slaughter. Answer to your own conscience. And then realize it isn’t quite 4 months into barry’s term.

ptsalt

Father Norman Weslin is being assisted by someone and appears unsteady on his feet. He truly cannot understand why they are arresting him even though he has been arrested many (>50) times before and has been violently injured during it. This time though he is on the campus of Notre Dame University. I understand his incredulity. Why should a Catholic priest have to protest against a Catholic University to uphold the Teachings of the Church? It boggles the mind. Worse is the papal silence (until today – another post) and lack of outrage among Catholic Bishops and Cardinals.

So 26 seconds in he s told he is being arrested.

Bystander: God be with you, Father.

Bystander: Bless you Father.

Bystander 1: Bless you Father, in the name of Jesus. It’s a shame for Notre Dame today.

Father begins to sing and bystanders join in.

Immaculate Mary, your praises we sing,

You reign now in Splendor with Jesus your King.

(1:00) Father drops to the ground and four policemen surround him. He is not resisting – just trying to sing – and he is winded by the manhandling.

Disgusted bystander 1 repeats: Shame! Shame on Father Jenkins! [President of Notre Dame]

Father continues to sing:

Ave, Ave, Ave Maria,

Ave, Ave, Ave Maria.

He doesn’t pull his hand away while Policeman A is slipping a piece of rope over his wrist and pulling his hand behind his back – the other already behind him. They don’t give him instructions and he is treated like any Saturday night drunk: impersonally and hear we go again. He sings:

In Heaven, the Blessed, Your glory proclaim…

His hands are so high behind his back he has to bend forward.

Bystander 1 says something about Obama and it’s a Catholic University and ain’t nobody saying anything.

Except for her.

Father is still bent forward with his knees on the bare ground with three full sized men and a woman trying to tie him up. He is not resisting – he continues to sing:

...On earth, your children invoke your sweet name…

Bystander 1 berates someone and repeats: Shame! Shame! Shame!

It is reassuring that one human being saw what was happening was disgusted and made her thoughts known. Halfway through the arrest after she begins to cry her voice is no longer heard. What was done to her, by whom? Father continues his singing:

....Ave, Ave, Ave Maria.

They are still trying to bind his hands together behind his back. The cameramen and photographers say nothing as they hover like pirahnas.

Isn’t there a single one of them who finds this reprehensible?

Does it look different through their lenses?

There was absolutely no need to handcuff his hands in the back. They could have handcuffed him in front so he could still hold his rosary and retains his dignity – something that should go unsaid. He was not treated with respect. He was not given the simple deference a Man of God deserves. It speaks volumes of all present, especially Policeman A, who appears to be in charge.

Father continues singing to Jesus’ mother:

Immaculate Mary, Your praises we sing,

Bystander 1 is crying.

Father starts to tip, hands secured behind his back, he is unable to balance himself. It’s remarkable how supple he is with his legs bunched under him. He begins to speak:

Notre Dame…

Slapped on the shoulders and upper arms by Policeman A.

…is putting a priest–

Policeman A then puts both hands tight across Father Weslin’s shoulders as he grimaces in pain. Freeze it at (2:22) and ask yourself how it makes you feel. Ask yourself if you would feel differently if it were your relative, or a Holy Man of any other ethnicity, race or religion. And if so, why?

Father continues:

Notre Dame is arresting the police. We don’t need the people out there to correct us.

Policeman A grips down on Father’s shoulders, his legs crumpled to the side, pinning him in place on the hard cement pavement. Imagine for a minute if this was an 82 y/o black priest and four white policemen were videotaped doing the same. Would there be outrage? What if it were an Imam outside a mosque?

Father looks into one of the cameras, incredulous:

We-we-we’re Catholic priests. Why are you arresting a Catholic priest for trying to stop the killing of a baby? Use your mind. What are you doing that for? Why are you arresting a priest for trying to stop the killing of a baby? You’ve got it all backwards. They’re trying to hurt the policemen so they shut up. That’s what you do. That’s why you’ve got this whole problem.

He seems confused. I don’t quite get what he means about the police. Policeman A puts a tag on a piece of rope around Father’s neck – like he’s a prize head of beef that needs identifying. Like his collar no longer identifies him.

And now you’re putting one around my neck!

Male bystander: His arms are already hurt.

Policeman A: I understand that.

Policeman off camera: Just drag him.

Policeman A, who understands that his arms are already hurt, continues to yank Father by arm to lay him down so they can haul him away. He knows his arms are hurt and doesn’t have the humanity to untie his hands from behind his back.

Ask yourself if the level of violence by the police matched the benign, justified nature of the protest and the protester’s non-resistance.

What is your threshold for police brutality?

Policeman A and Female Officer roughly drag Father back and roll him over on his left side on a thin blue piece of cloth with his hands still bound tightly behind his back. After he is given a final shove and knee by Policeman A, Father says: (3:20)

Land of Freedom!

Poignant words coming from a man who defended it with his life for 2o years in the US Army.

Bystander or cameraman: Wow. I can’t believe I am seeing this.

I choose to believe he is uttering it in disbeliefe and disgust rather than vicarious bystander. And I can’t believe people are just standing there, doing nothing to help Father. No comments to the police about the insanity of it all.

Wouldn’t you like to know what was going on inside thos bystanders and officers’ heads? Inside their consciences?

Bystander 1 can no longer be heard. What was done to her?

Male bystander: His arms were broken by the last police officer.

Said loud enough for all to hear and yet Father is left on his side having to hold up his head with his hands bound behind him – not resisting in the least. And as the bystanders start to sing, the Policeman B holds the blue cloth right up to Father’s face, who clearly cannot move it away himself. He can’t move at all because Policeman A has his boot on the blue cloth and his leg and knee tight against Father’s lower back like he’s propping open a door.

Look around. Look at all the cameramen and regular folks talking pictures as a 82 y/o Man of God lays in full habit on the ground with his hands bound behind him, the blue edge of the cloth stretcher in his face and a leg pinning his back.

What are you feeling as you watch this?

Imagine if that were your father or grandfather. And what would you feel if he was wearing his Army uniform instead?

Father begins singing again – never once complaining about his position or his humiliation or the fact that no one is coming to his aid.

Immaculate Mary, Your praise we sing,

You reign now in Splendor–

And then suddenly there’s quiet (4:06) except for the click of the camera – which even stops – as Father lays with not a single person offering to support his head. Not a single person asks him if he’s in pain. Not a single word from the four policemen who surround him. No apologies to a man who is twice their age, who served his country before they were born. No embarrassment with what they are doing to a harmless Man of God. No: I’m sorry, Father, that I have to do this.

This is really hard to watch. Especially over and over to transcribe it. Each time overcome with a profound bewilderment mixed with something unnameable that folks – my fellow Americans can do this to an 82 y/o Man of God, who is doing exactly what he is supposed to. This video proves that there is no sanctity for sentient life, either.

And the words I feel about the man who brought this about are untranscribable.

A full minute Father lays on the ground on his side with his hands bound behind him and Policeman A’s leg propping him up from the back and Policeman B & C holding up the blue cloth in front of him. He is being restrained like a common drunk. Like he is about to get up and flee.

They then finally lift him up and struggle as they haul him away.

Father, still not uttering a word of protest or complaint, his shoes hanging off the end.

This was not a big group. There were no agitators. Bystander 1, the vocal protester with a conscience was silenced somehow. The police and security were there waiting and yet it took four full minutes to arrest a 82 y/o man who was not fighting them.

Now recall how Policeman A said he knew about Father’s injuries. That means he knew who he was and was expecting him. So why not a simple wheelchair?

If nothing else, why not hoist Father Indian style between two policemen with another in front and back? They could have removed him from the scene in a minute – the time he laid on the ground helpless and defenseless while bystanders and professionals took pictures and videos.

Would you want to be laid out like that? Would you like to witness your parent laid out like that, helpless with a pack of silent humans surrounding them?

Why the need for the complete humiliation of a peaceful Man of God, who was not in any way resisting?

And why can’t a Catholic priest walk onto the campus of a Catholic University to peacefully proclaim his faith and stand up for what he believes: the sanctity of human life?

And why were there no University priests or nuns there protesting his manhandling? Catholic professors? Catholic students? Anyone with an inch of a soul and ounce of compassion?

I hope you folks are fully aware that barry could have showed up and given his teleprompter reading and avoided this by simply not accepting the degree Notre Dame was offering him. But his ego wouldn’t let him. ASU wouldn’t give him anything but naming rights to an already established scholarship. So he wasn’t about to go 2-0. Professor Mary Ann Glendon, who was to have received the highest award Notre Dame bestows, having already been honored by them, would not have had to decline if barry had chosen not to accept the . She did so because Notre Dame, the premier Catholic University in the US, was giving an award to a man who believes killing a fetus is okay and vows to keep it legal.

A Catholic University, which is supposed to be guided by the Teachings of the Church – the most absolute the sanctity of life – allowed the arrest of a Catholic Priest for simply standing by his Faith. For doing what he took a sacred vow to do: defend the Teachings of the Church. The same exact Church the University should be defending.

And how is it a Catholic University when it allows a devout Man of God to be manhandled, bound and humiliated for the sake of a man who disregards the most sacred tenet of the Church? A man who believes killing a fetus is not murder. A man who voted to withhold treatment from a human life that by any definition was alive despite the attempt to murder it?

Why was a Catholic priest arrested on the campus of a Catholic University for protesting abortion?

And why weren’t the faculty and surrounding parish priests standing right next to him?

Fr Weslin arrested (again) at Notre Dame (5-16)

May 16, 2009

The same principles, the same priest, a new day, another arrest.

See here for Father Weslin’s humiliating arrest on the 15th.

3-4 policemen are needed to arrest an 82 y/o man who is not resisting and then they proceed to handcuff him behind his back and haul him off like a piece of meat.

Video and description courtesy of TheEveningPrayer

Norma McCorvey (formerly Roe of Roe v. Wade) is stopped and turned away Notre Dame University during peaceful pro-life demonstration. 18 PEOPLE JAILED with Pro-life Father Norman Weslin (a Catholic priest), arrested the second time this week by the Catholic (but pro-abortion) Father Jenkins at NDU who plans to honor President Obama.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Prof Mary Ann Glendon declines Notre Dame meda

April 27, 2009

Another barry Notre Dame casualty. This time it's pro-life Harvard Law School Professor, Mary Ann Glendon, who will be unable to accept her Laetare Medal because, in addition to delivering the Commencement Speech, barry is being awarded an honorary degree, which is in direct opposition to US Bishops' policy. And for it to be Notre Dame - the most prestigious Catholic University in the nation - it is an even bigger disappointment. Professor Glendon served as Bush's Ambassador to the Holy See. Notre Dame should have known she would be unable to compromise. And she shouldn't have had to. She was invited in December 2008. barry March 2009. That is not only wrong, it is rude.

barry could decline the honorary degree but his ego will never allow that since he was already stiffed by ASU. See links below letters.

Thanks to MICHAEL PAULSON at Boston.com for providing the following letters - posted as is.

From Professor Glendon to Notre Dame President Fr John I. Jenkins. His impersonal statement follows.

"Dear Father Jenkins,

When you informed me in December 2008 that I had been selected to receive Notre Dame's Laetare Medal, I was profoundly moved. I treasure the memory of receiving an honorary degree from Notre Dame in 1996, and I have always felt honored that the commencement speech I gave that year was included in the anthology of Notre Dame's most memorable commencement speeches. So I immediately began working on an acceptance speech that I hoped would be worthy of the occasion, of the honor of the medal, and of your students and faculty.Last month, when you called to tell me that the commencement speech was to be given by President Obama, I mentioned to you that I would have to rewrite my speech. Over the ensuing weeks, the task that once seemed so delightful has been complicated by a number of factors.

First, as a longtime Consultant to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, I could not help but be dismayed by the news that Notre Dame also planned to award the President an honorary degree. This, as you must know, was in disregard of the U.S. Bishops’ express request of 2004 that Catholic institutions "should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles" and that such persons "should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions." That request, which in no way seeks to control or interfere with an institution's freedom to invite and engage in serious debate with whomever it wishes, seems to me so reasonable that I am at a loss to understand why a Catholic university should disrespect it.

Then I learned that "talking points" issued by Notre Dame in response to widespread criticism of its decision included two statements implying that my acceptance speech would somehow balance the event:

"President Obama won't be doing all the talking. Mary Ann Glendon, the former US Ambassador to the Vatican, will be speaking as the recipient of the Laetare Medal."

"We think having the President come to Notre Dame, see our graduates, meet our leaders, and hear a talk from Mary Ann Glendon is a good thing for the President and for the causes we care about."

A commencement, however, is supposed to be a joyous day for the graduates and their families. It is not the right place, nor is a brief acceptance speech the right vehicle, for engagement with the very serious problems raised by Notre Dame's decision--in disregard of the settled position of the U.S. Bishops--to honor a prominent and uncompromising opponent of the Church's position on issues involving fundamental principles of justice.

Finally, with recent news reports that other Catholic schools are similarly choosing to disregard the Bishops' guidelines, I am concerned that Notre Dame’s example could have an unfortunate ripple effect.

It is with great sadness, therefore, that I have concluded that I cannot accept the Laetare Medal or participate in the May 17 graduation ceremony.

In order to avoid the inevitable speculation about the reasons for my decision, I will release this letter to the press, but I do not plan to make any further comment on the matter at this time.

Yours very truly,
Mary Ann Glendon"

And here is a statement from Father Jenkins:

“We are, of course, disappointed that Professor Glendon has made this decision. It is our intention to award the Laetare Medal to another deserving recipient, and we will make that announcement as soon as possible.”

Her letter was beautiful - his was insulting. Wait till they fins out they awarded an honorary degree to someone who is not eligible to be president.

=====================

ASU: barry can speak, no honorary degree
ASU caves: The President Barack Obama Scholars Program
CNN’s Preston: barry’s degree enough for ASU honorary degree