Monday, November 23, 2009

Arianna Huffington: “Jon Klein fired Lou Dobbs from CNN”


November 21, 2009

Updated

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Who knows the truth.

I watched Lou Dobbs on Bill O’Reilly and there was no inkling he was fired. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t. But it seems a tad odd that a man who was fired walked away with a reported $8M. More curious is who provided the cash.

According to the NY Post, Dobbs left because of the birth certificate issue. Dobbs said the only thing that changed was the president.

Next on their list: Glenn Beck.

Arianna Huffington fearmongers with Olbermann about “fearmonger-in-chief” Glenn Beck. The whole conversation was rehearsed propaganda to get barry’s poll numbers back up and distract folks away from the healthcare bill. It’s getting so old. Especially the racism.

EIGHT MILLION eligible black voters didn’t even register to vote.

Are they racists?

Ms Huffington uses a decided them vs us “we” as if she has a team behind her. I guess that would be the Huffington Post. Wonder how Axelrod’s son is doing out in Colorado. No practical experience experience and he was “hired” as editor right out of college.

The full transcript is in the next post along with the video. Wanted to put this quote in a separate post.

Olbermann wonders if Beck would just disappear.

ARIANNA HUFFINGTON (4:40)

Well, I hope it‘s going to happen,

but it’s not going to happen without people pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

I mean, we saw how it worked with Lou Dobbs and John Klein.

You know, John Klein in the end fired Lou Dobbs from CNN.

Pressure makes a difference.

So, we all have a part to play here in pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

Yes comrade.

The way she spoke so matter-of-factly I’m starting to believe they think they are going to get away with everything.

Olbermann/Huffington: Glenn Beck, “fearmonger-in-chief”


November 20, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Herr Olbermann is a plain nasty human who spouts lies that no one calls him on. He’s after the birthers again with the same old tired racism. What does he know about racism and/or the birthers? He still thinks barry’s birth certificate was what was posted on barry’s website.

Arianna Huffington is the guest and the two of them talk about Beck’s fear-mongering by fear-mongering themselves. They both say “it’s frightening”. Remember how that was the campaign whine when his numbers dropped? First Secy Clinton and then Palin. It’s getting old.

Then they talk about how “various establishments” are going to have to stop Beck and stop Sen Grassley from giving out Beck’s book. And that if violence erupts – Beck, Ailes and Murdock will be morally liable.

When did she become God?

And why isn’t she saying that about the muslim murderer?

TRANSCRIPT

HERR OLBERMANN:

The ugly environment was not fostered overnight, but town hall opposition to health care reform and all those tea bagger rallies gave comfort to racism and even intonations of violence. The Birther movement was nothing more than extreme and desperate attempt to delegitimize a new president. And Congressman Joe Wilson‘s “you lie,” though a first should not have been a surprise.

Our third story on COUNTDOWN, a sweeping new report on anti-government rage in America not only connects the dots it refuses to let off the hook the most irresponsible voice in the mainstream media, the man it describes as the fearmonger-in-chief, Glenn Beck. Simply stated Beck creates an intersection between the mainstream and the extreme, according to the report by the Anti-Defamation League. It calls Beck, “The most important mainstream media figure who has repeatedly helped to stoke fires of anti-government anger…”

Beck has compared Obama to Adolf Hitler.

[Why is it he forgets how Pres Bush was portrayed as AH by his fellow liberals? And DL Hughley said the Rep Convention looked like Nazi Germany.]

One of Beck‘s guests claimed that Obama was trying to create a civilian national security force.

[barry said it himself in a stump. Watch for yourself.

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.

OLBERMANN: Beck once promoted the conspiracy that theory FEMA was building concentration camps to house dissidents, but he eventually backed away from it. But Beck has consistently posed Obama is “dangerous to America.” The United States, Beck say, “Is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism beyond your wildest imagination.”

Beck‘s obsession with so-called czars is one example, decrying a term proudly launched by the Republicans under Nixon and Reagan and not actually used by the current administration.

[What? barry's called them czars.]

OLBERMANN: Beck is just part of the ADL report which takes stock of the ugliest aspect of those town hall meetings and the tea bagger rallies, the birther movement and Joe Wilson‘s “you lie.” But the September 12th rally in Washington, the report notes, featured the worst in racist, violent imagery since Obama was elected. That event, heavily promoted, of course, by Beck, a man who projects his own hate onto others.

[That's the pot calling the kettle black.]

OLBERMANN: It would be nice to think of Glenn Beck just as a joke, as fodder for this show and the “Daily Show” and others that point out how stupid some of this stuff is. But this report, you know, suggests something else, this is—fearmonger-in-chief term is frightening.

HUFFINGTON: It is frightening.

[Talk about fear-mongering.]

HUFFINGTON Well, I would say the fearmonger-in-chief title should still be reserved for Dick Cheney, even in retirement. But barring that, there is something that we need to really pay attention to with Glenn Beck. We cannot just dismiss him. Because the truth of the matter is that there is a good reason why we have an exemption to the free speech protection by the first amendment when we say you cannot shout fire in a crowded theater.

And he‘s doing that every night. He‘s basically using images of violence to bring together with all that he‘s accusing the Obama administration of, which varies from racism to communism, Nazism and everything else in between. So, all that has definitely an impact. I believe words matter, language matters and he‘s using it in incredibly irresponsible ways night after night.

OLBERMANN: What do you say to the argument that this country has always self corrected, that whether Father Coughlin on the radio in the ‘30s or Bo Carter (ph) who was a newscaster who presented literally stuff that was made up on the hour in CBS News in the ‘30s or the columnist Westbook Pegler or Senator Joe McCarthy? All these people a finale in which they exited the stage and suddenly. What is to say that that‘s not going to happen here?

[The internet and talk radio.]

HUFFINGTON: Well, I hope it‘s going to happen, but it‘s not going to happen without people pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing. I mean, we saw how it worked with Lou Dobbs and John Klein. You know, John Klein in the end, fired Lou Dobbs from CNN. Pressure makes a difference.

So, we all have a part to play here in pointing out what Glenn Beck is doing.

And even though he may not be legally liable if violence ensues from what he does, he‘s morally liable and so is Fox and Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes for keeping him on the air.

[And her and olbermann? They've been lying and riling people up since barry was campaigning. And they're talking about fearmongering even as they do it.]

OLBERMANN: Some of Beck‘s claims, according to the report from the ADL, let me quote it again, “play an important role in drawing people further out of the mainstream making them more receptive to extreme notions and conspiracy theories.” And without going into Sociology 101, isn‘t the point here that people like Beck enable some of the wildest, most paranoid notions about what the U.S. government is doing and instead of people thinking, as they think these things, for whatever they think them, no, that‘s crazy, he says, no you‘re not crazy, come with me down this path?

[A moment of truth. Of course, she makes no connection to the fact they're legitimately angry because of barry. That would be sacrilegious.]

HUFFINGTON: Yes. But, on top of it, Keith, what makes it possible for Glenn Beck to enable and even take advantage of what‘s happening is the fact that there‘s a lot of misery out there, there‘s a lot of legitimate anger. People are losing their jobs. They‘re losing their homes. Or they‘re afraid of losing their jobs or losing their homes, so it‘s in this climate of often legitimate rage that Glenn Beck comes in and provides scapegoats.

I mean, traditionally throughout history, these are the dangerous times. And that‘s why various establishments also need to become much more sensitive to what is happening out there and not leave it up to the Glenn Becks of the world to take advantage of what‘s happening.

[VARIOUS ESTABLISHMENTS?? Take advantage of what? barry's ineffectuality? And what is happening?

Of course, here's the old standby of race-baiting. Every single person who did not vote for barry is a racist. It's getting awfully tired - especially coming from old white men's mouth.]

OLBERMANN: Obviously, the new component to this is the race of the president. And a lot of this rage that we‘re discussing here is rooted in racism, something we certainly knew before the ad put out its analysis. But Beck tried unsuccessfully to turn that one in the other direction, claiming that Mr. Obama is the racist. Is that the twist by which he and the other actual racists are rationalizing their own prejudice simply project it on to the other people?

[He's projecting it onto every person who doesn't agree with barry. Everyone is a racist to him. And Huffington has become Mrs Freud.]

HUFFINGTON: It is a classic case of projection. But, even worse than Glenn Beck saying that is the fact that Rupert Murdoch endorsed it, all though then he took it away. Or to have people like Senator Chuck Grassley giving away books of Glenn Beck.

[Can't give away books? Do they even hear themselves? What's more frightening - state run media or freedom of speech? Even a convicted muslim murderer got access to barry's books.]

HUFFINGTON So, this is really what the ADL report is talking about, this sort of intersection between the mainstream and the extreme. There are always extremes. There are always paranoids who sound like Russell Crowe in “A Beautiful Mind,” you know, connecting everything and scaring everyone. But, it‘s when that becomes part of the mainstream that it becomes dangerous.

—–

Precisely what this rehearsed chat is doing. The entire conversation was fear-mongering to the leftists. One by one they’re trying to pick off non barryfans.

The question is who gave them their marching orders?

All Santa wants for Christmas: H1N1 vaccine

November 20, 2009

Updated H1N1 posts/symptoms/vaccine

Not sure what the reasoning is. One of the Santas will be in close contact with 20-30 thousand children over a period of 4 weeks. It’s not so much for Santa’s protection as it is to hopefully prevent him from spread it. And what are those kids going to do when there’s no Santa?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Burgess to Geithner: “I thought you should have never been hired”


November 20, 2009

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is not a very bright man. He doesn’t seem to understand he was in someone else’s house and they’re not going to tolerate his mouthing off. Must say he has grown a spine since his confirmation hearings.

Joint Economic Committee of Congress

Rep Peter DeFazio (D-OR) thinks Geithner should step down, citing his poor handling of the AIG bailout.

Rep MICHAEL C BURGESS (R-TX):

I don’t think that you should be fired. I thought you should have never been hired.

Rep KEVIN BRADY (R-TX)

Conservatives agree that as point person, you failed. Liberals are growing in that consensus as well. Poll after poll shows Americans have lost confidence in this president’s ability to handle the economy. For the sake of our jobs, will you step down from your post?

GEITHNER:

I think almost nothing you said represents a fair and accurate perception of where this economy is today. If any measure of confidence in the financial system, it is substantially stronger today than when the president took office. We would have had a stronger fiscal position if we hadn’t had eight years of paying for our commitments — not borrowing against them.

Why is it barry people always say ‘it’s not our fault’? Democrats have been in control since 2006 but it’s all Bush’s fault. After 10 months, yes it is their fault and the polls back that up.

Rep BRADY:

At some point you have to take responsibility for your decisions.

GEITHNER:

I take responsibility for anything I am part of doing. What I can’t take responsibility for is the legacy of crisis–

Rep BRADY:

This is your budget, this is your bailout, this is your stimulus, this is your–

GEITHNER:

I take full responsibility for those with great honor--

Why does Geithner pretend he had no idea what was going on until he became Treasury Secretary? He was part of the problem as president of the NY Federal Reserve Bank. And he knew all about the bonuses.

WH statement in defense of Geithner:

Secretary Geithner has helped steer the American economy back from the brink, and is now leading the effort on financial reform. His focus today – and ours – is economic recovery and addressing the challenges the American people face everyday.

Barnett/Keyes: Taitz’s Velamoor declaration


November 18, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

This is Taitz’s most recent declaration concerning her motion for reconsideration. In it she outlines the connection between barry, eligibility lawsuits, Robert Bauer, Perkins Coie, Siddarth Velamoor and Judge Carter.

Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration

Thanks to Jack Ryan.

————

Barnett/Keyes: Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration


November 18, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

barry’s defense lists the rules for reconsideration and then declares:

Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration completely violates, procedurally and substantively, the above quoted Local Rule, and, accordingly, should be summarily denied.

Also: No conference of counsel or Notice of Motion to be filed.

Motion for reconsideration
Taitz’s Velamoor declaration

Thanks to Jack Ryan

Secy Sebelius re: mammograms: “our policies remain unchanged “


November 18, 2009

Secy Sebelius & Ann Curry (video)

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius put out a statement today to counteract the nuts at the Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), who decided less screening is better preventative medicine for women age 40-49.

USPSTF recommendations

Cost-benefit analysis. How many lives saved vs how many dollars wasted on the statistically non-sick.

And why are women being told to stop examining their breasts?

Because if they find a lump they’re just gonna get all hysterical and cost the insurance companies money.

barry’s looking for a way to not have to pay for healthcare and $100 x women age 40-49 x 10 years is worth funding studies and putting together a task force.

Secy Sebelius:

There is no question that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations have caused a great deal of confusion and worry among women and their families across this country. I want to address that confusion head on.

The U.S. Preventive Task Force is an outside independent panel of doctors and scientists who make recommendations. They do not set federal policy and they don’t determine what services are covered by the federal government.

Truth: USPSTD is under the Dept of Health and Human Services. The task force’s recommendations are considered the “gold standard”. Who are they? Academics, insurance companies, HMO and of course the CDC, who seems to be everywhere lately. Not a single cancer specialist – breast or otherwise.

Secy Sebelius:

There has been debate in this country for years about the age at which routine screening mammograms should begin, and how often they should be given.

The Task Force has presented some new evidence for consideration but our policies remain unchanged.

Indeed, I would be very surprised if any private insurance company changed its mammography coverage decisions as a result of this action.

What is clear is that there is a great need for more evidence, more research and more scientific innovation to help women prevent, detect, and fight breast cancer, the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women.

My message to women is simple. Mammograms have always been an important life-saving tool in the fight against breast cancer and they still are today. Keep doing what you have been doing for years — talk to your doctor about your individual history, ask questions, and make the decision that is right for you.

Don’t need a task force for that. Just a co-pay.

Secy Sebelius re: mammogram recommendations (video)

November 19, 2009

Secretary Sebelius is put on the spot by Ann Curry about the new USPSTF recommendations.

Sebelius written statement – HHS not changing policies.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Axelrod re: Afghanistan & terrorists being tried in NYC


November 16, 2009

Are you aware that David Axelrod sits in the discussions about Afghanistan?

David Axelrod the WH’s resident lobbyist discussed Gitmo closure, Afghanistan decison and KSM being tried in NYC on State of the Union with John King (Lou Dobbs new replacement). Axelrod sets up Holder as the one responsible – barry was informed of the decision and the reasoning behind it. Axelrod admitted Gitmo won’t be closed completely, but wouldn’t give a deadline. He said they are going to “substantially meet the deadline”. barry said it would be closed. He ran on that and people voted for him because of it. Once the deadline passes – barry’s lies will be 100% complete and he will have been proven to be a complete fraud.

TRANSCRIPT

KING: Let’s begin with the controversial decision to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four other 9/11 alleged conspirators in the federal courts in New York City, just a short walk from the site of the twin towers collapsing….This is Jim Webb, Democratic senator from Virginia who says, “they do not belong in our country, they do not belong in our courts, and they do not belong in our prisons.”

Why, David Axelrod, did the administration decide to take this step?

AXELROD:

Well, I think for the same reason that Mayor Bloomberg and others felt strongly that we should. We believe that these folks should be tried in New York City, as you say, near where their heinous acts were conducted, in full view in our court system, which we believe in.

Translation: barry wants to make an impression on the world – 9-11 family members be damned. Just like 9-11 anniversary – neither POTUS or FLOTUS went to NYC and they named Sept 11 day of service – like it needed naming. No reason why Michelle couldn’t have been there. And who are the “others”? And the heinous acts were an act of terrorism that resulted in the deaths of 2974 innocent people.

AXELROD: We’ve had, you know, since 2001, have had 195 terrorism cases in the courts, and we’ve been successful 91 percent of the time. We’re very confident about these cases, and we believe this is the appropriate thing to do.

And what if this trial ends in that 9%?

They’re relying on the jury to convict and totally ignoring the judge and whether the confession will be allowed. In civil court, torture obtained confessions are inadmissible. Period. It will come down to whether a terrorist, who has no rights under the Geneva Convention, and who carried out an unprovoked on American soil was read his rights.

AXELROD: This is a judgment the attorney general made in concert with the secretary of defense. As you know, there were five other cases that were sent to military commissions, but we feel strongly that justice will be done here.

And frankly it’s been a long time in coming. A lot of these cases have been delayed for many, many years. And now, the people who suffered so much in that attack will get the justice they deserve.

Did he ask them what they wanted?

A daily reminder? Having to look at the murderers face in the papers and in TV and all over the internet?

KING: We will have later in the program the former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who of course was the mayor when the horrible tragedy of 9/11 took place. And he is among those who say, to him, this reflects returning to a pre-9/11 mentality of treating terrorism as a crime, not an act of war. How would you answer that?

AXELROD: You know, it is odd, because when the 20th 9/11 bomber was tried in Virginia, in a civilian court, and convicted, Mayor Giuliani testified in that case and he heralded the outcome. So he may have changed his view, but we haven’t changed ours.

It may have had something to do with the muslim murderer in Texas.

KING: You mentioned this was the attorney general’s decision. How involved was the president of the United States?

AXELROD: Well, the president was informed of the attorney general’s decision and his reasoning for the decision. This was a decision for the attorney general to make, in concert with the secretary of defense.

Translation: Doesn’t go well, it’s Holder’s head.

KING: It is a reminder bringing these terrorists to New York City for trial, alleged terrorists, a reminder of the controversy about Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. We are just now two months and one week away from this promise from the president of the United States.

KING: If you talk, David Axelrod, to top officials at the Pentagon, top officials at the building you work at, in the White House, they say now it is a near impossibility that that deadline will be kept. When will Gitmo be closed?

AXELROD: We believe we are going to substantially meet the deadline. We may not hit it on the date, but we will close Guantanamo. And we are making good progress toward doing that.

“Substantially”?

Open – close are absolutes and barry said one year.

KING: Any idea? Two months, four months, six months more?

AXELROD: I‘m not going to put a deadline on it, John. But we are going to get it done. We are moving toward getting it done in all the different dimensions that are necessary to get it done. The president believes it is important to get it done and to end this chapter in our history. And we are going to get it done.

Too late you already have a deadline. And again, barry’s words mean nothing.

KING: Part of this chapter in our history is the 9/11 attacks, which, of course, were hatched in Afghanistan. And the president is closer to making this big decision he has to make about how many troops. When he makes that decision, will he lay out for the American people not only the rationale for the decision he has made, but an exit strategy for Afghanistan? If you travel the country as I do all the time, people keep saying, eight years later, how long is it going to take? How much is it going to cost? How many lives will be lost? Will the president give us an exit strategy?

AXELROD: Well, I think that is a concern. And it is obviously one of the factors the president is thinking through. We have been there for eight years; it is a long, long time. And we have to keep focused on what our purpose was in the first place. Our purpose was to disrupt and dismantle and destroy Al Qaeda. That remains our purpose.

But obviously we can not make an open-ended commitment. And we want to do this in a way that maximizes our efforts against Al Qaeda, but within the framework of bringing out troops home at some point. And the president has made that clear in all these discussions. There has to be a framework to this decision.

But we are getting close. It has been a good process.

And how many Americans have been killed? How many undeployed soldiers killed themselves so they wouldn’t have to go? He’s not going to make his decision until after the new year.

KING: As you know, conservatives have been critical of the president’s policy review, saying, why is it taking so long? The former Massachusetts governor and Republican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney gave a speech this weekend in which he said, not only why is it taking so long for the president to decide, but he also said, why is David Axelrod, his top political adviser, involved in these deliberations? Let’s listen.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MIT ROMNEY, (R-MA,) FMR. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I find it incomprehensible and inexcusable that this president invites David Axelrod into national security meetings. Polls and politics have no place at that table. He is the commander in chief. What has he been doing? Do you realize he carried out more than 30 campaign visits in this last season, for various Democrats? While he can’t make up his mind on Afghanistan, or have enough time to meet with generals, he is out there campaigning.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: Let’s take them in order. Why does David Axelrod deserve a seat at that table? And why is it taking so long?

AXELROD: Well, first of all, let’s be clear. David Axelrod does not have a seat at that table. I have observed these discussions because, as I am today, I have to help communicate the message of the administration. And so it is helpful for me to hear. I have not said a word in any of those meetings.

Now let’s take the second part. Governor Romney has to choose one argument or another. Either he has to say he is not paying attention or he has to say he is taking too long because he has been involved in a rigorous review.

The president has had hours and hours and hours of meetings with his military commanders, with his national security team, to run through every aspect of this, in order to get it right. And we’ve seen in the past what happens when we don’t do that; when we don’t do the necessary preparations. And he is determined to get Afghanistan right. It is something that Secretary Gates supports. It is something that the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff supports. General McChrystal has been supportive of this process.

And, you know, I know that Governor Romney has never had responsibility for any decision akin to this, and so he just may not be familiar with all that it entails. But I think the American people are being well served by a process that is assiduous and in which every aspect of this is considered. Because, after all, lives of American servicemen are involved here. An enormous investment on the part of the American people. We ought to get it right.

He’s Philosopher in Chief not Commander in Chief. Gen McCrystal had to force barry’s hand. It’s clear what he wants.

And why is Axelrod cleared to “observe”?

Who else is in there?

Why is Gaddafi doing in Rome?


November 18, 2009

Source: UK Mirror

What was Gaddafi doing in Rome?

Attending a world food summit.

What did he do while he was there?

Ordered 500 women from an online escort agency.

Requirements:

At least 5′ 7″ tall, between 18 to 35.

Why were they summoned?

Ostensibly to be taken back to Libya with him. [His bodyguards are women who are supposedly virgins. Not sure if they go through a gyne exam,]

What happened when they showed up?

He tried to convert Italian women – probably > 90% of them Catholic – to Islam, including a free Koran.

His quote in reference to Jesus not being crucified:

They crucified someone who looked like him.

It’s not the first time he’s requested hundreds of women.

Previous visit to Rome, he requested 700 women from the world of politics, industry and culture..

Paris, 2007: After pitching his tent on the grounds of a 5-star hotel and allowing his camels to roam free, he requested 1,000 French women because “he was on a mission to save European women”.

And in Qatar in March he proclaimed:

I am an international leader, the dean of the Arab rulers, the king of kings of Africa and imam of Muslims, and my international status does not allow me to descend to a lower level.

Of course at the UN, he rambled on for 90 minutes, exhausting the first translator and making the second one laugh.

Army lawyer declined to defend muslim murderer


November 16, 2009

A former Army defense lawyer, JAMES F CULP, weighs in on defending the muslim murderer. mm’s present lawyer (Col J P Galligan) is also retired military.

JAMES F CULP:

The only practical way J. P. Galligan will be able to save Hasan’s life is to convince one military member — one — that Hasan should not die.

One thing about a military jury is, they know people who have been wronged by the military. If you’ve got any kind of case that’s credible, it’s that very kind of jury that would consider it.

Not sure about that. Being wronged doesn’t quite cover declaring war on fellow soldiers because they are non muslims and then opening fire on them.

Mr Culp decline the case when he was asked if he would consider working on it.

Every soldier deserves a great defense, but the crimes Major Hasan is accused of go so harshly against the grain of military honor that, if true, Major Hasan has essentially divested himself of the status of the American soldier.

They’re true. There are a million eyewitnesses. He murdered unarmed soldiers without provocation. He deserves to rot in hell.

And his crime needs to be called what it was: Islamic terrorism.

Source: NY TIMES


Whoopi wrong again: barry’s bow

November 20, 2009

Whoopi Goldberg should study up on what she decides to yap about – especially when it comes to barry. Or rape. She thinks it’s “protocol” for the president of the United States to bow to 90 degrees and greet the emperor with the top of his head and at the same time treat the press corps to a view of his buttocks. Again. It’s a replay of King Saudi — although barry actually genuflected that time (video). And in the interim barry has refused to learn proper protocol. He prefers to show the world how clueless he is of international protocol, while Secy Clinton travels and conducts herself like a head of state.

Ms Goldberg: the emperor doesn’t bow to anyone.

Greeting Emperor, servant barry at your service.

Unfortunately this is the only video I could find. I would have like to hear the whole conversation and whether Ms Walters chimed in about what’s proper or just defended barry like she did with the Saudi bow.

WHOOPI: Dick! It’s called protocol. What’s wrong with you?

(Photo: ABC)

Photo of the day: Ringtone mind control


November 20, 2009

Mogadishu, Somalia. As usual there are a group of “devout muslims” aka terrorists wearing sandals and holding guns – one with the picnic tablecloth hiding his face – standing guard after they’ve taken over by force.

And they started right in on the mind control.

A woman passes by Shabab militia patrolling Bakara Market in Mogadishu
SACDIYO SHEEQ, a resident of Kismayu in southern Somalia, on a rule imposed by the hard-line Islamist group after it seized control of the port city.

Al-Shabaab wants our ringtones to be only a Muslim cleric reading the Hadith or Koranic verse.

Video of the day: Power of Iconography (barry logo)

Updated: Peruvian gang members arrested for trafficking human fat


November 20, 2009

Updated

Weird. And gross.

Seems there’s a gang of fat collectors down in Peru. They harvest fat from dead humans and then sell it. Problem is they’re not harvesting it from cadavers – they’re murdering unfortunate fat folks. Sixty people are missing from two regions in Peru.

Police arrested four gang members and charged them with the murder of Abel Matos Aranda, after one of them was caught with a container of human fat. Police had found a small container at a bus depot and picked up a suspect after he removed three bottles of the fat, which they suspect belonged to Aranda.

Other suspects: Elmer Segundo Castillejos Aguero, Hilario Cudena Simon and Enedina Estela Claudio.

They confessed to trafficking the human fat and they might also face drug charges.

There is a really weird twist involving “brujos,” the Spanish word for witches. Evidently it’s part of an “Andean mountain culture that believes bodies can be used to ward off evil and prevent disasters”.

The fat was sold in Peru and Europe for “commercial purposes”.

Still not sure what the fat was used for – cosmetics? – but they were paid $15,000 per liter of fat.

How fat are people in Peru?

Think of the market they’d have in the US.

An enterprising plastic surgeon in California, Dr C. Alan Bittner, specialized in “green liposuction”. He was recycling the lipo’d fat from his patients to use as fuel for his vehicle.

Source: CNN

Scorecard of birth certificate lawsuit

November 20, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Hey Jacqi.

The defense just refiled the same opposition to Taitz’s Motion for Reconsideration. I didn’t post Larry Sinclair’s affidavit and Mr Young’s death certificate. It’s here if you’re interested. The declarations are here and here (Velamoor).

Found something interesting though. JACK RYAN has posted a list of barry eligibility lawsuits and their status. I’d like to thank Mr Ryan personally but you have to register to make a comment.

List includes:
–Case Caption (and plaintiff’s full name)
–Court, Case Number, with Justia Docket link (or other, where available)
–Dismissal Order, with link to Order where available
–Appeal Dismissal Order, with link when available
–Supreme Court Docket showing application/writ denied, with link
–Whether Obama’s Attorneys defended the case

—————-

Japan’s ICHIRO OZAWA: “Islam is better than Christianity”


November 20, 2009

During his meeting with Yukei Matsunaga, president of the Japan Buddhist Federation, Democratic Party of Japan Secretary General, ICHIRO OZAWA, had a few choice words about Christianity and the West.

Christianity:

[Is an] exclusive and self-righteous religion. European and U.S. societies with a (historical) background of Christianity are bogged down.

Not sure with what.

Islam:

It is better than Christianity but it is also exclusive.

Buddhism:

It teaches us a state of mind and way of life from the start about how human beings should be.

Muslim murderer worried about HIV test results

November 20, 2009

Updated list of Fort Hood posts

Thank God Sen Lieberman (I-CT) is chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee because he has no problem labeling the muslim murderer’s cowardly rampage what it was: a terror attack. Susan Collins (R-ME) will be working with him.

LIEBERMAN:

We do no favor to all of our fellow Americans who are Muslim by ignoring real evidence that a small number of their community have in fact become violent Islamists and extremists.

And they do no favors to their fellow Americans by staying quiet and only coming forward to complain AFTER another “devout muslim” kills non-muslim Americans just because they are not muslims. And there was no way the muslim murderer could know if the soldiers he was shooting in the back were muslims because he never asked. He just yelled the same thing the insurgents yell after they blow up Americans.

What that impotent, bacon-eating, beer-drinking, perverted strip club-attending islamic terrorist did qualifies as a hate crime and should be labeled as such.

Updated information:

*In the emails he sent to another hate-filled “devout” muslim cleric in Yemen:

I can’t wait to join you in the afterlife.

And this shows without a doubt that he knew what he was planning was wrong because he asked if jihad was permissible:
If there are innocents killed in a suicide attack?

He doesn’t even qualify as a “martyr” because he was too cowardly to kill himself.

*He donated $20-30K/year to overseas Islamic hate-filled charities.

Meaning he was funding the murders of his fellow soldiers. This man is as evil as they come. Take out the muslim hate – he went against everything a doctor stands for and committed unprovoked pre-meditated murder on innocent, unarmed people.

*He was worried about an HIV test he had taken.

Why? As far as was made public he wasn’t married. And “devout muslims” are not to have premarital sex, which is punishable by lashings and imprisonment.

So who was he having sex with? The naked non-muslim blonde women he paid to give him lap dances? Was he homosexual? Did he shoot drugs?

*Pentagon: 45-day investigation into extremism in the military.

Sure makes one wonder if they know he was recruiting others.

Have they discovered the identity of the young men who stayed with the neighbors thought were his sons?

What did the Army know?

LIEBERMAN:

The question is were those concerns conveyed up the chain of command, and were they recorded anywhere in Hasan’s personnel files and did the Army do anything in response to those concerns?

Source: CBN