Drew Peterson posts updated (5-22)
May 22, 2009
Stacy Peterson family spokeswoman PAM BOSCO’s reaction to the news Drew Peterson will not get out on bond.
She is angry today. I’ve never seen her this angry before and I don’t know the origin. Maybe hearing how no one listened to Kathleen Savio. Had they, Stacy might still be here and Bosco wouldn’t have to be there. Maybe now that he is locked up she can vent.
This is photo from NBC 5’s website. The middle pix has to be from today because the caption was he appeared “glum” in court. He looks completely vacant. Before he looked evil crazy now he looks demented crazy and well on his way to psychosis. Look a this left eye.
Drew Peterson posts: update 5-22
New judge appointed in Peterson case
Peterson: Judge Policandriotes denies request to lower bond
Peterson defense filing immediate appeal
PAM BOSCO:
For so many years nobody heard the cries and the pleas from Kathleen. We were too slow to react to Stacy. But I think today the Courts listened to them.
Tone of the Judge?
The judge’s tone was strict with what she expected from both sides. Because of tha,t I think it was very fair. She wasn’t going to have too much room except for expected rules of a courtroom. So I was happy with how she set the tone.
Relationship with Savio family?
We fully support of each other. We both look to each other as family and I think because of that – the Savio family it helps us get through these says. I’m sure with what we’ll be hearing in the days ahead – weeks ahead – with this trial, we’ll be relying on each other even more. It’s a very sad situation for both families and I just hope we get through this with some sanity.
What about the change in Peterson’s demeanor?
I think as Jim Glasgow said in the beginning, [Peterson] thought all this was a joke, and he probably thought he would never come to see this day, and now that he sees the seriousness of it he’s no longer laughing.
What did you think about the new judge?
Again, I thought she was very serious – strict, and in the end, I think that was fair for both sides.
Suggestion that he confided in another Bolingbrook police officer about this murder beforehand and nothing ever came of it?
Everyone always said in the beginning what does the state really have against Drew Peterson. I think that as this trial proceeds we’re going to see there’s a lot more that we haven’t heard that will support what will support what we’ve always thought about him regarding Kathy and Stacy.
Motive money?
To Drew, everything is about money. We felt that from the very beginning – that he valued material things over relationships. And for Mr Brodsky’s remark that if anything Drew is a unique but honest man – that is a fallacy. I don’t know a single married man who cheats on women to be considered an honest man. So Drew is not an honest man, as far as we’re concerned.
CASSANDRA CALES:
I’m going to sleep good tonite knowing that he’s paying for what he’s done.
Just shows the corruption and the way not to be a basic police officer to serve and protect.
Reduced his bond to $25K, think he would have “flown”?
Yes, because he now sees the seriousness of it.
PAM BOSCO:
And that $25K is the magic number for Drew. When Stacy Peterson disappeared, he said she took her bikini and $25k. So that number seems to be a recurrence.
No comments:
Post a Comment