January 22, 2009
barry was sworn in...again...last night. Amazing the attention to The Constitution after he becomes president. If he is so concerned about upholding The Constitution, why doesn't he relieve The American People's minds by proving his constitutional eligibility to be sworn in at all? Not in attendance was the Lincoln Bible - or any Bible for that matter. So is it a true oath?
One thing is for sure - Justice Roberts had time to think over his decision so he can never say he didn't have a second chance. I would like to talk to Justice Alito. His not being at barry and Biden's fireside chat was intentional.
So was Biden the President? Did barry re-sign whatever he had done? If he really wasn't able to execute the office of the president until the repeat oath, then nothing he did up until that time was "legal". Can't have it both ways. Although that is barry's MO.
And why no video? A separate picture and audio? Didn't he want that footage shown?
The whole thing reeks.What would Freud have thought about Roberts' and barry's mis-swearing in?
(PETE SOUZA White House)
White House Counsel Greg Craig (who was also at the fireside chat):
We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday. But the oath appears in the Constitution itself.
Absolute insanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment