Showing posts with label Arab world. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arab world. Show all posts

Monday, November 23, 2009

Why is Gaddafi doing in Rome?


November 18, 2009

Source: UK Mirror

What was Gaddafi doing in Rome?

Attending a world food summit.

What did he do while he was there?

Ordered 500 women from an online escort agency.

Requirements:

At least 5′ 7″ tall, between 18 to 35.

Why were they summoned?

Ostensibly to be taken back to Libya with him. [His bodyguards are women who are supposedly virgins. Not sure if they go through a gyne exam,]

What happened when they showed up?

He tried to convert Italian women – probably > 90% of them Catholic – to Islam, including a free Koran.

His quote in reference to Jesus not being crucified:

They crucified someone who looked like him.

It’s not the first time he’s requested hundreds of women.

Previous visit to Rome, he requested 700 women from the world of politics, industry and culture..

Paris, 2007: After pitching his tent on the grounds of a 5-star hotel and allowing his camels to roam free, he requested 1,000 French women because “he was on a mission to save European women”.

And in Qatar in March he proclaimed:

I am an international leader, the dean of the Arab rulers, the king of kings of Africa and imam of Muslims, and my international status does not allow me to descend to a lower level.

Of course at the UN, he rambled on for 90 minutes, exhausting the first translator and making the second one laugh.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Ron Buitenhuis: “We Believe” (Neda’s Song)

July 24, 2009

“We Believe” (Neda’s Song) written and performed Dutch folk musician Ron Buitenhuis. Can’t find any information about him.

It was written in memory of 27 y/o Neda Agha-Soltan who was murdered while standing peaceably in the street during the Iran protests of the election. Dr Arash Hejazi was witness to the murder and said she was shot in the chest from the front by a Basij – not the CIA. Here is Dr Hejazi’s BBC video describing what happened.

Courtesy of LimboLennart

You can see Neda just moments before her murder, walking to the left of her singing teacher–white ponytail and light blue striped shirt–Hamid Panahi. She’s wearing a baseball cap and at (0:43) she turns around and looks at the camera. She is shot shortly thereafter. In a civilized world, we would be watching a video of hers. Women aren’t even allowed to sing in public in Iran.

No violent or graphic footage. No images of her in death or dying.

http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2009-06/neda-agha-soltan_47642233.jpg

(LA TIMES)


Tuesday, July 21, 2009

barry stalling on gitmo report

July 20, 2009

Tomorrow barry’s minions were to have a report ready detailing barry’s policy on detaining terror suspects. Something Gibbs has been tap dancing around. Instead, the task forces have been given extensions: detention policy – 6 months and interrogation policy – 2 months. So that means the detention policy task force report will be due on the anniversary of his executive order that said he would have Guantanamo Bay shut down in a year. How can that be take as anything other than evidence that it will not be closed as promised?

ACLU’s Executive Director ANTHONY ROMERO:

The Obama administration must not slip into the same legal swamp that engulfed the Bush administration with its failed Guantanamo policies. Any effort to revamp the failed Guantanamo military commissions or enact a law to give any president the power to hold individuals indefinitely and without charge or trial is sure to be challenged in court and it will take years before justice is served.

The only way to make good on President Obama’s promise to shut down Guantanamo and end the military commissions is to charge and try the detainees in established federal criminal courts. Any effort to do otherwise will doom the Obama administration to lengthy litigation. A promise deferred could soon become a promise broken.

Source: CNN

Saturday, July 18, 2009

POTUS re: bombings in Indonesia July 18, 2009 by mattie14 July 17, 2009 Statement by the President on the bombings in Indonesia

July 17, 2009

Statement by the President on the bombings in Indonesia

I strongly condemn the attacks that occurred this morning in Jakarta, and extend my deepest condolences to all of the victims and their loved ones.

The American people stand by the Indonesian people in this difficult time, and the U.S. government stands ready to help the Indonesian government respond to and recover from these outrageous attacks as a friend and partner.

Indonesia has been steadfast in combating violent extremism, and has successfully curbed terrorist activity within its borders. However, these attacks make it clear that extremists remain committed to murdering innocent men, women and children of any faith in all countries. We will continue to partner with Indonesia to eliminate the threat from these violent extremists, and we will be unwavering in supporting a future of security and opportunity for the Indonesian people

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Former Gitmo detainee leading attack against Marines in Afghanistan

July 10, 2009

According to FOX, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee, Mullah Zakir (aka Abdullah Ghulam Rasoul) is leading the fight against the Marines’ Operation Khanjar in the Helmand province of Afghanistan. Zakir surrendered in Afghanistan in 2001 – was transferred to Gitmo in 2006 and then was released to Afghan custody 2007. Not sure what the “custody” entails because he was “released” from it in 2008. Shortly thereafter Taliban chief Mullah Omar appointed him as senior military commander.

Why was he released?

They quote an anonymous defense official:

We were under incredible pressure from the world to release detainees at Gitmo. You just don’t know what people are going to do.

He was no worse than anyone else being held at Guantanamo Bay. He was not going to be tried for war crimes so we decided to release him. Either he was not thought to have committed a crime or we didn’t have enough evidence to prosecute him.

The country which agreed to take him promised to take steps to mitigate the threat he posed.

How are they going to do that and what is their incentive?

In March 2009, 37 ex-detainees had returned to fighting the US. Don’t know the more recent number

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Transparency myth: meeting with Jewish leaders left off WH schedule

July 13, 2009

Why?

Are there transparency police? I know Politico noticed it early on but I don’t know if they’ve kept it up. Something tells me no. Politifact with the Obameter? Ha-ha. They’re as much in the bag as factcheck.

Anyway – saw this on the transcript. Still pandering to the arabs by hiding his meeting with Jewish Leaders?

TRANSCRIPT: WH Press Briefing 7-13-09

GIBBS: Let me do Lynn one more question, and then we’ll go.

LYNN: Robert, this is on the meeting at 3:00 p.m. with the American Jewish leaders. This is the first time that Obama has met with this group of presidents of major organizations. And some, but not all — there’s a division there about the President’s urging Israel to end settlements.

So my question is, what is the message he’s trying to — what is he trying to accomplish in that? Does he want to just — does he feel he needs to explain more? By chance, if this subject matter is so sensitive, could there be a transcript of what happens made available to us? And –

MR. GIBBS: I could — go ahead, I’m sorry.

LYNN: And this meeting, for some reason, was left off the White House schedule. It was just added on later in the day, though the people were invited last week. Is there a reason for that?

MR. GIBBS: Not that I’m aware of. Obviously, I think the President will use this opportunity to have a discussion with major Jewish leaders about the progress that he believes we’re making toward comprehensive Middle East peace. And what he has asked each side in this process, the hard decisions that he’s asked each to evaluate as we seek to make more of that progress.

Obviously, this is a very influential group, and I think he looks forward to discussing with them how these efforts are ongoing, the progress that he sees that has been and what he thinks has to be addressed in order to see more progress. We won’t have a transcript, but we’ll certainly give you a readout.

And I know you know both Rosy and Alan Solow’s cell phone number. So I will check repeatedly your blog in order to find out as close to an official transcript as one might need.

Lynn Sweet?

Friday, July 3, 2009

CNN’s Fareed Zakaria re: Iran

July 3, 2009

CNN’s FAREED ZAKARIA weighs in on Iran.

Evidently there are at least three politicians who aren’t going to recognize AHMADINEJAD.

Presidential candidate MEHDI KARRUBI wrote a letter in his party’s newspaper (which caused the paper not to be published), saying that he would not recognize the government and vowed to “stand by the people and the revolution, until the end of my life.”

Hope that doesn’t give anyone any ideas.

Ahmadinejad’s main presidential rival, MIR HOSSEIN MOUSSAVI released a statement Wednesday criticizing the government and its crackdown on the media, which he said has created a “bitter, coup d’etat atmosphere” in Iran.

Iran’s former reformist President MOHAMMAD KHATAMI called on Iranians to keep up the struggle, noting that “all doors are not yet closed.”

They’ve each got to have their own supporters. And how many who were behind ahmadinejad changed their minds when they saw what was happening in the street to their own neighbors? How many people in Iran even know about NEDA?
CNN’s Fareed Zakaria:

The situation is fluid. The challenger, Mir Hossein Moussavi, and the former president, Khatami, are still criticizing the government for stealing the election. That is an extraordinary level of dissent at the highest levels of the establishment. But the most likely outcome remains that for now, the regime will be able to reassert order.

But it has become a naked dictatorship, losing the facade of the Islamic and democratic political ideals that are important to it.

And what about the “holy men”? Are any of them in favor of peace? Blaming Infidels and putting UK embassy workers on trial are not going to fly anymore.

Iran’s nuclear program?

Zakaria: I would say do nothing. Inaction can be a strategy. The five major powers on the U.N. Security Council (plus Germany) have given Iran a very generous offer to restart the nuclear negotiations. It has not responded. Until it does, the West should build support for tougher sanctions and more isolation.

Until we hear from Tehran, there is no reason for the United States or the others to get engaged.

He thinks that although the West is limited because of the threat of nuclear proliferation – Iran doesn’t have many options because of the state of the economy and general mood of the country.

Zakaria: Let the supreme leader and President Ahmadinejad figure out what they should do first. Time might not be on their side.

And it appears neither are the people.

How many innocents have been murdered or tortured?

Does anyone know?

Sunday, June 28, 2009

BBC interview: Dr who tried to save Neda (video)

June 27, 2009

What kind of people live in the Arab World?

Do they actually believe whatever they hear about the US?

The Iranian ambassador to Mexico is claiming that the CIA shot NEDA AGHA-SOLTAN, the innocent 26 y/o Iranian woman whose murder was captured on cellphone video.

http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2009-06/neda-agha-soltan_47642233.jpg

I don’t know how much you know about Neda Agha-Soltan. She was a beautiful young woman (as you can see from her picture), who was shot in the chest while she stood observing a demonstration. She was not chanting or waving her arms or in any way calling attention to herself. She was a complete innocent who was murdered for no reason.

She is seen on video [not graphic] moments before her death, walking along the street in the back of a demonstration. She was accompanied by her music teacher and close friend, Hamid Panahi, who said they had gotten stuck in traffic and had gotten out of the cab to see what was going on. That’s it. They hadn’t even been standing there very long.

From the LA TIMES:

PANAHI: She wanted to show with her presence that ‘I’m here. I also voted. And my vote wasn’t counted.’ It was a very peaceful act of protest, without any violence.

Her friend urged her not to go and Neda was quoted as saying – eerily:

NEDA: Don’t worry. It’s just one bullet and its over.

This cellphone video documents Neda’s murder. It is graphic and very difficult to watch. I recommend you DO NOT watch it – her eyes will never leave you. It’s not worth simple curiosity. Trust me. And it is not pixilated.

The footage shows Neda immediately after she is shot in the chest. She falls backward and the man who had been accompanying her and a bystander – who happened to be a doctor – help her to the ground and then attempt to staunch the massive bleeding from her chest wound. The doctor said the wound was below her neck and not in her head. The cellphone user runs from the angle of her feet around to her face — taking seconds — and catches her final moments. She looks at the cellphone and then blood erupts from her mouth and nose. She dies.

Less than 30 seconds after she was shot – she is dead.

Her last words according to PANAHI: I am burning. I am burning.”

Shot for absolutely no reason by a complete savage who knew he was shooting a woman – a woman who was doing nothing but standing there.

It is an absolutely shocking video that bears witness to the indiscriminate violence taking place. The utter savagery. It is perfectly clear she was in the periphery. A single shot to her chest could not have been random. You don’t need to watch the video – you just have to know that she was absolutely positively shot through the chest and her face and head were completely intact.

The doctor who tried to help Neda, Dr Arash Hejazi was interviewed by the BBC. He is seen on the cellphone video kneeling to her left with his hands pressed against the wound. He looks right at the cellphone. He described it as an entrance wound right below the throat, which he thinks hit her aorta. He said there was no exit wound in the back – meaning she was shot from the front – not the back like the Iranian ambassador to Mexico, who is trying to pin it on the CIA, said. Somebody was looking at her when he shot her. There could not have been any doubt that he was shooting a woman. A woman who was doing nothing but standing.

Dr Hejazi was a GP in Iran but now runs a publishing house in England. He also is a published author and former journalist and is known in Iran. Here is his video of his interview from the BBC. The horror of it is still in his face. I added to the partial transcript they provided to include more of his description of the wound and the fact that he doesn’t think an autopsy was even performed.

=============

====================

HEJAZI: I was there with some friends because we had heard that there were some protests and we decided to go and take a look.

Anti-riot police were coming by motorcycles towards the crowd….All of a sudden everything turned crazy, because the anti-riot police threw teargas on people and the motorcycles started rushing towards people.

He ran down an alley and came out at an intersection where people were just standing.

We ran to an intersection and people were just standing. They didn’t know what to do…either to scatter, to leave or to wait and see what happens.

We heard a gunshot. Neda was standing one meter away from me. I didn’t know her – she was just one other person in the crowd.

I turned back and I saw blood gushing out of Neda’s chest. She was in a shocked position situation, just looking at her chest. Then she lost her control.

We ran towards her and lay her on the ground. I bent over her and saw the bullet wound then, which was right in the chest, and blood gushing out. My experience says that it is the aorta and the lung as well….Her aorta and her lung were hit by the bullet.

And I don’t know – as far as I know never an autopsy was performed on her – she was buried so fast afterwards.

I can verify that the bullet came from in front and it didn’t leave from her back. So there were no bullet wounds – exit points from the back.

I have never seen such a thing, because the bullet, it seemed to have blasted inside her chest – that blood – and later on, blood exiting from her mouth and nose. I had the impression that it had hit the lung as well. Her blood was draining out of her body, and I was just putting pressure on the wound to try to stop the bleeding, which wasn’t successful, unfortunately, and she died in less than one minute. She was drained out of her blood.

He was asked where the shot came from.

At first he thought it might have come from a rooftop but then he saw that bystanders had caught a man on a motorcycle. He had come from the other direction – in a position to shoot Neda in the chest – and he was hiding in the corner. They yelled: “We caught him. We caught him.” While they disarmed him, the man spontaneously shouted: “I didn’t want to kill her. I didn’t want to kill her.”

The bystanders didn’t know what to do with him. He heard someone said: Don’t harm him – we are not killers, like them.”

They looked at his identity papers – which did indeed identify him as Basij – and they took pictures of him. They were afraid to turn him over to the police because the police would have just released him and they would have identified themselves. So they kept his papers and let him go.

It says a great deal that the protesters showed such restraint. That there wasn’t the mob mentality or any eye for an eye even though they had just witnessed a beautiful innocent young woman murdered for absolutely no reason. They let the man who they were certain killed Neda go without laying a hand on him. That is a testament to her death as well.

A stranger passing by in a car took Neda to the hospital – allegedly getting lost on the way. All to no avail. It’s clear even from the video that she was dead. Dr Hejazi went inside to his office and “washed his hands compulsively”. As the shock wore off he said he became overwhelmed with fear – the realization of how close he was standing to Neda and how easily it could have been him. Then he began to feel guilty for not being able to save her life and for having such fears about his own safety when she was dead and he was still alive. This is a detail that even the best storyteller couldn’t come up with.

He said he didn’t sleep for three nights.

The look in her eyes – she didn’t have time to say anything. She just had this look in her eyes – that what has happened? Why has this happened? A very innocent look. I was overwhelmed.

He went to his elderly parent’s house for the night. He didn’t want to say anything but the video was shown on TV and he said that was him.

I can’t explain. It’s indescribable. I don’t want anyone to face this situation in their life. Nobody is that guilty to see such a thing. You have to see it to believe what I’m saying.

How does he feel that he is tied to Neda’s death?

I feel responsible. The most important thing I’m putting myself in jeopardy now — talking to you. And it was a hard – it was a tough decision to make to come out and talk about it. But it was responsible.

She died for a cause. The cause is not a simple cause…She was fighting for basic rights – human’s basic rights. She wanted her vote to be counted. She wanted to be free. The freedom of assembly, which is even mentioned in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran: freedom of assembly, freedom of protesting, freedom of speech, which is compromised now.

I don’t want her blood to have been shed in vain. She died on the street to say something. The fact that the image has traveled so fast around the world – it means something. It means that there’s a message there.

Iranian authorities are saying it was a protestor who did it. Do you believe that’s a possibility at all?

I don’t know who can says such a thing. But as an eyewitness during the past 11 days in Iran – I have never seen any of the protesters carrying a gun – carrying nothing – not even a knife. Nothing. They just had their hands and their voice. That is what they did.

He’s incredulous. And angry.

Yes I heard that. It’s terrible. I don’t know why these people are trying to cover a crime. This a crime. It wasn’t the war. This wasn’t the war. This wasn’t that someone would get killed. This is not collateral damage. This is a crime because protesters, unarmed people, civilians were on the street asking for something.

She was shot, without even knowing why…and who…by what guilt.

I believe the government should prosecute this thing.

He said the government wouldn’t let her family give Neda a proper burial or allow her to be mourned in the mosque. People then started leaving flowers and gathering at the sight of her murder. They were hit by the Basij and run off and the flowers covered with rubbish.

He can’t understand what was happening. That the violence was so out of proportion.

Something has gone wrong…They were protesters to the result, and that could be handled very wisely. Not by shooting them. Not by hitting them. Not by arresting everybody who was on the streets trying to protest.

What do we mean when we say protest? It’s shouting.

And in the last few days before that Saturday, people weren’t even shouting. They were having these silent rallies. They werent even shouting, they weren’t even using that small tool they had. They were just walking in the streets…not saying anything – just holding their hands up and some signs. Nothing.

Is that the right way to handle the situation, and then deny it?

I can’t explain it – I don’t understand why would the State TV say that – but nobody believes that. Nobody can believe that.

Can he envisage going back to Iran?

Not now. Not in this situation. No, I have been identified. I can’t explain. You have to be in the system to understand it. They are going to denounce what I’m saying afterwards. They’re going to put so many things on me after this.

But he says people know him in Iran and that they would believe him.

I want the world to know that I am here on my own will, trying to testify on what I had to bear witness [to], and why I’m jeopardizing my situation is just the innocent look in her eyes before she died.

Nobody would believe she was shot by a protester. She was shot from [the] front – not from behind. She was shot by a Besij member, which are the armed people.

Yes, the anti-riot police never used firing guns. They never – they just used anti-riot tools and teargas.

But the Basij is armed — it’s an armed force. And they don’t follow the rules that are set for the police.

The police is not shooting people. These people [the Basij] are.

In the next post, Wolf Blitzer interviews the Iranian ambassador to Mexico, who speaks through an interpreter. Even still his words are pure fiction when compared to Dr Hejazi’s hands-on eyewitness account, who was there for a reason. The odds of a doctor [let alone a doctor who is a writer and a previous journalist and presently living in the UK] being within a few feet of a senseless shooting is astronomical – especially since he had just run down an alley.

Neda’s wound was catastrophic. She would have died had she been shot in the ER. He was there as a doctor to provide unimpeachable testimony. Testimony from a native Iranian — who is known there, who will be believed there, who was able to get out to immediately tell his story and who owns a publishing house of some sort to make sure that it never gets forgotten.

He looks right at the cellphone so he can easily be identified on video. He mentions the exact street location where it took place. And the manner in which he relates the event leaves no doubt as to its veracity.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Supreme Leader blames infidels for his impotence

June 20, 2000

Who can take the term “Supreme Leader” seriously?

Especially when it appears he can only do so by inciting well-choreographed chants of “Death to America”?

Is “Death to America” written somewhere in the Koran? Because it seems to a regular and fervent part of televised “prayer services” in the Muslim World.

He has decided there will be no revote because 11 million voted cannot be rigged. I’m sure there are a lot of ACORN workers and barrymedia who chuckled out loud when they heard that. And he thinks that hundreds of thousands of dissatisfied voters are going to stop because he decreed Ahmadinejad’s victory “absolute”.

And then he blamed the uprising in his own country, caused by his own corruption and impotence, on the infidels whose media isn’t allowed into the country, who cannot communicate through the internet and who can only see what’s going on through blurry cellphone video and photos.

Is the Arab World that ignorant?

And despite the fact that the infidel-in-chief has said nothing other than the US is watching, the world is watching, the right to assembly and free speech should be respected and that he’s not going to meddle because it’s up to the Iranian people to decide who leaders will be.

And what of the courageous protesters who are risking their lives because they have had enough of the Supreme Leader? Does he think they are going to settle right down when he calls them mindless puppets controlled by infidels?

SL: Some may imagine that street action will create political leverage against the system and force the authorities to give in to threats. No, this is wrong.

Then he admits there will be bloodshed and that he intends to do nothing to prevent it except declare that the protesters’ murders will instead be suicides.

SL: It must be determined at the ballot box what the people want and what they don’t want, not in the streets. I call on all to put an end to this method. … If they don’t, they will be held responsible for the chaos and the consequences.

If there is any bloodshed, leaders of the protests will be held directly responsible.

They will be held accountable for all the violence, bloodshed and rioting.

With these words he should be condemned in every civilized nation.

How many Arab countries will that include?

Just like the world bore witness to how the Arab World stood by and did nothing for the Palestinian people when Hamas was pounding Israel with missiles and still did nothing but incite hate and promise years of retribution when Israel finally defended itself, the world is bearing witness to their lack of concern on behalf of the Iranian people.

It is becoming very clear – if not already clear – that the Arab World is not interested in promoting peace and only get involved when they can spread hate and propaganda. Something they can no longer deny. And something they can no longer blame on the infidels.

Source: FOX

Monday, June 15, 2009

Inspiring words from President Clinton

June 15, 2009

Every once in a while it is good to be reminded of the power of a US president’s words. And one thing is for certain – that power does not reside in the teleprompter or in the recycling of a previous president’s sentiments.

A few quotes from President Clinton’s keynote address at the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee in Washington upon receiving their global leadership award.

Global cooperation is crucial for the survival of mankind.

If we have a chance, it has to begin by people accepting that they can be proud of who they are without despising who someone else is.

To foster this cooperation, people should focus on their similarities because we are genetically “99.5 percent” the same.

From time immemorial, people have fought over identity rooted in that (half percent). We should have spent more time thinking about that other 99.5 percent of ourselves.

You teach your children their ethnic heritage; their religious heritage; their cultural heritage with no negative reference to anyone else because it’s the only shot we’ve got to make the most of our interdependent world.


Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Saudi Arabia’s pre-POTUS preparations

June 1, 2009

WARNING: ADULT CONTENT

So barry is heading to the Muslim world again. Hasn’t been to two continents – South American or Australia. Hasn’t been to Eastern Europe (except Russia on a Codel) or Japan or India or China or Central America or Ireland or Vatican City but he added on a stop to visit his old pal King Saudi so he can bend completely over in the privacy of a tent or a cave or a palace or wherever the women and “child brides” are slaves. He has yet to speak out on anything except the marital rape law in Afghanistan – and then only because he was pressured. He has not said anything while in the companies of Arabs. He has the courage and conviction of a gnat.

And how is the center of the Muslim World, the “moderate” and “progressive” land of Saudi Arabia preparing for his visit?

Public execution. In this particular case, the beheading was accompanied by a “crucifixion” – which his nothing to do with Christianity. It means the body is displayed in public as a “deterrent”.

GROSS WARNING: They are beheaded first and their head is sewn back on and the reassembled corpse is mounted on a pole or a tree and left for all to see. His was displayed “throughout the evening”.

2009 and there are still savages beheading folks – as in women, too – in public. [I don't know about Saudi Arabia but Iran executes folks who (allegedly) commit crimes as a minor.] They have a special square just for this purpose. It’s called “Chop Chop” Square (Deera Square) for obvious reasons. In the center is a drain so they can flush the blood and whatever else away when they’re finished. Cleanliness being next to Godliness. They used to be held on Fridays after noon prayers – now they take place unannounced but always at 9:00 am.

And the executioner?

The job is a coveted one, often passed from father to son.

What qualifies for the death penalty?

…many crimes, such as armed robbery, rape, adultery, drug use and trafficking, and renouncing Islam. There’s a woman on death row now for witchcraft, and the charge is based partly on a man’s accusation that her spell made him impotent.

In this case, the crime was “an offense of rebellion, one that basically rejected all of the rules of religion and society” and he was caught in the act. And what he did was truly evil and would probably qualify for the death penalty in some states.

And according to the article:

There is also no written penal code, so questions of illegality depend on the on-the-spot interpretations of police and judges.

Amnesty International’s Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui:

[The trial proceedings] usually take place behind closed doors without adequate legal representation. Convictions are often made on the basis of “confessions” obtained under duress, including torture or other ill-treatment during incommunicado detention.

But it appears (alot of) money talks.

At any time until the sword strikes, a victim’s family can pardon the condemned — usually for a cash settlement of at least two million riyals ($690,000 or so) from the convict or his family.

Usually though:

AI’s Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui: Those who are sentenced to death are often not informed of the progress of legal proceedings against them or of the date of execution until the morning when they are taken out and beheaded.

How common?

There were 102 executions in Saudi Arabia in 2008 and is aware of 136 people believed to be awaiting execution….”but nobody knows how many people are on death row.”

Sahraoui: King Abdullah should show true leadership and commute all death sentences if Saudi Arabia is to have any role to play as a global leader or member of the G-20.

Do you think that is on barry’s agenda?

Sources: BOLD links are to an article with a description of the beheading — towards the bottom. Amnesty International links are from a CNN article.

Katie Couric recently returned from Saudi Arabia. She gives a glimpse of the Square.

NOTHING GROSS

May 13, 2009

Friday, May 15, 2009

POTUS re: release of torture photos

POTUS re: release of torture photos

May 14, 2009 by mattie14

May 14, 2009

barry’s prepared comments concerning his reversal on the release of the torture photos. He never says the word torture. He refers to it as conduct that didn’t conform with the Army manual.

How much did Dick Cheney have to do with it? It being past 100 days? The Generals? Nancy Pelosi? Or simple reality? The kind of reality he will eventually arrive at with Guantanamo Bay.

NewsPoliticsNews

WH Transcript

Now, let me also say a few words about an issue that I know you asked Robert Gibbs about quite a bit today, and that’s my decision to argue against the release of additional detainee photos. Understand, these photos are associated with closed investigations of the alleged abuse of detainees in our ongoing war effort.

Operative words: war effort. Something folks seem to forget.

And I want to emphasize that these photos that were requested in this case are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib, but they do represent conduct that did not conform with the Army Manual. That’s precisely why they were investigated — and, I might add, investigated long before I took office – and, where appropriate, sanctions have been applied.

That caveat is attached to every decision he makes. How long before it no longer applies.

In other words, this is not a situation in which the Pentagon has concealed or sought to justify inappropriate action. Rather, it has gone through the appropriate and regular processes. And the individuals who were involved have been identified, and appropriate actions have been taken.

Meaning everything that is going to be done has been done. The photos, if released, will change nothing.

It’s therefore my belief that the publication of these photos would not add any additional benefit to our understanding of what was carried out in the past by a small number of individuals. In fact, the most direct consequence of releasing them, I believe, would be to further inflame anti-American opinion and to put our troops in greater danger.

Honestly – why does that even need to be said out loud?

Moreover, I fear the publication of these photos may only have a chilling effect on future investigations of detainee abuse. And obviously the thing that is most important in my mind is making sure that we are abiding by the Army Manual and that we are swiftly investigating any instances in which individuals have not acted appropriately, and that they are appropriately sanctioned. That’s my aim and I do not believe that the release of these photos at this time would further that goal.

Those deeds are done. The photos are not going to change that. Any and all future instances will be dealt with start to finish.

Now, let me be clear: I am concerned about how the release of these photos would be — would impact on the safety of our troops. I have made it very clear to all who are within the chain of command, however, of the United States Armed Forces that the abuse of detainees in our custody is prohibited and will not be tolerated. I have repeated that since I’ve been in office, Secretary Gates understands that, Admiral Mullen understands that, and that has been communicated across the chain of command.

Any abuse of detainees is unacceptable. It is against our values. It endangers our security. It will not be tolerated.

All right. Thank you very much, everybody.

Did not take any questions.

For the first time ever I actually agree with barry. Believing he did it out of personal conviction is another matter.

ACLU’s Amrit Singh’s justification for release of photos
To the ACLU re: release of torture photos
POTUS re: release of torture photos
ACLU’s Amrit Singh, Anderson Cooper, Kevin Madden re: photo release

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Go ahead, it’s Saudi Arabia, slap them b*tches up side the head

May 11, 2009

It seems they keep track of domestic violence in Saudi Arabia because it’s on the rise. The reporting of it that is. Just think for a minute. There are no female police in Saudi Arabia, so when women/girls try to report a sexual assault they have to tell a man, who already thinks they are property of their male relatives/husband. If they ever progress from caves in the desert and palaces with consorts into the 21st century and allow women to be police officers and judges, the incidence of all crimes against women would increase exponentially, because for once they would be worth reporting.

It was shocking just to read that women were allowed not only to attend a domestic violence seminar but that they were allowed to vocally protest – albeit from behind their mandated shrouds, which were the subject of the protest.

The caveman of a judge said if the husband beast decides that the little missus spent too much money buying a garment she must wear – he can slap her across the face. Yep. I didn’t see what page he quoted from the Koran where it is so written.

I wonder if they realize how ridiculous they look when these stories break in the US?

And Saudi Arabia is supposed to be a “moderate Arab state” and “progressive” even as the Supreme Imam decrees that it’s ok to sell off girls as young as 10 and that there’s no problem mutilating their genitals either. Savages. All of them are savages. Morons don’t realize that if they allowed their women to actually do something they wouldn’t have to receive a stipend to go shopping with. And if they could actually drive a vehicle they could do some comparison shopping.

From CNN’s MOHAMMED JAMJOOM [emphasis added]:

Arab News, a Saudi English-language daily newspaper based in Riyadh, reported that Judge Hamad Al-Razine said that “if a person gives SR 1,200 [$320] to his wife and she spends 900 riyals [$240] to purchase an abaya [the black cover that women in Saudi Arabia must wear] from a brand shop and if her husband slaps her on the face as a reaction to her action, she deserves that punishment.”

Women in the audience immediately and loudly protested Al-Razine’s statement, and were shocked to learn the remarks came from a judge, the newspaper reported.

Arab News reported that Al-Razine made his remark as he was attempting to explain why incidents of domestic violence had increased in Saudi Arabia. He said that women and men shared responsibility, but added that “nobody puts even a fraction of blame” on women, the newspaper said.

Al-Razine “also pointed out that women’s indecent behavior and use of offensive words against their husbands were some of the reasons for domestic violence in the country,” it added.

Women can’t be blamed when they can’t do anything and are ordered around by the beasts they were sold to. And what is considered “indecent behavior”? Showing their ankles? Protesting marital rape? Fighting for a divorce for their 8 y/o daughter? Resisting the mutilation of their daughters’ genitals?

Do these beasts have any idea what this says about their lack of manhood? That they have to slap instead of reason? That they have to smack the mother of their children in order to prove their dominance?

More from Jamjoom:

Domestic violence, which used to be a taboo subject in the conservative kingdom, has become a hot topic in recent years. Groups like the National Family Safety Program have campaigned to educate the public about the problem and help prevent domestic abuse.

Saudi women’s rights activist Wajeha Al-Huwaider told CNN that Saudi women routinely face such attitudes.

“This is how men in Saudi Arabia see women,” she said in a telephone interview from the Saudi city of Dahran. “It’s not something they read in a book or learned from a friend. They’ve been raised to see women this way, that they’re less than a person.”

Al-Huwaider added that “I’m not surprised to see a judge or a religious man saying that – they’ve been raised in the same culture – a culture that tells them it’s ok to raise your hand to a woman that this works.”

These women are heroes and should be applauded as such. Wonder what type of violence they have been subjected to – before and because of their work.

Monday, April 27, 2009

POTUS: "We are not at war with Islam"

April 6, 2009

barry may not be, but I am.

And any self-respecting woman, who enjoys freedom and believes women's rights are human rights should be.

Woman in the Muslim world right now are being beaten, stoned, raped, killed, forced to marry, sold into slavery, disfigured for wanting a divorce or striving to be educated and their daughters' genitals are being sliced and hacked at because of the "holy men's" interpretation of Islam.

Women and children abused in every fashion imaginable without threat of prosecution.

Fathers, brothers and husbands allowed free reign over women and children - theirs or not.

Precious little girls sold to men 2-8 times their age to settle their cowardly fathers' debts.

Holy men sanctioning every evil bit of it, nullifying the legitimacy of Islam as a religion.

No religion sanctions the enslaving and ritual abuse of women and children.

Men do.

Do they not realize what it is saying about them? About their (lack of) morals and values? About their country and religion?

Do they not realize how it reflects on their ancestors when they are willing to sell, mutilate, disfigure and murder their own DNA?

And just how impotent are Muslim men that they need to own a woman in order to keep her? That they need to rape and destroy a young girl before her sexual organs have even matured?

Have they no idea what this says about their manhood - literally and figuratively?

In what type of savage civilization does a 10 y/o have to run away to ask for a divorce only to find out that she can only do so when she becomes an "adult" at 15 - long after she has been ruined by the pedophile she was given to like a common farm animal.

How blind do these savage nations think the world is?

We see what they are doing. We hear their cowardly justifications that it is "custom" and "religion". We watch as woman after woman and child after child are mutilated for the sake of "honor".

And they expect us to "honor" their "religion"? Their "holy men"?

How are we to respect the rest of the Arab world - including Turkey - who sit by and do nothing?

No, the President was not speaking for this American citizen. I am very much at war with Islam and will be until one Muslim country says to the world that the savagery sanctioned by Islam: female genital mutilation, child marriages, and honor killings is inhuman and needs to be stopped and needs to be punished.

It is the Koran that the human detonators quote before they blow their cowardly useless selves up. Allah is great! It's time to find my 7 virgins in Allah heaven! And that's because it is the only place they can find virgins - the rest of the young girls have had their virginity sold and torn apart by shriveled pedophiles.

Do the suicide bombers really believe what they are doing is going to make them a martyr? The only people who remember them are the families of the innocent victims - not their own people. Why would they? They were just another pawn, just another exploded mist of DNA used by cowards to further their own agenda.

And where is the oh so courageous leader of the human detonators and hate-filled indiscriminate killing machines?

Hiding in a cave like the savage caveman he is.

And the rest?

Hiding behind scarves - obscuring their identities - so proud of what they've allowed themselves to become.

If their mission is from Allah, then why don't they have the courage to show their faces?

Because inside they feel shame. They know what they are doing goes against the laws of Nature and that no good life can come from perpetrating evil.

It is a blessing once their hate-filled flesh explodes. They can no longer beat and abuse their mothers, sisters, wives, nieces, daughters or throw acid into the faces of innocent girls on their way to school.They can no longer recruit and brainwash more ignorant savages. They can no longer propagate evil.

It is a blessing their sperm is vaporized along with their empty soul. They can never create more hate-filled boys and precious little girls to be sold into "marriage".

Child marriages are nothing other than unholy unions consecrated by sanctioned rape. And night after night after night after night, defenseless little girls weighing less than 100lbs are allowed to be raped - their yet unripened and already mutilated genitals invaded over and over and over and over by impotent shameful pigs.

Yes. I am very much at war with Islam - just as I am against polygamy and "religious" cults in the US, who think it's ok for children to be raped by adults - including their parents - in the name of free love and "God's will".

But they live in a country where they can potentially escape. Where someone can hear their pleas for help and provide them shelter and care. Where someone finds what is happening to them reprehensible. Where their rapists and savagers can be held accountable in a court of law.

Not so for Muslim women.

And that is wrong.

There will be no justice in the Arab world until women are the judges. And I will be long dead before that happens.

Yes. I am at war with Islam - my weapons, my words. And it is because I don't live in a Muslim country that I can wield them for those who cannot.

Those of you who have been leaving comments in Arabic, why don't you use the Google translation page so we can all see what you are saying? As is you just get deleted and we learn nothing.

=================

Hillary Rodham Clinton: "Womens's Rights are Human Rights"
Ranked #35 out of the top 100 speeches of the 21st Century

Female genital mutilation
While the Arab World Sits Silent
Child marriages go unabated in Arab World
Arab Carter on Human Rights - does not allow the marriage of 8 y/o girls and yet not a single Arab country demands it stop. They all signed it - therefore they are all violating it by not enforcing it.

Friday, April 17, 2009

barry's panderment continues at Georgetown

April 16, 2009

We are not at war with Islam.

We genuflect to beasts who allows little girls to be raped and mutilated with impunity.

We don’t consider ourselves a nation of Christians.

We cover up the crucifixes so the arabs won’t be offended.

Two days after Easter.

NBC

It doesn’t matter who said what. Nothing he does is spontaneous - it’s all perfectly choreographed and telepromptered. He knew. And it’s clear the reason.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Donna Brazile: barry’s bow a sign of “mutual respect”

April 14, 2009

Just watch the video. First there’s Robert Gibbs at the press conference LAUGHING at the question. He thinks it’s funny that the alleged leader of the free world acts like the savage beast’s subject. Clearly barry didn’t think he did anything wrong because Gibbs would have been prepared with an answer. And then there is the pat answer that The American People don’t care, with the reporters laughing.

That’s the problem they don’t seem to be getting. We care. Very much so. barry was representing each and every one of us and he bowed to the king of a land that produced 15 men who were responsible for the murder of 2973 innocent Americans and foreign nationals. A land that allows 8 y/o girls to be sold to a 47 y/o man to pay off her father’s debt. A land that allows marital rape, that allows young girls’ genitals to be hacked at, a land that does not allow women even the most basic right of driving.

NewsPoliticalNews

WH Press Briefing Transcript

LOTHIAN: When the President met with King Abdullah, there was something that took place which I believe the White House explained was just the president being taller than the king. We took a look at the video, and it does appear that the president actually bowed to King Abdullah. Did he bow or didn’t he?

GIBBS: No, I think he bent over with both, to shake — with both hands to shake his hand, so I don’t–

LOTHIAN: — one hand —

GIBBS: Well I... [laughter]

LOTHIAN: Did he bow or didn’t he?

GIBBS: No. But I think this meeting was like a week ago, right?

LOTHIAN: That’s right but this is something a lot of people are talking about today.

GIBBS: I can only imagine it is of great cause and concern for many people struggling with the economy.

Donna Brazile thinks bowing to someone is a sign of “mutual respect”. And she says Michelle “supposedly” touched the Queen when there is abundant proof of that also. When is the lying going to stop? And if she thinks what barry did to that saudi person was a sign of respect then why didn’t he do the same to the Queen? The WH also tried to say barry was taller than him which is why he did it - well he’s over a foot taller than the Queen. and didn’t show even the slightest “dip” (as Ben Smith from Politico put it). Lie after lie after lie and the press plays merrily along. Goebbels would be so proud.

(4-9) CNN Transcript

BLITZER: All right. Clearly trying to play down the issue. The “Pittsburgh Tribune Review editorial said this, Donna, “In the least, it was an embarrassing protocol faux paus. Mr. Obama is not the king’s subject but his equal. But the bow,” in quotes, “actually was worst than that, it’s a troubling metaphor for a deferential presidency.” He’s getting a lot of criticism from the right.

Not just the right. And what does it say of the left that they are not criticizing him too?

BRAZILE: Well, you know, they criticized Michelle Obama, the first lady, for supposedly touching the Queen, so I don’t know if it was a bow, [What?] a nod or that was his way of saying — you know (speaking foreign language), I don’t know what the greeting was, but look, the fact is that he was just showing his friendship and his kindness to a country that we hope remains a strong ally in the Middle East.

BLITZER: Big deal or little deal? [He has to ask?]

PERINO: I think it’s a little deal if they would have let it be a little deal but I think that they have perpetuated this story for several days because if you look at the tape, just from the plain face of it people can look at it and go, oh gosh, that kind of looks like a bow. But I think they could have handled it differently. Look, when President Bush did the cultural and customary thing of grabbing the king of Saudi Arabia’s hand, we saw the Democrats play that card over and over again.

BLITZER: He went further. Take a look at — turn around, you can see the video we have. If you turn around, Dana, right behind you. But he went further, he actually gave him a kiss.

PERINO: Well, that’s the customary thing to do. And you get your State Department memo, you left that protocol and you want to do the right thing.

Absolutely. A kiss and holding hands are customary, as is a not from the waist with genuflected knee bow to the Japanese. But a bow like barry did is not in any book of protocol. [Nor is rubbing the Queen's back.] It is what Muslims do to their leaders. No I am not saying barry is a muslim. I don’t care what he is. He did not act like a Christian and he certianly did not act like the leader of the free world. He sublimated himself to a man - who allows children under 10 to be married and raped and mutuilated in the name of Islam - with a servile gesture. And it was witnessed by the entire world - who for the record were just as appalled.

His panderment went too far this time and cannot be forgiven. That image will remain forever. An American president salaam-ing to a savage king. Is this what he meant by improving our status in the world? By bending down to the level of savages?

BLITZER: But you can imagine if President Obama…

PERINO: But no American bows to anybody else.

BLITZER: … would have kissed King Abdullah…

PERINO: But America — our whole country is based on the fact that we’re not the subject of anybody else and we’re not supposed to bow.
That’s probably why this is a controversy. I think the White House probably could have blown this off earlier if they would have just said thought that that was the protocol, trying to be kind. You know, move on. Instead, now it’s like four days later and we’re still talking about it and you’re showing the videotape.

BLITZER: All right.

BRAZILE: Look, I just think he was just trying to show just some — just show mutual respect.

***
barry irreparably disgraced The American People (the video)
By bowing, barry was saying this is ok
Robert Gibbs’ blatant lie re: barry’s bow
Donna Brazile: barry’s bow a sign of “mutual respect” (video of Gibbs lying)
“The Secret behind Obama’s Bow to the King”

Yo, WH spokesliar, Robert Gibbs:

April 14, 2009

What lie can you use to explain this?

Caption: ” Praise Allah”

POTUS: It is true that we have to change our behavior in showing the Muslim world greater respect.

Why?

Disgusting is bowing to another disgusting who sanctions child marriages, child rape, child genital mutilation, marital rape and oppression of adult woman.

Bend over Mr President and take your own punishment. Girls just like Sasha and Malia are being raped without threat of prosecution because the man you just bowed to allows it.

What kind of man, let alone father are you?

You can claim whatever religion you like. No Christian would have done that.

And no American President should ever be see like that.

And no White House should be allowed to lie like Gibbs did. And that fact that he laughed and the press laughed says a great deal about this administration.

Even President Bush, in all his gaffe-prone clumsiness, would not have made such an egregious and despicable breech of etiquette and betrayal if the trust of The American People.

And folks don’t think pro-barry media bias exists? Here is another prime example. What would have been the consequences to Bush? And folks don’t think he got a pass because he is biracial aka “black”? How else do you explain the lack of media scrutiny?

(Photo)

***
barry irreparably disgraced The American People (the video)
By bowing, barry was saying this is ok
Robert Gibbs' blatant lie re: barry's bow
Yo, WH spokesliar, Robert Gibbs
Donna Brazile: barry's bow a sign of "mutual respect" (video of Gibbs lying)
"The Secret behind Obama's Bow to the King"

As the Arab World sits silent
Child marriages continue unabated in the Arab World
Female genital mutilation
International Woman of Courage Award: Reem Al Nury, Yemen

Sunday, April 12, 2009

By bowing, barry was saying this is ok

April 12, 2009

barry has yet to stand up for the oppressed women in the world. He said nothing in his Inauguration speeh, nothing in his pandering to the Arab media first presidential interview and nothing on his my name is Hussein I feel your pain tour of Turkey. He could tour a mosque but he didn’t have time to go to Normandy. That’s twice - on both tours of the cosmos barry has refused to honor the military. First he refused to visit the injured and maimed soldiers in the hospital at Landstuhl, which he lied about and tried to blame on the Pentagon. Howie Fineman who was there said he should have forgotten the media and just gone. And then his second trip he refused to go to Normandy. He didn’t want to upset Germany.

He is disgusting.

Go ahead. Have at me bots. I no longer care.

courtesy of uxaiz

And the bowing - yes bowing - it’s perfectly clear to anyone who is not obamerized, to anyone who is honest with themselves - was the final straw. He bowed to a pig who allows young girls to be sold into marriage - as young as 8 - knowing that their “husbands” are going to rape them night after night after night. He bowed to a savage who allows grown men to rip open and tear apart little girls’ hymens and vaginas that have not even matured.

And it doesn’t stop there - he bowed to a savage who sanctions the slicing off of innocent little girls’ genitalia.

That is savagery of the highest order.

And how do they justify their inhuman and inhumane acts? Islam. The Islam that barry is not at war with.

What type of father could bow to such a savage?

It could just as easily be Malia and Sasha. Both of then genitally mutilated and Malia even married. And Michelle would not be having been able to stop anything as the property of her husband.

I went into this in a post about “not being at war with Islam” that I just realized I haven’t posted yet.

This is what set me off this morning. A story that I had written about previously.

Saudi clerics deemed it legal for girls as young as 8 to be “married”. This particular 8 y/o girl was sold to a 47 y/o pig by her own pig of a father to settle his debt. Sold like a piece of meat by her own father. The mother has no rights and had no say in the matter as she is not the child’s legal guardian.

On December 24th, the judge, Sheikh Habib Al-Habib, refused to annul the “marriage”. But he made sure to ask the pig who “married” her to make a pledge to not consummate the marriage until she reaches puberty. Like that is realistic.

What age is considered puberty in Saudi Arabia and who decides it?

And when can she request a divorce? Once she reaches puberty, when she has already been ruined.

He upheld the ruling, which in effect means that it is legal for a 47 y/o man to rape an 8 y/o girl. And 8 y/o girl who was traded like an animal in 2008. And it doesn’t matter how long or how little he waits to rape her–there is no way an 8 y/o can “consent” to sex–she has been sold into slavery and had her childhood stolen by her own father.

And how long before she has her genitals sliced off - if she hasn’t already?

This is what barry said was ok when he bowed to the chief savage of a nation of savages. And by bowing he lowered himself to their subhuman level. He looked that little girl in the eye and said I bow to your great leader. I don’t care what happens to you. I don’t care enough to say anything or at least register my disdain. No, you don’t matter, little girl, because I want to rule the cosmos and I am willing to do whatever it takes, including betraying my nation and bowing to savages.

Anyone who doesn’t see it as such - I hope you don’t have daughters.

The horror of being mutilated in the name of Islam.

Traditionally done using what ever is handy: razors, glass, regular knives, sharp pieces of rusty metal. It is done without anesthesia with female relatives holding the child down, chanting Praise Allah! Afterward ashes or whatever is handy is rubbed in to help prevent hemorrhage. Some girls live the rest of their lives in constant pain from just clothing touching the area. Others are left incontinent. Some have their vaginal openings opened for intercourse and then sewed shut. Some die. All are traumatized and all are left with a physical reminder of what Islam means to the men in their society - Saudi Arabia included.

November 2008: 60% of girls/women around Kirkuk, Iraq (Kurds) had undergone genital mutilation.

***

barry irreparably disgraced the American People (video of bow)
Gibbs’ blatant lie about barry’s groveling
What needed to be in the Inaugural Address
barry’s interview with al Arabiya TV
As the Arab World sits silent
Child marriages continue unabated in the Arab World
Female genital mutilation

Friday, April 10, 2009

barry irreparably disgraced The American People

April 10, 2009

rant alert

I needed a few days not to go off on barry on this. He is disgusting and there is no longer any way around it. Why did he bow to that Saudi person? Why? I have posted before about the fact that neither he or Michelle know the proper etiquette but this was intentional. There is only one explanation: he is sympathetic to Muslims. Prove me wrong. That is all I am going to say on this. I haven’t watched the MSM’s take or heard barry’s lame excuse. He did not represent me on the world stage and what he did was beyond wrong - It was despicable and it can never be forgiven.

uxalz

Right around 0:50 he makes a deep bow even though the saudi person clearly extends his hand with the intent of a handshake - nothing more.

The commentary is in Italian - but it isn’t needed.

Would Lincoln, JFK, FDR or Reagan have done that?

And then he says “we’re” not at war with Islam? I sure the hell am and will be until they stop using it as justification to slice off their innocent daughters' genitals. Another post.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Shoe thrower's sentenced reduced

April 7, 2009

It was only a matter of time. They went through the charade of "justice" and now begins show thrower's gradual release from prison. A federal appeals court in Baghdad Monday reduced his sentence from three years to one. To include time served? He was found guilty of assaulting a foreign head of state on an official visit to Iraq, which carried with it a sentence of 15 years. Attempted assault is 1-5 years. So although he was found guilty of the more serious charge he was given the most minimal sentence under the lesser charge. Guess those 25 lawyers he had in court with him were worth something - a month a piece.

Source: CNN

President Bush attacked by shoethrower
Malaysian foreign minister praises shoethrower
Shoe party in the streets
Update: shoe thrower
First Lady Laura Bush reacts
Shoe thrower sentenced to 3 years
Indonesians welcome Madame Secretary of State with lame shoe toss
Shoethrower’s monument lasted less than 48 hrs
Shoe thrower's sentenced reduced from 3 to 1 year