Showing posts with label propaganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label propaganda. Show all posts

Monday, November 23, 2009

Arianna Huffington: “Jon Klein fired Lou Dobbs from CNN”


November 21, 2009

Updated

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Who knows the truth.

I watched Lou Dobbs on Bill O’Reilly and there was no inkling he was fired. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t. But it seems a tad odd that a man who was fired walked away with a reported $8M. More curious is who provided the cash.

According to the NY Post, Dobbs left because of the birth certificate issue. Dobbs said the only thing that changed was the president.

Next on their list: Glenn Beck.

Arianna Huffington fearmongers with Olbermann about “fearmonger-in-chief” Glenn Beck. The whole conversation was rehearsed propaganda to get barry’s poll numbers back up and distract folks away from the healthcare bill. It’s getting so old. Especially the racism.

EIGHT MILLION eligible black voters didn’t even register to vote.

Are they racists?

Ms Huffington uses a decided them vs us “we” as if she has a team behind her. I guess that would be the Huffington Post. Wonder how Axelrod’s son is doing out in Colorado. No practical experience experience and he was “hired” as editor right out of college.

The full transcript is in the next post along with the video. Wanted to put this quote in a separate post.

Olbermann wonders if Beck would just disappear.

ARIANNA HUFFINGTON (4:40)

Well, I hope it‘s going to happen,

but it’s not going to happen without people pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

I mean, we saw how it worked with Lou Dobbs and John Klein.

You know, John Klein in the end fired Lou Dobbs from CNN.

Pressure makes a difference.

So, we all have a part to play here in pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

Yes comrade.

The way she spoke so matter-of-factly I’m starting to believe they think they are going to get away with everything.

Olbermann/Huffington: Glenn Beck, “fearmonger-in-chief”


November 20, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Herr Olbermann is a plain nasty human who spouts lies that no one calls him on. He’s after the birthers again with the same old tired racism. What does he know about racism and/or the birthers? He still thinks barry’s birth certificate was what was posted on barry’s website.

Arianna Huffington is the guest and the two of them talk about Beck’s fear-mongering by fear-mongering themselves. They both say “it’s frightening”. Remember how that was the campaign whine when his numbers dropped? First Secy Clinton and then Palin. It’s getting old.

Then they talk about how “various establishments” are going to have to stop Beck and stop Sen Grassley from giving out Beck’s book. And that if violence erupts – Beck, Ailes and Murdock will be morally liable.

When did she become God?

And why isn’t she saying that about the muslim murderer?

TRANSCRIPT

HERR OLBERMANN:

The ugly environment was not fostered overnight, but town hall opposition to health care reform and all those tea bagger rallies gave comfort to racism and even intonations of violence. The Birther movement was nothing more than extreme and desperate attempt to delegitimize a new president. And Congressman Joe Wilson‘s “you lie,” though a first should not have been a surprise.

Our third story on COUNTDOWN, a sweeping new report on anti-government rage in America not only connects the dots it refuses to let off the hook the most irresponsible voice in the mainstream media, the man it describes as the fearmonger-in-chief, Glenn Beck. Simply stated Beck creates an intersection between the mainstream and the extreme, according to the report by the Anti-Defamation League. It calls Beck, “The most important mainstream media figure who has repeatedly helped to stoke fires of anti-government anger…”

Beck has compared Obama to Adolf Hitler.

[Why is it he forgets how Pres Bush was portrayed as AH by his fellow liberals? And DL Hughley said the Rep Convention looked like Nazi Germany.]

One of Beck‘s guests claimed that Obama was trying to create a civilian national security force.

[barry said it himself in a stump. Watch for yourself.

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.

OLBERMANN: Beck once promoted the conspiracy that theory FEMA was building concentration camps to house dissidents, but he eventually backed away from it. But Beck has consistently posed Obama is “dangerous to America.” The United States, Beck say, “Is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism beyond your wildest imagination.”

Beck‘s obsession with so-called czars is one example, decrying a term proudly launched by the Republicans under Nixon and Reagan and not actually used by the current administration.

[What? barry's called them czars.]

OLBERMANN: Beck is just part of the ADL report which takes stock of the ugliest aspect of those town hall meetings and the tea bagger rallies, the birther movement and Joe Wilson‘s “you lie.” But the September 12th rally in Washington, the report notes, featured the worst in racist, violent imagery since Obama was elected. That event, heavily promoted, of course, by Beck, a man who projects his own hate onto others.

[That's the pot calling the kettle black.]

OLBERMANN: It would be nice to think of Glenn Beck just as a joke, as fodder for this show and the “Daily Show” and others that point out how stupid some of this stuff is. But this report, you know, suggests something else, this is—fearmonger-in-chief term is frightening.

HUFFINGTON: It is frightening.

[Talk about fear-mongering.]

HUFFINGTON Well, I would say the fearmonger-in-chief title should still be reserved for Dick Cheney, even in retirement. But barring that, there is something that we need to really pay attention to with Glenn Beck. We cannot just dismiss him. Because the truth of the matter is that there is a good reason why we have an exemption to the free speech protection by the first amendment when we say you cannot shout fire in a crowded theater.

And he‘s doing that every night. He‘s basically using images of violence to bring together with all that he‘s accusing the Obama administration of, which varies from racism to communism, Nazism and everything else in between. So, all that has definitely an impact. I believe words matter, language matters and he‘s using it in incredibly irresponsible ways night after night.

OLBERMANN: What do you say to the argument that this country has always self corrected, that whether Father Coughlin on the radio in the ‘30s or Bo Carter (ph) who was a newscaster who presented literally stuff that was made up on the hour in CBS News in the ‘30s or the columnist Westbook Pegler or Senator Joe McCarthy? All these people a finale in which they exited the stage and suddenly. What is to say that that‘s not going to happen here?

[The internet and talk radio.]

HUFFINGTON: Well, I hope it‘s going to happen, but it‘s not going to happen without people pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing. I mean, we saw how it worked with Lou Dobbs and John Klein. You know, John Klein in the end, fired Lou Dobbs from CNN. Pressure makes a difference.

So, we all have a part to play here in pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

And even though he may not be legally liable if violence ensues from what he does, he‘s morally liable and so is Fox and Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes for keeping him on the air.

[And her and olbermann? They've been lying and riling people up since barry was campaigning. And they're talking about fearmongering even as they do it.]

OLBERMANN: Some of Beck‘s claims, according to the report from the ADL, let me quote it again, “play an important role in drawing people further out of the mainstream making them more receptive to extreme notions and conspiracy theories.” And without going into Sociology 101, isn‘t the point here that people like Beck enable some of the wildest, most paranoid notions about what the U.S. government is doing and instead of people thinking, as they think these things, for whatever they think them, no, that‘s crazy, he says, no you‘re not crazy, come with me down this path?

[A moment of truth. Of course, she makes no connection to the fact they're legitimately angry because of barry. That would be sacrilegious.]

HUFFINGTON: Yes. But, on top of it, Keith, what makes it possible for Glenn Beck to enable and even take advantage of what‘s happening is the fact that there‘s a lot of misery out there, there‘s a lot of legitimate anger. People are losing their jobs. They‘re losing their homes. Or they‘re afraid of losing their jobs or losing their homes, so it‘s in this climate of often legitimate rage that Glenn Beck comes in and provides scapegoats.

I mean, traditionally throughout history, these are the dangerous times. And that‘s why various establishments also need to become much more sensitive to what is happening out there and not leave it up to the Glenn Becks of the world to take advantage of what‘s happening.

[VARIOUS ESTABLISHMENTS?? Take advantage of what? barry's ineffectuality? And what is happening?

Of course, here's the old standby of race-baiting. Every single person who did not vote for barry is a racist. It's getting awfully tired - especially coming from old white men's mouth.]

OLBERMANN: Obviously, the new component to this is the race of the president. And a lot of this rage that we‘re discussing here is rooted in racism, something we certainly knew before the ad put out its analysis. But Beck tried unsuccessfully to turn that one in the other direction, claiming that Mr. Obama is the racist. Is that the twist by which he and the other actual racists are rationalizing their own prejudice simply project it on to the other people?

[He's projecting it onto every person who doesn't agree with barry. Everyone is a racist to him. And Huffington has become Mrs Freud.]

HUFFINGTON: It is a classic case of projection. But, even worse than Glenn Beck saying that is the fact that Rupert Murdoch endorsed it, all though then he took it away. Or to have people like Senator Chuck Grassley giving away books of Glenn Beck.

[Can't give away books? Do they even hear themselves? What's more frightening - state run media or freedom of speech? Even a convicted muslim murderer got access to barry's books.]

HUFFINGTON So, this is really what the ADL report is talking about, this sort of intersection between the mainstream and the extreme. There are always extremes. There are always paranoids who sound like Russell Crowe in “A Beautiful Mind,” you know, connecting everything and scaring everyone. But, it‘s when that becomes part of the mainstream that it becomes dangerous.

—–

Precisely what this rehearsed chat is doing. The entire conversation was fear-mongering to the leftists. One by one they’re trying to pick off non barryfans.

The question is who gave them their marching orders?

Photo of the day: Ringtone mind control


November 20, 2009

Mogadishu, Somalia. As usual there are a group of “devout muslims” aka terrorists wearing sandals and holding guns – one with the picnic tablecloth hiding his face – standing guard after they’ve taken over by force.

And they started right in on the mind control.

A woman passes by Shabab militia patrolling Bakara Market in Mogadishu
SACDIYO SHEEQ, a resident of Kismayu in southern Somalia, on a rule imposed by the hard-line Islamist group after it seized control of the port city.

Al-Shabaab wants our ringtones to be only a Muslim cleric reading the Hadith or Koranic verse.

Video of the day: Power of Iconography (barry logo)

Saturday, July 25, 2009

What this site is about

July 24, 2009

Hello.

Folks seem to think this is some rightwing nutjobs birther website and have been writing some, dare I say wacko? comments, most of which are not publishable.

The profanity is not a problem, the rants on unrelated issues are not a problem, the personal attacks on our words are not a problem, and although not pleasant to read and oftentimes simply unbelievable to fathom, the personal attacks on us as human beings are a cyber reality.

But the misunderstanding and lack of understanding of what this site is about is a problem.

Folks who do not agree with the folks questioning why barry hasn’t just released his birth certificate and why he has been fighting in court for nearly a year to prevent its release, are doing themselves a disservice by not understanding the difference.

So just to be clear:

Citizens Against Pro-Obama Media Bias is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, any candidate, political party or organization and is not associated with any movement, cause or website.

We established this website to document and prove the pro-Obama media bias, which has been done many times over–even to where the media has admitted it themselves.

Doubters: Ask yourself if Secretary Clinton or Governor Palin would have been allowed to be president/VP without their birth, medical and/or school records made public. The answer is an obvious and resounding no. More information was dug up about Gov Palin in the weekend following the GOP Convention than is still known about barry. Even Joe the Plumber was vetted more thoroughly.

This is our original site and we started around the Conventions. It was not being crawled by Google and Technorati stopped pinging it completely despite multiple requests to look into the matter – never once receiving an email response (which is their right) so went over to wordpress in mid-December.

There we’ve had our URL’s hijacked by bogus sites, had a series of “Orly Taitz” posts deleted and have periodic problems with posts going missing.

We also have concerns our site may somehow be linked to pornographic sites(s) because of the referrers, such as Facebook.com/porn and Wrestling Divas.com and some extremely disturbing search terms: rape videos, bestiality, sex with young children, mutilated slave girls, nude Chris Matthews, naked Tom Delay. None of us have Facebook accounts and there has never been, nor will there ever be, adult content on this site.

The closest thing to nudity are some images of Henrik Stenson in his skivvies taken in public during an official PGA Tour event that he is fully aware of and finds humorous. And by the traffic, so do a lot of other people across the globe. And there’s the soldier in pink boxers.

The birth certificate issue has emerged as the most fundamental example of the MSM’s lack of vetting of barry, which is why we have been following it. Not because we are sore losers (I have never voted) or racists or homophobes or think he was born in Kenya or is a Muslim (why should it matter if he were?) or believe that he is Constitutionally ineligible to be President.

What matters is the MSM has been completely corrupted and have intentionally allowed him to go unvetted.

Any sane reasoning person knows he is hiding something by not releasing his records — but that DOES NOT MEAN HE IS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT.

At this point, I don’t even care what is on it. What are the chances “the first black president” who happens to be descended from Muslims and is now happily using his middle name, is about to be removed from office? It’s a matter of national and global security. It’s why he went to the Arab world early and often.

What does matter is that the MSM is holding him to a different standard than they have any other president. He is the only president whose actual physical location of birth is unknown – as in hospital – if in fact he was born in one. But the MSM is absolutely certain he was born in Hawaii and can rant and rave and destroy the reputations of folks who just want barry to be vetted like every other president – but become curiously silent when asked which hospital barry was born in in Hawaii. And it seems the “factcheckers”: snopes, UPI and barrypedia have had a sudden enlightenment as to the hospital requiring a change in their “facts”.

And the Fight The Smears website set up solely to deal with the birth certificate issue? Gone. “Wasn’t needed anymore.”

Well, clearly it is because Robert Gibbs – the man who speaks for the President of the United States – doesn’t know where he was born – except for sure it was in Hawaii.

In the July 13th, 2009 press briefing, Robert Gibbs responded to the question:Would you tell us which Hawaiian hospital he was born in?” with I don’t know the name of the exact hospital.” And then went on to talk about (in reference to barry’s Hawaii birth) “the pursuit of Noble Truth” and the “knowing clarity that comes with that certainty”.

And the media wonders why folks are so angry?

But, by far, the worst thing the MSM did was intentionally embargo facts that could potentially have hurt barry’s chances of being elected. That was not only wrong – it was criminal.

The New York Times admitted to it when they wrote about the ACORN story they had refused to print in October 2008. Then they tried to justify it by saying it wouldn’t have mattered.

Then why did they do it?

The mere fact they did it proves their absolute corruption.

And that is only one example from one media outlet.

And it continues.

Ask yourself why the MSM is going after the “birther nutjobs” instead of simply asking–demanding if need be (as in doing their job)–that the White House release a copy of the original birth certificate?

Instead, the AP, Reuters, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, NY and LA Times prefer to stake their reputation (relative word) on newspaper notices from 48 years ago?

How reliable was the NY Times “letter from the Mayor of Paris” re: Caroline Kennedy from just seven months ago when a simple text message would have verified the hoax?

What would MSM be doing if it were Secretary Clinton or Governor Palin?

What isn’t known about Secretary Clinton?

And how many “confidential” hospital records were obtained in reference to the absolutely insane allegation (made by folks who can’t count to nine) that Gov Palin did not give birth to Trig? How many folks in the media and elsewhere are still looking into his birth certificate?

And folks wonder why the right side is angry?

Anyway. Apologies if you made it this far – it wasn’t meant to turn into a rant. The media is our focus – and one can only take so much, which is why we follow other things.


Tuesday, July 14, 2009

8th of 9 UK Embassy employees to be released

July 14, 2009

I realize there are some Iran posts missing – especially about the doctor who witnessed Neda’s murder. And I can’t find a post with pix. The doctor is why they seized the embassy workers. I need to find out what happened to him. His parents still lived in Tehran and he had some type of office there.

Iran is releasing the eighth embassy worker, leaving behind the Embassy’s Chief Political Analyst, who has been charged with crimes against the state “acting against national security”. Is the punishment beheading or hanging? All nine were native Iranians.

The Supremely Impotent Leader AYATOLLAH ALI KHAMENEI:

Some leaders of Western countries at the level of president, prime minister and foreign minister openly intervened in Iran’s internal affairs that had nothing to do with them. Then, they said they don’t intervene in Iran’s internal affairs.

Why don’t they get this isn’t going to work anymore?

The last thing barry did was meddle. And the world saw with its own eyes what happened. The media censorship, the internet shut down and the disruption of cellphone service.

We all saw Neda. We saw her calmly standing there. We saw her murdered.

And then we heard/are still hearing the lame propaganda: first the protesters shot Neda…then it was the CIA…now foreign governments with inside connections.

They continue to lie when they know an reliable eyewitness – a native Iranian/doctor/once journalist/now publisher in the UK – already gave unimpeachable video testimony of what happened to the BBC. He spoke without the need of a translator in fine English and the horror in his face and the details he gave could not be faked.

He saw Neda’s wound. He tried to stop the blood from spurting out. A single shot from the front with no exit wounds. Shot in the chest and not the head where they said they found the bullet. The doctor said she was buried so quickly he didn’t see how they could have done an autopsy.

The crowd detained a man whose papers made him Basij. He spontaneously confessed without being attacked. They took his papers and pix and let him go. I hope his name and pix and maybe even pix of his ID papers made it out through cellphone.

===========

PM GORDON BROWN:

The Iranian regime must be clear that if this action continues and we are forced to act, we will act together with our European partners.

I’m glad that is “European” partners.

Foreign Secretary DAVIS MILIBAND:

That leaves one more in custody and all of our efforts are now directed towards getting that person out….The allegations of improper conduct have absolutely no basis.

AHMAD JANNATIM – leader of the Iran’s supreme legislative body the Guardian Council (their Supreme Court):

The British Embassy had a presence and some people were arrested.

Well, inevitably they will be put on trial. They have made confessions too.

MR MILIBAND:

It is very important that my anger, my cold anger, about the way our staff have been treated… doesn’t turn into a rhetorical volley at the Iranian regime, because that doesn’t do anything either for our people or for reform in Iran. What’s important is that I turn my anger into determination to see that justice is done by our people.

SOURCE: BBC NEWS

Video: Foreign Secretary DAVIS MILIBAND

===============

================

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Election Year in Review: barry voters

January 3, 2009

Here's an eye-opening video of how little barry voters knew and strangely how much they knew of his opponents. This would have been a much better video if it was done during the primaries. Folks would come out of the yes-we-can rallies eyes all a'glaze and not be able to recite anything barry said or state his position on anything other than "he voted against the war". Which of course is a fairy tale that will go down as the most blatant fraud perpetrated on The American People (o-baaa-ma sheeples) in presidential election history. The ones who could answer most often said return of the middle class or universal healthcare, which were Sen Clinton's stands. Anyway take the ten minutes to watch. See if you find it funny as in Leno's Jaywalking. Then take it a step further and realize that folks like these spent the last two years making personal attacks on barry's opponents - including the tried and true cries of racism - instead of learning something about barry.


courtesy of talktozig

Name one accomplishment: Dukakais

Name one accomplishment: Kirk Watson

Name on accomplishment: Harlem voters

Name one accomplishment: Super Tuesday voters

Name one accomplishment: New Yorkers

Name one accomplishment: Democratic voters

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

technorati censorship day 13

December 30, 2008

No pings since 12-17.

60 posts not indexed.

POLL: IFC/ZOGBY overwhelming media bias

December 29, 2008

Independent Film Channel/Zogby poll shows overwhelmingly that Americans believe the news is biased and that the biased coverage influenced the outcome of the presidential election. Surprise.

They polled 3,472 adults nationwide on November 5 and 6, 2008 with a very good split of sampling. Of those surveyed: Dems 38%, Rep 31% and Independents 28%. East (22%), South (26%), Center/Great Lakes (30%) and west (22%). Nearly all (99.6%) were registered to vote,99.7% voted. 53% voted for barry 46% McCain. MOE +/- 1.7%.

RESULTS:
93.1% barry received more coverage
4.1% thought McCain received more

74.7% thought media coverage of the presidential election influenced the outcome
94.2% Rep
55.6% Dem
79.3% Men
70.2% Women

Overall unreliable
80% TV
84% Radio

72.6% believe the news they read/see is biased.
88.7% Rep
57.5% Dem
77% males
67% females
73.3% White
76.7% Hispanic
62.2% Black
70.6% Asian
83.5% Other

Most reliable source of news
37.6% Internet
20.3% National TV News
16% Radio
11.3% Valid newspapers
4% Local TV News

Most trusted Newspaper
20.1% don't read newspapers
19.6 NY Times
19.2% Local
17.4% WSJ

Most trusted source:
39.3% FOX
16% CNN
15% MSNBC
10.1% PBS
6% NBC

Least trusted:
0.6% CNBC
1.5% CBS
3.3% ABC

81% Rep trust FOX
30.3% Dems trust MSNBC
26.2% Dems trust CNN

Most trusted news personality:
12.5% Rush Limbaugh

10.1% Bill O'Reilly
10.3% None listed
8.5% Brokaw
8% Hannity
6.9% Olbermann
6.6% Williams
6.3% Maddow

Least trusted:
0.6% Elisabeth Hasselbeck
(How is she considered a news source?)
1.6% Colbert
1.9% Matthews
2.1% Stephanopoulos

Most trusted news personality:
­14.2% Dem Keith Olbermann
29.2% Rep Rush Limbaugh

Don't think media giving a true representation of Iraq
73% overall
90% Rep
55.6% Dem

So 73% believe there is media bias in general, 75% thought media bias influenced the outcome of the presidential election and 93% thought barry got more coverage.

Sure doesn't get a lot clearer than that or folks who need stats to point out the obvious.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Technorati is censoring us

December 22, 2008

Technorati isn't pinging us...again. 25 or so posts have not been indexed since the 19th and before that it was intermittent starting in November. Hourly manual pinging and repeated inquiries have done nothing. They have yet to respond to a single one of my inquiries even though I am getting the ticket numbers. They cannot say my email doesn't work. Not a single response to at least eight different inquiries. Both this site and our blogger site aren't being pinged. There are no blog reactions either.

Anyone have a suggestion?

I know this doesn't matter to anyone but us - but it needs to be posted. Congratulations to whoever out there flagged it for review. Might you just leave an anonymous message why? I have no way of tracing you - and quite frankly I don't care who the hell you are - just please tell me what you found offensive.

Thank you.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Who is the real barack obama?


Can you see why he was pist Governor Palin came on the scene? Newsweek sunk to an even lower low (which I didn't think possible after jonjon's DISABLED INFANT comment) with Governor Palin's cover. Why didn't they just use a magic marker and make a devil tail and scrawl on her locker that she's dumb hillbilly and to get lost.

Note that Wright's church magazine, "Trumpet" has a willing posed shot of barry. How do you believe that story...still? How did you fall for WHITE AMERICA not understanding black churches as an explanation for that hate-spewing man?

[Thanks to whomever put the covers together. I lost your link. Sorry.]

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Propaganda Pravda style

November 15, 2008

I happened across this article from Filebox and it all seemed very familiar. Read along. Do you hear propaganda, media control, rallies, pamphlets, internet, youth vote, grass root, documentaries of their leader, 30 minute infomercials, ACORN, caucus, voter turnout and glorifying image? Musings not accusations. Scattered quotes from the article.
Pravda achieved the goals of Bolshevik propaganda by motivating the people and controlling the media available to them, The Russian Association of Proletarian Writers controlled the media available to the public.

To spread their propaganda, “agit-trains” were sent throughout Russia with pamphlets and even films to assimilate the peasants. This allowed the communists to see things on a local level and take care of problems at the root, such as school conditions and the secret police. These films brought the faces of Lenin and Trotsky to them and made them feel closer to their leaders.

To ensure that the communists secured the vote, voting rules were changed in the early 1920’s. Now, votes were taken by a raising of hands. Obviously not many people came out to vote under this method and a ‘secret’ ballot system was instilled.... To make matters worse, voting counts were manipulated, making voter turnout appear higher.

The influence of these groups – the writers, the soldiers, the youth, and the voters was to be accomplished through propaganda.

Lenin definitely used these means to promote his ideology, and his image was often used in propaganda, although not to the glorifying extent that Stalin's image was.

[Poster] depicts Lenin as the bringer of a better future but is different in the way that it does not depict the workers in adulation, rather, they are working hard - infering that all good Soviets should work hard to bring about the Leninist ideal.