January 3, 2009
You asked for a copy. I couldn't find the old post so here. Go to Dr "Ron Polarik's" website for the technical breakdown of the alleged forgery. Note: it takes a while to load because of the enlarged photo evidence.
barry's Certification of Live Birth posted on KOS shows an obvious difference in security borders.
January 3, 2009
Here's an eye-opening video of how little barry voters knew and strangely how much they knew of his opponents. This would have been a much better video if it was done during the primaries. Folks would come out of the yes-we-can rallies eyes all a'glaze and not be able to recite anything barry said or state his position on anything other than "he voted against the war". Which of course is a fairy tale that will go down as the most blatant fraud perpetrated on The American People (o-baaa-ma sheeples) in presidential election history. The ones who could answer most often said return of the middle class or universal healthcare, which were Sen Clinton's stands. Anyway take the ten minutes to watch. See if you find it funny as in Leno's Jaywalking. Then take it a step further and realize that folks like these spent the last two years making personal attacks on barry's opponents - including the tried and true cries of racism - instead of learning something about barry.
courtesy of talktozig
Name one accomplishment: Dukakais
Name one accomplishment: Kirk Watson
Name on accomplishment: Harlem voters
Name one accomplishment: Super Tuesday voters
January 3, 2009
They keep coming. The derisive and tired old racist comments about American citizens who want to know the truth about barry. My fellow citizens and I have no interest in preventing barry from being president - that would cause more rioting than the Gaza strip - we just want the propaganda and censorship to stop. We want the truth. The truth we deserve. The truth they should be ferreting out like they did with Gov Palin, Sen McCain - and it goes without saying - Sen Clinton. That's it. The proobamedia has not done their job - which was to vet barry for the American People. Instead, they have put together propaganda and denial worthy of Pravda and Goebbels.
So here's another ignorant of the facts blogger. He is commenting on the challenges to barry's eligibility to be president. He doesn't realize that he is just as 'prejudiced' as those he implies are racists and derogatorily calls "trollers" and "birfers". The lawsuit he refers to has not a chance and, quite frankly, alleging that McCain and barry are ineligible to be POTUS because they are sitting senators is a tad wacko.
AOL Political Machines's TOMMY CHRISTOPHER:
Our court system has become an internet message board writ large, and there are two new trolls spamming Lady Justice...
Oh, I get it. These two idiots are questioning Obama and McCain, so they can't be racists, right? I mean, if successful, they would totally disqualify Obama from the Presidency, and McCain from...from presidential loserdom.
This entire movement to question Obama's birth smacks of some kind of "ism." As YesToDemocracy.com's Christina Cedeno points out, there has never been any challenge like this made to any other candidate. Why Obama? What is it about him that makes them question the legitimacy of his native birth? Hmmmm.
These "birfers," as they're apparently being called now, don't have even the tiniest fig leaf to hide behind. There's no good reason to have asked about Obama's birth certificate in the first place, let alone to still question it after it has been produced, verified, and certified.
Such energetic outrage! The "ism" is Obamerism. And the lame racist allegation is a bit cliche. barry was elected. He is biracial. Who cares. What matters is his "transparency, integrity and superior judgment" and the absolutely outrageous proclamation in Philly to The American People that he "WILL NEVER LIE TO YOU!"
He was at that very moment...and throughout the campaign...and throughout his mythologized autobiography and...
Why haven't these bloggers asked themselves one simple question: Why does barry continue to refuse to submit his vault copy of his birth certificate?
What does barry have to lose? What is he gaining by not producing it? I understand his resistance during the primary and general election to get folks like Tommy to cry racism! But no longer. There is only one logical reason barry is still refusing -- he has something to hide. What it is may have nothing to do with his "natural born" eligibility argument.
Mr Transparency has also refused to release his full medical and school records. Why are folks still buying this transparency crap? The history he has presented to The American People is largely of his own making. Who knows the truth other than his sister now that his grandmother has passed? And how much has she revealed? Been asked to reveal? Pressed to be reveal?
Tommy mistakenly writes that barry has produced his "birth certificate" and that it has been verified and certified. No, it has not. Had he - Berg's case would not still be ongoing and SCOTUS would not be conferencing to decide its merit. What barry produced was the short form "Certification of Live Birth" which just means that there exists a long form that is the actual birth certificate. No need to go into it all over again. Go look for yourself on the official Hawaiian Department of Health website. Read up on the investigation of the COLB and make up your own mind, while asking yourself why he wouldn't want to put an end to all this? And yes, he and the DNC are having to spend money to defend the lawsuits.
And the comment about why barry? Simple - Because he refuses to submit it.
Hmmmm.
Tommy?
December 29, 2008
Independent Film Channel/Zogby poll shows overwhelmingly that Americans believe the news is biased and that the biased coverage influenced the outcome of the presidential election. Surprise.
They polled 3,472 adults nationwide on November 5 and 6, 2008 with a very good split of sampling. Of those surveyed: Dems 38%, Rep 31% and Independents 28%. East (22%), South (26%), Center/Great Lakes (30%) and west (22%). Nearly all (99.6%) were registered to vote,99.7% voted. 53% voted for barry 46% McCain. MOE +/- 1.7%.
RESULTS:
93.1% barry received more coverage
4.1% thought McCain received more
74.7% thought media coverage of the presidential election influenced the outcome
94.2% Rep
55.6% Dem
79.3% Men
70.2% Women
Overall unreliable
80% TV
84% Radio
72.6% believe the news they read/see is biased.
88.7% Rep
57.5% Dem
77% males
67% females
73.3% White
76.7% Hispanic
62.2% Black
70.6% Asian
83.5% Other
Most reliable source of news
37.6% Internet
20.3% National TV News
16% Radio
11.3% Valid newspapers
4% Local TV News
Most trusted Newspaper
20.1% don't read newspapers
19.6 NY Times
19.2% Local
17.4% WSJ
Most trusted source:
39.3% FOX
16% CNN
15% MSNBC
10.1% PBS
6% NBC
Least trusted:
0.6% CNBC
1.5% CBS
3.3% ABC
81% Rep trust FOX
30.3% Dems trust MSNBC
26.2% Dems trust CNN
Most trusted news personality:
12.5% Rush Limbaugh
10.1% Bill O'Reilly
10.3% None listed
8.5% Brokaw
8% Hannity
6.9% Olbermann
6.6% Williams
6.3% Maddow
Least trusted:
0.6% Elisabeth Hasselbeck (How is she considered a news source?)
1.6% Colbert
1.9% Matthews
2.1% Stephanopoulos
Most trusted news personality:
14.2% Dem Keith Olbermann
29.2% Rep Rush Limbaugh
Don't think media giving a true representation of Iraq
73% overall
90% Rep
55.6% Dem
So 73% believe there is media bias in general, 75% thought media bias influenced the outcome of the presidential election and 93% thought barry got more coverage.
Sure doesn't get a lot clearer than that or folks who need stats to point out the obvious.
December 13, 2008
Donofrio’s case was based on the exact same premise as Wrotnowski’s. His application was denied on 12-8 - the same day Wrotnowski’s was referred to the full court by Justice Scalia. On 12-9, a supplemental brief was filed by Wrotnowski and distributed to the Court.
If it was a slam dunk ‘no’ - then logic dictates they would have held Donofrio’s and denied them together. They didn’t. And they will have had the case since December 2nd.
Donofrio’s case suffered from lower court procedural problems that may have explained why his was denied. Wrotnowski’s has had no such problems.
I find it curious that the Court is still considering a case based on the exact same premise as the case they already denied.
December 4, 2008
From Politico's MIKE ALLEN:
Political analyst Micheal Barone was speaking in Chicago to the National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges.
BARONE: The liberal media attacked Sarah Palin because she did not abort her Down syndrome baby. They wanted her to kill that child. ... I'm talking about my media colleagues with whom I've worked for 35 years.
Barone said in an e-mail that he "was attempting to be humorous and ... went over the line."
HUMOR?
There's been an e-mail going around advising black folks on unacceptable behavior now that Obama has won. We at The Root thought we'd add a few tips of our own.And this is the white version written by two white men CHRISTOPHER BEAM & CHRIS WILSON. Number two is interesting in its interpretation.
1. No Negro spirituals or quotes from Dr. King. John Hope Franklin can get away with this. The rest of us cannot.
2. Don't go up to every "redneck-y" looking person and gloat. "It hurts don't it? It burrrrnnss!" Dave Chappelle warned us about parading our pride too much.
3. Don't corner your white coworkers to give them a tutorial on black culture just because "the president is black and it's 'bout time y'all learn!"
4. Don't go to your local DMV, post office or other government office and try to jump the line, talkin' 'bout, "Barack's got my back."
5. Do not promise to name your first child after Barack Obama. We've come far, but Barack Obama Jackson does not have as much of a ring to it as you think.
Black people aren't the only ones worried about embarrassing themselves now that Obama is president-elect. Here are a few pointers for white people.
1. Don't personally congratulate all your black friends.
Black people are not a sports team, and Obama did not win the Super Bowl.
2. Don't declare that you "never thought you'd see the day."
You never thought you'd see the day?
3. Don't start crossing the street in order to walk next to a black person.
President Obama is glad you support racial reconciliation, but he takes a hard line against jaywalking.
4. Don't name drop "Dr. King."
If you absolutely must make some comment about how this is a victory for civil rights, pick a marginally less obvious figurehead.
5. Don't use the phrase "white people" in any way that suggests it doesn't include you.
"For better or worse, voters have taken an interest in candidates' grades since 1999, when the New Yorker published President Bush's transcript at Yale and disclosed that he was a C student. Mr. Bush had never portrayed himself as a brain, but many were surprised to learn the next year that his opponent, Vice President Gore, did not do much better at Harvard despite his intellectual image. When Senator Kerry's transcript surfaced, reporters found that he actually had a slightly lower average at Yale than Mr. Bush did."Unfortunately it's more than a matter of grades. The question is how long after the inauguration are we going to find out and at what cost?
No one predicted the attention I would get in the election. I mean, this was not a decision based on that at all.
Every ounce of his being? Being a coward? Running away when his girlfriend blew her damn self up? How can he possibly say such things and malign American hero and POW Senator McCain who was at the time resisting within an ounce of his own life? Not playing GI Joe with his War Manifesto Jane. What would've happened if ayers did today what he did then? His case got thrown out in part because of illegal wiretaps that barry finds perfectly reasonable...or has he changed his mind again?We tried to end that war. And in trying to end it, we did cross lines of propriety, of legality, maybe even of common sense. But we never committed terror.
It's not terrorism, because it doesn't target - target people to either kill or injure. [A list of his targets.] And had we killed or injured anybody, I'm sure it would have been devastating for everyone.
We knew it was wrong. We knew it was illegal. We knew it was immoral. We had to do more.I didn't regret for a minute resisting the murderous assault on Viet Nam with every ounce of my being.
I knew Barack Obama, absolutely. And I knew him probably as well as thousands of other Chicagoans. And like millions of other people worldwide, I wish I knew him better right now. [Yeah so do The American People] The truth is we came together in Chicago...that's the full extent of our relationship.For those interested - here are the links to Ayers GMA interview with Chris Cuomo. One & Two & Three.
[We] had served together on the board of a foundation, knew one another as neighbors and family friends, held an initial fund-raiser at my house, where I'd made a small donation to his earliest political campaign. [Which barry has never returned.]
This idea that we need to know more, like there's some dark hidden secret, some secret link, is just a myth, and it's a myth thrown up by people that wanted to exploit the politics of fear. And I think it's a great credit to the American people that those politics were rejected. The idea that we should continue to be frightened and worried and barricaded is falling down, and it should.
It's not at all true that he sought me out to listen to my radical ideas, or that I sought him out.
"As far as it goes it is workmanlike enough and presents McCain, unlike the Obama covers we are used to seeing, without the halo. Given the level to which the owner and the staff of the Atlantic are in the tank for Obama -- the owner's wife, Katherine Brittain Bradley, is on record in one instance for $28,500.00 to committees supporting Barack Obama-- even the cover-lines are not half-bad if a bit half-hearted."Who needs lobbyists and PACs when the MSM is your best propaganda outlet and shamelessly contributes to your campaign? Who's going to investigate?
Ayers blog: On the campaign trail, McCain immediately got on message. I became a prop, a cartoon character created to be pummeled.As a well-paid, Starbucks-drinking, vanilla ex-hippy professor. It's not what he did - it's the fact that barry felt it necessary to lie. Somebody should barry off that his body language gives him away. Blinking and looking down (lying), scratching his cheek (arrogant anger - McCain roasting him and post ABC debate dissing Sen Clinton). His word usage and speech pattern, predictable. And, as with the flagpin, his patriotism, all matters Rezko, Wright and lipstick - he kept at it. He couldn't let it go. That is a monstrous ego. Ayers is sellout periphery. His own (lack of) integrity revealed in that he waited till the election to come forward.
....And every day, I participate in the never-ending effort to build a powerful and irresistible movement for peace and social justice.
JOE: They're only assuring she'll come to Washington as a hero. They're making a terrible mistake.
SEXIST LARRY: They're not making her look more sympathetic. These stories IF TRUE are hugely condemning of Sarah Palin just as a citizen. Just as someone who is FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE about what is going on in her own country and the world.
MIKA: Larry they hired her.
LARRY: I agree.
MIKA: I mean c'mon-
LARRY: Your point is absolutely true. IF THESE THINGS ARE ALL TRUE - it is a devastating statement about John McCain and everyone else who selected her as VP.
MIKA: And let me say, John McCain-
LARRY: The reason we know this is is because REALLY GOOD REPORTERS are pumping their sources. [aka howie fineman, evan thomas, richard wolffe, jon meacham, jonjon alter]
MIKA: Ok, but here's the deal-
LARRY: Really good reporters make sure something is true. These aren't people OUT there running to find-
MIKA: If John McCain-
JOE: Hold on a second.
MIKA: Ok. [Yes, says mommie.]
JOE: Really good reporters aren't pumping their sources. These people are letting the sewage out out of their house because it's up to their necks and they're trying to save their own hides. So all of that sludge is being spewed into print and Larry this is just what people did to Ronald Reagan...Let's see. The president elect thinks there's at least 57 states and that Kentucky borders Arkansas. Jonathan Capehart doesn't know where Ohio is in relation to Illionois and Bob Herbert doesn't recognize the phallic symbol:
LARRY: They never wrote if Africa was a country or a continent. (laughs)
MIKA: Larry, if John McCain left the reservation and did this himself, it's still a bad statement on all these people leaking these things about her - because they clearly didn't have what was needed [Implied: cojones] to talk him out of it. So if he did it on his own, that says something about their weakness. And if they were part of it and IF THESE THINGS ARE TRUE - they're complete idiots. I don't think they are true.[...]
LARRY: If this is the material inside the campaign -- this is what will come out. If the truth of it was, boy, Sarah Palin is really brilliant' that would be coming out too.Yeah right. Did we hear that about Senator Clinton, of which it is true? No. She was stupid too.
MIKA: Yeah there are so many sinister dimensions to this given the fact she's a woman-JOE goes on to say that these type of people are mercenaries and they lie to save themselves and get reelected.
LARRY: Are we advocating on this show that we wish the people working in the McCain camp would lie about Sarah Palin and say she was fully prepared?
MIKA: I wish they would not lie about their vetting process.
MIKA: Somewhere in the middle is the true. I think she will get that last laugh. Just wait. Even if some of these things are true and some of them appear to be - she will get the last laugh. This is a very talented person given a very raw deal. That's just "MOMMIE" talking on a Friday.This cracks me up. One minute she's complaining Palin's getting trashed because she's a woman and the next she's calling herself Mommie, Joe's sidekick.
