January 9, 2009
I was looking over the birth certificate posts and court cases since Berg v Obama is being conferenced by SCOTUS today and can't find Colonel Hollister's post. I'm going on memory here.
Colonel Hollister (in his 50's) lives in Colorado and is retired from the USAF. As such, he is subject to ready reserve, which means he is forever holden to the commander in chief. servicemembers can be called up no matter their age or how long they served. What an incentive.
This gives Col. Hollister "standing" in that his performance of duty directly hinges on whether barry is a legally qualified Commander in Chief. The previous suits the plaintiffs had no standing and they were dismissed in part because of it.
Col Hollister as an active member of the USAF would be legally bound to follow the president's orders. If barry is constitutionally eligible to be CIC - no problem. If barry is constitutionally ineligible - it's a problem. Servicemembers are sworn to protect our country and in doing so uphold The Constitution. So, if barry is ineligible, they - including Col Hollister - would in a sense have a right and a duty to not follow his orders, as they would be null and void because barry would be a usurper. This of course goes all the way up the chain of command.
Hollister's case is still in the lower courts. I wonder if the USAF could circumvent this by discharging (or whatever) Col Hollister from ever having to serve again. Since Berg is acting as an interpleader the burden of proof is shifted to barry. Very important since barry is forced to prove he is eligible vs berg proving he is ineligible.
Hollister is suing barry as barry soetero, which may in fact be his legal name if he was adopted in Indonesia and never had it legally changed back to barry obama. Hence the importance of his school and medical records to see exactly what name he used and which of the little boxes he checked off. If his name is barry soetero he committed fraud on his initial application to the Illinois Bar.
Can you imagine if this were to be true and he has done all this knowingly as a Constitutional lawyer?
Berg also has a mysterious lawsuit going that is sealed so he can't comment on it. I have no idea what that could be but it makes me wonder if it involves DNA. No reason - just curiosity. Anyone else know anything?
No. 08-570 has been distributed for conference on January 16, 2009.
Background and previous updates.
(1-26-09) Motion for Dismissal
1 comment:
The nation owes more than thanks to three unlikely modern day patriots: professional poker player, musician, and retired attorney, Leo Donofrio; life long Democrat and former Pennsylvania assistant attorney general, Phil Berg; and Soviet emigree and attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz (she’s also a dentist).
While Mr. Donofrio painstakingly established the airtight case that BHO could not be an Article II “natural born citizen” (at BHO’s birth, dad was British/Kenyan, not American, citizen) Leo’s Stay of the 12/15/08 electoral college vote was denied by SCOTUS as procedurally unripe.
Nevertheless, since no congressman and senator objected on 1/8/09 to Congress’ count and certification of the electoral vote which would have turned resolution of Obama’s eligibility issue over to Congress — rendering moot the Berg and Taitz (Lightfoot) cases — Berg finally does achieve standing on the issue of actual harm, to be addressed at the Friday 1/9/09 SCOTUS Conference on Writ of Certiorari. Obama’s failure to submit evidence of his constitutional qualification for the 1/9/09 conference will mean he cannot thereafter challenge Berg’s request to enjoin the 1/8/09 Congressional electoral count and certification, albeit retroactive, scheduled for SCOTUS conference Friday 1/16/09. Moreover, Chief Justice Roberts has scheduled a full Court conference on the Lightfoot case Friday 1/23/09 in the event there needs to be a Constitutionally mandated action, the Inauguration itself, to enjoin retroactively.
Now that BHO is in checkmate and cannot be POTUS, he can be a patriot as well. He need not subject the nation to the expense and trauma of requiring SCOTUS to overrule his ‘Presidency’. BHO can and should voluntarily step down with Biden becoming Acting POTUS under the 20th Amendment, and under the agreement all potential claims by the Government for itself and on behalf of others against BHO are released.
Post a Comment