Berg’s sealed case “dismissed with prejudice”

Not new information – found missing post.

Updated list of birth certificate posts

June 13, 2009

Press release from Phil Berg. His sealed case against barry was “Dismissed with Prejudice” meaning there was a good reason it was dismissed and he can’t bring it up again. The case was unsealed. He is appealing.

Here’s the Justia docket (NOT the ranting at Mr Hemenway Judge Roberts):

Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court, Case No. 08-cv-1933

Plaintiff: PHILIP J. BERG
Defendant: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR.
Case Number: 1:2008cv01933
Filed: November 7, 2008
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office

Presiding Judge: Judge Richard W. Roberts
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes – Other Statutory Actions
Cause: U.S. Government Defendant
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 31:3729 False Claims Act

Berg had claimed that since barry is not a US Citizen – > didn’t meet the Senate citizenship requirement (9 yrs) = he defrauded the US Treasury each time he cashed his Senate paycheck. Berg cited the False Claim Act (as in Medicaid/Medicare fraud) “when a person has knowledge that another party has obtained money from the Government based on a false claim”.

Denied, of course, but it’s one more case costing barry money that can’t be explained by innocence. Frivolous lawsuits don’t cost innocent folks over a million dollars. Especially when less than $20 could have kept that money from even being spent.

Historians will wonder what was in the water. barryfans swear he was born in Hawaii because of his “birth certificate” but can’t come to a consensus on the hospital where he was allegedly born – not even barry or his sister.

Birthers are the crazy ones?

=============================

OBAMACRIMES WEBSITE

For Immediate Release – 06/11/2009 (highlight added)

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Refuses to Prosecute President Obama

Under False Claims Act whereby Obama was accused of Defrauding the U.S. Treasury by Illegally being a U.S. Senator from Illinois as Obama is an Illegal Alien, not a U.S. Citizen

Berg brought action against Obama and after months of delay Holder’s Staff refused to investigate

Berg raised issue of “Conflict of Interest” and why Discovery was “not” turned over and Judge Roberts Dismissed case against Obama on June 9th.

(Washington, DC – 06/11/2009) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of Constitutional “qualifications/eligibility” to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that United States Attorney General Eric Holder refused to prosecute President Barack H. Obama for Obama illegally running for and holding the U.S. Senate seat from Illinois because he was Constitutionally ineligible to be a U.S. Senator.

A False Claims Act [FCA] case is when a person has knowledge that another party has obtained money from the Government based on a false claim. In this instance, in order to be a United States Senator, you must be a United States Citizen for nine [9] years. Obama is not a United States Citizen and therefore, usurped the Office of U.S. Senator for Illinois and obtained payment from the U.S. Department of the Treasury based on his false statements that he was a U.S. Citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve the position of United States Senator.

PHILIP BERG:

What a miscarriage of justice! At a closed door hearing on June 9, 2009 because of the status of the “sealed case,” sealed because of the nature of the case, that being a “Qui Tam” or FCA [False Claims Action] case, the Attorney General through his representatives refused to proceed with the prosecution of Obama for fraudulently serving as a U.S. Senator from Illinois for 3 ½ years. [FCA cases are usually used in Medicare/Medicaid fraud cases]”

I presented overwhelming evidence that Obama was ineligible to be a U.S. Senator and therefore, Obama fraudulently received a salary and benefits of nearly $1 Million Dollars.

Since the case was ‘Dismissed with Prejudice’ it is now ‘Unsealed’ and the record is open for review. The case, Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-1933 and is available on Pacer or our website, obamacrimes.com. I, Phil Berg, will be Appealing this case!

During oral argument, I raised the issue of a ‘Conflict of Interest’ as Attorney General Holder’s boss is the President Barack H. Obama, so how could they properly review this case? I suggested the appointment of a Special Prosecutor. I also raised the issue that any Discovery used in the Government’s decision to have the case dismissed, which was secured by the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney General’s Office should be turned over to me as the Relator, however, no Discovery was turned over.

Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution entrusts the Executive, which includes the United States Attorney General, with duty to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. Berg stated, “I am very disappointed that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder through his Staff has failed to uphold his duties.

I am not giving up and am continuing my legal fight to prove Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President of the United States. I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the 1.5 million men and women that have died defending our Constitution in the many wars over the years and the 1.5 million men and women who were injured in those wars.

================
For copies of all Press Releases and Court Pleadings, go to: obamacrimes.com